PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

On 24-May-2016 10:46 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 23/05/2016 3:33 PM, Trevor wrote:
On 23/05/2016 1:29 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 21/05/2016 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
Yes, I have heard the difference between speaker cables under certain
circumstances. As have many of my clients. It's why I suggest RG213/U
when the situation demands it.

I'd still like to see a double blind trial on that.

He's right of course, "under certain circumstances"... "when the
situation demands it".
Not something that too many people have to deal with though. Obviously
you don't, and neither do I.

Trevor.



And most that think they do I would hazard to guess.
Click to expand...

some ppl prefer to have their AV equipment performing to the best of
it's capabilities


--
"As long as there is this book [Koran] there will be no peace in the world"
-William Gladstone, four times PM of Great Britain
http://www.siotw.org/
http://www.australianlibertyalliance.org.au/
 
On 24/05/2016 11:22 AM, felix wrote:
On 24-May-2016 10:46 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 23/05/2016 3:33 PM, Trevor wrote:
On 23/05/2016 1:29 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 21/05/2016 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
Yes, I have heard the difference between speaker cables under certain
circumstances. As have many of my clients. It's why I suggest RG213/U
when the situation demands it.

I'd still like to see a double blind trial on that.

He's right of course, "under certain circumstances"... "when the
situation demands it".
Not something that too many people have to deal with though. Obviously
you don't, and neither do I.

And most that think they do I would hazard to guess.


some ppl prefer to have their AV equipment performing to the best of
it's capabilities
Click to expand...

Right, which is not about inventing non existent problems that are
easily "solved" while ignoring more major ones that are difficult or
impossible to fix.
Most people like to do the former because it makes them happy. Keeps
their mind off the problems they can't so easily fix (the room and
speakers themselves being the major ones) Nothing wrong with that I
guess. Just their continual BS that annoys me.

Trevor.
 
On 24/05/16 11:19 AM, felix wrote:

Nobody, including me, has ever claimed that I'm a cable expert.

just exaggerating for impact.
Click to expand...

So is *that* how you explain what you do? You think you can legitimately
claim that you don't "lie", because you just "exaggerate for impact"?

Bullshit by another name....

but you were trying to tell me about
cables saying I didn't know what I was talking about, and noddy did say
he would take your word over mine,
Click to expand...

I'm sorry but due to your total lack of anything resembling normal human
intellect you have completely misunderstood my comments. I wasn't
endorsing Cockwit's knowledge in the area of cables (or anything else).
I was saying that you demonstrably have absolutely *less* than no idea
of anything that you happen to be talking about, and I would take his
(or anyone else's) word over yours on any subject you'd care to name
(including cables).

There are as yet undiscovered tribes in the deepest Amazon forests who
know more about cables (or anything else) than you do.

> so don't get so uppity

From the bloke who looks for arguments and then sulks like a kid who's
shit his pants in a fart competition when everyone laughs at him.

Much like your dear friend Jonz, you are in fact too stupid to
understand how stupid you actually are.





--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
 
On 24/05/2016 10:03 AM, Noddy wrote:
On 24/05/16 11:19 AM, felix wrote:

Nobody, including me, has ever claimed that I'm a cable expert.

just exaggerating for impact.

So is *that* how you explain what you do? You think you can legitimately
claim that you don't "lie", because you just "exaggerate for impact"?

Bullshit by another name....
Click to expand...

You call your lies "figures of speech" Woody, who are you to talk?
 
On 24/05/2016 9:22 AM, felix wrote:
On 24-May-2016 10:46 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 23/05/2016 3:33 PM, Trevor wrote:
On 23/05/2016 1:29 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 21/05/2016 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
Yes, I have heard the difference between speaker cables under certain
circumstances. As have many of my clients. It's why I suggest RG213/U
when the situation demands it.

I'd still like to see a double blind trial on that.

He's right of course, "under certain circumstances"... "when the
situation demands it".
Not something that too many people have to deal with though. Obviously
you don't, and neither do I.

Trevor.



And most that think they do I would hazard to guess.



some ppl prefer to have their AV equipment performing to the best of
it's capabilities
Click to expand...

Even when they think they can see and hear differences that they can't
possible perceive.

But hey, it's your money to waste.
 
On 24/05/16 2:39 PM, Clocky wrote:

So is *that* how you explain what you do? You think you can legitimately
claim that you don't "lie", because you just "exaggerate for impact"?

Bullshit by another name....


You call your lies "figures of speech" Woody, who are you to talk?
Click to expand...

ROTFL :)

I see. So, if I said to you that "I've done something a million times"
you have no idea that it's simply a figurative way of implying that I've
done it a lot, and it automatically becomes bullshit to you because it
can't be shown to have occurred one million times?

Are you *sure* you want to go down this road, dickhead?







--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
 
On 24/05/2016 9:19 AM, felix wrote:
On 24-May-2016 10:45 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 23/05/2016 5:00 PM, felix wrote:
On 23-May-2016 2:14 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 23/05/2016 12:06 PM, felix wrote:
On 23-May-2016 9:01 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 23/05/2016 1:29 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 21/05/2016 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:


Yes, I have heard the difference between speaker cables under
certain
circumstances. As have many of my clients. It's why I suggest
RG213/U
when the situation demands it.




I'd still like to see a double blind trial on that.


**You organise it. I'll bring the speakers, amplification, source and
cables.



speaker cables can affect the sound from the speakers just as AV
interconnects do



**Of course. Only a complete moron would dispute such things.


well don't tell noddy. according to him Clocky is the cable expert and I
know nothing about them :)




Nobody, including me, has ever claimed that I'm a cable expert.

just exaggerating for impact. but you were trying to tell me about
cables saying I didn't know what I was talking about,
Click to expand...

You don't.

and noddy did say
he would take your word over mine, so don't get so uppity
Click to expand...
 
On 24-May-2016 2:35 PM, Clocky wrote:
On 24/05/2016 9:19 AM, felix wrote:
On 24-May-2016 10:45 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 23/05/2016 5:00 PM, felix wrote:
On 23-May-2016 2:14 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 23/05/2016 12:06 PM, felix wrote:
On 23-May-2016 9:01 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 23/05/2016 1:29 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 21/05/2016 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:


Yes, I have heard the difference between speaker cables under
certain
circumstances. As have many of my clients. It's why I suggest
RG213/U
when the situation demands it.




I'd still like to see a double blind trial on that.


**You organise it. I'll bring the speakers, amplification,
source and
cables.



speaker cables can affect the sound from the speakers just as AV
interconnects do



**Of course. Only a complete moron would dispute such things.


well don't tell noddy. according to him Clocky is the cable expert
and I
know nothing about them :)




Nobody, including me, has ever claimed that I'm a cable expert.

just exaggerating for impact. but you were trying to tell me about
cables saying I didn't know what I was talking about,

You don't.
Click to expand...

saying so doesn't make it true and never will. you didn't even know
quality HDMI cables had triple or quad shielding, so STFU!

and noddy did say he would take your word over mine, so don't get so
uppity
Click to expand...

--
"As long as there is this book [Koran] there will be no peace in the world"
-William Gladstone, four times PM of Great Britain
http://www.siotw.org/
http://www.australianlibertyalliance.org.au/
 
On 24/05/2016 6:04 PM, felix wrote:
On 24-May-2016 2:35 PM, Clocky wrote:
On 24/05/2016 9:19 AM, felix wrote:
On 24-May-2016 10:45 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 23/05/2016 5:00 PM, felix wrote:
On 23-May-2016 2:14 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 23/05/2016 12:06 PM, felix wrote:
On 23-May-2016 9:01 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 23/05/2016 1:29 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 21/05/2016 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:


Yes, I have heard the difference between speaker cables under
certain
circumstances. As have many of my clients. It's why I suggest
RG213/U
when the situation demands it.




I'd still like to see a double blind trial on that.


**You organise it. I'll bring the speakers, amplification,
source and
cables.



speaker cables can affect the sound from the speakers just as AV
interconnects do



**Of course. Only a complete moron would dispute such things.


well don't tell noddy. according to him Clocky is the cable expert
and I
know nothing about them :)




Nobody, including me, has ever claimed that I'm a cable expert.

just exaggerating for impact. but you were trying to tell me about
cables saying I didn't know what I was talking about,

You don't.

saying so doesn't make it true and never will. you didn't even know
quality HDMI cables had triple or quad shielding, so STFU!
Click to expand...

And none of that makes any difference whatsoever to what you see on the
screen as you described. Nor does it make a difference is the same spec
cable has extra shielding or not. It either complies with the spec or it
doesn't.



and noddy did say he would take your word over mine, so don't get so
uppity
Click to expand...
 
On 21/05/2016 7:43 PM, felix wrote:
Been doing a bit of PC cleanup. I have Kaspersky Internet Security installed and it has not detected any problems. I
also have MalwareBytes and it has not detected any problems either. I have just installed SpyHunter and ran it, and it
has found heaps of stuff, including a trojan dialer. so far it's listed 202 'infections' and still running. what
gives??!! why is it finding stuff and the others didn't?!
Click to expand...

I am starting to believe that so called anti-virus companies may not only be writing viruses to keep themselves in
business, they may also be selling their customer data bases.

my findings with Norton last year. Never resolved. I simply gave up and moved on.
https://community.norton.com/en/forums/cosymantecnisbfw-bug-and-auto-injection-additional-html-code

Cheers Don...



--
Don McKenzie

Dontronics has just launched a new Shopping Cart.
Now located at: https://www.shop-dontronics.com

All Olimex products now 75% to 95% off normal Olimex Prices.
https://www.shop-dontronics.com/olimex-discounts
Many other items discounted up to 95% off.
Also discounts on Sparkfun, CCS, SimmStick, etc.
 
felix wrote:

saying so doesn't make it true and never will. you didn't even know
quality HDMI cables had triple or quad shielding, so STFU!
Click to expand...

Actually Felix the fucktard, we do know why a digital cable is blessed
with triple or even quad shielding - to empty the wallet of stupid,
easily impressed, know-nothing gooses like you.


you are in fact the lawful prey of the spivs that sell such shit. By
all means give them all your money at least you can't then spend it on
something even more stupid.
 
On 24-May-2016 9:44 PM, Clocky wrote:
On 24/05/2016 6:04 PM, felix wrote:
On 24-May-2016 2:35 PM, Clocky wrote:
On 24/05/2016 9:19 AM, felix wrote:
On 24-May-2016 10:45 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 23/05/2016 5:00 PM, felix wrote:
On 23-May-2016 2:14 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 23/05/2016 12:06 PM, felix wrote:
On 23-May-2016 9:01 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 23/05/2016 1:29 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 21/05/2016 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:


Yes, I have heard the difference between speaker cables under
certain
circumstances. As have many of my clients. It's why I suggest
RG213/U
when the situation demands it.




I'd still like to see a double blind trial on that.


**You organise it. I'll bring the speakers, amplification,
source and
cables.



speaker cables can affect the sound from the speakers just as AV
interconnects do



**Of course. Only a complete moron would dispute such things.


well don't tell noddy. according to him Clocky is the cable expert
and I
know nothing about them :)




Nobody, including me, has ever claimed that I'm a cable expert.

just exaggerating for impact. but you were trying to tell me about
cables saying I didn't know what I was talking about,

You don't.

saying so doesn't make it true and never will. you didn't even know
quality HDMI cables had triple or quad shielding, so STFU!


And none of that makes any difference whatsoever to what you see on
the screen as you described.
Click to expand...

yes it does, and the fact that you don't know why is just further
evidence of your ignorance regarding cables

Nor does it make a difference if the same spec cable has extra
shielding or not. It either complies with the spec or it doesn't.





and noddy did say he would take your word over mine, so don't get so
uppity
Click to expand...

--
"As long as there is this book [Koran] there will be no peace in the world"
-William Gladstone, four times PM of Great Britain
http://www.siotw.org/
http://www.australianlibertyalliance.org.au/
 
On 25/05/2016 4:19 AM, Blue Peeler wrote:
felix wrote:


saying so doesn't make it true and never will. you didn't even know
quality HDMI cables had triple or quad shielding, so STFU!




Actually Felix the fucktard, we do know why a digital cable is blessed
with triple or even quad shielding - to empty the wallet of stupid,
easily impressed, know-nothing gooses like you.


you are in fact the lawful prey of the spivs that sell such shit. By
all means give them all your money at least you can't then spend it on
something even more stupid.
Click to expand...

+1
 
SEC means it had a security bit. If set, it would self erase before you could re-program it. Not a problem if you wrote the code.

You could also configure one of the mode pins so it would erase at power up, ready to be re-programmed. One of my first designs had a dip switch connected to the mode pin in question. I put a dab of hot glue on the switch after programming, to prevent the customer from accidentally bricking his unit. Of course, they could always be sent in for re-programming.
 
On Sunday, July 15, 2001 at 8:25:02 PM UTC+10, Joe Irvine wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone out there has some info ( manual ) for a
BWD 530A Oscilloscope.
Any info would be appreciated as I am trying to repair a no trace fault and
am trying to find a schematic.
Cheers
Joe
Click to expand...

Did you ever get a copy of the BWD 530 manual, I would also like a copy.
ozengines@gmail.com
Regards
Peter
 
On 12/08/2016 5:52 PM, ozengines@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2001 at 8:25:02 PM UTC+10, Joe Irvine wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone out there has some info ( manual ) for a
BWD 530A Oscilloscope.
Any info would be appreciated as I am trying to repair a no trace fault and
am trying to find a schematic.
Cheers
Joe

Did you ever get a copy of the BWD 530 manual, I would also like a copy.
ozengines@gmail.com
Regards
Peter
Click to expand...

It would be cheaper and much better to buy a modern digital CRO, eg
something like a Rigol 1052. Far and away superior than wrestling with
ancient junk.

I note you are replying to an email now 15 years old. Doubt if the OP
is still interested.
 
Adrian Jansen <adrian@qq.vv.net> wrote:
On 12/08/2016 5:52 PM, ozengines@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2001 at 8:25:02 PM UTC+10, Joe Irvine wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone out there has some info ( manual ) for a
BWD 530A Oscilloscope.
Any info would be appreciated as I am trying to repair a no trace fault and
am trying to find a schematic.
Cheers
Joe

Did you ever get a copy of the BWD 530 manual, I would also like a copy.
ozengines@gmail.com
Regards
Peter


It would be cheaper and much better to buy a modern digital CRO, eg
something like a Rigol 1052. Far and away superior than wrestling with
ancient junk.
Click to expand...

Old 'scopes are fine if they suit the job.

The only links that I know of for BWD manuals are here:
http://bee.mif.pg.gda.pl/ciasteczkowypotwor/B.W.D/
http://www.kevinchant.com/bwd.html

Neither has a manual for the BWD 530.

--
__ __
#_ < |\| |< _#
 
Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

It would be cheaper and much better to buy a modern digital CRO, eg
something like a Rigol 1052. Far and away superior than wrestling with
ancient junk.


Old 'scopes are fine if they suit the job.
Click to expand...

** And they suit lots of jobs that DSOs like the Rigol do not.



The only links that I know of for BWD manuals are here:
http://bee.mif.pg.gda.pl/ciasteczkowypotwor/B.W.D/
http://www.kevinchant.com/bwd.html

Neither has a manual for the BWD 530.
Click to expand...

** Popular models like the 539a, 509, 821 and 824 are there.

My main scope is an 821 - like the one in this pic:

http://www.vinylengine.com/turntable_forum/gallery/image.php?album_id=1065&image_id=32914&view=no_count

Dual trace, 50Mhz, 6.3kV acceleration on the tube which has an internal graticule. Bought new in 1995 and in daily use since. So far, one 22kohm resistor and a switch pot have needed replacing.

BWD scopes are models of economical design using readily available parts.

I also have a Rigol DS1052E, barely used except for image captures for publication on the net.


.... Phil
 
Phil Allison wrote:

" Bought new in 1995 and in daily use since. "


** Correction:

Bought new in 1985 ...




..... Phil
 
Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:



" Bought new in 1995 and in daily use since. "


** Correction:

Bought new in 1985 ...
Click to expand...

Ah, I was wondering.

The controls look nicely laid out.

--
__ __
#_ < |\| |< _#
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top