We are going to need to say this over and over again: "Bush

Kang · Jan 6, 2005

The Democrats that stood up today did a fine thing.

Was it enough?

No, it wasn't

Do the criminals win the day?

NO, HELL NO!!!

They are going to laugh for a while but as soon as more wars start, more
boys die "over there", more crimes take place the people is going to take
their government back.

The fraud is about to explode. Now, to those of you who get it:

Phase 2 is coming.

You need to "escalate the conflict". Take some pages of their own playbook.
Do not accept the words of Dems that are "rethug wannabes".

Pick the right people to run next time.

I know what I'm going to do next. I'm going to contact the people working
to uncover the fraud. These bastards will pay for what they did, but
writing on the Internet will not be enough.

Take the corporate media whores to task. Write daily emails to those
fuckers, do something daily, guys!

Is not that hard!

And sorry, John F. Kerry will not run in the next election.

He had it, he gave it up...

Jim Thompson · Jan 6, 2005

On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:30:57 GMT, Kang <kang@cnn.com>

declared himself to be a poor ignorant leftist bastard ;-)

The Democrats that stood up today did a fine thing.

[snip]

480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax

Uncle Al · Jan 6, 2005

Kang wrote:

The Democrats that stood up today did a fine thing.
[snip crap]

Hey stooopid - there are no Republicans and Democrats other than
Republicans steal from what you have, Democrats steal from what you
might have. The difference is hunger vs. famine. There are really
only politicians. Political power is a zero-sum game. The less your
opponent has the more you have.

The most popular drink at the Republican National Convention was
Maker's Mark. It's quality stuff as domestic tipple goes, but it's no
Lagavulin single malt scotch. Dems will pretty much drink anything
alcoholic that won't kill them, Kitty Dukakis excepted.

Barbara Boxer is a Liberal political whore. She'd sell her snatch
hair claiming it was a limited edition collectible.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Richard Tobin · Jan 7, 2005

In article <CZadnXMviufnCUPcRVn-pQ@rcn.net>, <jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote:

You are kidding. You should notice that the new word for
Liberal around here (Massachusetts) is Progressive.

That's the name used by many European conservative parties. But then,
the US parties only cover the right of the political spectrum, so
perhaps that makes sense.

-- Richard

keith · Jan 7, 2005

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:11:49 +0000, jmfbahciv wrote:

In article <1105055281.955398.295330@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
"JeffM" <jeffm_@email.com> wrote:
Barbara Boxer is a Liberal political whore.
Uncle Al

Accent on the *whore* not the *Liberal*.
She has sold out to the RIAA & MPAA
(just as evil as the De Beers cartel, IMO).
Selling out to corporations
that want to use eternal copyrights to constrict Fair Use
is hardly a Liberal value.

You are kidding. You should notice that the new word for
Liberal around here (Massachusetts) is Progressive. Since
Mass is usually the first field test site of the Democrat
party, the word should being to wave a red flag.

Dunno, BAH. I think Vermont's got Taxyourtwoshits beat as a welfare-world
alpha site. Remember, Bernie Sanders was a member of the Socialist party
who then joined the Progressive Party (but calls himself an 'I'). The
Progressive Party has been around for at least 15 years in NW Vermont.

--
Keith

Volker Hetzer · Jan 7, 2005

Kang wrote:

The Democrats that stood up today did a fine thing.
Just out of curiosity, what is this guy talking about?

Volker

Jim Thompson · Jan 7, 2005

On 7 Jan 2005 15:16:13 -0800, "JeffM" <jeffm_@email.com> wrote:

The Democrats that stood up today did a fine thing.
Kang

Just out of curiosity, what is this guy talking about?
Volker

http://news.google.com/news?q=democrats+ohio+election

|Nevermind him
| Jim Thompson
|
...unless you worry about things like *Democracy* and *fair elections*.

For some reason the courts have tossed all challenges. Wonder why
that is? No validity to the claims? IIRC "W" leads by >100K.
Democrats are just poor losers... or is it just "losers" ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice

480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax

JeffM · Jan 7, 2005

"W" leads by >100K.
Jim Thompson

In an election whose methods and tallies are suspect.

Democrats are just poor losers... or is it just "losers"

If the methods and tallies were allowed to be fully analyzed

THEN you might have a valid point.
What are you Repugs afraid of? The truth?
More likely: being caught with your hands in the cookie jar.

John Larkin · Jan 8, 2005

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:36:57 -0700, Jim Thompson
<thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

On 7 Jan 2005 15:16:13 -0800, "JeffM" <jeffm_@email.com> wrote:

The Democrats that stood up today did a fine thing.
Kang

Just out of curiosity, what is this guy talking about?
Volker

http://news.google.com/news?q=democrats+ohio+election

|Nevermind him
| Jim Thompson
|
...unless you worry about things like *Democracy* and *fair elections*.

For some reason the courts have tossed all challenges. Wonder why
that is? No validity to the claims? IIRC "W" leads by >100K.
Democrats are just poor losers... or is it just "losers" ;-)

...Jim Thompson

Serial losers.

John

Jan 8, 2005

In article <9vcut0lrsg3qsgjimm0mic2k8vj2ne8i5b@4ax.com>, John Larkin <jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> writes:

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:36:57 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

On 7 Jan 2005 15:16:13 -0800, "JeffM" <jeffm_@email.com> wrote:

The Democrats that stood up today did a fine thing.
Kang

Just out of curiosity, what is this guy talking about?
Volker

http://news.google.com/news?q=democrats+ohio+election

|Nevermind him
| Jim Thompson
|
...unless you worry about things like *Democracy* and *fair elections*.

For some reason the courts have tossed all challenges. Wonder why
that is? No validity to the claims? IIRC "W" leads by >100K.
Democrats are just poor losers... or is it just "losers" ;-)

...Jim Thompson

Serial losers.

Yep.

Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"

Jan 9, 2005

In article <KP3Ed.33$25.17116@news.uchicago.edu>,
mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:

In article
BLOCKSPAMfishfry-CE021E.21302608012005@comcast.dca.giganews.com>, fishfry

<BLOCKSPAMfishfry@your-mailbox.com> writes:

In article <41E09BA1.5D200A5B@Hovnanian.com>,
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." <Paul@Hovnanian.com> wrote:

This is just another argument in favor of smaller and decentralized
government. It may be impossible to prevent the theft of an election
here and there (WA State is battling over the possibility of a Dem.
theft of the governor's office), so the best solution is to make sure
that there isn't anything serious that a potential thief can do if they
get away with it.

If Bush stole it, so what? The Republicans stole it fair and square.
It's well-known that JFK stole the 1960 election. Politics is a tough
game. Dems better wake up, toughen up, get their organization together.
The Republicans out-politicked the Dems in every facet of the game in
2004.

Nobody stole anything in the 2004 presidential elections. Give the
garbage a rest.

Note that this garbage trail has been generated by using the net.
I find this tactic very interesting because the lies posted
keep cropping up in serious discussions and sessions in places
other than the net. IOW, spammed gossiping has become a player in
politics and the fourth estate.

/BAH

Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.

John S. Dyson · Jan 9, 2005

In article <crqqab$btk$1@hercules.btinternet.com>,
"Reg Edwards" <g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> writes:

So "Watergate" is readily accepted by USA citizens as being a perfectly
normal legitimate political activity.

Watergate like activities were quite common in the US (JFK/LBJ/etc) before

Nixon. It is just that he was president when the opposition was irritable
and had decided to make an issue of the misbehavior. Note that one result
was the Democrat Church commission which partially led up to the CIA
being denuded and the 9/11 attacks.

It is very true that politics is a nasty business -- the Dems have generally
been better at it, but recently (perhaps after the Reagan presidency) they
were seriously weakened and became too left wing to succeed (no matter their
gameplaying.)

John

JeffM · Jan 9, 2005

It is possible that, just as the 'free press'
was described as 'the fourth estate of the Realm',
the Internet may be a 'fifth estate' of every realm?
John Woodgate

http://www.google.com/search?&q=people-of-the-year-bloggers+abc+December-*-2004
Time Magazine's choice sucks.

Pig Bladder · Jan 10, 2005

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 14:23:07 -0800, JeffM wrote:

http://www.google.com/search?&q=people-of-the-year-bloggers+abc+December-*-2004

Time Magazine's choice sucks.

Bye.
Jim Thompson

Jim must be one of those Fox News watchers
who think like Dubya
(**Don't say anything I might disagree with.**)

According to Kevin, he can't help it - he's a victim of his memes.
--
The Pig Bladder From Uranus, Still Waiting for
Some Hot Babe to Ask What My Favorite Planet Is.

Jan 10, 2005

Paul Hovnanian P.E. wrote:

This is just another argument in favor of
smaller and decentralized government. It may be
impossible to prevent the theft of an election
here & there, so the best solution is to make sure
that there isn't anything serious that a potential
thief can do if they get away with it.

Of the prohibitions of alcohol, drugs, gambling,
prostitution and big gov't, only the latter will
work, because you can't get big gov't on the black
market. However, as long as population keeps
growing, advocates of big gov't will have enough
ammo to hold sway. We have to stop suppressing
influenza, at least.

--

Jess Askin · Jan 11, 2005

"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote in message
news:yXdpj4CBaV4BFwpC@jmwa.demon.co.uk...

I read in sci.electronics.design that jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote (in
CdKdndbQ-6eRq3zcRVn-og@rcn.net&gt about 'We are going to need to say
this over and over again: "Bush stole it!"', on Sun, 9 Jan 2005:

IOW,
spammed gossiping has become a player in politics and the fourth estate.

It is possible that, just as the 'free press' was described as 'the
fourth estate of the Realm', the Internet may be a 'fifth estate' of
every realm.

Um, oops. The press *is* the Fifth Estate.

JeffM · Jan 11, 2005

Um, oops. The press *is* the Fifth Estate.
Jess Askin

No.
http://www.google.com/search?&q=fourth-estate+nobility+clergy

John Woodgate · Jan 11, 2005

I read in sci.electronics.design that Jess Askin <dontbother@nospam.net>
wrote (in <34h8nqF4bf7muU1@individual.net&gt

about 'We are going to need
to say this over and over again: "Bush stole it!"', on Tue, 11 Jan 2005:

"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote in message
news:yXdpj4CBaV4BFwpC@jmwa.demon.co.uk...
I read in sci.electronics.design that jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote (in
CdKdndbQ-6eRq3zcRVn-og@rcn.net&gt about 'We are going to need to say
this over and over again: "Bush stole it!"', on Sun, 9 Jan 2005:

IOW,
spammed gossiping has become a player in politics and the fourth estate.

It is possible that, just as the 'free press' was described as 'the
fourth estate of the Realm', the Internet may be a 'fifth estate' of
every realm.

Um, oops. The press *is* the Fifth Estate.

Not in Britain.

--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

Jan 11, 2005

In article <yXdpj4CBaV4BFwpC@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
John Woodgate <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote (in
CdKdndbQ-6eRq3zcRVn-og@rcn.net&gt about 'We are going to need to say
this over and over again: "Bush stole it!"', on Sun, 9 Jan 2005:

IOW,
spammed gossiping has become a player in politics and the fourth estate.

It is possible that, just as the 'free press' was described as 'the
fourth estate of the Realm', the Internet may be a 'fifth estate' of
every realm.

No.

/BAH

Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.

keith · Jan 12, 2005

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:39:43 +0000, jmfbahciv wrote:

In article <gr03u0lu7odu0re51ogbb814a6advqln1l@4ax.com>,
John Larkin <john@spamless.usa> wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:06:25 +0000, John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote (in
CdKdndbQ-6eRq3zcRVn-og@rcn.net&gt about 'We are going to need to say
this over and over again: "Bush stole it!"', on Sun, 9 Jan 2005:

IOW,
spammed gossiping has become a player in politics and the fourth estate.

It is possible that, just as the 'free press' was described as 'the
fourth estate of the Realm', the Internet may be a 'fifth estate' of
every realm.

This is really interesting. Now anybody with wit or talent can become
famous with a little simple blogging software. And now any crackpot
can find "documentation" to support his lunatic beliefs.

But you see this in all its glory in sci.physics. Now observe, like
I have for the last 10 years, the trends of how people work on
both sides of the crank farm.

Ok, but I'm not on the C.P sice of the crank farm (but I am on the AFC
side of that farm;-)

Next serious goal: destruction of the paid scientific journals.

That won't work. What is getting done, is dumbing down the next
generation of those who will be paid to submit to those journals. It
will take two generations to destroy the work if no messes occur. Go
reread everything reany has written. He's been at it for three (I think)
years. Hint: ignore all the big words that sound like it's coming from
a high-brow philosophy class. Now go listen to a math and science high
school class in a school where the moral majority has taken power.

Oh, BS. I've always lived in areas where they laugh the "Moral Majority"
types out of town, or at least under tables. Math and science
teaching is abysmal everywhere! The teacher's unions are dumbing down
education because *they* are. We live in one of the "best" school
districts in the state, yet the HS biology teacher didn't have any
credentials in biology, and didn't know a corn plant from a house-
kitty. There is no accountability for teachres, there is no feedback, thus
it's a system that is a couple of generations out of control. It has
*nothing* to do with the "moral majority".

--
Keith

We are going to need to say this over and over again: "Bush

Kang

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

Uncle Al

Guest

Richard Tobin

Guest

keith

Guest

Volker Hetzer

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

JeffM

Guest

John Larkin

Guest

Guest

Guest

John S. Dyson

Guest

JeffM

Guest

Pig Bladder

Guest

Guest

Jess Askin

Guest

JeffM

Guest

John Woodgate

Guest

Guest

keith

Guest

Log in

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor