A french product design student is looking for an internship

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 01:29:28 +1300, Terry Given wrote:

<snip>
I'll get flamed for saying this for sure, but in many respects terrorism
is just like capitalism. In theory giant companies cant be beat, in
practice they often can, invariably by small companies with a great
dynamic response and innovative ideas. For much the same reasons, Al
Qaeda tend not to get into pitched battles with the US (GW 1 & 2 have
shown what a bad idea that is), but instead rely on innovation and
so-called dirty tricks.
Small, highly motivated, unconventional forces can ruin the day for
a large well armed one.
--
Best Regards,
Mike
 
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:25:34 -0700, Jim Thompson
<thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:06:18 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 23:51:52 -0500, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:39:44 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

[snip]
I had to tear it down and hone it out twice before she totalled
it and lost her spleen. Good riddance [1].

John


[1] ambiguity intentional.

Gee! John! I don't get your gist ;-)

It seems he just vented his.

That wasn't a vent, it was a riff.

John

As in reduction in force ?:)
RIW, reduction-in-wives.

John
 
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:02:57 +1300, Terry Given <my_name@ieee.org>
wrote:

A buddy of mine at Uni had a Suzuki RG500(R?) 2-stroke crotch rocket.
One day whgile tootling along at about 180kph it threw a piston (luckily
not the one pointed at his nuts) and locked the back wheel up. He hung
on for about 300m (fishtailing like a son-of-a-bitch) before coming to a
stop, and ground a huge hole in the rear tyre. Most impressive, and the
skid mark was pretty cool too.
Wow, that was some pretty good riding. I'd have been tumbling along
the tarmac if that had happened to me. 2-stroke street bikes sure
sucked. But I do have fond memories of my single-jug Yamaha 250 dirt
bike... I bet I crashed it 300 times at least. We used to play tag on
motorcycles in a big old gravel pit and climb basically vertical
hills, dumb stuff like that.

But I bike no longer. My current wife, the good one, is a speech
pathologist who has tried to repair too many brain-damaged bikers and
doesn't want to be married to a member of the plant kingdom. And the
way people drive around here these days, it's just as well.

John
 
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:24:12 +0000, John Woodgate
<jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Terry Given <my_name@ieee.org
wrote (in <18bZd.9441$1S4.1000730@news.xtra.co.nz>) about 'A french
product design student is looking for an internship', on Mon, 14 Mar
2005:
not quite. It was complete, just oscillated like a SOB. The millenium
bridge across the river Thames is another good example of that.

Both Tacoma and the Millennium Bridge suffered from **previously
unknown** effects. Not the same as bad or ignorant design.
The big debate around here is whether to add suicide barriers to the
Golden Gate bridge. It would mess up the aesthetics and aerodynamics
both. There's been something like 1400 jumpers so far, a few of which
survived. They just approved a $2 million *study*.

John
 
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com>
wrote in message news:e3pb315dbmgj24ph2uc7ru9u1rh24jg5lr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:24:12 +0000, John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:
....
Both Tacoma and the Millennium Bridge suffered from **previously
unknown** effects. Not the same as bad or ignorant design.

The big debate around here is whether to add suicide barriers to the
Golden Gate bridge. It would mess up the aesthetics and aerodynamics
both. There's been something like 1400 jumpers so far, a few of which
survived. They just approved a $2 million *study*.
Will the study include an effort to estimate how many
of the frustrated suiciders will not be motivated enough
to find some other method? Or is yet another example
of "Spend money for no use beyond feel-goodery."?

--
--Larry Brasfield
email: donotspam_larry_brasfield@hotmail.com
Above views may belong only to me.
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin <jjlarkin@highSNIPland
THIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote (in <e3pb315dbmgj24ph2uc7ru9u1rh24jg5lr@
4ax.com>) about 'A french product design student is looking for an
internship', on Mon, 14 Mar 2005:

The big debate around here is whether to add suicide barriers to the
Golden Gate bridge. It would mess up the aesthetics and aerodynamics
both. There's been something like 1400 jumpers so far, a few of which
survived. They just approved a $2 million *study*.
Drain the Bay, to prevent them drowning. Or spend the $2 million on
compulsory diving lessons for would-be suicides.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
Jim Thompson wrote:
Probably a lobotomized socialist. At least I'm a "has been", jsmith
seems to be a "hasn't been" ;-)

Jim Thompson

Don't forget his "Never gonna be" rating! ;)

--
?

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
Active8 wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 01:15:37 +1300, Terry Given wrote:


Active8 wrote:

snip

ROTFLMAO! reminds me of that song by Ice T - that girl tried to kill me.
She did a back flip, landed on my dick, I knew that I would be dead
soon.....



No rap for me,
same for Ice T.
I'd like to talk,
but I gotta pee.
<snort>

I have had a few good kicks in the nuts at Karate over the years, but
they were all my fault for not paying attention.


snip

Agreed wrt counters, we do a lot of arm conditioning for that express
purpose ie all blocks are strikes. Fluid, circular motion coupled with
dynamic tension delivers force where required and nowhere else. fast is
good, faster is better :). My club in Napier was great, we did a lot of
ground fighting, against multiple opponents too. Biting can be very
effective.


Shoto Kahn emphasised hard blocks. Hapkido is the Korean version of
Aikido. Means the same - Art of power control. It's Segal's form
along with [probably] Shoto Kahn. The Korean Secret Service trains
in it. They guard the Blue House. Interesting history how was born
and went underground to survive the Japanese occupation.
any good links?

I was on the piss in The Fitz in Palmerston North one night, when I saw
a TKD guy get into a bar fight with a redneck. The fool did a jumping
spinning crescent kick, which the redneck easily dodged. When he landed,
twisting on one foot on the beer-soaked floor, he promptly fell over and
had the shit kicked out of him before the bouncers rescued him. An
object lesson on the follies of (inappropriate) high kicking. But it
does look cool, I spent years practising shit like that as a boy.


It's good training. Makes the low kicks easy.
yep. and fast.

Cheers
Terry
 
John Woodgate wrote:
I read in sci.electronics.design that Paul Burke <paul@scazon.com> wrote
(in <39lkhlF62gsv2U1@individual.net>) about 'A french product design
student is looking for an internship', on Mon, 14 Mar 2005:

Terry Given wrote:

The Millennium bridge was IIRC due to the (rather typical in civil
engineering) use of approximations rather than detailed analysis -
specifically they didnt even consider oscillations of that type, so
didnt check for them.

Well, that's more or less what I meant. Torsional oscillation wasn't
expected to be a problem with that type of construction, so it wasn't
checked.

Yeah, I betcha there were a few red faces there :)

They missed a golden opportunity back then. All they had to do was
rename it the Millennium Cakewalk, and wait for the crowds to roll up.



A lot of people wanted to leave it alone, but the Health and Safety
people killed that.
Bah Humbug!

Cheers
Terry
 
Terry Given wrote:
John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:24:12 +0000, John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:


I read in sci.electronics.design that Terry Given <my_name@ieee.org
wrote (in <18bZd.9441$1S4.1000730@news.xtra.co.nz>) about 'A french
product design student is looking for an internship', on Mon, 14 Mar
2005:

not quite. It was complete, just oscillated like a SOB. The
millenium bridge across the river Thames is another good example of
that.


Both Tacoma and the Millennium Bridge suffered from **previously
unknown** effects. Not the same as bad or ignorant design.



The big debate around here is whether to add suicide barriers to the
Golden Gate bridge. It would mess up the aesthetics and aerodynamics
both. There's been something like 1400 jumpers so far, a few of which
survived. They just approved a $2 million *study*.

John


Crazy. Why bother to stop suicides anyway? I think suicidal people
should be encouraged to kill themselves, perhaps even shown how to do it
properly so they dont botch the job and cost the taxpayer healthcare
funding that would be better spent on someone who *didnt* want to die.

Cheers
Terry
Right. As someone said here recently: less chat and more splat!
Or how about: Less talk and more chalk (as in outline).

Bob
 
In article <e3pb315dbmgj24ph2uc7ru9u1rh24jg5lr@4ax.com>,
jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com says...
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:24:12 +0000, John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Terry Given <my_name@ieee.org
wrote (in <18bZd.9441$1S4.1000730@news.xtra.co.nz>) about 'A french
product design student is looking for an internship', on Mon, 14 Mar
2005:
not quite. It was complete, just oscillated like a SOB. The millenium
bridge across the river Thames is another good example of that.

Both Tacoma and the Millennium Bridge suffered from **previously
unknown** effects. Not the same as bad or ignorant design.

The big debate around here is whether to add suicide barriers to the
Golden Gate bridge. It would mess up the aesthetics and aerodynamics
both. There's been something like 1400 jumpers so far, a few of which
survived. They just approved a $2 million *study*.

....and who's friend is getting the $$ for the study?

--
Keith
 
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:05:54 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:25:34 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:06:18 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 23:51:52 -0500, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:39:44 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

[snip]
I had to tear it down and hone it out twice before she totalled
it and lost her spleen. Good riddance [1].

John


[1] ambiguity intentional.

Gee! John! I don't get your gist ;-)

It seems he just vented his.

That wasn't a vent, it was a riff.

John

As in reduction in force ?:)

RIW, reduction-in-wives.

John
ONE is definitely enough ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
"Larry Brasfield" <donotspam_larry_brasfield@hotmail.com>
wrote in message news:cbmZd.18$oD6.476@news.uswest.net...
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com
wrote in message news:e3pb315dbmgj24ph2uc7ru9u1rh24jg5lr@4ax.com...
....
The big debate around here is whether to add suicide barriers to the
Golden Gate bridge. It would mess up the aesthetics and aerodynamics
both. There's been something like 1400 jumpers so far, a few of which
survived. They just approved a $2 million *study*.

Will the study include an effort to estimate how many
of the frustrated suiciders will not be motivated enough
to find some other method? Or is yet another example
of "Spend money for no use beyond feel-goodery."?
After discussing this with a friend, I have been helped
to see why that study may not be as silly as it appears.
My friend informs me that the authorities shut down
traffic for awhile after each jump off that bridge. So
the accumulated inconvenience of all the folks who
get to wait for it to reopen may well justify finding a
way to get the suiciders to pick another location.

I suggested building a stairway to the top of each
side of the towers, accessible after pressing a button
and permitting somebody to come and get a chance
to talk the suicider-to-be out of their decision. The
inviolate offer would be some reasonably limited
counseling, followed by an offer of a lethal injector
and, if wind conditions warrant, a trip to the other
side. There would be no need to impede traffic
while an investigation is conducted because the
counselor would also verify that the absence of
foul play, (at least at that location). My advisor
could find nothing to poke at about that, so here it
is for you folks to try.

--
--Larry Brasfield
email: donotspam_larry_brasfield@hotmail.com
Above views may belong only to me.
 
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:52:20 +1300, Terry Given wrote:

Active8 wrote:
snip
[...]Interesting history how was born
and went underground to survive the Japanese occupation.


any good links?
All over the place :)
I was given a small photocopied book when I started. I wish I could
remember it all. Time for a refresher. The original master of what
became Hap Ki Do had his students each dig a 1" deep ditch with
their hands, jump in, jump out, dig another inch, etc., 'til it was
as deep as they were tall. I think they then started filling it in -
the reverse.

You might google on Hwarang Do - It sounds like the root of the word
harangue, eh?

http://www.hwarangdoeastcoast.com/

That link desc. says it means "The Way of the Flowering Manhood",
but I remember "The Way of the Flowering Child" I'm prob wrong.
IIRC, it (Hap Ki Do) started somwhere with them. I remember
something about or related to it being only studied by a bunch of
"dandies" at one time. I think that's what is referred to as "A
group of elite young noblemen" in this link:

http://www.universalmartialarts.com/hapkido.htm

The water principle definition at that link is lame. Here's a better
one:

http://www.sungjado.org/warriorforchrist.html

- we called it "mind of water". Then there was "mind of moon". It
shines light on everything under it. It reveals things. I didn't
find a link on that.

http://www.allmartialarts.com/KIXCO/History/hapkido.htm

That brings back some memory, except there can be weapons involved -
like the cane. Master Lee sometimes used the cane. I thought the
dragon was cool. After the normal stretching and excersizes, he'd
make us run wheel barrow races and other such physical challenges. I
hated the chicken (duck walk - "Odie-odie" "quack-quack") The
"kitchen" was a joke we came up with. "Did you say chicken or
kitchen?" Same thing, but you hop and don't quack. The dragon was
great. You line up behind each other in the front-leaning rest
(push-up position) and put your feet on the person's shoulders
behind you and everyone walks on their hands.

Contrast Aikido:

http://www.allmartialarts.com/KIXCO/History/aikido.htm

Another:

http://www.hapkiyoosool.com/hist.htm

In the second link it says Hap Ki Do uses small circles and Aikido
uses large ones. There's a philosophy disaggreement here I think,
because my instructors had us "move the arm" more. Use a bigger
circle. But we used small circles, too.

You'll find variations on the definition of Hap Ki Do. I gave what
Master Lee told us. The Chinese "chi" is the equiv of the Korean
"ki", BTW.

Eg: "Literally translated, the word Hap means coordination of
harmony, Ki denotes the essence of power, and Do means the art, or
the way"

Tai Kwon Do is the art of hand and foot. It's good cross training.

Aikido is stricktly defensive and Hap Ki Do is more offensive. IOW,
when Segal punches, it's Shoto Kahn. If I strike, it's the part of
Hap Ki Do I do after taking control of the attacker's power and
redirecting it. Unless I decide to call it something else, since
many forms use strikes. The joint locks are pretty cool, too. They
didn't use the reverse-punch style much, though it worked better
closing the door on my old Blazer than the haymaker style. There's
nothing I can come up with to indicate that snapping your opposite
hip adds to the force.

A tree:
http://www.allmartialarts.com/KIXCO/History/history/map.htm

http://www.martial-way.com/hapkido.html

Well, that brought back some memory.
--
Best Regards,
Mike
 
Active8 wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:52:20 +1300, Terry Given wrote:


Active8 wrote:

snip

[...]Interesting history how was born
and went underground to survive the Japanese occupation.


any good links?


All over the place :)

I was given a small photocopied book when I started. I wish I could
remember it all. Time for a refresher. The original master of what
became Hap Ki Do had his students each dig a 1" deep ditch with
their hands, jump in, jump out, dig another inch, etc., 'til it was
as deep as they were tall. I think they then started filling it in -
the reverse.

You might google on Hwarang Do - It sounds like the root of the word
harangue, eh?

http://www.hwarangdoeastcoast.com/

That link desc. says it means "The Way of the Flowering Manhood",
but I remember "The Way of the Flowering Child" I'm prob wrong.
IIRC, it (Hap Ki Do) started somwhere with them. I remember
something about or related to it being only studied by a bunch of
"dandies" at one time. I think that's what is referred to as "A
group of elite young noblemen" in this link:

http://www.universalmartialarts.com/hapkido.htm

The water principle definition at that link is lame. Here's a better
one:

http://www.sungjado.org/warriorforchrist.html

- we called it "mind of water". Then there was "mind of moon". It
shines light on everything under it. It reveals things. I didn't
find a link on that.

http://www.allmartialarts.com/KIXCO/History/hapkido.htm

That brings back some memory, except there can be weapons involved -
like the cane. Master Lee sometimes used the cane. I thought the
dragon was cool. After the normal stretching and excersizes, he'd
make us run wheel barrow races and other such physical challenges. I
hated the chicken (duck walk - "Odie-odie" "quack-quack") The
"kitchen" was a joke we came up with. "Did you say chicken or
kitchen?" Same thing, but you hop and don't quack. The dragon was
great. You line up behind each other in the front-leaning rest
(push-up position) and put your feet on the person's shoulders
behind you and everyone walks on their hands.

Contrast Aikido:

http://www.allmartialarts.com/KIXCO/History/aikido.htm

Another:

http://www.hapkiyoosool.com/hist.htm

In the second link it says Hap Ki Do uses small circles and Aikido
uses large ones. There's a philosophy disaggreement here I think,
because my instructors had us "move the arm" more. Use a bigger
circle. But we used small circles, too.

You'll find variations on the definition of Hap Ki Do. I gave what
Master Lee told us. The Chinese "chi" is the equiv of the Korean
"ki", BTW.

Eg: "Literally translated, the word Hap means coordination of
harmony, Ki denotes the essence of power, and Do means the art, or
the way"

Tai Kwon Do is the art of hand and foot. It's good cross training.

Aikido is stricktly defensive and Hap Ki Do is more offensive. IOW,
when Segal punches, it's Shoto Kahn. If I strike, it's the part of
Hap Ki Do I do after taking control of the attacker's power and
redirecting it. Unless I decide to call it something else, since
many forms use strikes. The joint locks are pretty cool, too. They
didn't use the reverse-punch style much, though it worked better
closing the door on my old Blazer than the haymaker style. There's
nothing I can come up with to indicate that snapping your opposite
hip adds to the force.

A tree:
http://www.allmartialarts.com/KIXCO/History/history/map.htm

http://www.martial-way.com/hapkido.html

Well, that brought back some memory.
Hi Mike,

thanks for that. I have some reading to do - at least I do after I
finish this planar flyback design :(

as far as the hip flick is concerned, it does help, but only until you
learn better methods in GoJu (akin to the Bruce Lee 1" power punch).
Which is more Wing-Chun like. Reverse-punches are for beginners, or
using on blind opponents (like head kicks, eh?)

The idea is to ground oneself (starts out as holding onto the ground
with your feet, and gets better with practice) then use *all* of your
muscles to deliver the impact, esp. stomach & lats. We used to practice
this by standing face-to-face, fingertips touching the opponents
shoulders, elbows bent at 45 degrees, wrists likewise so palms are
parallel to ground. very relaxed. then *BANG* flip wrists to vertical,
hitting with heel of palms. arms dont straighten.

After a couple of months of doing this for 20-30 minutes 5 times a week,
its fairly easy to knock a big guy (6'2" 100kg) back several meters and
onto his arse. Dont hit the clavicle though, it'll break. We used to get
seriously bruised chests doing this. Which is why we did a lot of chest
conditioning - stand arms raised, while 2 others repeatedly kick you.
Start nice and soft, and get harder over time. By the time you get to
Dan grades, the kicks are hard enough to seriously hurt juniors. thats
pretty much true of all Goju really.

Thats how we used to beat TKD fighters in tournaments - actually hit
them, they werent used to it and didnt like it very much. Its also
helpful in that you can take a blow in order to deliver a debilitating
one in return :)

The hardest hitter I ever trained with was a scrawny shortarse who had
been doing Tai Chi for about 20 years. We were sparring with a pair of
target mitts (ie padded gloves to hit). His punches were these crazy
huge circles, but they were devastating, and *FAST*. I couldnt hold a
pen for several days afterwards, the palms of my hands were so badly
bruised, despite 3" of padding. Ouch. On the bright side, I got to
embarass the hell out of the HOD at uni. I turned up to a comms lecture
and sat at the front, but took no notes. He got all pissy, and berated
me in front of the whole class, as to why I was so special I didnt need
to bother to take notes. So I stood up, and in a loud voice explained
about my hands, that I had a mate taking notes for me, and that I wanted
to hear the lecture so as to understand it more fully. He apologised
gracefully, and we ended up becoming good friends.

Damn, back to work :[

Cheers
Terry
 
Active8 wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:08:57 GMT, Fred Bloggs wrote:

snip

[...] Historically
speaking, there would be no US today if France had not intervened
against the British in the Revolution, the colonials were pathetic by
comparison.


I thought we brought them in in response to the Brits hiring German
mercenaries - but I thought it was the other way around. I never
read that we were that lame. We started off ambushing the Brits -
inconventional warfare. Here's a short history of one colonial worth
his salt. The father of modern day special forces you might say.

http://www.acidus.com/rogers.html
Much of that piecemeal history is wives' tales. The fact is the colonial
Army was starved, under-equipped, under-trained, and spent nearly half a
decade avoiding direct confrontation with the British Army and certain
slaughter. The French arrive on the scene and the show is wrapped up in
about 14 months, which is like "immediately" by 18th century warfare
standards. Cornwallis was defeated by the French- and the terms of his
original surrender negotiations were that he surrender his Army to
Rochambeau, disregarding Washington altogether; but Rochambeau insisted
that the formal surrender be to Washington. This little summary appears
to be an accurate description:
http://people.csail.mit.edu/people/sfelshin/saintonge/frhist.html .

And the idea that "we brought them in" is ridiculous- America was a
powerless dwarf by comparison. We sent our most talented genius,
Benjamin Franklin, to France to ply his most prominent political skills
of argument, wine, dine, and propaganda to do whatever it took to win
the favor of the French King, he was there for the duration of the war.
You need to acknowledge that these main players of the times knew the
situation better than anyone, and that was American independence would
eventually fail unless France could be brought into the war.
 
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 11:19:44 +0100, whilst I was lookin "Bertrand
Clerc" <clerc.bertrand@neuf.fr> wrote:

Hello! I am Bertrand, french design student, I am looking for an internship.

see my portfolio
http://www.coroflot.com/clerc
http://www.isd-up.com/portfolios/affiche.php5?id_port=715&id_img=375&recherche=2&search=-1&section=3&filiere=-1

see my school website
http://www.isd-valenciennes.com/

see the students website
http://www.isd-up.com/



Couldn't you just do some Internet searches for businesses in your
area that offer internships?


Rose
http://members.aol.com/Roseb44170/home.html
"How in the heck did I ever get talked into this?"
 
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 18:37:20 -0500, whilst I was lookin "jsmith"
<juddo@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

Hi Bertrand,
I hope you are not too disillusioned by the responses and comments you have
read resulting from your posting. I don't really think there is malicious
intent but unfortunately many posts are hijacked by "comedians" who think of
themselves as very clever, when in fact they are a bunch of has-been's who
spend all their time making what they consider to be clever remarks and not
contributing anything to the usefulness of the group. I have observed that
in most cases any technical comments or suggestions they make are way off
the mark or down right foolish. I hope you are successful in finding what is
you are seeking.
Good luck!

"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote in message
news:sH6uX5EOk0MCFwWk@jmwa.demon.co.uk...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Gregory L. Hansen <glhansen@steel.
ucs.indiana.edu> wrote (in <d0vc3m$i9q$1@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>)
about 'A french product design student is looking for an internship', on
Sat, 12 Mar 2005:

"Will we be suturing the anus?"

"Certainly not! He'd never speak again."
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk


So do I! Although I'm in the US there are still designers who are
managing to make a good living at designing. Some even are getting
more work than they can handle.

I don't know if you're looking for internship-type work while you're
still in school but hopefully you'll be able to find some work to help
pay your way.


Rose
http://members.aol.com/Roseb441702/grants.htm
Grant Basics 101!
 
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:09:53 -0800, John Larkin wrote:

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 22:02:09 -0500, Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net
wrote:


I see the right wheel is driven and not the left.

It has an engine? That doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
LOL. That's a no-shitter.
Did your wife really lose her spleen? That's f'd up beyond words.

Yup; spleens bleed a lot when they get whacked, so out it comes. It's
not very important, actually.

I may have once heard that it's vital and then heard otherwise. I
think it produces white blood cells - an immuno defense. At any
rate, I empathize with anyone who gets hurt. Especially when they
didn't ask for it and even more so when some f-stick creates a
dangerous device that's supposed to be safe.

Like the jackasses that installed their crane at Bethlem Steel,
Sparrows Pt., MD. Low grade bolts broke and f'd up my stepdad. Beth
Steel dicked him around. The contractor from OH wasn't required to
carry insurance at the time they did the work (or maybe never) and
they filed bankruptcy to get out of paying him the 4.2 M he was
finally awarded.

--
Best Regards,
Mike
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top