Apparently makes some great motorcycle riding though:
Those arent my kids.
When has it ever stopped you before?
I've heard of the 'nuclear family', but that's ridiculous....
An interesting article, if not somewhat disturbing in parts to think some
Down, boy |-)
Indeed.
That whole story is a hoax.
What, the Chernobyl disaster or the biker's story with the somewhat
LOL, you have to ask? I may be known for being predisposed towards
No need for debate, the facts speak for themselves
Nope.
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/ockhamsrazor/stories/2007/1895697.htmAlan Rutlidge wrote:
"Jeßus" <n...@all.org> wrote in message
news:f5scqf$e5r$1@stable.tornevall.net...
David L. Jones wrote:
On Jun 26, 3:36 pm, Bob Parker <bobp.deletet...@bluebottle.com> wrote:
On 26/06/2007 09:42 kreed wrote:
Its basically a geiger counter, used to detect nuclear radiation, not
radio/microwave frequency
A must have, if you are planning a trip to Chernobyl / Pripyat
There are some very depressing photos of that deserted area
athttp://www.panoramio.com/user/226142
Apparently makes some great motorcycle riding though:
http://www.kiddofspeed.com/
That whole story is a hoax.
What, the Chernobyl disaster or the biker's story with the somewhat
convincing photos?
LOL, you have to ask? I may be known for being predisposed towards
conspiracy theories, etc.... but come on!
I meant the biker's story.
As I recall, she eventually admitted to it being more than a little
embellished after a number of people picked up on some inconsistencies
and factual errors. If you're sufficiently interested, do a search on
'Chernobyl biker hoax' or similar. There shouldn't be too much trouble
bringing up some relevant links.
Whether she was on a bike or in a car is a moot point, the factualOn Jun 27, 2:24 pm, Jeßus <n...@all.org> wrote:
Alan Rutlidge wrote:
"Jeßus" <n...@all.org> wrote in message
news:f5scqf$e5r$1@stable.tornevall.net...
David L. Jones wrote:
On Jun 26, 3:36 pm, Bob Parker <bobp.deletet...@bluebottle.com> wrote:
On 26/06/2007 09:42 kreed wrote:
Its basically a geiger counter, used to detect nuclear radiation, not
radio/microwave frequency
A must have, if you are planning a trip to Chernobyl / Pripyat
There are some very depressing photos of that deserted area
athttp://www.panoramio.com/user/226142
Apparently makes some great motorcycle riding though:
http://www.kiddofspeed.com/
That whole story is a hoax.
What, the Chernobyl disaster or the biker's story with the somewhat
convincing photos?
LOL, you have to ask? I may be known for being predisposed towards
conspiracy theories, etc.... but come on!
I meant the biker's story.
As I recall, she eventually admitted to it being more than a little
embellished after a number of people picked up on some inconsistencies
and factual errors. If you're sufficiently interested, do a search on
'Chernobyl biker hoax' or similar. There shouldn't be too much trouble
bringing up some relevant links.
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/ockhamsrazor/stories/2007/1895697.htm
Click on "SHOW TRANSCRIPT"
Not sure about now, but back then it was possible to book a legitimate
tour to Pripyat. Travel was on four wheels.
There's no doubting that there's some serious s#& going down atrowan194 wrote:
On Jun 27, 2:24 pm, Jeßus <n...@all.org> wrote:
Alan Rutlidge wrote:
"Jeßus" <n...@all.org> wrote in message
news:f5scqf$e5r$1@stable.tornevall.net...
David L. Jones wrote:
On Jun 26, 3:36 pm, Bob Parker <bobp.deletet...@bluebottle.com> wrote:
On 26/06/2007 09:42 kreed wrote:
Its basically a geiger counter, used to detect nuclear radiation, not
radio/microwave frequency
A must have, if you are planning a trip to Chernobyl / Pripyat
There are some very depressing photos of that deserted area
athttp://www.panoramio.com/user/226142
Apparently makes some great motorcycle riding though:
http://www.kiddofspeed.com/
That whole story is a hoax.
What, the Chernobyl disaster or the biker's story with the somewhat
convincing photos?
LOL, you have to ask? I may be known for being predisposed towards
conspiracy theories, etc.... but come on!
I meant the biker's story.
As I recall, she eventually admitted to it being more than a little
embellished after a number of people picked up on some inconsistencies
and factual errors. If you're sufficiently interested, do a search on
'Chernobyl biker hoax' or similar. There shouldn't be too much trouble
bringing up some relevant links.
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/ockhamsrazor/stories/2007/1895697.htm
Click on "SHOW TRANSCRIPT"
Not sure about now, but back then it was possible to book a legitimate
tour to Pripyat. Travel was on four wheels.
Whether she was on a bike or in a car is a moot point, the factual
disaster of Chernobyl is what counts. You can't discount the dangers of
nuclear power because one person drives a car instead of a motorbike.
Exactly. So basically her story is just that - a story.On Jun 30, 7:32 pm, Dorfus Dippintush
Dorfus.Dippint...@kippinbot.com> wrote:
rowan194 wrote:
On Jun 27, 2:24 pm, Jeßus <n...@all.org> wrote:
Alan Rutlidge wrote:
"Jeßus" <n...@all.org> wrote in message
news:f5scqf$e5r$1@stable.tornevall.net...
David L. Jones wrote:
On Jun 26, 3:36 pm, Bob Parker <bobp.deletet...@bluebottle.com> wrote:
On 26/06/2007 09:42 kreed wrote:
Its basically a geiger counter, used to detect nuclear radiation, not
radio/microwave frequency
A must have, if you are planning a trip to Chernobyl / Pripyat
There are some very depressing photos of that deserted area
athttp://www.panoramio.com/user/226142
Apparently makes some great motorcycle riding though:
http://www.kiddofspeed.com/
That whole story is a hoax.
What, the Chernobyl disaster or the biker's story with the somewhat
convincing photos?
LOL, you have to ask? I may be known for being predisposed towards
conspiracy theories, etc.... but come on!
I meant the biker's story.
As I recall, she eventually admitted to it being more than a little
embellished after a number of people picked up on some inconsistencies
and factual errors. If you're sufficiently interested, do a search on
'Chernobyl biker hoax' or similar. There shouldn't be too much trouble
bringing up some relevant links.
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/ockhamsrazor/stories/2007/1895697.htm
Click on "SHOW TRANSCRIPT"
Not sure about now, but back then it was possible to book a legitimate
tour to Pripyat. Travel was on four wheels.
Whether she was on a bike or in a car is a moot point, the factual
disaster of Chernobyl is what counts. You can't discount the dangers of
nuclear power because one person drives a car instead of a motorbike.
There's no doubting that there's some serious s#& going down at
Chernobyl, but the fact that she was caught lying about her mode of
transport makes you wonder how much else on her site has been
sensationalized for the reader. I look at the images but take the
captions with a grain of salt.
Yes, it will just take time.
Exactly. So basically her story is just that - a story.
The realities about what Chernobyl has become since the meltdown goes
without saying (or should do anyway).
Yes, it will just take time.
A lot of time.