Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well there's vegans and vegetariians. Some do eat fish on occasion. IAt one time, not so long ago, Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers
theslipper...@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 19:04:34 +0000 (UTC), IMBJR <im...@cloon.fucker
wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 14:00:59 -0500, Kent Wills wrote:
I'm a vegetarian
I bet you eat fish, though, like a lot of vegetarians.
I'll bet that you couldn't be any more of an utter retard if you tried.
His claim of a lot may be inaccurate. However, there are those
who do. Seems stupid to me, since fish is meat, but if they want to,
more power to them.
I'm not militant about my vegetarianism. I did it to lose weight
and have chosen to continue with the diet even though I realized my
weight loss goal.
--
"I could have been ambassador to Moscow by now. Maybe even Private
Secretary. Instead, I'm watching a dinosaur trash my office..."
Or drives a Vega.Greegor wrote:
Do you think Nymbecile is vegan?
Well, there's a chance that he's from a planet in the Vega system. ;-)
Cheers!
Rich
He is a moron, which isn't good. He's here, which is very bad.On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 14:50:22 -0500 "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in Message id:
5qjhp6deu0dspbbansoeknp87kbsk4euck@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 10:50:17 -0700, Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers
theslipperman@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 13:12:07 -0400, Spehro Pefhany
speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote:
You are going to have a 10,000+ PSI compressor in your garage?
The tanks on the shuttle main engine are not high pressure tanks.
The shuttle's main tanks would vent into your garage, moron.
You say that like it's a *bad* thing.
Atlas was fueled by RP-1 and LOX. You must try to be an idiot. No one can beOn Apr 3, 8:58 pm, "k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz
wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 19:30:48 -0700, Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers
theslipper...@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 17:06:50 -0700, Don Lancaster <d...@tinaja.com> wrote:
And the mass energy density of liquid hydrogen is actually WAY higher
than gasoline,
A popular misconception and a dead wrong OUTRIGHT LIE.
Then why didn't they use gasoline for the manned moon missions or for
space shuttle engines, or for ANY rocket engines, for that matter?
RP-1 is essentially kerosene, AlwaysWrong. Guess what "RP" means, DimBulb?
Name one manned booster (US) that used a petroleum propellant?
I've noticed that myself. If he were merely stupid, you'd expect himOn Sun, 3 Apr 2011 22:25:14 -0700 (PDT), Nunya <jack_shephard@cox.net> wrote:
On Apr 3, 8:58 pm, "k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz
wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 19:30:48 -0700, Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers
theslipper...@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 17:06:50 -0700, Don Lancaster <d...@tinaja.com> wrote:
And the mass energy density of liquid hydrogen is actually WAY higher
than gasoline,
A popular misconception and a dead wrong OUTRIGHT LIE.
Then why didn't they use gasoline for the manned moon missions or for
space shuttle engines, or for ANY rocket engines, for that matter?
RP-1 is essentially kerosene, AlwaysWrong. Guess what "RP" means, DimBulb?
Name one manned booster (US) that used a petroleum propellant?
Atlas was fueled by RP-1 and LOX. You must try to be an idiot. No one can be
that stupid accidentally.
You seem excited.On Apr 4, 3:24 pm, Kabuki Bob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Moe > Well there's vegans and vegetariians. Some do
Moe > eat fish on occasion. I forget what the difference
Moe > is between the two, but I do remember that
Moe > there is a difference.
I bet that Nymbecile is excited about rubbing up to KentMoe!
WRONG.Name one manned booster (US) that used a petroleum propellant?
100 percent of ALL the X Prize candidates.
Any more stupid questions?
Projection noted.G > Have you told Nymbecile why you're so PO'd at me?
Moe > Your claims and distortions noted.
G > It was a question.
Moe > In your " question" you made claims.
Moe > Quit lying.
G > Are you saying your not PO'd at me?
Moe > No I am not. At worst you are like
Moe > a poison ivy itch, slightly annoying
Moe > but of no consequence.
I'm sure you're used having a rash.
G > What other "claims" did my question make?
Moe > You implied a few things,
You failed to answer the question.
Moe > a tactic that is usual for you in your "game".
Moe > Now that I answered two of your que stons,
You evaded the question about what
other "claims" my question made.
Moe > how about answering some of
Moe > mine I asked you?
Moe > Not a chance, I know, but then
Moe > I know how much of a coward
Moe > you really are.
You are full of usenet bravado.
Post your address and watch it expand.G > Have you told Nymbecile why you're so PO'd at me?
Moe > Your claims and distortions noted.
G > It was a question.
Moe > In your " question" you made claims.
Moe > Quit lying.
G > Are you saying your not PO'd at me?
Moe > No I am not. At worst you are like
Moe > a poison ivy itch, slightly annoying
Moe > but of no consequence.
I'm sure you're used having a rash.
G > What other "claims" did my question make?
Moe > You implied a few things,
You failed to answer the question.
Moe > a tactic that is usual for you in your "game".
Moe > Now that I answered two of your que stons,
You evaded the question about what
other "claims" my question made.
Moe > how about answering some of
Moe > mine I asked you?
Moe > Not a chance, I know, but then
Moe > I know how much of a coward
Moe > you really are.
You are full of usenet bravado.
You're a retard, who's entire bloodline should be erased from the geneOn Mon, 04 Apr 2011 07:53:23 -0400, JW <none@dev.null> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 14:50:22 -0500 "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in Message id:
5qjhp6deu0dspbbansoeknp87kbsk4euck@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 10:50:17 -0700, Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers
theslipperman@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 13:12:07 -0400, Spehro Pefhany
speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote:
You are going to have a 10,000+ PSI compressor in your garage?
The tanks on the shuttle main engine are not high pressure tanks.
The shuttle's main tanks would vent into your garage, moron.
You say that like it's a *bad* thing.
He is a moron, which isn't good. He's here, which is very bad.
I can't help it if you don't like the truth, DimBulb.On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:36:13 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 07:53:23 -0400, JW <none@dev.null> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 14:50:22 -0500 "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in Message id:
5qjhp6deu0dspbbansoeknp87kbsk4euck@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 10:50:17 -0700, Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers
theslipperman@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 13:12:07 -0400, Spehro Pefhany
speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote:
You are going to have a 10,000+ PSI compressor in your garage?
The tanks on the shuttle main engine are not high pressure tanks.
The shuttle's main tanks would vent into your garage, moron.
You say that like it's a *bad* thing.
He is a moron, which isn't good. He's here, which is very bad.
You're a retard, who's entire bloodline should be erased from the gene
pool.
So, you are admitting that you are this little scuzbag Hanson asswipe?G > Have you told Nymbecile why you're so PO'd at me?
Moe > Your claims and distortions noted.
G > It was a question.
Moe > In your " question" you made claims.
Moe > Quit lying.
G > Are you saying your not PO'd at me?
Moe > No I am not. At worst you are like
Moe > a poison ivy itch, slightly annoying
Moe > but of no consequence.
G > I'm sure you're used having a rash.
G > What other "claims" did my question make?
Moe > You implied a few things,
G > You failed to answer the question.
Moe > a tactic that is usual for you in your "game".
Moe > Now that I answered two of your que stons,
G > You evaded the question about what
G > other "claims" my question made.
Moe > how about answering some of
Moe > mine I asked you?
Moe > Not a chance, I know, but then
Moe > I know how much of a coward
Moe > you really are.
G > You are full of usenet bravado.
Nymbecile > Post your address and watch it expand.
I was wondering what excuse you were going to use next!
Do you really intend to deny having the address?
What is your excuse for waiting now, ""Archie""?On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:10:50 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <greego...@gmail.com
wrote:
G > Have you told Nymbecile why you're so PO'd at me?
Moe > Your claims and distortions noted.
G > It was a question.
Moe > In your " question" you made claims.
Moe > Quit lying.
G > Are you saying your not PO'd at me?
Moe > No I am not. At worst you are like
Moe > a poison ivy itch, slightly annoying
Moe > but of no consequence.
G > I'm sure you're used having a rash.
G > What other "claims" did my question make?
Moe > You implied a few things,
G > You failed to answer the question.
Moe > a tactic that is usual for you in your "game".
Moe > Now that I answered two of your que stons,
G > You evaded the question about what
G > other "claims" my question made.
Moe > how about answering some of
Moe > mine I asked you?
Moe > Not a chance, I know, but then
Moe > I know how much of a coward
Moe > you really are.
G > You are full of usenet bravado.
Nymbecile > Post your address and watch it expand.
I was wondering what excuse you were going to use next!
Do you really intend to deny having the address?
So, you are admitting that you are this little scuzbag Hanson asswipe?
Wow. You have no shame, eh, you sub-human piece of shit?
You are no longer amusing, punk. Take your retarded ass, and your
retarded posts somewhere else, or I'll come beat the piss out of you.
Let's see,On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 17:06:50 -0700, the renowned Don Lancaster
don@tinaja.com> wrote:
And the mass energy density of liquid hydrogen is actually WAY higher
than gasoline,
A popular misconception and a dead wrong OUTRIGHT LIE.
The CONTAINED mass energy density of hydrogen is actually WAY lower than
gasoline when used in any automotive app. And gets ridiculously worse as
the container empties.
Further, the mass energy density is utterly and totally meaningless for
automotive apps, as voluumetric density utterly and totally dominates.
A 24" cube of liquid hydrogen holds as much energy as 15 gallons of
gasoline. That's certainly not an outrageous volume if the car is
designed around it, less than 7% of the passenger+luggage volume of a
Toyota Camry.
If it won't work for a jet airliner that badly it won't for a car for theEven if the dewar increases that by 50% or 75%, it's
still not remotely decisive. OTOH, a 747-400 would have no passenger
or cargo space left over if you tried to fuel it with liquid hydrogen.
It would end up looking like the hideously ugly 747-LCF.
Even in those apps when mass energy density is crucial, twenty out of
twenty X-prize candidates used something else instead.
True.
The volumetric density of hydrogen is ludicrously low.
Even when you throw cyrogenics or high pressures into the mix.
Neither of which should EVER be allowed even remotely near the general
public.
If the liquid hydrogen was 1/2 the price of gasoline for equivalent
energy we'd probably find a way to use it relatively safely (ie. so it
doesn't kill more people than gasoline does), but it isn't and won't
likely ever be.
See < http://www.tinaja.com/glib/nrglect2.pdf > to shatter more
ridiculous hydrogen myths.
As in those things that refer to hydrogen as a "source of energy"? lol
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 06:22:49 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <greegor47@gmail.com
wrote:
Are your folks at vegan also, Kent?
Do you think Nymbecile is vegan?
plonk