What a newsgroup!!!

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:09:01 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:25:00 GMT, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
null@example.net> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:13:47 -0700, connor_a@hotmail.com wrote:
On Apr 10, 2:59 pm, cyclops <cycl...@nopspam.org> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin

Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."

What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just leave
them to us... and thanks!

Yes, you are most welcome to having your wallet emptied. ;-)

Not impressed it seems.
Do you always form such snap judgments?

Has life always been so peachy for you?

soc.men is becomming the masculinist voice of the world. Soon, soc.men
will grow so big we'll have "guest posters" of the week such as Warren
Farrell PHD, leading masculinist voices from around the globes and
best of all, free speech.

The days of the cunt of feminism are being kicked in!

Well, I presume that their psychopathic hatred of women will keep them
from breeding, so there's a positive note. ;-)

---
Plus the fact that more and more women are carrying concealed these
days.
You bet. Some years ago one of my neighbors worked a shift that ended
about 4AM. On her drive home some clown tried to run her off the
road... intent unknown. She picked up her 45 and pointed it out the
window. He slammed on his brakes and disappeared ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave
 
"MCP" (gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk) writes:
"Darling Regan" <oopsie@fjflds.net> oozed hypocricy as usual in message
news:MPG.2084dcaacc21fc35989a00@supernews.netrelated.com...
In soc.men, connor_a@hotmail.com <connor_a@hotmail.com> flippantly
asserted...
On Apr 10, 2:59 pm, cyclops <cycl...@nopspam.org> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin

Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."

What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just leave
them to us... and thanks!

Yes, you are most welcome to having your wallet emptied. ;-)

Not impressed it seems.
Do you always form such snap judgments?

Has life always been so peachy for you?

soc.men is becomming the masculinist voice of the world. Soon, soc.men
will grow so big we'll have "guest posters" of the week such as Warren
Farrell PHD, leading masculinist voices from around the globes and
best of all, free speech.

Wrong. Warren Farrell wouldn't dream of posting in this trashy joint. He
doesn't advocate
misogyny.

Than WHY do YOU post here, Dumbo?
The answer to that is, of course, well known here on this happy and
generous newsgroup; She craves *any* free attention from men, and
well earned disdain is the least worst that she can get.

If she were *really* interested in " supporting women ", she'd be
posting women positive posts on, say, soc.women.

As with most Feminazis, she indeed doth protest way too much.
But, thats hardly news around here... <g>

Andre
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:59:32 -0700, cyclops wrote:

Comprehension problems Rich?
It's *men* who are complaining here not women.
I haven't seen a complaint posted by a "man" ever since you roobs started
crossposting this crap to our NG.

Just a bunch of noisy, frustrated little boys.

Thanks,
Rich
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:35:40 GMT, "Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie"
<eatmyshorts@doubleclick.net> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:33:07 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:59:13 -0700, cyclops <cyclops@nopspam.org
...
Not impressed it seems.
Do you always form such snap judgments?

Has life always been so peachy for you?

Oh, here we go again with the: "It's not my fault I'm this way." sob
story

She is more to be pitied than censured,
She is more to be helped than despised,
She is only a lassie who ventured,
On life's stormy path ill-advised.

Do not scorn her with words fierce and bitter,
Do not laugh at her shame and downfall;
For a moment just stop to consider,
That a man was the cause of it all.
---
I've always liked:

http://www.actionext.com/names_r/ry_cooder_lyrics/always_lift_him_up_kanaka_wai_wai.html


--
JF
 
In soc.men, MCP <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk> flippantly asserted...
"Darling Regan" <oopsie@fjflds.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.2085925da738a9a3989a03@supernews.netrelated.com...
In soc.men, MCP <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk> flippantly asserted...

"Darling Regan" <oopsie@fjflds.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.2084dcaacc21fc35989a00@supernews.netrelated.com...
In soc.men, connor_a@hotmail.com <connor_a@hotmail.com> flippantly
asserted...
On Apr 10, 2:59 pm, cyclops <cycl...@nopspam.org> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin


Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits
of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."

What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just
leave
them to us... and thanks!

Yes, you are most welcome to having your wallet emptied. ;-)


Not impressed it seems.
Do you always form such snap judgments?

Has life always been so peachy for you?

soc.men is becomming the masculinist voice of the world. Soon, soc.men
will grow so big we'll have "guest posters" of the week such as Warren
Farrell PHD, leading masculinist voices from around the globes and
best of all, free speech.

Wrong. Warren Farrell wouldn't dream of posting in this trashy joint.
He
doesn't advocate
misogyny.

Than WHY do YOU post here, Dumbo?


Dumbo is a more fitting term for you, given your habit of asking questions
you *should*
already know the answer to.
Yap! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine!
Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine!
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
LOL You cannot even conceive one original thought... even your lames belong to someone else...
in this case, Lionel.


--
DR

Hell awaits - exert brevity

What amazes me is the sheer number of inadequate males. Even more surprising
is how they can congregate on soc.men and claim superiority. They're duds, misfits, throw-
backs, but won't face up to it. - Jim Thompson
<fd9n13pmcup0no7pavm0j9r8h74eba2f56@4ax.com>

----------------------

http://www.evilbible.com/

http://www.paladin-press.com/

http://www.clubit.com/
 
In soc.men, Andre Lieven <dg411@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> flippantly asserted...
"MCP" (gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk) writes:
"Darling Regan" <oopsie@fjflds.net> oozed hypocricy as usual in message
news:MPG.2084dcaacc21fc35989a00@supernews.netrelated.com...
In soc.men, connor_a@hotmail.com <connor_a@hotmail.com> flippantly
asserted...
On Apr 10, 2:59 pm, cyclops <cycl...@nopspam.org> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin

Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."

What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just leave
them to us... and thanks!

Yes, you are most welcome to having your wallet emptied. ;-)

Not impressed it seems.
Do you always form such snap judgments?

Has life always been so peachy for you?

soc.men is becomming the masculinist voice of the world. Soon, soc.men
will grow so big we'll have "guest posters" of the week such as Warren
Farrell PHD, leading masculinist voices from around the globes and
best of all, free speech.

Wrong. Warren Farrell wouldn't dream of posting in this trashy joint. He
doesn't advocate
misogyny.

Than WHY do YOU post here, Dumbo?

The answer to that is, of course, well known here on this happy and
generous newsgroup; She craves *any* free attention from men, and
well earned disdain is the least worst that she can get.

If she were *really* interested in " supporting women ", she'd be
posting women positive posts on, say, soc.women.
And when did I ever state "supporting women" as my mission?

*scoff* Andre loves to ASSume.


As with most Feminazis, she indeed doth protest way too much.
But, thats hardly news around here... <g

Andre
--
DR

Hell awaits - exert brevity

What amazes me is the sheer number of inadequate males. Even more surprising
is how they can congregate on soc.men and claim superiority. They're duds, misfits, throw-
backs, but won't face up to it. - Jim Thompson
<fd9n13pmcup0no7pavm0j9r8h74eba2f56@4ax.com>

----------------------

http://www.evilbible.com/

http://www.paladin-press.com/

http://www.clubit.com/
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:58:36 GMT, Sven Wilhelmsson
<sven@nospam.please> Gave us:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:16:30 -0700, MassiveProng wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:46:28 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:


Anything is often better than tv.

John


You're an idiot. Are you really so fucking backward that you have
never watched the history channel, or Discovery times, or the National
Geographic channel, or the military channel?

If so, you are even more sad than I thought. Your grandkids will
grow up to be meth heads.


You are talking about me!! I read SED, but have no tv.
My theory is that the more technically advanced a medium, the
less interesting the is content. I am sure about this. TV is made for
idiots by people who may not be idiots themselves, but regard their
audience as being idiots. On the contrary, some of the writers in this
newsgroup do not consider their readers as being idiots. Therefore SED is
worth reading.
---
Sven W
You're not an idiot... You're a total fucking retard!
 
On Apr 11, 1:03 am, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:40:13 -0700, John Larkin

John

What amazes me is the sheer number of inadequate males. Even more
surprising is how they can congregate on soc.men and claim
superiority. They're duds, misfits, throw-backs, but won't face up to
it.
Thanks man, soc.men must really be onto something when they are so
stereotyped!
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:48:15 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:16:30 -0700, MassiveProng
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:46:28 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:


Anything is often better than tv.

John


You're an idiot. Are you really so fucking backward that you have
never watched the history channel,

I have a lot of history books, and they don't have commercials.
So do I. That was still a retarded response.
or Discovery times, or the National
Geographic channel, or the military channel?

I do have the entire Victory At Sea set on video tape, and Morison's
14-volume History of US Naval Operations in WWII, and about 8 more
shelves of military history, especially books about radar and The
Bomb. The crap on TV is, usually, dumbed-down and inaccurate crap,
faked re-enactments, and Ollie North type talking heads.
You're dumbed down, dipshit.

Get the new Einstein biography:


http://www.amazon.com/Einstein-Life-Universe-Walter-Isaacson/dp/0743264738

If so, you are even more sad than I thought. Your grandkids will
grow up to be meth heads.

Not likely. Their father is a PhD engineer and their mother is a PhD
biologist.
Whoopie fuckin' doo. You don't know much about stats.
 
On Apr 11, 4:22 am, Darling Regan <oop...@fjflds.net> wrote:
In soc.men, conno...@hotmail.com <conno...@hotmail.com> flippantly asserted...


IOW you advocate violence against women.
Men generations of 'em havent led a violence free existence, why
should cunt be leaned out for special attentions?
 
In soc.men, connor_a@hotmail.com <connor_a@hotmail.com> flippantly asserted...
On Apr 11, 1:03 am, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:40:13 -0700, John Larkin

John

What amazes me is the sheer number of inadequate males. Even more
surprising is how they can congregate on soc.men and claim
superiority. They're duds, misfits, throw-backs, but won't face up to
it.

Thanks man, soc.men must really be onto something when they are so
stereotyped!
Self-pwnage: Grade B-

By your logic, feminists are onto something, as well.


--
DR

Hell awaits - exert brevity

What amazes me is the sheer number of inadequate males. Even more surprising
is how they can congregate on soc.men and claim superiority. They're duds, misfits, throw-
backs, but won't face up to it. - Jim Thompson
<fd9n13pmcup0no7pavm0j9r8h74eba2f56@4ax.com>

----------------------

http://www.evilbible.com/

http://www.paladin-press.com/

http://www.clubit.com/
 
In soc.men, connor_a@hotmail.com <connor_a@hotmail.com> flippantly asserted...
On Apr 11, 4:22 am, Darling Regan <oop...@fjflds.net> wrote:
In soc.men, conno...@hotmail.com <conno...@hotmail.com> flippantly asserted...


IOW you advocate violence against women.


Men generations of 'em havent led a violence free existence, why
should cunt be leaned out for special attentions?
<glances upward> Nice snip, cowardly Contard.

Men have been violent toward EACH OTHER for eons, yes. It's their game, not ours. Play in your
own field and keep us out of it.

--
DR

Hell awaits - exert brevity

What amazes me is the sheer number of inadequate males. Even more surprising
is how they can congregate on soc.men and claim superiority. They're duds, misfits, throw-
backs, but won't face up to it. - Jim Thompson
<fd9n13pmcup0no7pavm0j9r8h74eba2f56@4ax.com>

----------------------

http://www.evilbible.com/

http://www.paladin-press.com/

http://www.clubit.com/
 
On 10 Apr 2007 16:32:08 -0700, "connor_a@hotmail.com"
<connor_a@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 11, 4:22 am, Darling Regan <oop...@fjflds.net> wrote:
In soc.men, conno...@hotmail.com <conno...@hotmail.com> flippantly asserted...


IOW you advocate violence against women.


Men generations of 'em havent led a violence free existence, why
should cunt be leaned out for special attentions?
You are so inadequate. Might I suggest a high, long, bridge? Take a
short walk ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave
 
On Apr 11, 9:47 am, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
Web-Site.com> wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 16:32:08 -0700, "conno...@hotmail.com"


You are so inadequate. Might I suggest a high, long, bridge? Take a
short walk ;-)
Thanks for the "advice" but I'm fully hooked this week.
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:36:31 GMT, Niemadre Gave us:

Post editing is for losers.

Header editing is for criminals. Hope you are behind bars soon.
When that happens, I'll file civil, and get every fucking thing you
own, boy.
 
MassiveProng <MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:36:31 GMT, Niemadre Gave us:

Post editing is for losers.



Header editing is for criminals. Hope you are behind bars soon.
When that happens, I'll file civil, and get every fucking thing you
own, boy.
Wh000t! I know where Numby Genius can hire an attorney.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
The section is clearly attributed to Art Deco, not to you, Deco."
-- Dr. David Tholen

"Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from
attribution problems?"
-- Dr. David Tholen
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:32:43 -0500, Darling Regan <oopsie@fjflds.net>
wrote:

In soc.men, MCP <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk> flippantly asserted...

"Darling Regan" <oopsie@fjflds.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.2085925da738a9a3989a03@supernews.netrelated.com...
In soc.men, MCP <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk> flippantly asserted...

"Darling Regan" <oopsie@fjflds.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.2084dcaacc21fc35989a00@supernews.netrelated.com...
In soc.men, connor_a@hotmail.com <connor_a@hotmail.com> flippantly
asserted...
On Apr 10, 2:59 pm, cyclops <cycl...@nopspam.org> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin


Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits
of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."

What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just
leave
them to us... and thanks!

Yes, you are most welcome to having your wallet emptied. ;-)


Not impressed it seems.
Do you always form such snap judgments?

Has life always been so peachy for you?

soc.men is becomming the masculinist voice of the world. Soon, soc.men
will grow so big we'll have "guest posters" of the week such as Warren
Farrell PHD, leading masculinist voices from around the globes and
best of all, free speech.

Wrong. Warren Farrell wouldn't dream of posting in this trashy joint.
He
doesn't advocate
misogyny.

Than WHY do YOU post here, Dumbo?


Dumbo is a more fitting term for you, given your habit of asking questions
you *should*
already know the answer to.
Yap! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine!
Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine!
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*

LOL You cannot even conceive one original thought... even your lames belong to someone else...
in this case, Lionel.
Well, to be fair they are a combination of Lionel's and new stool.
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:09:01 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:25:00 GMT, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
null@example.net> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:13:47 -0700, connor_a@hotmail.com wrote:
On Apr 10, 2:59 pm, cyclops <cycl...@nopspam.org> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin

Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."

What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just leave
them to us... and thanks!

Yes, you are most welcome to having your wallet emptied. ;-)

Not impressed it seems.
Do you always form such snap judgments?

Has life always been so peachy for you?

soc.men is becomming the masculinist voice of the world. Soon, soc.men
will grow so big we'll have "guest posters" of the week such as Warren
Farrell PHD, leading masculinist voices from around the globes and
best of all, free speech.

The days of the cunt of feminism are being kicked in!

Well, I presume that their psychopathic hatred of women will keep them
from breeding, so there's a positive note. ;-)

---
Plus the fact that more and more women are carrying concealed these
days.
Indeed.
:)
 
In soc.men, cyclops <cyclops@nopspam.org> flippantly asserted...
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:32:43 -0500, Darling Regan <oopsie@fjflds.net
wrote:

In soc.men, MCP <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk> flippantly asserted...

"Darling Regan" <oopsie@fjflds.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.2085925da738a9a3989a03@supernews.netrelated.com...
In soc.men, MCP <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk> flippantly asserted...

"Darling Regan" <oopsie@fjflds.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.2084dcaacc21fc35989a00@supernews.netrelated.com...
In soc.men, connor_a@hotmail.com <connor_a@hotmail.com> flippantly
asserted...
On Apr 10, 2:59 pm, cyclops <cycl...@nopspam.org> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin


Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits
of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."

What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just
leave
them to us... and thanks!

Yes, you are most welcome to having your wallet emptied. ;-)


Not impressed it seems.
Do you always form such snap judgments?

Has life always been so peachy for you?

soc.men is becomming the masculinist voice of the world. Soon, soc.men
will grow so big we'll have "guest posters" of the week such as Warren
Farrell PHD, leading masculinist voices from around the globes and
best of all, free speech.

Wrong. Warren Farrell wouldn't dream of posting in this trashy joint.
He
doesn't advocate
misogyny.

Than WHY do YOU post here, Dumbo?


Dumbo is a more fitting term for you, given your habit of asking questions
you *should*
already know the answer to.
Yap! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine!
Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine!
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*

LOL You cannot even conceive one original thought... even your lames belong to someone else...
in this case, Lionel.


Well, to be fair they are a combination of Lionel's and new stool.
LMAO Yes... even worse. Aping newstool warrants immediate psychiatric treatment.


--
DR

Hell awaits - exert brevity

What amazes me is the sheer number of inadequate males. Even more surprising
is how they can congregate on soc.men and claim superiority. They're duds, misfits, throw-
backs, but won't face up to it. - Jim Thompson
<fd9n13pmcup0no7pavm0j9r8h74eba2f56@4ax.com>

----------------------

http://www.evilbible.com/

http://www.paladin-press.com/

http://www.clubit.com/
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:50:57 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:59:32 -0700, cyclops wrote:

Comprehension problems Rich?
It's *men* who are complaining here not women.

I haven't seen a complaint posted by a "man" ever since you roobs started
crossposting this crap to our NG.
Nice dodge and weave but no cigar Rich.
Whining men were being discussed.

Your misogynist sneer and put down was
totally inappropriate and showed limited.

Just a bunch of noisy, frustrated little boys.
So why the sneering attack on women, so typical of those
you now rush to condemn?

You are welcome
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top