What a newsgroup!!!

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:46:28 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:

Anything is often better than tv.

John
Click to expand...

You're an idiot. Are you really so fucking backward that you have
never watched the history channel, or Discovery times, or the National
Geographic channel, or the military channel?

If so, you are even more sad than I thought. Your grandkids will
grow up to be meth heads.
 
MassiveProng a écrit :
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:46:28 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:

Anything is often better than tv.

John


You're an idiot. Are you really so fucking backward that you have
never watched the history channel, or Discovery times, or the National
Geographic channel, or the military channel?
Click to expand...
Military channel?

Whoa...
And you're ranking it among the best programs? Triple whoa...


--
Thanks,
Fred.
 
"Darling Regan" <oopsie@fjflds.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.2084dcaacc21fc35989a00@supernews.netrelated.com...
In soc.men, connor_a@hotmail.com <connor_a@hotmail.com> flippantly
asserted...
On Apr 10, 2:59 pm, cyclops <cycl...@nopspam.org> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin


Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."

What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just leave
them to us... and thanks!

Yes, you are most welcome to having your wallet emptied. ;-)


Not impressed it seems.
Do you always form such snap judgments?

Has life always been so peachy for you?

soc.men is becomming the masculinist voice of the world. Soon, soc.men
will grow so big we'll have "guest posters" of the week such as Warren
Farrell PHD, leading masculinist voices from around the globes and
best of all, free speech.

Wrong. Warren Farrell wouldn't dream of posting in this trashy joint. He
doesn't advocate
misogyny.
Click to expand...
Than WHY do YOU post here, Dumbo?
--
DR

Hell awaits - exert brevity

tarquil_fortesque_smythe_the3rd exemplifies uber-n00bdom:

"In this thread
http://tinyurl.com/2nnesq
from the 3rd of April we see you start off using message ID links in
your lame sig which will only work reliably for someone using the same
newsreader on the same machine the links were made on."
1175856636.569335.208030@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com

"No, you had to change them [article ids] because they didn't link to
anything on
anyones machine but yours. Unless of course someone has exactly the
same newsreader and reads exactly the same stuff as you."
1175878242.126512.91310@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com

"Please explain to me how YOU use message IDs to verify a quote?"
1175893178.110882.4340@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com

Society scolds tarquil_fortesque_smythe_the3rd for his usage of TinyUrl:

"The source of this report is NOT "tinyurl.com" and
when they go out of business, all their links will be
gone. Please supply original sources and the names
of the publication and author(s) whose work you
are reproducing -- not everyone has a news reader
that can follow a URL given in a Usenet news post."
12vq68ukbi0h62f@corp.supernews.com
----------------------
For Google droolers without readers, go here and enter message id:
http://groups.google.com/advanced_search

http://www.evilbible.com/

http://www.paladin-press.com/

http://www.clubit.com/
Click to expand...
 
"cyclops" <cyclops@nopspam.org> wrote in message
news:t56m13du7soth6eed58rtlr44jvb5br72s@4ax.com...
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:09:03 -0700, Donald <Donald@dontdoithere.com
wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:


Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.



And we, the electronic designers, get to be the Alpha Males.

John


Alpha Males !!??

See thread: Snapshot:the soul of soc.men

;-)

I had a peek at soc.men. It seems to be populated by neurotics,
misogynists, whiners, wimps, and just plain nasty people, nearly all
of whom hide behind ludicrous superhero nyms. And it's *really*
boring.

This seems to be typical:

"Women are like paintings... nice to look at.. but thats about it.
Remember true masculinist believers, if you go any further than
looking at women, you are doomed to a life of living hell.

For a woman in your life will consume your masculinity and turn you
into a pissy mangina. She will slowly destroy you by her constant nag
harassment and restrict your every freedom that you had as a free man.

Oh masculine friends of soc.men, dont seek women for in doing so, you
will be absorbed by the creature that represents womankind like in the
movie "The Thing".

Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."


What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just leave
them to us... and thanks!

John

Not impressed it seems.
Do you always form such snap judgments?

Has life always been so peachy for you?

Yap! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine!
Click to expand...
Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine! Yap! Yip! Whiiiiine!
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
*DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL* *DROOL*
 
D from BC wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:


Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.


SED is often better than tv....
D from BC
...and the FCC cannot kill it with a stupid, illegal ruling like they did
Click to expand...
with TV.
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:58:21 +0200, Fred Bartoli
<fred._canxxxel_this_bartoli@RemoveThatAlso_free.fr_AndThisToo> Gave
us:

MassiveProng a ?crit :
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:46:28 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:

Anything is often better than tv.

John


You're an idiot. Are you really so fucking backward that you have
never watched the history channel, or Discovery times, or the National
Geographic channel, or the military channel?


Military channel?

Whoa...
And you're ranking it among the best programs? Triple whoa...
Click to expand...

You know... I have nothing against the french people (I have french
ancestry), but have a LOT against their government's behavior.

Are you working in the french government, because you sure are one
stupid mother fucker sometimes?
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:07:24 GMT, Robert Baer
<robertbaer@earthlink.net> Gave us:

D from BC wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:


Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.


SED is often better than tv....
D from BC
..and the FCC cannot kill it with a stupid, illegal ruling like they did
with TV.
Click to expand...

Get yourself an HDTV and get over it, asshole.

Stop fucking crying about it.

The FCC controls the airwaves, so it was in no way, shape, or form,
an "illegal ruling". It is for THEM to decide.
 
On 9 Apr 2007 16:41:41 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote:

On Apr 10, 1:22 am, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.

Nobody in their right minds thinks that the U.S. doesn't do a lot of
things right, but then again, nobody in their right minds would think
that the U.S. (or any other country) does everything right.

The curious thing about many of the U.S. citizens on this user group
is that they appear to think that critical comment about any aspect of
U.S. society is vociferous anti--Americanism, which they proceed to
describe as a claim that the U.S. does everything wrong.

Some of the people who make these absurd claims are perfectly rational
about other subjects and can engage in quite intelligent discussion in
their area interest. John Fields isn't one of them, of course, but a
smart engineer like Jim Thompson can rival Jon Fields for stupidity
and ignorance when it comes to political questions.
Click to expand...
---
Oh, my, the Sloman rouses from its torpor with heartburn and
proceeds to spew bile after obviously missing the reference to the
"Film Actors Guild" from "Team America World Police."

Here, asshole, try to put a little fun in your life:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Team+America



--
JF
 
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:16:30 -0700, MassiveProng wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:46:28 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:


Anything is often better than tv.

John


You're an idiot. Are you really so fucking backward that you have
never watched the history channel, or Discovery times, or the National
Geographic channel, or the military channel?

If so, you are even more sad than I thought. Your grandkids will
grow up to be meth heads.
Click to expand...

You are talking about me!! I read SED, but have no tv.
My theory is that the more technically advanced a medium, the
less interesting the is content. I am sure about this. TV is made for
idiots by people who may not be idiots themselves, but regard their
audience as being idiots. On the contrary, some of the writers in this
newsgroup do not consider their readers as being idiots. Therefore SED is
worth reading.
---
Sven W
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:43:53 GMT, "Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie"
<eatmyshorts@doubleclick.net> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields wrote:

Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.

Well, yeah, but you can also look up any circuit or data sheet you
want to on google (or lycos, or yahoo, or metacrawler, or whatever),
but it's Sooooo BOrrrrrr-iiiiiinnnnng! ;-)
Click to expand...
---
Not true. Some old data sheets which aren't available any more have
been posted by people who had them, and you can't get free, custom
designs by looking them up if they don't exist.

Here, (sed) we make that happen.


--
JF
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:35:13 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:25ol13p4ds6qacp81n20inbeeva92af5mu@4ax.com...

And we, the electronic designers, get to be the Alpha Males.

More like the theta geeks.
Click to expand...
---
Well, you're not a designer, so of course you have to cast
aspersions on those who are in order to try to ass uage your
impotence.


--
JF
 
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:09:03 -0700, Donald <Donald@dontdoithere.com
wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:


Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.



And we, the electronic designers, get to be the Alpha Males.

John


Alpha Males !!??

See thread: Snapshot:the soul of soc.men

;-)

I had a peek at soc.men. It seems to be populated by neurotics,
misogynists, whiners, wimps, and just plain nasty people, nearly all
of whom hide behind ludicrous superhero nyms. And it's *really*
boring.

This seems to be typical:

"Women are like paintings... nice to look at.. but thats about it.
Remember true masculinist believers, if you go any further than
looking at women, you are doomed to a life of living hell.

For a woman in your life will consume your masculinity and turn you
into a pissy mangina. She will slowly destroy you by her constant nag
harassment and restrict your every freedom that you had as a free man.

Oh masculine friends of soc.men, dont seek women for in doing so, you
will be absorbed by the creature that represents womankind like in the
movie "The Thing".

Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."


What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just leave
them to us... and thanks!
Click to expand...
---
Funny!!!

Sounds to me like someone who was so severely pussywhipped by his
mother that she left him an emotional cripple totally in fear of
women.

His poor father was probably in the same boat.


--
JF
 
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:59:13 -0700, cyclops <cyclops@nopspam.org>
wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:09:03 -0700, Donald <Donald@dontdoithere.com
wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:


Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.



And we, the electronic designers, get to be the Alpha Males.

John


Alpha Males !!??

See thread: Snapshot:the soul of soc.men

;-)

I had a peek at soc.men. It seems to be populated by neurotics,
misogynists, whiners, wimps, and just plain nasty people, nearly all
of whom hide behind ludicrous superhero nyms. And it's *really*
boring.

This seems to be typical:

"Women are like paintings... nice to look at.. but thats about it.
Remember true masculinist believers, if you go any further than
looking at women, you are doomed to a life of living hell.

For a woman in your life will consume your masculinity and turn you
into a pissy mangina. She will slowly destroy you by her constant nag
harassment and restrict your every freedom that you had as a free man.

Oh masculine friends of soc.men, dont seek women for in doing so, you
will be absorbed by the creature that represents womankind like in the
movie "The Thing".

Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."


What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just leave
them to us... and thanks!

John

Not impressed it seems.
Do you always form such snap judgments?

Has life always been so peachy for you?
Click to expand...
---
Oh, here we go again with the: "It's not my fault I'm this way." sob
story

--
JF
 
On 9 Apr 2007 22:13:47 -0700, "connor_a@hotmail.com"
<connor_a@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 10, 2:59 pm, cyclops <cycl...@nopspam.org> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:45:23 -0700, John Larkin


Be aware of the shortcomings of femininity and the great benefits of
masculinity. For there to be wise men, there must first be men."

What a hoot! If you guys can't handle being around women, just leave
them to us... and thanks!

Yes, you are most welcome to having your wallet emptied. ;-)


Not impressed it seems.
Do you always form such snap judgments?

Has life always been so peachy for you?

soc.men is becomming the masculinist voice of the world. Soon, soc.men
will grow so big
Click to expand...
---
Wink, wink, nudge, nudge?
---

we'll have "guest posters" of the week such as Warren
Farrell PHD, leading masculinist voices from around the globes
Click to expand...
---
Wink, wink, nudge, nudge?
---

and best of all, free speech.
Click to expand...
---
Seems you've got that now.
---

The days of the cunt of feminism are being kicked in!
Click to expand...
---
Oh, my, how non-violent!


--
JF
 
On 9 Apr 2007 22:43:46 -0700, "connor_a@hotmail.com"
<connor_a@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 10, 3:29 pm, Darling Regan <oop...@fjflds.net> wrote:
In soc.men, conno...@hotmail.com <conno...@hotmail.com> flippantly asserted...


Wrong. Warren Farrell wouldn't dream of posting in this trashy joint. He doesn't advocate
misogyny.


Free speech isnt "trash", twinkie

I don't advocate violence against anyone except everyday sluts who
display their sexual wares like prostitute hoes!
Click to expand...
---
If you expect to be treated non-violently by those who disagree
vehemently with your views, why do you not afford the same courtesy
to those whom you disagree with?
---

Unfortunately violence is the only way to get through to women.
Click to expand...
---
Sounds to me like your father wasn't a very nice man.


--
JF
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:50:44 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:v1vl139im1b2vtj3ua6f39c35dt9humfqc@4ax.com...

And we, the electronic designers, get to be the Alpha Males.

More like the theta geeks.

Well, what are you good at?

Everything.
Click to expand...
---
Eating shit is a member of that set, no?


--
JF
 
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:46:28 -0700, the renowned John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:39:01 GMT, D from BC <myrealaddress@comic.com
wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.

SED is often better than tv....
D from BC

Anything is often better than tv.

John
Click to expand...
You just say that because you can't see curling live in High Def.


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
 
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:10:51 -0700, MassiveProng
<MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:35:13 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:


"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:25ol13p4ds6qacp81n20inbeeva92af5mu@4ax.com...

And we, the electronic designers, get to be the Alpha Males.

More like the theta geeks.


Damn... Homer made a funny.
Stop slurping, no one will help you now.
Click to expand...


Usenet lits score:
GIT-R-DONE!
#20 Usenet asshole
#6 Lits Slut
#11 Most posting trolls/hunters/flonkers 2007
 
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:20:49 -0700, MassiveProng
<MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:07:24 GMT, Robert Baer
robertbaer@earthlink.net> Gave us:

D from BC wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:22:47 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:


Not only do we have world-class electronic designers here, we also
have philosophers, musicians, political pundits, humorists,teachers,
students, rednecks, assholes and, lately, an infusion of kooks and
fags [America, Fuck Yeah!] telling us that we're doing everything
wrong.

Methinks that to be garnering that much attention must mean that
we're doing _something_ right. :)

Otherwise, one would expect that the complainants would slink back
into their own dreary little worlds where they can wank themselves
off into oblivion.


SED is often better than tv....
D from BC
..and the FCC cannot kill it with a stupid, illegal ruling like they did
with TV.


Get yourself an HDTV and get over it, asshole.

Stop fucking crying about it.

The FCC controls the airwaves, so it was in no way, shape, or form,
an "illegal ruling". It is for THEM to decide.
Click to expand...
Ever hear of Pirate radio? < snicker >


Usenet lits score:
GIT-R-DONE!
#20 Usenet asshole
#6 Lits Slut
#11 Most posting trolls/hunters/flonkers 2007
 
"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:BJCSh.18248$hO2.11651@edtnps82...
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message news:25ol13p4ds6qacp81n20inbeeva92af5mu@4ax.com...

And we, the electronic designers, get to be the Alpha Males.

More like the theta geeks.
Click to expand...
Good one (and honestly in most cases closer to reality) :)

SioL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top