an.2005.01.07.21.11.35.436120@doubleclick.net...They've got a lot of cows too.
Huh- they only spend several hundred million per year to research and
No. The deviation from the expected trends started with large scaleMark Jones wrote:
What doesn't make sense is the last few thousand years of the graph. It
clearly should have started going into a colder period, but instead the
global temperature has stayed almost constant. So what we perceive as
being "no change" in global warming might actually be a "big deal."
Disclaimer: I'm no climatologist.
If you are going to blame humans, that glitch better have started in the
last 100-200 years. 800 years ago, humans were insignificant producers of
greenhouse gasses.
Mt. St. Helens produces only as much S02 as the local coal fired
How can it be rare if it's boiled for 3 or four hours! ;-)I read in sci.electronics.design that Mark Fergerson <nunya@biz.ness
wrote (in <hTEDd.52068$Cl3.49016@fed1read03>
on Fri, 7 Jan 2005:
I thought British food was anything at all, boiled for three or four
hours. ;>
That can be still found if you want it, but it's rare now.
Well, if insolation on Earth, at 9.3E7 miles from the Sun, is 1 KW/m^2,
The largest island of Denmark and the site of Copenhagen
It must piss down rain there all the time too. Or maybe Tasman saw the
an.2005.01.08.22.33.47.957766@doubleclick.net...For sufficiently large values of "around" , that is even true for the
I read in sci.electronics.design that Mark Borgerson <mborgerson.at.comc
ast.net@?.?> wrote (in <MPG.1c49e9e851988e17989682@news.comcast.giganews
.com>
In article <wr4p8VBoj53BFwzX@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk says...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Mark Fergerson <nunya@biz.ness
wrote (in <hTEDd.52068$Cl3.49016@fed1read03>
on Fri, 7 Jan 2005:
I thought British food was anything at all, boiled for three or four
hours. ;>
That can be still found if you want it, but it's rare now.
How can it be rare if it's boiled for 3 or four hours! ;-)
It hasn't been boiled yet!
Thanks!
(I see as a result a somewhat photogenic thunderstorm scene whose most
New Look at Satellite Data Supports Global Warming Trend
an.2005.01.09.06.46.14.46569@example.net...As one would suspect, BS can't spell, but that is exactly what I
You also have to UNDERSTAND what you read!
Clarence provides yet another example of his failure to UNDERSTAND what"Rich Grise" <richgrise@example.net> wrote in message
news
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:32:06 -0800, bill.sloman wrote:
Clarence gets it wrong again.
The name of New Zealand appears to be dervied from that of
Zeeland, the most southerly of the seven provinces of the
Netherlands.
As one would suspect, BS can't spell, but that is exactly what I
would expect. I am so glad I kill filed that clown!
snip
Read the entire link, it seems no one really knows how the name
came about. But there is a "Dutch" influence!
http://history-nz.org/discovery1.html
Google is handy, but you need some background information to
get the best out of it.
You also have to UNDERSTAND what you read!
The US Weather Service rated three cells in North Scottsdale and one
True, this area, and southward into Mexico) is called the Sonoran
I doubt your numbers.
So? What's your point? Sour grapes because you don't live here
480)460-2350 | |480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |What extra water? The Northern ice cap is floating.Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:45:29 GMT, the renowned mzenier@eskimo.com (Mark
Zenier) wrote:
In article <l6WdnUD41LtTeEPcRVn-rQ@rcn.net>,
Chuck Harris <cf-NO-SPAM-harris@erols.com> wrote:
Mark Jones wrote:
What doesn't make sense is the last few thousand years of the graph. It
clearly should have started going into a colder period, but instead the
global temperature has stayed almost constant. So what we perceive as
being "no change" in global warming might actually be a "big deal."
Disclaimer: I'm no climatologist.
If you are going to blame humans, that glitch better have started in the
last 100-200 years. 800 years ago, humans were insignificant producers of
greenhouse gasses.
No. The deviation from the expected trends started with large scale
rice cultivation in Asia about 4-6000 years ago. Rice paddies are good
sources of methane and CO2.
We still are, but we are making much more now than we
were prior to the industrial revolution. The active volcanoes are making
way more than we ever could.
Mt. St. Helens produces only as much S02 as the local coal fired
power plant did before they installed latest set of scrubbers.
(Western Washington coal is pretty nasty stuff, though).
Mark Zenier mzenier@eskimo.com Washington State resident
On the plus side, the Arctic is probably going to become fully
navigable year-round in the next century or two, eventually removing
the need to rely on those big nuclear-powered Russian icebreakers to
get shipping through. Bypassing the Panama Canal will link Europe to
Asia much more closely (40% less distance). Assuming the latter isn't
washed into the sea, that is.
I've got a great idea to get rid of extra water: pump it on top of the
Himalaya mountains, it will stay there as ice. Problem solved.
You're down near Indiannapolis aren't you, Dave?
Or the former.
I did not know that.
This information is readily available.