Use resistor instead of regulator?...

J

John Doe

Guest
I can put a resistor after a voltage that\'s too high for the circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

Thanks.
 
On 2021-01-30, John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
I can put a resistor after a voltage that\'s too high for the circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If the capacitor is needed there probably are problems.

In the spirit of your question that is all I will say.
--
Jasen.
 
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
I can put a resistor after a voltage that\'s too high for the circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a
variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.
 
Rich wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that\'s too high for the circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a
variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it\'s a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?
 
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
Rich wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that\'s too high for the circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a
variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it\'s a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which the
voltage changes. Given a current draw change of sufficient length in
time (length determined by capicator size), the voltage across the
capacitor will settle to that which remains after the new drop across
the resistor.

Wire up a test circuit on a breadboard and measure the changes
yourself.
 
Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:

John Doe wrote:
Rich wrote:
John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that\'s too high for the circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a
variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it\'s a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which the
voltage changes.

Then your answer should be \"Yes\", given the same amount of time.

Why are you fighting this?

Do you think it makes you look smart?
 
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:

John Doe wrote:
Rich wrote:
John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that\'s too high for the
circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have
a variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it\'s a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which
the voltage changes.

Then your answer should be \"Yes\", given the same amount of time.

No, the correct answer is \"no\". The voltage variation can be
substantial. Rate of change is a different measure than voltage
magnitude.

> Why are you fighting this?

Note that I could ask you the same question. My answer is correct,
yours is incorrect.
 
No, thanks anyway...

--
Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rich <rich@example.invalid
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:59:53 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <rv9519$1l9$1@dont-email.me
References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me
Injection-Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:59:53 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host=\"d71d69244b44f2167a5474a852a92cea\"; logging-data=\"1705\"; mail-complaints-to=\"abuse@eternal-september.org\"; posting-account=\"U2FsdGVkX18WDlUwqnHhTSdJSoCqQnVy\"
User-Agent: tin/2.0.1-20111224 (\"Achenvoir\") (UNIX) (Linux/3.10.17 (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LBNwrlosj8h+C/mmb8/JDn9V+kU=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55501

John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:

John Doe wrote:
Rich wrote:
John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that\'s too high for the
circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have
a variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it\'s a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which
the voltage changes.

Then your answer should be \"Yes\", given the same amount of time.

No, the correct answer is \"no\". The voltage variation can be
substantial. Rate of change is a different measure than voltage
magnitude.

Why are you fighting this?

Note that I could ask you the same question. My answer is correct,
yours is incorrect.
 
On 2/02/2021 4:11 am, John Doe wrote:
No, thanks anyway...
So bugger off and do it know it all.You don\'t need advice from us humble
mortals !!
 
Lots of reasons for non-answers, crappy answers, and venting. When a group
is dying, for example. Non-answers are entirely understandable and no
problem with me. Normally, people answer questions because they like the
question, and because they want to see their writing on USENET. Then there
are not-quite-grown-ups who love playing with an imaginary kill file
friend (they are not skilled enough to control).

This netcop wannabe troll can go fuck itself...

--
RheillyPhoull <Rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!xmission!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.westnet.com.au!news.westnet.com.au.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 19:55:35 -0600
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,free.spam
References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me> <rv9519$1l9$1@dont-email.me> <rv9na2$thk$2@dont-email.me
From: RheillyPhoull <Rheilly@bigslong.com
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:55:34 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rv9na2$thk$2@dont-email.me
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <mOqdnViuHfaKLIX9nZ2dnUU7-dudnZ2d@westnet.com.au
Lines: 5
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 106.69.177.15
X-Trace: sv3-FcLxUF6QNWGWX0JZWCAqzZeFnCSRzIQzxdQPKKU/ouvaIlWI81kWv1URdSDv8QPTWUxiVuwood7EFam!ntsViOraSWMiGNeU3PvZ3jmOjBPT5/oLAtbfIqEIZzAjdGLnmekbgEeq7GqPIUaiW+h0rJwIdL2y!gpMhtQDdJlzT+lDzBVi9
X-Complaints-To: abuse@westnet.com.au
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1542
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55503 free.spam:14046

On 2/02/2021 4:11 am, John Doe wrote:
No, thanks anyway...

So bugger off and do it know it all.You don\'t need advice from us humble
mortals !!
 
Lots of Australian trolls on USENET recently...

--
RheillyPhoull <Rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!xmission!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.westnet.com.au!news.westnet.com.au.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 19:55:35 -0600
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,free.spam
References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me> <rv9519$1l9$1@dont-email.me> <rv9na2$thk$2@dont-email.me
From: RheillyPhoull <Rheilly@bigslong.com
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:55:34 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rv9na2$thk$2@dont-email.me
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <mOqdnViuHfaKLIX9nZ2dnUU7-dudnZ2d@westnet.com.au
Lines: 5
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 106.69.177.15
X-Trace: sv3-FcLxUF6QNWGWX0JZWCAqzZeFnCSRzIQzxdQPKKU/ouvaIlWI81kWv1URdSDv8QPTWUxiVuwood7EFam!ntsViOraSWMiGNeU3PvZ3jmOjBPT5/oLAtbfIqEIZzAjdGLnmekbgEeq7GqPIUaiW+h0rJwIdL2y!gpMhtQDdJlzT+lDzBVi9
X-Complaints-To: abuse@westnet.com.au
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1542
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55503 free.spam:14046

On 2/02/2021 4:11 am, John Doe wrote:
No, thanks anyway...

So bugger off and do it know it all.You don\'t need advice from us humble
mortals !!
 
On 2/02/2021 2:13 pm, John Doe wrote:
Lots of Australian trolls on USENET recently...
We respond when know it all\'s ask non detailed questions that require
description of the process involved. Not mentioning the nature of the
load shows how little you understand of the nature of your query.
On the subject of trolls, I see much more of your nick (which I assume
applies to your brain) than mine ??
 
Australia is a small country, but in fact, of the four groups I post to, I
have encountered Australian trolls in three groups recently. There are
several in the electronics design group, the most hyperactive being \"Bill
Sloman\". The only response to one of my recent posts in the metalworking
group is an Australian troll. And now here. Australia under pressure from
communist China seems to be like Norway before World War II. Will it
continue pleading \"neutrality\" if communist China invades and rapes it?

--
RheillyPhoull <Rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.westnet.com.au!news.westnet.com.au.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 18:08:19 -0600
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,free.spam
References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me> <rv9519$1l9$1@dont-email.me> <rv9na2$thk$2@dont-email.me> <mOqdnViuHfaKLIX9nZ2dnUU7-dudnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <rvaqil$u72$8@dont-email.me
From: RheillyPhoull <Rheilly@bigslong.com
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:08:19 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rvaqil$u72$8@dont-email.me
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <DqSdnRsmg8Vup4b9nZ2dnUU7-KvNnZ2d@westnet.com.au
Lines: 8
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 106.69.177.15
X-Trace: sv3-kDO+9B5dQ3JBzQjh1Dn52x9JynhPfKQSGKE6U2TqgBR9AC0o2wSUAgPtbZNE/5VdAW+Jsyxq9Yknt1X!bpu6IZqjHbGJ8LGgUDEVwsoG55tN8taoEeC+NvW8uJxWcfpdtvYR+JAO+hcfs3qe4m+tmfXBMsox!CdUMMRt7hJHMYfk1sk/x
X-Complaints-To: abuse@westnet.com.au
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1887
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55512 free.spam:14106

On 2/02/2021 2:13 pm, John Doe wrote:
Lots of Australian trolls on USENET recently...

We respond when know it all\'s ask non detailed questions that require
description of the process involved. Not mentioning the nature of the
load shows how little you understand of the nature of your query.
On the subject of trolls, I see much more of your nick (which I assume
applies to your brain) than mine ??
 
On 4/02/2021 6:27 pm, John Doe wrote:
Australia is a small country, but in fact, of the four groups I post to, I
have encountered Australian trolls in three groups recently. There are
several in the electronics design group, the most hyperactive being \"Bill
Sloman\". The only response to one of my recent posts in the metalworking
group is an Australian troll. And now here. Australia under pressure from
communist China seems to be like Norway before World War II. Will it
continue pleading \"neutrality\" if communist China invades and rapes it?

WHOOOOSSHH !!
 
Australia is a small country, but in fact, of the four groups I have
recently posted to, I have encountered Australian trolls in three. There
are several in the electronics design group, the most hyperactive being
\"Bill Sloman\". The only response to my recent post in the metalworking
group is an Australian troll. And now here. Australia under pressure from
communist China seems to be like Norway before World War II. Will it
continue pleading \"neutrality\" if communist China invades and rapes it?

A troll who publicly plays with its imaginary kill file friend is almost
always technically incapable of ignoring a thread branch. So they end up
stumbling over all the replies to the person that they allegedly kill
filed.

And they are always incapable of simply pressing the \"ignore thread\" key
when they see a post by someone they cannot cope with.

Such is the way of this silly troll and its fake kill file...

--
RheillyPhoull <Rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!xmission!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.westnet.com.au!news.westnet.com.au.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:46:25 -0600
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,free.spam
References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me> <rv9519$1l9$1@dont-email.me> <rv9na2$thk$2@dont-email.me> <mOqdnViuHfaKLIX9nZ2dnUU7-dudnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <rvaqil$u72$8@dont-email.me> <DqSdnRsmg8Vup4b9nZ2dnUU7-KvNnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <rvgi6p$gd8$4@dont-email.me
From: RheillyPhoull <Rheilly@bigslong.com
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 07:46:24 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rvgi6p$gd8$4@dont-email.me
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <fNadnb6ILajMGoH9nZ2dnUU7-W2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au
Lines: 11
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 106.69.172.78
X-Trace: sv3-HI2odCHGZXP7m00iLKhmPQukWlm+hW1csOo/uwjGFgYr53qydfJij2yCoUe8NdpVp9R0iMqelTMBcgL!8HnqOR/dYreEzjvI2U5rAjMW1oC2UrxVjhwYKWhE55AGabwHSCAKDgxzbyR0KsGA1WdamFS5gXDl!QCyTpbwe9nMWyPocYBKP
X-Complaints-To: abuse@westnet.com.au
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2144
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55514 free.spam:14114

On 4/02/2021 6:27 pm, John Doe wrote:
Australia is a small country, but in fact, of the four groups I post to, I
have encountered Australian trolls in three groups recently. There are
several in the electronics design group, the most hyperactive being \"Bill
Sloman\". The only response to one of my recent posts in the metalworking
group is an Australian troll. And now here. Australia under pressure from
communist China seems to be like Norway before World War II. Will it
continue pleading \"neutrality\" if communist China invades and rapes it?


WHOOOOSSHH !!
 
On Monday, February 1, 2021 at 3:26:14 AM UTC-8, John Doe wrote:
Rich <ri...@example.invalid> wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Rich wrote:
John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that\'s too high for the circuit?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a
variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it\'s a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which the
voltage changes.
Then your answer should be \"Yes\", given the same amount of time.

Why are you fighting this?

Do you think it makes you look smart?

Mr. Doe, Rich explained it correctly. You are wrong and he is right. How much Voltage are you trying to get rid of?

G²
 
Bullshit...

--
Glenn Gundlach <stratus46@yahoo.com> wrote:

X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4349:: with SMTP id q9mr5905486qvs.23.1612554086079; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:41:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:c602:: with SMTP id l2mr4658324ooq.5.1612554085805; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:41:25 -0800 (PST)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:41:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.96.68.241; posting-account=JX7V1wkAAAAeax67P9giUWdoKufQ8keT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.96.68.241
References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5dbc9fbb-777c-4858-9f31-91d20a48b662n@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
From: Glenn Gundlach <stratus46@yahoo.com
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 19:41:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=\"UTF-8\"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2383
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55516

On Monday, February 1, 2021 at 3:26:14 AM UTC-8, John Doe wrote:
Rich <ri...@example.invalid> wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Rich wrote:
John Doe wrote:

I can put a resistor after a voltage that\'s too high for the circuit
?

Of course the resistor must handle the current.

A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.

Any problems with that?

If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a

variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.

If it\'s a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?

No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which the

voltage changes.
Then your answer should be \"Yes\", given the same amount of time.

Why are you fighting this?

Do you think it makes you look smart?

Mr. Doe, Rich explained it correctly. You are wrong and he is right. How much Voltage are you trying to get rid of?

G¶ý
 
Nothing but a troll...

--
RheillyPhoull <Rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.westnet.com.au!news.westnet.com.au.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 18:26:35 -0600
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,free.spam
References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me> <5dbc9fbb-777c-4858-9f31-91d20a48b662n@googlegroups.com> <rvk7vh$9ur$1@dont-email.me
From: RheillyPhoull <Rheilly@bigslong.com
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 08:26:35 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rvk7vh$9ur$1@dont-email.me
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <j6ednUKFPdihf4D9nZ2dnUU7-KGdnZ2d@westnet.com.au
Lines: 4
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 106.69.172.78
X-Trace: sv3-zvpXqR0p+oDz6nJ2eb3t2IKb92KpQ58wnGCYN3s8EMsUC78ejGSZTFgLnFzYwi1yl2ZsS2w0YaEuFmS!y1oNO8zzA9rNwr+MZCBVsCzstlAOq8/zH2SeB0PSww9qmnSZdz1l0j5ROVj/+u+WF42NFL4uzTEJ!vqT/dYZyWnI5J8sUhY2Y
X-Complaints-To: abuse@westnet.com.au
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1537
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55518 free.spam:14132

On 6/02/2021 3:57 am, John Doe wrote:
Bullshit...

It displays it\'s technical prowess again :) what a joke !!
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top