magnetic field

[Madness]

On 10/20/2010 5:17 AM, JW wrote:

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:27:40 -0700 (PDT) world-trade<jiazhao34@yahoo.com
wrote in Message id:
9555e6d5-a797-4389-b001-b02fca0eab77@w30g2000prj.googlegroups.com>:

Websit[BOOM]

Nuke Googlegroups.

Well, I can't offer five fingers, but I can give you one -- it's the one
in the center! :ţ

 

On Tuesday, February 13, 1996 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, James W. Lynch wrote:

Does anyone have plans for a simple off-hook detector? I need to know
when someone has lifted a receiver. A dial-tone detector circuit would
also work.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,
Jim.

was there a receiver off hook tone called a queue tone?

 

[Andrew Smallshaw]

On 2012-11-10, robbiedcain1@gmail.com <robbiedcain1@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, February 13, 1996 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, James W. Lynch wrote:

Thanks,
Jim.

was there a receiver off hook tone called a queue tone?

I think it is unlikely Jim is still looking at this 16 years after
initially posting.

--
Andrew Smallshaw
andrews@sdf.lonestar.org

 

[G. Morgan]

Andrew Smallshaw wrote:

On 2012-11-10, robbiedcain1@gmail.com <robbiedcain1@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, February 13, 1996 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, James W. Lynch wrote:

Thanks,
Jim.

was there a receiver off hook tone called a queue tone?

I think it is unlikely Jim is still looking at this 16 years after
initially posting.

Lol... good catch. I almost answered!

 

[Don Bruder]

In article <v6bt98970ban0ktp8t8e5icffifqq5e1k0@Osama-is-dead.net>,
G. Morgan <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:

Andrew Smallshaw wrote:

On 2012-11-10, robbiedcain1@gmail.com <robbiedcain1@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, February 13, 1996 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, James W. Lynch wrote:

Thanks,
Jim.

was there a receiver off hook tone called a queue tone?

I think it is unlikely Jim is still looking at this 16 years after
initially posting.

Lol... good catch. I almost answered!

Look! It's the amazing Google NecroThread<TM>

This just might be the oldest one I've seen to date. About 3 weeks ago
in another group I haunt, one came to life (obviously another google
groups inspired incident) after 7 years dead.

--
If the door is baroque don't be Hayden. Come around Bach and jiggle the Handel

 

[Michael Black]

On Sat, 10 Nov 2012, Don Bruder wrote:

In article <v6bt98970ban0ktp8t8e5icffifqq5e1k0@Osama-is-dead.net>,
G. Morgan <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:

Andrew Smallshaw wrote:

On 2012-11-10, robbiedcain1@gmail.com <robbiedcain1@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, February 13, 1996 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, James W. Lynch wrote:

Thanks,
Jim.

was there a receiver off hook tone called a queue tone?

I think it is unlikely Jim is still looking at this 16 years after
initially posting.

Lol... good catch. I almost answered!

Look! It's the amazing Google NecroThread<TM

This just might be the oldest one I've seen to date. About 3 weeks ago
in another group I haunt, one came to life (obviously another google
groups inspired incident) after 7 years dead.

They go back further. The lefendary thread where Linus announces Linux

(and the one where Andrew Tannenbaum argues that Minix is better, if that
is a separate thread) has been vandalized in the minix newsgroup, and the
announcement is 1991.

In that case, google brought the vandalism on itself. At one point years
back they put up a timeline of Usenet, pointing to some "key" threads,
which included that Linux announcement. The last time they changed the
interface, they "forgot" to keep the ability to reply limited to 30 days
(which had always been the case previously), so it allowed the vandalism,
and people wanted to leave their mark on important threads. I never did
check at google to see if they removed the recent replies or not, I know I
complained a bunch of times at the time, including about replies to that
thread. Soon/eventually, they fixed that "bug".

But then it happened again when they changed the interface recently, and
more vandalism of that thread. INdeed, about the only traffic in the
minix newsgroup right now is people replying to that thread, they don't
even seem aware of what they are doing.

It's easy to notice these replies to old threads. Suddenly someone is
replying to a message you've never seen. Sometimes they even quote the
date, other times you just know since it's already happening. Yes, I know
messages can go astray, but that happens less and less, unlike the old
days. I remember when I was reading some Usenet newsgroups via a local
BBS starting in late 1994, and it was relativley common for messages to
not make it there, or for a reply to appear before the original post.

The only other reason for seeing a post you haven't seen before is if
someone is reading another newsgroup and feels the need to add another one
to their reply. It seems to happen a lot less than in the old days.

I think I've seen people reply via google to messages older than 1991, but
I'm not certain.

I still can't figure out what someone is replying to an old message.
They'd have to do searching going quite far back to find the old message,
which then can't be accidental.

Michael

 

On Tuesday, February 13, 1996 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, James W. Lynch wrote:

Does anyone have plans for a simple off-hook detector? I need to know
when someone has lifted a receiver. A dial-tone detector circuit would
also work.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,
Jim.

At this former Concord Telephone Exchange that i've been talking aboutthe receiver off hook tone at the Concord Telephone Exchange that was a medium pitch sound that went like a horn. Was it a siren or buzzer?

 

[Josef Moellers]

On 11/10/2012 06:09 AM, robbiedcain1@gmail.com wrote:

On Tuesday, February 13, 1996 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, James W. Lynch wrote:
Does anyone have plans for a simple off-hook detector? I need to know
when someone has lifted a receiver. A dial-tone detector circuit would
also work.

I once built a circuit to connect two phones to one land line. It
consisted of two relays with each relay's coil put in series with a
phone and a capacitor in parallel to the relay: if you take the receiver
off-hook, a direct current will flow which will cause the relay to
switch and disconnect the other phone. The capacitor was there to allow
the alternating current which carries the voice to pass through.
IIRC the relays' voltage was matching the DC voltage (24V?) and the
capacitors were some very large unpolar (i.e. no tantals or electrolytic).

Please don't ask me to dig the circuit up, it's very deeply buried ;-)

Josef

 

On Sunday, November 11, 2012 5:20:47 AM UTC-5, Josef Moellers wrote:

On 11/10/2012 06:09 AM, robbiedcain1@gmail.com wrote:

On Tuesday, February 13, 1996 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, James W. Lynch wrote:

Does anyone have plans for a simple off-hook detector? I need to know

when someone has lifted a receiver. A dial-tone detector circuit would

also work.
No heed to do that. Yeah don't because you can accecently cut the cable wires into. Si I aggree with you 100%


I once built a circuit to connect two phones to one land line. It

consisted of two relays with each relay's coil put in series with a

phone and a capacitor in parallel to the relay: if you take the receiver

off-hook, a direct current will flow which will cause the relay to

switch and disconnect the other phone. The capacitor was there to allow

the alternating current which carries the voice to pass through.

IIRC the relays' voltage was matching the DC voltage (24V?) and the

capacitors were some very large unpolar (i.e. no tantals or electrolytic).



Please don't ask me to dig the circuit up, it's very deeply buried ;-)



Josef

 

On Tuesday, February 13, 1996 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, James W. Lynch wrote:

Does anyone have plans for a simple off-hook detector? I need to know
when someone has lifted a receiver. A dial-tone detector circuit would
also work.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,
Jim.

What was the telephone receiver off hook tone for the Concord Telephone Exchange Inc. Company in Farragit Tn.

 

On Tuesday, February 13, 1996 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, James W. Lynch wrote:

Does anyone have plans for a simple off-hook detector? I need to know
when someone has lifted a receiver. A dial-tone detector circuit would
also work.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,
Jim.

What kond of of hook tone did the Concord Telephone Exchange Inc. Company have?

 

[Jasen Betts]

On 2012-11-12, robbiedcain1@gmail.com <robbiedcain1@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, February 13, 1996 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, James W. Lynch wrote:
Does anyone have plans for a simple off-hook detector? I need to know
when someone has lifted a receiver. A dial-tone detector circuit would
also work.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,
Jim.

What kond of of hook tone did the Concord Telephone Exchange Inc. Company have?

In 1996 line voltage droped from 48V to about 12V when the phone is
taken off hook for any reason (eg to make or answer a call) nothing
has changed since then.


--
⚂⚃ 100% natural

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

 

On Monday, November 12, 2012 5:05:14 AM UTC-5, Jasen Betts wrote:

On 2012-11-12, robbiedcain1@gmail.com <robbiedcain1@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, February 13, 1996 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, James W. Lynch wrote:

Does anyone have plans for a simple off-hook detector? I need to know

when someone has lifted a receiver. A dial-tone detector circuit would

also work.



Any suggestions?



Thanks,

Jim.



What kond of of hook tone did the Concord Telephone Exchange Inc. Company have?



In 1996 line voltage droped from 48V to about 12V when the phone is

taken off hook for any reason (eg to make or answer a call) nothing

has changed since then.





--

⚂⚃ 100% natural



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

I'm trying to get in there but it won't let me.

 

On Tuesday, February 13, 1996 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, James W. Lynch wrote:

Does anyone have plans for a simple off-hook detector? I need to know
when someone has lifted a receiver. A dial-tone detector circuit would
also work.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,
Jim.

Did all Telephone exchange Inc. companie have that off hook tone that was a medium pitch sound that went like a horn? Was it a siren or a buzzer?

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:01:11 -0500, rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:

but at least you know how to trim a post.

---
Thanks!


--
JF

 

On 5 Jan 2013 02:27:57 GMT, Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote:

On 2013-01-05, krw@attt.bizz <krw@attt.bizz> wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:01:11 -0500, rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:


You guys are all pretty ridiculous calling each other names and such,
but at least you know how to trim a post. Thanks. It makes it easier
to get through this crap.

Buy a scroll wheel.

They don't make them that that go fast enough to deal with the sewage
you produce

You lefties are always projecting your inadequacies.

 

[John Fields]

On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:25:02 -0500, krw@attt.bizz wrote:

On 5 Jan 2013 02:27:57 GMT, Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote:

On 2013-01-05, krw@attt.bizz <krw@attt.bizz> wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:01:11 -0500, rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:


You guys are all pretty ridiculous calling each other names and such,
but at least you know how to trim a post. Thanks. It makes it easier
to get through this crap.

Buy a scroll wheel.

They don't make them that that go fast enough to deal with the sewage
you produce

You lefties are always projecting your inadequacies.

---
You pretend to be part of the right, yet wallow in self-indulgence.
--
JF

 

On Wednesday, March 29, 2000 4:00:00 AM UTC-4, skulldy wrote:

Hello,
I'm looking for a reader/programer for these chips made by Motorola.
Can anyone help me out ?
Thanks
Kelley

If anyone is still looking for a MC68701 or MC68705P3/R3/U3 reader or programmer try www.lucidtechnologies.info

 

[conundrum]

On Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:44:57 PM UTC+1, conundrum wrote:

Hey,

Anyone like to quote odds on science coming up with a stable
reproducible ambient temperature (>290K) superconductor before the
decade is out ?

Just wondering what odds I'm likely to get down the local betting shop
? Hmm, 500 to 1 ?

Bonus if its made up of less than 6 elements . 1000 to 1

Bigger bonus if it has a critical current of more than 1 million amps
per cm square . (e.g. useful) . 50,000 to 1

Even bigger bonus if a hobbyist or other amateur discovers it.
500,000,000 to 1



Andre

BTW all bets are off if its a product of an extraterrestrial
intelligence !

Late 2011, possible RTSC in a thallium perovskite with a magnesium substitution.

 

[Michael Black]

On Sat, 5 Jan 2013, info@lucidtechnologies.info wrote:

On Wednesday, March 29, 2000 4:00:00 AM UTC-4, skulldy wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for a reader/programer for these chips made by Motorola.
Can anyone help me out ?
Thanks
Kelley

If anyone is still looking for a MC68701 or MC68705P3/R3/U3 reader or
programmer try

Don't reply to 13 year old messages, and especially don't reply to old

messages if you are spamming.

Michael