M
Michael Terrell
Guest
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 11:11:54 AM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
They like being abused?
They like being abused?
F
Flyguy
Guest
On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 8:51:55 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
Maybe if you are shipped off to a reeducation camp with the Uighurs you will be moved, but, then again, maybe not.
Maybe if you are shipped off to a reeducation camp with the Uighurs you will be moved, but, then again, maybe not.
F
Flyguy
Guest
On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 10:31:03 PM UTC-7, Jasen Betts wrote:
Hardly, a totally false equivalency - the CHICOMs are murdering people by the millions.
Hardly, a totally false equivalency - the CHICOMs are murdering people by the millions.
F
Flyguy
Guest
On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 10:46:09 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
Hey SL0W MAN, maybe, just maybe, the CHICOMs will produce Dr. Li-Meng Yan\'s mother and have her confirm that she hasn\'t been arrested (it wouldn\'t be hard), but I wouldn\'t hold my breath. You are more than welcome to travel to China and prove Dr. Yan wrong, but I doubt that you will.
Hey SL0W MAN, maybe, just maybe, the CHICOMs will produce Dr. Li-Meng Yan\'s mother and have her confirm that she hasn\'t been arrested (it wouldn\'t be hard), but I wouldn\'t hold my breath. You are more than welcome to travel to China and prove Dr. Yan wrong, but I doubt that you will.
F
Flyguy
Guest
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 8:11:54 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
I assume that they have a secret admiration with how the CHICOMs rule with an iron fist.
I assume that they have a secret admiration with how the CHICOMs rule with an iron fist.
J
John Doe
Guest
The virologist knew her family might be terrorized by the Communist
Chinese government because of her story. Even an idiot knows why her
mother was arrested, regardless of the validity of her claims (that
will be tested by her peers). Why would she (allegedly) tell lies
knowing her family might be terrorized and/or killed?
Here we have a troll pretending like it\'s a virology expert...
--
whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:
Chinese government because of her story. Even an idiot knows why her
mother was arrested, regardless of the validity of her claims (that
will be tested by her peers). Why would she (allegedly) tell lies
knowing her family might be terrorized and/or killed?
Here we have a troll pretending like it\'s a virology expert...
--
whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 4:00:23 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
Really? There\'s no evidence of any actual murdering going on at the moment. Flyguy seems to think that claims of some demented Sinophobe or other are \"evidence\", but all that proves that he is a gullible twit.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Really? There\'s no evidence of any actual murdering going on at the moment. Flyguy seems to think that claims of some demented Sinophobe or other are \"evidence\", but all that proves that he is a gullible twit.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 4:06:37 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
<snip>
John Larkin does guess-work, Flyguy makes assumptions. Neither of then has bothered to come up with any actual leftist apologists.
If you drag all your evidence out of your imagination, you can have a lively and satisfying discussion with yourself and even draw in fellow fantasists. It is a waste of bandwidth, but it keeps the wankers happy.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
<snip>
John Larkin does guess-work, Flyguy makes assumptions. Neither of then has bothered to come up with any actual leftist apologists.
If you drag all your evidence out of your imagination, you can have a lively and satisfying discussion with yourself and even draw in fellow fantasists. It is a waste of bandwidth, but it keeps the wankers happy.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
F
Flyguy
Guest
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 10:16:02 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
Hey SL0W MAN, there is no dispute that Uighurs are being interned in what is euphemistically called \"reeducation\" camps. The CHICOMs do not have good motives for this and are torturing Uighurs in these camps. The camps are, effectively, death sentences for the Uighurs, which is tantamount to murder. But you, with your head in the sand as usual, don\'t question this.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-53650246
Hey SL0W MAN, there is no dispute that Uighurs are being interned in what is euphemistically called \"reeducation\" camps. The CHICOMs do not have good motives for this and are torturing Uighurs in these camps. The camps are, effectively, death sentences for the Uighurs, which is tantamount to murder. But you, with your head in the sand as usual, don\'t question this.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-53650246
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 4:32:06 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
Really? First it was murder and now it\'s torture. Flyguy would clearly find any kind of education torture.
>The camps are, effectively, death sentences for the Uighurs, which is tantamount to murder.
If they were. why would the Chinese bother to build camps? It\'s a lot quicker and cheaper to dig graves.
Precisely what got that unfortunate young man stuck in a cell isn\'t all that clear. He\'d clearly like us to think that it\'s just because he was a Uighur, and would be less forthcoming about the cannabis dealing, if the Chinese authorities were telling the truth.
You\'ve got your own head buried in a pile of political propaganda.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Really? First it was murder and now it\'s torture. Flyguy would clearly find any kind of education torture.
>The camps are, effectively, death sentences for the Uighurs, which is tantamount to murder.
If they were. why would the Chinese bother to build camps? It\'s a lot quicker and cheaper to dig graves.
Precisely what got that unfortunate young man stuck in a cell isn\'t all that clear. He\'d clearly like us to think that it\'s just because he was a Uighur, and would be less forthcoming about the cannabis dealing, if the Chinese authorities were telling the truth.
You\'ve got your own head buried in a pile of political propaganda.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
J
John Doe
Guest
Filthy troll lying about well-known practices of the Communist
Chinese, as if such obvious lies change anything. You have to
wonder, what is the motive for acting like an idiot on the Internet.
The only thing I can imagine is the big ego pretends to be a lawyer,
arguing anything no matter how ridiculous...
--
Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
Chinese, as if such obvious lies change anything. You have to
wonder, what is the motive for acting like an idiot on the Internet.
The only thing I can imagine is the big ego pretends to be a lawyer,
arguing anything no matter how ridiculous...
--
Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
C
Corvid
Guest
Flyguy wrote:
Almost looks like the claim has right-wing origins, latched onto by a
Chinese virologist.
Oh, no, Hannity too?
_________________
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/li-meng-yan-covid-19-lab/
*Funding Ties to the Rule of Law Society*
The report was primarily authored by Yan and three other researchers who
listed an affiliation with the Rule of Law Society on the cover page.
The society is a political organization â not a research institution â
that was founded by exiled Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui, who fled
China in 2014 in advance of corruption charges, and Steve Bannon, an
American businessman and political strategist who previously oversaw the
far-right publication Breitbart News, and was recently arrested in
connection to the âWe Build The Wallâ fraud scam.
_________________
<https://www.techtimes.com/articles/252590/20200916/fact-check-covid-19-whistleblower-li-meng-yan-releases-paper-with-other-scientists-suggesting-sophisticated-laboratory-modification.htm>
*Li-Meng Yan\'s Paper*
The paper was authored by Yan, who became famous overnight due to her
strong claims after fleeing China to come to the US.
Yan was accompanied by three researchers affiliated with the Rule of Law
of Society, which is not particularly known for working on infectious
diseases.
Moreover, it appears as though the Society was founded by a former POTUS
adviser that was recently charged by the Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI) for fraud, along with Guo Wengui, a Chinese businessman who fled
China back in 2014 due to bribery charges and more.
Almost looks like the claim has right-wing origins, latched onto by a
Chinese virologist.
Oh, no, Hannity too?
_________________
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/li-meng-yan-covid-19-lab/
*Funding Ties to the Rule of Law Society*
The report was primarily authored by Yan and three other researchers who
listed an affiliation with the Rule of Law Society on the cover page.
The society is a political organization â not a research institution â
that was founded by exiled Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui, who fled
China in 2014 in advance of corruption charges, and Steve Bannon, an
American businessman and political strategist who previously oversaw the
far-right publication Breitbart News, and was recently arrested in
connection to the âWe Build The Wallâ fraud scam.
_________________
<https://www.techtimes.com/articles/252590/20200916/fact-check-covid-19-whistleblower-li-meng-yan-releases-paper-with-other-scientists-suggesting-sophisticated-laboratory-modification.htm>
*Li-Meng Yan\'s Paper*
The paper was authored by Yan, who became famous overnight due to her
strong claims after fleeing China to come to the US.
Yan was accompanied by three researchers affiliated with the Rule of Law
of Society, which is not particularly known for working on infectious
diseases.
Moreover, it appears as though the Society was founded by a former POTUS
adviser that was recently charged by the Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI) for fraud, along with Guo Wengui, a Chinese businessman who fled
China back in 2014 due to bribery charges and more.
J
John Doe
Guest
A regular nym-shifting troll.
see also...
=?UTF-8?B?8J+QriBDb3dzIGFyZSBOaWNlIPCfkK4=?= <nice@cows.moo>
Banders <snap@mailchute.com>
Corvid <bl@ckbirds.org>
Cows Are Nice <cows@nice.moo>
Cows are nice <moo@cows.org>
Cows are Nice <nice@cows.moo>
dogs <dogs@home.com>
Great Pumpkin <pumpkin@patch.net>
Jose Curvo <jcurvo@mymail.com>
Local Favorite <how2recycle@palomar.info>
Sea <freshness@coast.org>
Standard Poodle <standard@poodle.com>
and others...
--
Corvid <bl@ckbirds.org> wrote:
see also...
=?UTF-8?B?8J+QriBDb3dzIGFyZSBOaWNlIPCfkK4=?= <nice@cows.moo>
Banders <snap@mailchute.com>
Corvid <bl@ckbirds.org>
Cows Are Nice <cows@nice.moo>
Cows are nice <moo@cows.org>
Cows are Nice <nice@cows.moo>
dogs <dogs@home.com>
Great Pumpkin <pumpkin@patch.net>
Jose Curvo <jcurvo@mymail.com>
Local Favorite <how2recycle@palomar.info>
Sea <freshness@coast.org>
Standard Poodle <standard@poodle.com>
and others...
--
Corvid <bl@ckbirds.org> wrote:
W
whit3rd
Guest
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 10:06:37 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Those assumptions and guesses aren\'t good basis for thought.
You guys can still vote, but jury selection will boot you off for prejudice.
Those assumptions and guesses aren\'t good basis for thought.
You guys can still vote, but jury selection will boot you off for prejudice.
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 22:06:30 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
<soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yes. Leftists inherently believe they understand everything hence
should control everything.
Mao had theories and created the greatest famine in world history. The
One Child thing was pretty awful too.
https://chineseposters.net/sites/default/files/images/e12-901.jpg
The Four Pests was another great concept.
<soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yes. Leftists inherently believe they understand everything hence
should control everything.
Mao had theories and created the greatest famine in world history. The
One Child thing was pretty awful too.
https://chineseposters.net/sites/default/files/images/e12-901.jpg
The Four Pests was another great concept.
J
John Doe
Guest
John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
\"If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving,
subsidize it.\"
Whenever I run into a greenie promoting climate change... \"Okay, but what do
you think about nuclear energy?\" They almost invariably say it\'s horrible,
making clear they are a nonscientist. They love to feign science, BUT
SERIOUSLY most know nothing about science. And in fact there have been
documentaries made about the subject, like by former greenies who have seen
the light. It\'s about control. That\'s the only thing it can be about.
Promoting so-called green energy while shunning nuclear energy is not about
science.
Control, and, some people want to see an end to the human race.
\"If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving,
subsidize it.\"
Whenever I run into a greenie promoting climate change... \"Okay, but what do
you think about nuclear energy?\" They almost invariably say it\'s horrible,
making clear they are a nonscientist. They love to feign science, BUT
SERIOUSLY most know nothing about science. And in fact there have been
documentaries made about the subject, like by former greenies who have seen
the light. It\'s about control. That\'s the only thing it can be about.
Promoting so-called green energy while shunning nuclear energy is not about
science.
Control, and, some people want to see an end to the human race.
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Friday, October 9, 2020 at 7:13:05 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote:
That sounds more like egomaniacs to me. John Larkin thinks he understands climate change.
Mao was an egomaniac in change of system that believed in the leading role of the party.
At least one leftist has seen that this can lead to problems.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/801264-if-you-took-the-most-ardent-revolutionary-vested-him-in
\"âIf you took the most ardent revolutionary, vested him in absolute power, within a year he would be worse than the Tsar himself.â
This dates back to about 1871, so it isn\'t a new observation. John Larkin gets reminded about it from time to time, but he does seem to think that he understands everything.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
That sounds more like egomaniacs to me. John Larkin thinks he understands climate change.
Mao was an egomaniac in change of system that believed in the leading role of the party.
At least one leftist has seen that this can lead to problems.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/801264-if-you-took-the-most-ardent-revolutionary-vested-him-in
\"âIf you took the most ardent revolutionary, vested him in absolute power, within a year he would be worse than the Tsar himself.â
This dates back to about 1871, so it isn\'t a new observation. John Larkin gets reminded about it from time to time, but he does seem to think that he understands everything.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
W
whit3rd
Guest
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 10:56:17 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
Truly, I do sometimes wonder. So, John Doe, as a man with first-hand knowledge of
acting like an idiot, what is your motive?
Truly, I do sometimes wonder. So, John Doe, as a man with first-hand knowledge of
acting like an idiot, what is your motive?
J
Jeroen Belleman
Guest
On 2020-10-09 12:26, whit3rd wrote:
Don\'t you have anything better to do than to cite and argue
with idiots?
Jeroen Belleman
Don\'t you have anything better to do than to cite and argue
with idiots?
Jeroen Belleman
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Saturday, October 10, 2020 at 2:51:01 AM UTC+11, Ricketty C wrote:
It\'s actually a re-run of the issue that was used to start impeachment proceedings against Trump. He was caught trying to pressure the Ukranian president into announcing this investigation (or something very like it). Presumably someone in Trump\'s election team has found somebody lower in the Ukranian pecking order who was easier to influence.
<snip>
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Friday, October 9, 2020 at 7:09:22 AM UTC-4, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
On 2020-10-09 12:26, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 10:56:17 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
Filthy troll lying about well-known practices of the Communist
Chinese, as if such obvious lies change anything. You have to
wonder, what is the motive for acting like an idiot on the Internet.
Truly, I do sometimes wonder. So, John Doe, as a man with first-hand knowledge of
acting like an idiot, what is your motive?
Don\'t you have anything better to do than to cite and argue
with idiots?
Jeroen Belleman
The trouble with asking such questions is that typically they should be asked of yourself.
I would love to talk politics here, but very few of the political posts here have anything useful to read and even less worth responding to. But once in a while I do learn something. Just yesterday I learned that Joe Biden appears to be a criminal. That\'s one I had not heard before.
It\'s actually a re-run of the issue that was used to start impeachment proceedings against Trump. He was caught trying to pressure the Ukranian president into announcing this investigation (or something very like it). Presumably someone in Trump\'s election team has found somebody lower in the Ukranian pecking order who was easier to influence.
<snip>
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney