K
Kadaitcha Man
Guest
JT wrote:
the yanKKKee-like Howdying fucktard named Walph, put his size 12 hobnail
boot in his own gob and tried to swallow it.
You fucking gormles nong. That misses the point entirely. The fact remains,On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 17:19:34 GMT, "relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net
wrote:
JT wrote:
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:33:23 GMT, "relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net
wrote:
DeMoN LaG wrote:
"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in
newstbPc.68611$SO5.47788 @twister.socal.rr.com:
Go ogle. It's ACPI.
ACPI and APIC are two different things. Go ogle yourself.
There are 4 entries. NOTHING to do with System IRQ's is mentioned
in them. That would be ACPI.
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/sysperf/IO-APIC.mspx#XSLTsection127121120120
Microsofts info on APIC. Google for "APIC interupt" and you won't
get all the noise of non-related links
I probably sounded like I'm trying to argue that it's /not/ APIC,
it's that I saw advice to the OP about using APIC. I believe the
option in BIOS is ACPI, not APIC; at least it is on the motherboards
I've seen lately. You have to enable ACPI to get APIC.
Depends heavily on the BIOS and what they have modified. APIC does
not Have to depend on ACPI.
You came across as though APIC didn't exist, which it very much does.
the yanKKKee-like Howdying fucktard named Walph, put his size 12 hobnail
boot in his own gob and tried to swallow it.