Driver to drive?

On 2/9/2012 10:57 PM, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra wrote:
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:34:43 -0600, tom<news4792@taring.org> wrote:

And I was leading 10M$ engineering projects while you were installing cable.

Yes, and now I am leading $400M (yes, idiot, the dollar sign goes in
front) telecom projects which include spaceborne elements and the fastest
gateways on the planet and put Americans to work all over the nation in
support, and you get to type stupid shit in Usenet and on your facebook
facetard account and wither away like the old, dead fuck you are.

Soon enough, you'll be as senile as krw is and you won't even be able
to cut a cable fitting, and I will be still taking cross country tours
and racing on my bike and barefoot water skiing and living until 2110.
Hell, I'll set records. I am just getting started.

Yes, idiot... you are amusing, sometimes. Bwuahahahahahaha!
Yup, he's amusing.

tom
K0TAR
 
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:31:52 -0800, josephkk
<joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:03:47 -0800, Winston <Winston@Bigbrother.net
wrote:

If i decide that John Doe is in that class, feeding will cease.

You are nothing more than an immature little bitch, just like ASCII boy
is.
 
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:32:34 -0600, tom <news4792@taring.org> wrote:

On 2/9/2012 10:27 PM, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra wrote:


You wouldn't know what a constellation measurement was if one bit you in
the ass, much less understand it. Nuff said.

Holy crap! He's made it to the 1970s!

tom
K0TAR
Hardly,retard boy.

They didn't do 10Gb/s, and neither did you... ever.

http://www.defensetechbriefs.com/images/stories/RFM/2012/FEATURES/40430-541_fig2.png

http://www.defensetechbriefs.com/component/content/article/12855
 
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:07:01 -0600, tom <news4792@taring.org> wrote:

Very nice. We were much more constrained on the install I mentioned up
the thread a ways. The fiber was fed at E1 speed, which probably didn't
work it very hard.

Bwuahahahahahahahahahaahha!

You are too stupid to even know how to say OC-192!
 
The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra wrote:
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:07:01 -0600, tom <news4792@taring.org> wrote:

Very nice. We were much more constrained on the install I mentioned up
the thread a ways. The fiber was fed at E1 speed, which probably didn't
work it very hard.


Bwuahahahahahahahahahaahha!

You are too stupid to even know how to say OC-192!
http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/units/data_transfer_rate/data_transfer_rate.dOCont.en.html

I can Google too!

--
VWW, P.E. ,K6EVE
 
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:47:31 -0800, VWWall <vwall@large.invalid> wrote:

The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra wrote:
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:07:01 -0600, tom <news4792@taring.org> wrote:

Very nice. We were much more constrained on the install I mentioned up
the thread a ways. The fiber was fed at E1 speed, which probably didn't
work it very hard.


Bwuahahahahahahahahahaahha!

You are too stupid to even know how to say OC-192!
It wasn't from google, idiot. It is what I work with daily. More than
an order of magnitude more, in fact. Over 300Gb/s

Here's another link for you, dork:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_band

Oh, and did I say FUCK YOU, Wall boy?
 
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:50:32 -0800, DaveC <invalid@invalid.net> wrote:

Any chance that the angle between the brushes and the field got
changed on reassembly?
[John Larkin]

Is there only one correct orientation? Or 2?

Thanks,
Dave
Some 'brush sets' are 180 degrees apart, and that right on the center
axis of the brush 'monolith'. Some are oriented slightly off center (but
still 180 degrees apart). Usually on a motor only meant to spin in one
direction. The result is that the brush face has the arch <sic> abraded
across it slightly off center,and may only have one 'correct'
re-installation orientation that will preclude chipping and unneeded
wear-in sessions.
 
Hellequin wrote:
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:47:31 -0800, VWWall <vwall@large.invalid> wrote:

The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra wrote:
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:07:01 -0600, tom <news4792@taring.org> wrote:

Very nice. We were much more constrained on the install I mentioned up
the thread a ways. The fiber was fed at E1 speed, which probably didn't
work it very hard.

Bwuahahahahahahahahahaahha!

You are too stupid to even know how to say OC-192!

It wasn't from google, idiot. It is what I work with daily. More than
an order of magnitude more, in fact. Over 300Gb/s

Tell us more about your work. You must not be doing much, since you're
always on Usenet. Do you work the graveyard janitorial shift?

Here's another link for you, dork:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_band

Oh, and did I say FUCK YOU, Wall boy?
Wikipedia is also handy for things you know nothing about!

What's Ku got to do with anything. I was designing and using Ku TWTAs
over twenty years ago. I was system engineering director for several
military satellites systems, including those for the UK and NATO. These
did not use Ku because of the problem with rain attenuation.

P.S. How about a reply using one of the many Linux systems you mention?

--
VWW
 
Some 'brush sets' are 180 degrees apart, and that right on the center
axis of the brush 'monolith'. Some are oriented slightly off center (but
still 180 degrees apart). Usually on a motor only meant to spin in one
direction. The result is that the brush face has the arch <sic> abraded
across it slightly off center,and may only have one 'correct'
re-installation orientation that will preclude chipping and unneeded
wear-in sessions.
["Giant Rat"]
The two brushes are mounted exactly 180 degrees apart. But the brush holder
is adjustable (in rotation). I haven't touched that adjustment, so if I just
get the gross orientation correct (90 degrees from current setting) all
should be well.

Thanks,
Dave
 
josephkk wrote:

(...)

If i decide that John Doe is in that class, feeding will cease. I ceased
feeding NymNoNutz long ago.
John Doe is all right by me.
He shares what he is doing in his shop for our
edification and entertainment.

That is a core value of USENET in my humble opinion.


--Winston
 
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:18:53 -0800, VWWall <vwall@large.invalid> wrote:

Wikipedia is also handy for things you know nothing about!
Yes. So people like you can give a cursory glance to a given term or
subject.

As for me, the things I mentioned are things I *do* know something
about.

Sorry, you fail. Just like the others. This group is full of dopes
like you, who know nothing about people, and even less about the world.
 
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:18:53 -0800, VWWall <vwall@large.invalid> wrote:

Tell us more about your work.
How many personalities did the doc say you have?

You must not be doing much,
I do a lot.

since you're
always on Usenet.
How many mistakes can you make in one post? I post here during the
period in which I am at home. Can you really be that retarded?

Do you work the graveyard janitorial shift?
Graveyards do not have janitors, idiot. They have groundskeepers.

Any idiot with half a brain could figure out that I work during the
day, dumbfuck.
 
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:32:15 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 07:08:07 -0800 (PST), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:

On Feb 9, 12:45 am, josephkk <joseph_barr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:06:30 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:31:32 -0500, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:

It must be hell to be manic depressive.

Nah, some of my favourite transistors are bipolar.

Mine, too >:-}


Often useful for tran' sisters.  Not necessarily good for engineers.

One wonders about that. Looking through history, the more brilliant
someone is, the more likely they're crazy.

Of course. Ideas come from permeability in the barriers that segrate
ideas and brain functions. Schitzophrenia comes from a more complete
breakdown.

I guess attachment to reality works the same way. If you can
reasonably suspend conventional concepts of what's possible and
impossible, you can better explore the solution space. If you suspend
all limits on the possible, you become a loonie.

Here's another interesting relationship: the more politically powerful
a person is, the more likely that they are sociopaths.
Profound observation.

May I add?:

The more "god-fearing" a person, the greater likelihood of a
sociopath.
 
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:18:53 -0800, VWWall <vwall@large.invalid> wrote:

Wikipedia is also handy for things you know nothing about!
For idiots like you who visit it, that is always the case.
What's Ku got to do with anything.
It has to do with a lot of things. Most folks refer to them as
"packets".

I was designing and using Ku TWTAs
over twenty years ago.
Good for you. Now, you are an old, jack brained fucktard who jumped on
the s.e.d jack brained fucktard bandwagon, and*I* am working with modern,
advanced ku systems.

I was system engineering director for several
military satellites systems,
And now you are a withering old fuck who comes in here mouthing petty
horseshit about someone as if you know them, when you, in fact, have no
clue about anything about them. What you are doing is jumping on the
petty, immature asshole bandwagon. You are a special case type asswipe.

including those for the UK and NATO.
Oh boy! Mine are mobile! You're a joke!

These
did not use Ku because of the problem with rain attenuation.
Not as bad as other bands and worse than some others. Easy enough to
get around.

P.S. How about a reply using one of the many Linux systems you mention?
WTF does Linux have to do with any fucking thing, and why would I go
out of my way to do a goddamned thing for a mouthy punk fuck like you?

Then, there is the fact that I could be running this very "agent"
session from within a DOS vdm from within a Linux base session, and a
dopey fuck like you wouldn't know the difference and couldn't tell the
difference.
 
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:56:50 -0800, Winston <Winston@Bigbrother.net>
wrote:

He shares what he is doing in his shop for our
edification and entertainment.

That is a core value of USENET in my humble opinion.


--Winston
He takes criticism like a fucking Charlie Mansonesque retard.

Sorry, chump, but that character flaw is too severe for my tastes for a
stupid fuck his age.
 
Rick wrote:
"DaveC" <invalid@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.CB59D59B00710F2AB01029BF@news.eternal-september.org...
A 1/2(?) horsepower 2-brush DC motor was having bearing issues so I
disassembled it and replaced the ball bearings, turned down the commutator
on
a lathe, and installed new original equipment brushes. A good clean-up was
done as there was much grease and carbon dust inside.

Now when I apple power it just growls.[...]

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated (and the sooner the better

Thanks,
Dave

Use a battery and momentarily connect the field winding. This "magnetizes"
the armature (do this with the motor un powered). You only have to do this
once.
That only makes sense for self-excited generators, not for motors.

He probably got the commutators turned by 90 degrees, or perhaps
he wired the field coils anti-series, or some such.

Jeroen Belleman
 
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:45:26 -0500, default wrote:

On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:32:15 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 07:08:07 -0800 (PST), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:

On Feb 9, 12:45 am, josephkk <joseph_barr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:06:30 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:31:32 -0500, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:

It must be hell to be manic depressive.

Nah, some of my favourite transistors are bipolar.

Mine, too >:-}


Often useful for tran' sisters.  Not necessarily good for engineers.

One wonders about that. Looking through history, the more brilliant
someone is, the more likely they're crazy.

Of course. Ideas come from permeability in the barriers that segrate
ideas and brain functions. Schitzophrenia comes from a more complete
breakdown.

I guess attachment to reality works the same way. If you can
reasonably suspend conventional concepts of what's possible and
impossible, you can better explore the solution space. If you suspend
all limits on the possible, you become a loonie.

Here's another interesting relationship: the more politically powerful
a person is, the more likely that they are sociopaths.

Profound observation.

May I add?:

The more "god-fearing" a person, the greater likelihood of a
sociopath.
You have that entirely backwards. Read this:

http://tinyurl.com/829rwty




--

John Larkin, President Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
 
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:07:05 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:45:26 -0500, default wrote:

On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:32:15 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 07:08:07 -0800 (PST), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:

On Feb 9, 12:45 am, josephkk <joseph_barr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:06:30 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:31:32 -0500, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:

It must be hell to be manic depressive.

Nah, some of my favourite transistors are bipolar.

Mine, too >:-}


Often useful for tran' sisters.  Not necessarily good for engineers.

One wonders about that. Looking through history, the more brilliant
someone is, the more likely they're crazy.

Of course. Ideas come from permeability in the barriers that segrate
ideas and brain functions. Schitzophrenia comes from a more complete
breakdown.

I guess attachment to reality works the same way. If you can
reasonably suspend conventional concepts of what's possible and
impossible, you can better explore the solution space. If you suspend
all limits on the possible, you become a loonie.

Here's another interesting relationship: the more politically powerful
a person is, the more likely that they are sociopaths.

Profound observation.

May I add?:

The more "god-fearing" a person, the greater likelihood of a
sociopath.

You have that entirely backwards. Read this:

http://tinyurl.com/829rwty
NymNoNuts can't read, let alone comprehend.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:27:00 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
<GeorgeTirebiter@drmemory.org> wrote:

On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:02:35 +0000, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:

On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:44:45 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
GeorgeTirebiter@drmemory.org> wrote:

On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:12:15 +0000, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:

Would you please supply some evidence of your claims?

You don't even know what a 10Gb/s optical port looks like either,
jackass.

You are truly pathetic, and a total loser.

The only response a retard like you knows is "stalk and jab".

Would you please supply some evidence of your claims?


You wouldn't know what a constellation measurement was if one bit you in
the ass, much less understand it. Nuff said.
Would you please supply some evidence of your claims?
 
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:52:31 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
<GeorgeTirebiter@drmemory.org> wrote:

I was system engineering director for several
military satellites systems,

And now you are a withering old fuck who comes in here mouthing petty
horseshit about someone as if you know them, when you, in fact, have no
clue about anything about them. What you are doing is jumping on the
petty, immature asshole bandwagon. You are a special case type asswipe.
I tend to judge people by their willingness and abilities to learn new
things. You fail.

You may know something about CATV and fiber, but it doesn't show.
Instead of taking the time to educate those whom you suspect of being
in error, you waste our time with insults and unsubstantiated
opinions. Your command of profanity is truly impressive, but
misplaced. If someone presented you with your comments, what you
would think of the author?

I can't imagine what personal tragedy has occurred in your life, that
you find it necessary to demonstrate your competence at the expense of
others. If you're truly competent, such a crutch is not necessary. If
you clean up your act, there may be hope for you remaining.




--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top