What a newsgroup!!!

John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:12:53 -0700, MassiveProng
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:


I had a peek at soc.men. It seems to be populated by neurotics,
misogynists, whiners, wimps, and just plain nasty people, nearly all
of whom hide behind ludicrous superhero nyms. And it's *really*
boring.


Sounds like the group was started by Phil Spector.

He is so fucking ugly that all the money in the world can't turn a
woman on, so he threatens the ones that laugh in his face with a gun,
and even killed one.

Should have paid attention in Dating 101.

John

They were too busy playing "Pocket Pool" to pay attention.

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:39:01 GMT, D from BC <myrealaddress@comic.com
wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.

SED is often better than tv....
D from BC

Anything is often better than tv.

John

Not better than "The Test Pattern". It was the best show ever on TV!
;-)


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:20:13 -0400, Phil Hobbs
pcdh@SpamMeSenseless.pergamos.net> wrote:

Sven Wilhelmsson wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:16:30 -0700, MassiveProng wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:46:28 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:

Anything is often better than tv.

John

You're an idiot. Are you really so fucking backward that you have
never watched the history channel, or Discovery times, or the National
Geographic channel, or the military channel?

If so, you are even more sad than I thought. Your grandkids will
grow up to be meth heads.


You are talking about me!! I read SED, but have no tv.
My theory is that the more technically advanced a medium, the
less interesting the is content. I am sure about this. TV is made for
idiots by people who may not be idiots themselves, but regard their
audience as being idiots. On the contrary, some of the writers in this
newsgroup do not consider their readers as being idiots. Therefore SED is
worth reading.
---
Sven W



The trouble with TV is that images can easily be made to speak directly
to our emotions without passing through our reason first. Music and
text can do this too, but only for some people, sometimes, and it's much
harder to arrange. The result of video saturation is a lot of strongly
held views with very little rational content, as we see on both sides of
most of the contentious issues of our day.

I've always thought that music and oratory are dangerous precisely
because of their unfiltered access to emotion. That results in people
thinking that loutish musicians and actors actually have something to
say, or that the best speach-maker will be the best leader.

Plus, I hate commercials.

John
This is the top of my list:

#1: Anything from Geico. Throw that rubber Gecko puppet into the
incinerator, and shave that stupid hippy who claims to be a caveman.

#2: Anything with that damn Energizer Bunny. it was almost funny, 30
years ago.

#3: Anything from Checkers restaurants. (BTW, they closed their
closest one the other day!)


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
Spehro Pefhany wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:46:28 -0700, the renowned John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:39:01 GMT, D from BC <myrealaddress@comic.com
wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.

SED is often better than tv....
D from BC

Anything is often better than tv.

John

You just say that because you can't see curling live in High Def.

I don't need High Def because I watch my bacon curling live, in my
skillet! That reminds me: I have a couple pounds of maple honey bacon
in the freezer. Ummmh, Bacon! ;-)


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:16:49 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:49:20 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:15:13 -0500, Spehro Pefhany
speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:46:28 -0700, the renowned John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:39:01 GMT, D from BC <myrealaddress@comic.com
wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.

SED is often better than tv....
D from BC

Anything is often better than tv.

John

You just say that because you can't see curling live in High Def.



Or Nascar!

John


NASCAR IS on Digital Cable here in Phoenix ;-)

...Jim Thompson

ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
Crash!
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
Crash!
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
ZOOOOOOOoooooommmm
Crash!

Great entertainment.

John
It was a lot better before they "Fixed" it to attract a different
crowd. I don't want to see the garage, the drivers family, or anything
else during a race. They are so boring anymore that it puts me to
sleep: A bunch of crap, a quick cutaway to a wreck, and back to the
crap.

At one time you couldn't pry me away from any NASCAR event. Now, I
just turn the TV off and go do something else. Its more like a fake
wrestling event than a real race.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:48:01 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

[snip]
It was a lot better before they "Fixed" it to attract a different
crowd. I don't want to see the garage, the drivers family, or anything
else during a race. They are so boring anymore that it puts me to
sleep: A bunch of crap, a quick cutaway to a wreck, and back to the
crap.

At one time you couldn't pry me away from any NASCAR event. Now, I
just turn the TV off and go do something else. Its more like a fake
wrestling event than a real race.
Have you seen that piece on the History Channel about NASCAR? Seems
it started out as rum-runners getting together annually to compete.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave
 
In article <t2an1315lo1f154678ji4t1t95gvsr7p0p@4ax.com>,
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com says...
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:26:37 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:09:03 -0700, Donald <Donald@dontdoithere.com
wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:


Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.



And we, the electronic designers, get to be the Alpha Males.

John


Alpha Males !!??

See thread: Snapshot:the soul of soc.men

;-)

I had a peek at soc.men. It seems to be populated by neurotics,
misogynists, whiners, wimps, and just plain nasty people, nearly all
of whom hide behind ludicrous superhero nyms. And it's *really*
boring.

This seems to be typical:

"Women are like paintings... nice to look at.. but thats about it.
Remember true masculinist believers, if you go any further than
looking at women, you are doomed to a life of living hell.

For a woman in your life will consume your masculinity and turn you
into a pissy mangina. She will slowly destroy you by her constant nag
harassment and restrict your every freedom that you had as a free man.

Oh masculine friends of soc.men, dont seek women for in doing so, you
will be absorbed by the creature that represents womankind like in the
movie "The Thing".

Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."


What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just leave
them to us... and thanks!

John


So I deduced correctly, they ARE queers.

...Jim Thompson

Most out gays are pretty well-adjusted. These guys are either
conflicted closet gays, or, worse, hetero women haters. Wanting women
and hating them is the ultimate dysfunction, and it happens a lot.

I have a spouse, two kids, two cats, one parrot, and one person who
runs my company for me. All female. The only thing men are good for is
designing electronics with.

Hmm, one wife. The brat, and two cats (one curled up in my lap
sucking up the heat from my laptop) are male. My last manager was
female.

--
Keith
 
In article <bjul1355gvq20f75a2j4pus83r2ekj7db8@4ax.com>,
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com says...
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:39:01 GMT, D from BC <myrealaddress@comic.com
wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.

SED is often better than tv....
D from BC

Anything is often better than tv.
Particularly daytime (radio is on).

--
Keith
 
In article <uu8n139quo0irlilsei9vaqfmubskj5bnn@4ax.com>,
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com says...
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:15:13 -0500, Spehro Pefhany
speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:46:28 -0700, the renowned John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:39:01 GMT, D from BC <myrealaddress@comic.com
wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.

SED is often better than tv....
D from BC

Anything is often better than tv.

John

You just say that because you can't see curling live in High Def.



Or Nascar!

A couple of years ago we saw the "NASCAR-3D" 3D I-Max movie. Even
though neither of us are NASCAR fans, it was quite entertaining. My
wife even admitted that she'd enjoyed it.

--
Keith
 
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:13:47 -0700, connor_a@hotmail.com wrote:
On Apr 10, 2:59 pm, cyclops <cycl...@nopspam.org> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin

Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."

What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just leave
them to us... and thanks!

Yes, you are most welcome to having your wallet emptied. ;-)

Not impressed it seems.
Do you always form such snap judgments?

Has life always been so peachy for you?

soc.men is becomming the masculinist voice of the world. Soon, soc.men
will grow so big we'll have "guest posters" of the week such as Warren
Farrell PHD, leading masculinist voices from around the globes and
best of all, free speech.

The days of the cunt of feminism are being kicked in!
Well, I presume that their psychopathic hatred of women will keep them
from breeding, so there's a positive note. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:40:07 +0000, Niemadre wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:34:54 -0700, John Larkin

My wife likely makes more money than you do, probably a lot more. And
there's no doubt that she's a lot cuter.

Can you prove this? Or is it just a vain attempt to hide your
ingenuity?
This isn't exactly fair - I've neven known John to try to hide his
ingenuity, and what's vain about that anyway? ;-)

[for the pun-impaired:
Definitions of vain on the Web:
conceited: characteristic of false pride; having an exaggerated sense of
self-importance; "a conceited fool"; "an attitude of self-conceited
arrogance"; "an egotistical disregard of others"; "so swollen by victory
that he was unfit for normal duty"; "growing ever more swollen-headed and
arbitrary"; "vain about her clothes"

bootless: unproductive of success; "a fruitless search"; "futile years
after her artistic peak"; "a sleeveless errand"; "a vain attempt" ]

Or maybe Niedermeyer[1] doesn't know what "ingenuity" means. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

[1]: See "Animal House"
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:03:04 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

What amazes me is the sheer number of inadequate males. Even more
surprising is how they can congregate on soc.men and claim
superiority.

They have lots of time, since they can't get a date.

John
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:01:36 GMT, Niemadre wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:13:17 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:26:37 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:09:03 -0700, Donald <Donald@dontdoithere.com
wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:


Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.



And we, the electronic designers, get to be the Alpha Males.

John


Alpha Males !!??

See thread: Snapshot:the soul of soc.men

;-)

I had a peek at soc.men. It seems to be populated by neurotics,
misogynists, whiners, wimps, and just plain nasty people, nearly all
of whom hide behind ludicrous superhero nyms. And it's *really*
boring.

This seems to be typical:

"Women are like paintings... nice to look at.. but thats about it.
Remember true masculinist believers, if you go any further than
looking at women, you are doomed to a life of living hell.

For a woman in your life will consume your masculinity and turn you
into a pissy mangina. She will slowly destroy you by her constant nag
harassment and restrict your every freedom that you had as a free man.

Oh masculine friends of soc.men, dont seek women for in doing so, you
will be absorbed by the creature that represents womankind like in the
movie "The Thing".

Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."


What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just leave
them to us... and thanks!

John


So I deduced correctly, they ARE queers.

...Jim Thompson

Most out gays are pretty well-adjusted. These guys are either
conflicted closet gays, or, worse, hetero women haters. Wanting women
and hating them is the ultimate dysfunction, and it happens a lot.

I have a spouse, two kids, two cats, one parrot, and one person who
runs my company for me. All female. The only thing men are good for is
designing electronics with.

John


So there are no men in this group?
---
Yes, there are. We are the ones doing the designing.


--
JF
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:33:07 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:59:13 -0700, cyclops <cyclops@nopspam.org
....
Not impressed it seems.
Do you always form such snap judgments?

Has life always been so peachy for you?

Oh, here we go again with the: "It's not my fault I'm this way." sob
story
She is more to be pitied than censured,
She is more to be helped than despised,
She is only a lassie who ventured,
On life's stormy path ill-advised.

Do not scorn her with words fierce and bitter,
Do not laugh at her shame and downfall;
For a moment just stop to consider,
That a man was the cause of it all.

Thanks,
Rich
 
John Larkin wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

What amazes me is the sheer number of inadequate males. Even more
surprising is how they can congregate on soc.men and claim
superiority.

They have lots of time, since they can't get a date.
I've noticed that guys who behave like big kids have that problem !

Graham
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:00:02 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote
<kujn13t3mfojta7hgn6gn9cs9bhck7mgk6@4ax.com>:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:35:25 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:01:36 GMT, Niemadre wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:13:17 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:26:37 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

[snip]


So I deduced correctly, they ARE queers.

...Jim Thompson

Most out gays are pretty well-adjusted. These guys are either
conflicted closet gays, or, worse, hetero women haters. Wanting women
and hating them is the ultimate dysfunction, and it happens a lot.

I have a spouse, two kids, two cats, one parrot, and one person who
runs my company for me. All female. The only thing men are good for is
designing electronics with.

John


So there are no men in this group?

---
Yes, there are. We are the ones doing the designing.

Why do these soc."men" have such problems with females? Females are
wonderful...
They've been angry, mean-spirited anti-social misfits for as long as I can
remember. The one or two stray posters who could actually deal with women
soon learn that they're not accepted by the regs of soc.men and leave.

We had 4 children, two daughters, two sons. We now have 5 granddaughters
and one grandson and one step-grandson.

We have another grandchild on the way... sex as yet unknown... ultrasound
next month ;-)
Congrats!

--
blu*goddess.of.groundhogs*juju
blu 3=3
master of irrelevance
Lits Slut#5
Gutter Chix0r #2
Cancel my subscription to the resurrection.
-Jim Morrison http://blu05.port5.com/
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:13:43 -0500, Spehro Pefhany wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:25:05 -0700, the renowned Jim Thompson
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:15:13 -0500, Spehro Pefhany
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:46:28 -0700, the renowned John Larkin
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:39:01 GMT, D from BC <myrealaddress@comic.com
....
SED is often better than tv....

Anything is often better than tv.

You just say that because you can't see curling live in High Def.

Isn't that an old-folks sport ?:)

Does she look like a senior to you?

http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/02/olympic_gear/image/5-curling.jpg
In High School, maybe. :)

Cheers!
Rich
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:49:20 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:15:13 -0500, Spehro Pefhany
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:46:28 -0700, the renowned John Larkin
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:39:01 GMT, D from BC <myrealaddress@comic.com
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields

Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.

SED is often better than tv....
D from BC

Anything is often better than tv.

You just say that because you can't see curling live in High Def.

Or Nascar!
Howcome everyone associated with Nascar talks like Gomer?

Thanks,
Rich
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:07:54 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:43:53 GMT, "Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie"
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields wrote:

Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.

Well, yeah, but you can also look up any circuit or data sheet you
want to on google (or lycos, or yahoo, or metacrawler, or whatever),
but it's Sooooo BOrrrrrr-iiiiiinnnnng! ;-)

Not true. Some old data sheets which aren't available any more have
been posted by people who had them, and you can't get free, custom
designs by looking them up if they don't exist.

Here, (sed) we make that happen.
Well, that's the point. Interacting with people is infinitely less
boring than just looking up stuff in the search engine. :)

Thanks,
Rich
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:35:25 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:01:36 GMT, Niemadre wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:13:17 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:26:37 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

[snip]


So I deduced correctly, they ARE queers.

...Jim Thompson

Most out gays are pretty well-adjusted. These guys are either
conflicted closet gays, or, worse, hetero women haters. Wanting women
and hating them is the ultimate dysfunction, and it happens a lot.

I have a spouse, two kids, two cats, one parrot, and one person who
runs my company for me. All female. The only thing men are good for is
designing electronics with.

John


So there are no men in this group?

---
Yes, there are. We are the ones doing the designing.
Why do these soc."men" have such problems with females? Females are
wonderful...

We had 4 children, two daughters, two sons. We now have 5
granddaughters and one grandson and one step-grandson.

We have another grandchild on the way... sex as yet unknown...
ultrasound next month ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top