Russians are facing severe consequences to Ukrainian invasion...

F

Flyguy

Guest
Most foreign companies are pulling out of Russia, which results in many severe consequences for Russian industries. Top of the list is commercial aviation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFOO11tywbM
 
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 17:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
<soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote:

Most foreign companies are pulling out of Russia, which results in many severe consequences for Russian industries. Top of the list is commercial aviation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFOO11tywbM

Germany did something similar. Twice.

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc trk

The cork popped merrily, and Lord Peter rose to his feet.
\"Bunter\", he said, \"I give you a toast. The triumph of Instinct over Reason\"
 
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 10:55:04 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 17:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Most foreign companies are pulling out of Russia, which results in many severe consequences for Russian industries. Top of the list is commercial aviation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFOO11tywbM

Germany did something similar. Twice.

Germany was bigger, relatively speaking. Russia is geographically large, but it\'s industrial output is about the same as Texas.

Europe and America seem happy to use Ukranian cannon fodder to use the weapons they supply to chew up Russia\'s stocks of weapons and conscripts.

It\'s strategic imbecility on the Russian side. They didn\'t achieve the first strike success that they clearly hoped for, and persistence isn\'t paying off the way it needs to justify continued expenditure.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 11:54:28 PM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 10:55:04 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 17:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Most foreign companies are pulling out of Russia, which results in many severe consequences for Russian industries. Top of the list is commercial aviation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFOO11tywbM

Germany did something similar. Twice.
Germany was bigger, relatively speaking. Russia is geographically large, but it\'s industrial output is about the same as Texas.

Europe and America seem happy to use Ukranian cannon fodder to use the weapons they supply to chew up Russia\'s stocks of weapons and conscripts.

It\'s strategic imbecility on the Russian side. They didn\'t achieve the first strike success that they clearly hoped for, and persistence isn\'t paying off the way it needs to justify continued expenditure.

Just as with all governments, there is a need to save face. Why else was the US in Vietnam and the rest of SE Asia for so long? Why were both the Soviet Union and the US in Afghanistan so long?

The war would have likely already ended if there had been a way for Russia and Putin to save face and declare a victory.

Meanwhile, the blow to the image of military might by Russia, is enormous. If Russia didn\'t have nuclear capability, I suspect any number of other countries would be involved in the fighting, and it would already be over.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 6:08:12 AM UTC-7, Ricky wrote:
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 11:54:28 PM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 10:55:04 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 17:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Most foreign companies are pulling out of Russia, which results in many severe consequences for Russian industries. Top of the list is commercial aviation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFOO11tywbM

Germany did something similar. Twice.
Germany was bigger, relatively speaking. Russia is geographically large, but it\'s industrial output is about the same as Texas.

Europe and America seem happy to use Ukranian cannon fodder to use the weapons they supply to chew up Russia\'s stocks of weapons and conscripts.

It\'s strategic imbecility on the Russian side. They didn\'t achieve the first strike success that they clearly hoped for, and persistence isn\'t paying off the way it needs to justify continued expenditure.
Just as with all governments, there is a need to save face. Why else was the US in Vietnam and the rest of SE Asia for so long? Why were both the Soviet Union and the US in Afghanistan so long?

The war would have likely already ended if there had been a way for Russia and Putin to save face and declare a victory.

Don\'t worry about Putin/Xi faces. Send more missiles to Ukraine/Taiwan.
 
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 6:08:12 AM UTC-7, Ricky wrote:
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 11:54:28 PM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 10:55:04 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 17:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Most foreign companies are pulling out of Russia, which results in many severe consequences for Russian industries. Top of the list is commercial aviation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFOO11tywbM

Germany did something similar. Twice.
Germany was bigger, relatively speaking. Russia is geographically large, but it\'s industrial output is about the same as Texas.

Europe and America seem happy to use Ukranian cannon fodder to use the weapons they supply to chew up Russia\'s stocks of weapons and conscripts.

It\'s strategic imbecility on the Russian side. They didn\'t achieve the first strike success that they clearly hoped for, and persistence isn\'t paying off the way it needs to justify continued expenditure.
Just as with all governments, there is a need to save face. Why else was the US in Vietnam and the rest of SE Asia for so long? Why were both the Soviet Union and the US in Afghanistan so long?

The war would have likely already ended if there had been a way for Russia and Putin to save face and declare a victory.

Meanwhile, the blow to the image of military might by Russia, is enormous. If Russia didn\'t have nuclear capability, I suspect any number of other countries would be involved in the fighting, and it would already be over.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Putin is having some serious medical issues and may want a big victory under his belt before he dies or is deposed.
 
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 1:29:44 PM UTC-4, Ed Lee wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 6:08:12 AM UTC-7, Ricky wrote:
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 11:54:28 PM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 10:55:04 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 17:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Most foreign companies are pulling out of Russia, which results in many severe consequences for Russian industries. Top of the list is commercial aviation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFOO11tywbM

Germany did something similar. Twice.
Germany was bigger, relatively speaking. Russia is geographically large, but it\'s industrial output is about the same as Texas.

Europe and America seem happy to use Ukranian cannon fodder to use the weapons they supply to chew up Russia\'s stocks of weapons and conscripts.

It\'s strategic imbecility on the Russian side. They didn\'t achieve the first strike success that they clearly hoped for, and persistence isn\'t paying off the way it needs to justify continued expenditure.
Just as with all governments, there is a need to save face. Why else was the US in Vietnam and the rest of SE Asia for so long? Why were both the Soviet Union and the US in Afghanistan so long?

The war would have likely already ended if there had been a way for Russia and Putin to save face and declare a victory.
Don\'t worry about Putin/Xi faces. Send more missiles to Ukraine/Taiwan.

Let\'s face it. If China wants to invade Taiwan, they will take out a few military objectives then land troops and be done with it.

That\'s what should have happened in Ukraine, but the Russian army has aged other than gracefully it would seem. I don\'t think the Chinese military will have that problem. Their weapons are new, shiny and they are ready to get them dirty. I can\'t say how they would fare against our military, but I think it is unlikely that we will be involved directly unless attacked. We probably wouldn\'t even have ships in the area.

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in news:fc28e85f-17c3-
42d9-a47f-e1059bdd229fn@googlegroups.com:

> Why else was the US in Vietnam and the rest of SE Asia for so long?

Because tricky Dicky wanted 5500 more dead \"hoodlums\".

Oh, and he \"did not want the US to lose face...\" His words.
 
Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
news:eec4b64b-4720-420e-a380-cf3e551ad5d2n@googlegroups.com:

On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 1:29:44 PM UTC-4, Ed Lee wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 6:08:12 AM UTC-7, Ricky wrote:
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 11:54:28 PM UTC-4,
bill....@ieee.org wrote
:
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 10:55:04 AM UTC+10, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 17:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Most foreign companies are pulling out of Russia, which
results in
many severe consequences for Russian industries. Top of the list
is commercial aviation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFOO11tywbM

Germany did something similar. Twice.
Germany was bigger, relatively speaking. Russia is
geographically lar
ge, but it\'s industrial output is about the same as Texas.

Europe and America seem happy to use Ukranian cannon fodder
to use th
e weapons they supply to chew up Russia\'s stocks of weapons and
conscripts.

It\'s strategic imbecility on the Russian side. They didn\'t
achieve th
e first strike success that they clearly hoped for, and
persistence isn\'t paying off the way it needs to justify continued
expenditure.
Just as with all governments, there is a need to save face. Why
else wa
s the US in Vietnam and the rest of SE Asia for so long? Why were
both the Soviet Union and the US in Afghanistan so long?

The war would have likely already ended if there had been a way
for Rus
sia and Putin to save face and declare a victory.
Don\'t worry about Putin/Xi faces. Send more missiles to
Ukraine/Taiwan.

Let\'s face it. If China wants to invade Taiwan, they will take
out a few military objectives then land troops and be done with
it.

That\'s what should have happened in Ukraine, but the Russian army
has aged other than gracefully it would seem. I don\'t think the
Chinese military will have that problem. Their weapons are new,
shiny and they are ready to get them dirty. I can\'t say how they
would fare against our military, but I think it is unlikely that
we will be involved directly unless attacked. We probably
wouldn\'t even have ships in the area.

I can say for certain and so can the Russian military commanders...
that Chinese rubber sucks big time. You can almost watch it dry
rotting. There were a lot of Russian armored troop carriers with 6
huge chinese tires on each that had severe rubber rot problems,
causing huge numbers of field failures.
 
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 7:56:52 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 6:08:12 AM UTC-7, Ricky wrote:
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 11:54:28 PM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 10:55:04 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 17:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Most foreign companies are pulling out of Russia, which results in many severe consequences for Russian industries. Top of the list is commercial aviation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFOO11tywbM

Germany did something similar. Twice.
Germany was bigger, relatively speaking. Russia is geographically large, but it\'s industrial output is about the same as Texas.

Europe and America seem happy to use Ukranian cannon fodder to use the weapons they supply to chew up Russia\'s stocks of weapons and conscripts.

It\'s strategic imbecility on the Russian side. They didn\'t achieve the first strike success that they clearly hoped for, and persistence isn\'t paying off the way it needs to justify continued expenditure.
Just as with all governments, there is a need to save face. Why else was the US in Vietnam and the rest of SE Asia for so long? Why were both the Soviet Union and the US in Afghanistan so long?

The war would have likely already ended if there had been a way for Russia and Putin to save face and declare a victory.

Meanwhile, the blow to the image of military might by Russia, is enormous. If Russia didn\'t have nuclear capability, I suspect any number of other countries would be involved in the fighting, and it would already be over.

Putin is having some serious medical issues and may want a big victory under his belt before he dies or is deposed.

The same kind as Gnatguy. Senile dementia is a bitch. Wanting a big victory when you haven\'t got the army that can deliver it is understandable, but even somebody as intellectually crippled as Gnatguy should know that it isn\'t going to happen.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 5:35:41 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 7:56:52 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 6:08:12 AM UTC-7, Ricky wrote:
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 11:54:28 PM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 10:55:04 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 17:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Most foreign companies are pulling out of Russia, which results in many severe consequences for Russian industries. Top of the list is commercial aviation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFOO11tywbM

Germany did something similar. Twice.
Germany was bigger, relatively speaking. Russia is geographically large, but it\'s industrial output is about the same as Texas.

Europe and America seem happy to use Ukranian cannon fodder to use the weapons they supply to chew up Russia\'s stocks of weapons and conscripts.

It\'s strategic imbecility on the Russian side. They didn\'t achieve the first strike success that they clearly hoped for, and persistence isn\'t paying off the way it needs to justify continued expenditure.
Just as with all governments, there is a need to save face. Why else was the US in Vietnam and the rest of SE Asia for so long? Why were both the Soviet Union and the US in Afghanistan so long?

The war would have likely already ended if there had been a way for Russia and Putin to save face and declare a victory.

Meanwhile, the blow to the image of military might by Russia, is enormous. If Russia didn\'t have nuclear capability, I suspect any number of other countries would be involved in the fighting, and it would already be over.

Putin is having some serious medical issues and may want a big victory under his belt before he dies or is deposed.
The same kind as Gnatguy. Senile dementia is a bitch.

SNIPPERMAN speaks with PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.

Wanting a big victory when you haven\'t got the army that can deliver it is understandable, but even somebody as intellectually crippled as Gnatguy should know that it isn\'t going to happen.

See what I mean?
 
On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 12:51:38 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 5:35:41 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 7:56:52 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 6:08:12 AM UTC-7, Ricky wrote:
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 11:54:28 PM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 10:55:04 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 17:47:55 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Most foreign companies are pulling out of Russia, which results in many severe consequences for Russian industries. Top of the list is commercial aviation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFOO11tywbM

Germany did something similar. Twice.
Germany was bigger, relatively speaking. Russia is geographically large, but it\'s industrial output is about the same as Texas.

Europe and America seem happy to use Ukranian cannon fodder to use the weapons they supply to chew up Russia\'s stocks of weapons and conscripts.

It\'s strategic imbecility on the Russian side. They didn\'t achieve the first strike success that they clearly hoped for, and persistence isn\'t paying off the way it needs to justify continued expenditure.
Just as with all governments, there is a need to save face. Why else was the US in Vietnam and the rest of SE Asia for so long? Why were both the Soviet Union and the US in Afghanistan so long?

The war would have likely already ended if there had been a way for Russia and Putin to save face and declare a victory.

Meanwhile, the blow to the image of military might by Russia, is enormous. If Russia didn\'t have nuclear capability, I suspect any number of other countries would be involved in the fighting, and it would already be over.

Putin is having some serious medical issues and may want a big victory under his belt before he dies or is deposed.
The same kind as Gnatguy. Senile dementia is a bitch.

Sloman speaks with PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.

Of Gnatguy\'s dementia. My father\'s mother had it, but it didn\'t make her as unpleasant as Gnatguy.

Wanting a big victory when you haven\'t got the army that can deliver it is understandable, but even somebody as intellectually crippled as Gnatguy should know that it isn\'t going to happen.

See what I mean?

Irony. We can see what Gnatguy thinks, and he can\'t see that he isn\'t thinking all that well.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:td2ir1$24usp$1@dont-email.me:

The war in Ukrain is just a US plot to keep the Military
Industrial Complex funded

You are a goddamned total retard. Putin invaded Ukraine all on his
own.

You are worse than that other absolute idiot Alex Jones.
 
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in news:td2ir1$24usp$1
@dont-email.me:

> EU is hurting its own citizens

This Jan Pan total retard has really gone off the deep end.

You should nuke yourself, jackass.
 
On 08/11/2022 06:05 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Well, if you go back a few years in history at least *I* do remember the CIA plot to overthrow the Ukrainian government
that succeeded.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Nuland

She\'s baaaack...
 
On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 2:40:57 AM UTC-7, Jan Panteltje wrote:

The Ukrainian people in Donbas had clearly voted to remain part of Russia, most are Russian speaking
and Shitkensky clearly violated previous peace treaties by bombing places in Donbas,

The people in Donbas weren\'t voting in a sanctioned and normal inspected election,
and the vote count happened during military surprise attack (by a small number of
nonuniformed \"covert\" Russian troops, mainly assaulting at government buildings).
Russian heavy weapons like the antiaircraft battery that took down Malasia
airlines MH14 were also clearly in place.

Crimea \'voted\' 6 March 2014.
Putin acknowledged the troop presence afterward, in April 2014.

Internet and other communications during and after those events were
dominated by Moscow, and the \'election results\' was just a Russian invention.
 
On a sunny day (Thu, 11 Aug 2022 10:35:23 -0700 (PDT)) it happened whit3rd
<whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote in
<a8b6ea01-f471-4446-9fcc-a546db997f83n@googlegroups.com>:

On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 2:40:57 AM UTC-7, Jan Panteltje wrote:

The Ukrainian people in Donbas had clearly voted to remain part of Russia, most are Russian speaking
and Shitkensky clearly violated previous peace treaties by bombing places in Donbas,

The people in Donbas weren\'t voting in a sanctioned and normal inspected election,
and the vote count happened during military surprise attack (by a small number of
nonuniformed \"covert\" Russian troops, mainly assaulting at government buildings).
Russian heavy weapons like the antiaircraft battery that took down Malasia
airlines MH14 were also clearly in place.

Crimea \'voted\' 6 March 2014.
Putin acknowledged the troop presence afterward, in April 2014.

Internet and other communications during and after those events were
dominated by Moscow, and the \'election results\' was just a Russian invention.

Yea and Iraq was full of weapons of mass destruction...
\'merrican media
Still waiting for CNN to mention the crimes of ByeThen\'s son.

And
when the international court in The Hague wanted to prosecute US solders
for war crimes in Iraq Double You Bushman threatened to intervene
so nobody was sentenced.

Nobody has sentenced doctor Faulty yet, todays Mengele, covid experimenter
on ALL of humanity!!!!!
 
whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 2:40:57 AM UTC-7, Jan Panteltje wrote:

The Ukrainian people in Donbas had clearly voted to remain part of
Russia, most are Russian speaking and Shitkensky clearly violated
previous peace treaties by bombing places in Donbas,

The people in Donbas weren\'t voting in a sanctioned and normal inspected
election, and the vote count happened during military surprise attack
(by a small number of nonuniformed \"covert\" Russian troops, mainly
assaulting at government buildings). Russian heavy weapons like the
antiaircraft battery that took down Malasia airlines MH14 were also
clearly in place.

Crimea \'voted\' 6 March 2014.
Putin acknowledged the troop presence afterward, in April 2014.

Internet and other communications during and after those events were
dominated by Moscow, and the \'election results\' was just a Russian
invention.

The Russian election is not recognized by the international community. It
will have no effect on the war and Ukraine\'s determination to take back
their country. Anyone who wants to remain Russian can evacuate back to
Russia.

The major effect will be when Ukrain takes down the Crimea bridge. I\'ve
been thinking of different ways to do it. One way might be to plant
explosives against the piers under water, a la Dambusters. The problem is
how to get them there, and how to to trigger them. But just blowing holes
in the road or twisting the rails won\'t work. The bridge has to be taken
down.




--
MRM
 
There can be no topic more important than the Ukraine war. The political
and economic devastation on the planet is incalculable, and the loss of
life is a tragic waste.

For those who are interested, I have compiled a list of various sites that
discuss recent events in Ukraine. Some are better than others - I placed
the two best and most reliable at the top of the list.

The Russian Dude <- very good. My top source
https://www.youtube.com/c/TheRussianDude/videos

Combat Veteran Reacts <- very good (loud)
https://www.youtube.com/c/CombatVeteranReacts/videos

Artur Rehi
https://www.youtube.com/c/arturrehi/videos

CRUX
https://www.youtube.com/c/CRUXnews/videos

Peter Ziehan Economy And Geopolitics
https://www.youtube.com/c/EconomyAndGeopolitics/videos

FRANCE 24 English - some Ukraine news
https://www.youtube.com/c/FRANCE24English/videos

Joe Blogs <- good review of economics resulting from the war
https://www.youtube.com/c/JoeBlogs/videos

Lena News
https://www.youtube.com/c/LenaNewss/videos

Newslab
https://www.youtube.com/c/Newslab0/videos

Speak The Truth <- very boring. depends on Russian News
https://www.youtube.com/c/SpeakTheTruth1/videos

Stone News
https://www.youtube.com/c/StoneNews/videos

The Sun
https://www.youtube.com/c/thesun/videos

TLDR News EU
https://www.youtube.com/c/TLDRNewsEU/videos

Untold News
https://www.youtube.com/c/UntoldNews123/videos

Warthog Defense
https://www.youtube.com/c/WarthogProduction/videos

36 Update
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_lhKBhtwVdCbHnOwvqWy3Q/videos

US Daily Brief
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbue2DdTM_S5LPvPeOYyP3A/videos

U.S Daily News
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi5PgcN1EK-2M0PwgLY9LOA/videos

War in Ukraine
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCP2QApi8G2TKc8NZmeDWSUg/videos

U.S Military News
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqQOZUzmRhGLUj6sXXl0zBg/videos

US Secret Agenda
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYYAo4actN90lemgcjdzSFg/videos

UK news
https://www.youtube.com/user/pnolfoak/videos

TVP World
https://www.youtube.com/c/TVPWorld/videos
- TVP is a Polish public broadcast service

I often do a general sweep to see if there are any other posts on Ukraine
that these sites missed. But you have to be careful. There are often fake
Russian news sites, game sites such as MilSim, and other crud to avoid:

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ukraine+war




--
MRM
 
On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 12:09:49 PM UTC-7, Mike Monett wrote:
whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 2:40:57 AM UTC-7, Jan Panteltje wrote:

The Ukrainian people in Donbas had clearly voted to remain part of
Russia, most are Russian speaking and Shitkensky clearly violated
previous peace treaties by bombing places in Donbas,

The people in Donbas weren\'t voting in a sanctioned and normal inspected
election, and the vote count happened during military surprise attack
(by a small number of nonuniformed \"covert\" Russian troops, mainly
assaulting at government buildings). Russian heavy weapons like the
antiaircraft battery that took down Malasia airlines MH14 were also
clearly in place.

Crimea \'voted\' 6 March 2014.
Putin acknowledged the troop presence afterward, in April 2014.

Internet and other communications during and after those events were
dominated by Moscow, and the \'election results\' was just a Russian
invention.
The Russian election is not recognized by the international community. It
will have no effect on the war and Ukraine\'s determination to take back
their country. Anyone who wants to remain Russian can evacuate back to
Russia.

The major effect will be when Ukrain takes down the Crimea bridge. I\'ve
been thinking of different ways to do it. One way might be to plant
explosives against the piers under water, a la Dambusters. The problem is
how to get them there, and how to to trigger them. But just blowing holes
in the road or twisting the rails won\'t work. The bridge has to be taken
down.

After taking Kherson and surrounding area, the bridge will be within range of the new missiles. The missiles are probably aided with western technologies.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top