System IRQ's

[JT]

On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 03:30:46 GMT, "relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote:

Ralph Wade Phillips wrote:
Howdy!

"Xolak the gladiatorial"
Nz7JuSXbBkqF@alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.blonde> wrote in message

news:tW07o0X3HBYb413D7395X5em8OpZVDRL@alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.blonde...
Linda wrote:
15 is the highest IRQ number.

BWAHAHAHAHAAH!!! You fuckwitted, top-posting slut. I have IRQ's up
to 24.


One abbreviation for you - APIC .

APIC? *APIC* ??

Advanced Configuration and Power Interface
shakes head
APIC is not the same as ACPI. Advanced Programmable Interupt Controller.

Was added when PCI was added. Part of why PCI interupts can be shared.

JT

 

[DeMoN LaG]

"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in newstbPc.68611$SO5.47788
@twister.socal.rr.com:

Go ogle. It's ACPI.

ACPI and APIC are two different things. Go ogle yourself.

--
website: http://www.demonlag.com
AIM: FrznFoodClerk
email: demonlag@snip.net

 

[relic]

DeMoN LaG wrote:

"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in newstbPc.68611$SO5.47788
@twister.socal.rr.com:

Go ogle. It's ACPI.


ACPI and APIC are two different things. Go ogle yourself.

There are 4 entries. NOTHING to do with System IRQ's is mentioned in them.
That would be ACPI.

--
- relic -
Don't take life too seriously, You won't get out alive.

 

[Ralph Wade Phillips, the]

Ralph Wade Phillips wrote:

Howdy!

"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:GtZOc.65170$SO5.55361@twister.socal.rr.com...
Ralph Wade Phillips wrote:
Howdy!

"Xolak the gladiatorial"
Nz7JuSXbBkqF@alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.blonde> wrote in message



news:tW07o0X3HBYb413D7395X5em8OpZVDRL@alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.blonde...
Linda wrote:
15 is the highest IRQ number.

BWAHAHAHAHAAH!!! You fuckwitted, top-posting slut. I have IRQ's up
to 24.


One abbreviation for you - APIC .

APIC? *APIC* ??

Advanced Configuration and Power Interface
shakes head

Advanced Programmable Interface Controller. Yes, on P4/Athlon
boards there are typically 24 hardware interrupts if you turn APIC on.

You fucking, stupid, yanKKKee-like, Howdying retard.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=APIC

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=ACPI

 

[Ralph W. Phillips]

Howdy!

"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in message
newstbPc.68611$SO5.47788@twister.socal.rr.com...

Ralph Wade Phillips wrote:
Howdy!

"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:GtZOc.65170$SO5.55361@twister.socal.rr.com...
Ralph Wade Phillips wrote:
Howdy!

"Xolak the gladiatorial"
Nz7JuSXbBkqF@alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.blonde> wrote in message




news:tW07o0X3HBYb413D7395X5em8OpZVDRL@alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.blonde...
Linda wrote:
15 is the highest IRQ number.

BWAHAHAHAHAAH!!! You fuckwitted, top-posting slut. I have IRQ's up
to 24.


One abbreviation for you - APIC .

APIC? *APIC* ??

Advanced Configuration and Power Interface
shakes head

Advanced Programmable Interface Controller. Yes, on P4/Athlon
boards there are typically 24 hardware interrupts if you turn APIC on.

RwP

Go ogle. It's ACPI.

I know about ACPI. I'm talking about APIC. Two different things.

Advanced Programmable Interface Controller. Why, the P4 at my feet
has one, installed, and therefore has 24 hardware IRQs.

ACPI is Advanced Configuration and Power Interface - not quite the
same thing.

RwP

 

[Ralph W. Phillips]

Howdy!

"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:nscPc.68615$SO5.10808@twister.socal.rr.com...

DeMoN LaG wrote:
"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in newstbPc.68611$SO5.47788
@twister.socal.rr.com:

Go ogle. It's ACPI.


ACPI and APIC are two different things. Go ogle yourself.

There are 4 entries. NOTHING to do with System IRQ's is mentioned in
them.
That would be ACPI.

Four? I get 54,200 on "Advanced Programmable Interface Controller",
including (as the FIRST hit) info on the Intel 82093AA. Info at
http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/290566.htm .

Try Googling with intelligent choices sometimes. Or better still,
study some. You just might learn something.

RwP

 

[Wizard]

not using XP.

Linda wrote:

15 is the highest IRQ number.

--
Hmmm, they've got internet on computers now. - Homer Simpson
"Jerry G." <jerryg50@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cef7lp$bev$1@news.eusc.inter.net...
I am looking at my system in both system information, and in the computer
properties.

I cannot see the following IRQ's: 3, 5, 7, 11, and 17. I am very
curious to know why Windows did not assign them, and doubled up others to
be
shared?

The second thing is that I cannot seem to figure out what USB device is on
what USB Universal Host Controller. Each controller has a set of ports in
association with it. I found the Host Controller addresses.

What I want to do in the end, is to determine exactly which USB device is
in
which port when viewing it in the System Hardware Properties.

It turns out that one of the USB Host Controllers is being shared in IRQ
with the ATA hard drive. Another Host Controller is being shared with a
modem. There is another one that is being shared with the video display.

I have an HP 4670 Scanner, and it is giving loss of communications
problems
because of the IRQ sharing. I found this out after doing a lot of
searching.
To get around that, I used the USB Host Controller that in shared with the
least demand. This was the one that is shared with the modem. The scanner
was now, only failing to communicate once in a while.

To resolve the issue, I added an active USB hub to act as a type of
buffer.
It actually is slowing down the USB communications. With this approach,
the
scanner seems to be working for now. I tried it many times over the coarse
of the evening, and it has not failed yet.

What I am looking for, is if someone would have an explanation for this???

--

Jerry G.
==========================

 

[Diogenes]

Ralph W. Phillips wrote:

Howdy!

"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:nscPc.68615$SO5.10808@twister.socal.rr.com...
DeMoN LaG wrote:
"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in
newstbPc.68611$SO5.47788 @twister.socal.rr.com:

Go ogle. It's ACPI.


ACPI and APIC are two different things. Go ogle yourself.

There are 4 entries. NOTHING to do with System IRQ's is mentioned
in them. That would be ACPI.

Four? I get 54,200 on "Advanced Programmable Interface
Controller",

Web Results 1 - 4 of 4 for "Advanced Programmable Interface Controller"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Advanced+Programmable+Interface+Controller%22&btnG=Google+Search

 

[relic]

Ralph W. Phillips wrote:

Howdy!

"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in message
newstbPc.68611$SO5.47788@twister.socal.rr.com...
Ralph Wade Phillips wrote:
Howdy!

"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:GtZOc.65170$SO5.55361@twister.socal.rr.com...
Ralph Wade Phillips wrote:
Howdy!

"Xolak the gladiatorial"
Nz7JuSXbBkqF@alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.blonde> wrote in
message





news:tW07o0X3HBYb413D7395X5em8OpZVDRL@alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.blonde...
Linda wrote:
15 is the highest IRQ number.

BWAHAHAHAHAAH!!! You fuckwitted, top-posting slut. I have IRQ's
up to 24.


One abbreviation for you - APIC .

APIC? *APIC* ??

Advanced Configuration and Power Interface
shakes head

Advanced Programmable Interface Controller. Yes, on
P4/Athlon boards there are typically 24 hardware interrupts if you
turn APIC on.

RwP

Go ogle. It's ACPI.


I know about ACPI. I'm talking about APIC. Two different
things.

Advanced Programmable Interface Controller. Why, the P4 at
my feet has one, installed, and therefore has 24 hardware IRQs.

ACPI is Advanced Configuration and Power Interface - not
quite the same thing.

While APIC allows IRQs beyond 16, I don't believe you can have APIC unless
ACPI is enabled. ACPI has been the BIOS configurable option I've seen on the
dozen or so post-APM motherboards I've setup recently (admittedly a limited
sample; ASUS, MSI, ABIT, Intel, and a couple of others), not APIC.

--
- relic -
Don't take life too seriously, You won't get out alive.

 

[JT]

On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:33:23 GMT, "relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote:

DeMoN LaG wrote:
"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in newstbPc.68611$SO5.47788
@twister.socal.rr.com:

Go ogle. It's ACPI.


ACPI and APIC are two different things. Go ogle yourself.

There are 4 entries. NOTHING to do with System IRQ's is mentioned in them.
That would be ACPI.

http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/sysperf/IO-APIC.mspx#XSLTsection127121120120

Microsofts info on APIC. Google for "APIC interupt" and you won't get all
the noise of non-related links

JT

 

[relic]

JT wrote:

On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:33:23 GMT, "relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net
wrote:

DeMoN LaG wrote:
"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in
newstbPc.68611$SO5.47788 @twister.socal.rr.com:

Go ogle. It's ACPI.


ACPI and APIC are two different things. Go ogle yourself.

There are 4 entries. NOTHING to do with System IRQ's is mentioned
in them. That would be ACPI.


http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/sysperf/IO-APIC.mspx#XSLTsection127121120120

Microsofts info on APIC. Google for "APIC interupt" and you won't
get all the noise of non-related links

I probably sounded like I'm trying to argue that it's /not/ APIC, it's that I
saw advice to the OP about using APIC. I believe the option in BIOS is ACPI,
not APIC; at least it is on the motherboards I've seen lately. You have to
enable ACPI to get APIC.

--
- relic -
Don't take life too seriously, You won't get out alive.

 

[Mark Ranxton]

Ralph W. Phillips wrote:

Howdy!

"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:nscPc.68615$SO5.10808@twister.socal.rr.com...
DeMoN LaG wrote:
"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in
newstbPc.68611$SO5.47788 @twister.socal.rr.com:

Go ogle. It's ACPI.


ACPI and APIC are two different things. Go ogle yourself.

There are 4 entries. NOTHING to do with System IRQ's is mentioned
in them. That would be ACPI.

Four? I get 54,200 on "Advanced Programmable Interface
Controller",

Four is what I got and I copied your text exactly as it is in quotes.

That means "Advanced Programmable Interface Controller" is virtually unknown
and likely means that the four entries are mistakes. If you remove the
quotes, google will return all pages that contain those words anywhere on a
page, so you can't claim a phurphy because if there is a phurphy going on,
it's you that's doing it. "Advanced Programmable Interface Controller" does
not exist.

including (as the FIRST hit) info on the Intel 82093AA.
Info at http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/290566.htm .

"We can't find "http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/290566.htm""

Try Googling with intelligent choices sometimes. Or better
still, study some. You just might learn something.

That won't win you an argument. You are wrong, end of story. You cannot win.
You have been bettered by your superiors. There is no such thing as
"Advanced Programmable Interface Controller". You can't even change your
claim and say you meant "Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller" without
getting blood and snot all over your gormless yanKKKee-like howdying face,
you snotfuck.

It's "Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller", "Advanced Programmable
Interface Controller".

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!

PS, fucktard: Kadaitcha Man was here.

 

[Banul the Giglet-howler]

JT wrote:

On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:33:23 GMT, "relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net
wrote:

DeMoN LaG wrote:
"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in
newstbPc.68611$SO5.47788 @twister.socal.rr.com:

Go ogle. It's ACPI.


ACPI and APIC are two different things. Go ogle yourself.

There are 4 entries. NOTHING to do with System IRQ's is mentioned
in them. That would be ACPI.


http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/sysperf/IO-APIC.mspx#XSLTsection127121120120

Microsofts info on APIC. Google for "APIC interupt" and you won't
get all the noise of non-related links

I in APIC stands for Interrupt, you fucktard. Walph the Fuckwit Howdyer got
it wrong.

 

[zink]

So, what about the shared IRQ lines? Why doesn't the OS just assign
each PCI object its *own* interrupt?

 

[Stuart]

Mark Ranxton wrote:

"We can't find "http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/290566.htm""

Actually that link is for Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller
anyway not what he trid to search for.

Stuart

 

[Cleland Worthingspear-Buc]

Stuart wrote:

Mark Ranxton wrote:

"We can't find
"http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/290566.htm""

Actually that link is for Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller
anyway not what he trid to search for.

Just exactly how fucking dumb are you, snot for brains? Did you even bother
looking at what was written, you know, the fucking shit you snipped,
cheesestickdick?

Fuck me dead, some cunts are stupid.

 

[Stuart]

Cleland Worthingspear-Bucklestat wrote:

Stuart wrote:

Mark Ranxton wrote:


"We can't find
"http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/290566.htm""

Actually that link is for Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller
anyway not what he trid to search for.


Just exactly how fucking dumb are you, snot for brains? Did you even bother
looking at what was written, you know, the fucking shit you snipped,
cheesestickdick?

Fuck me dead, some cunts are stupid.

I pointed out that the link does in fact work and it was also
contradicting what the poster was searching for. He said he searched for
Interface controller with that link being the top of the list while that
link relates to Interrupt controller.

Now fuck off and learn to read yourself, numbnuts!

Stuart

 

[Eriker the loveable]

Stuart wrote:

Cleland Worthingspear-Bucklestat wrote:
Stuart wrote:

Mark Ranxton wrote:


"We can't find
"http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/290566.htm""

Actually that link is for Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller
anyway not what he trid to search for.


Just exactly how fucking dumb are you, snot for brains? Did you even
bother looking at what was written, you know, the fucking shit you
snipped, cheesestickdick?

Fuck me dead, some cunts are stupid.

I pointed out that the link does in fact work

Fuck, you're denser than igneous rock.

Now fuck off and learn to read yourself, numbnuts!

Oh, I am devastated. I have been IKYABWAI lamed. I shall run away.

Say, what group do you mostly post from? alt.graphics.illustrator?
comp.graphics.apps.photoshop?

 

[JT]

On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 17:19:34 GMT, "relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote:

JT wrote:
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:33:23 GMT, "relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net
wrote:

DeMoN LaG wrote:
"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in
newstbPc.68611$SO5.47788 @twister.socal.rr.com:

Go ogle. It's ACPI.


ACPI and APIC are two different things. Go ogle yourself.

There are 4 entries. NOTHING to do with System IRQ's is mentioned
in them. That would be ACPI.


http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/sysperf/IO-APIC.mspx#XSLTsection127121120120

Microsofts info on APIC. Google for "APIC interupt" and you won't
get all the noise of non-related links


I probably sounded like I'm trying to argue that it's /not/ APIC, it's that I
saw advice to the OP about using APIC. I believe the option in BIOS is ACPI,
not APIC; at least it is on the motherboards I've seen lately. You have to
enable ACPI to get APIC.

Depends heavily on the BIOS and what they have modified. APIC does not Have
to depend on ACPI.

You came across as though APIC didn't exist, which it very much does. You
also came across as though APIC didn't have anything to do with IRQs and
sharing, which it very much does. You also said that there were only 4
google results and they had nothing to do with IRQs. That was just wrong.

JT

 

[relic]

JT wrote:

On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 17:19:34 GMT, "relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net
wrote:

JT wrote:
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:33:23 GMT, "relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net
wrote:

DeMoN LaG wrote:
"relic" <nospam@relic211.cjb.net> wrote in
newstbPc.68611$SO5.47788 @twister.socal.rr.com:

Go ogle. It's ACPI.


ACPI and APIC are two different things. Go ogle yourself.

There are 4 entries. NOTHING to do with System IRQ's is mentioned
in them. That would be ACPI.



http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/sysperf/IO-APIC.mspx#XSLTsection127121120120

Microsofts info on APIC. Google for "APIC interupt" and you won't
get all the noise of non-related links


I probably sounded like I'm trying to argue that it's /not/ APIC,
it's that I saw advice to the OP about using APIC. I believe the
option in BIOS is ACPI, not APIC; at least it is on the motherboards
I've seen lately. You have to enable ACPI to get APIC.

Depends heavily on the BIOS and what they have modified. APIC does
not Have to depend on ACPI.

You came across as though APIC didn't exist, which it very much does.

I said, "Advanced Programmable Interface Controller" didn't in the context of
IRQs. It doesn't.

You also came across as though APIC didn't have anything to do with
IRQs and sharing, which it very much does.

That was confusing as I wrote it and I admitted to that already. The BIOS
option the OP would most likely have seen was ACPI, not APIC.

You also said that there
were only 4 google results and they had nothing to do with IRQs. That
was just wrong.

Here it is, *4* google results that have nothing to do with IRQs:
Web Results 1 - 4 of 4 for "Advanced Programmable Interface Controller"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Advanced+Programmable+Interface+Controller%22&btnG=Google+Search

As you can see, it was just _correct_

--
- relic -
Don't take life too seriously, You won't get out alive.