Poll for all posters of this NG!

[John]

Should Richard Steve Walz be:

a) Roaming Newsgroups seeking anyone he may devour (over 20,000 posts since
1992)!
b) In a mental hospital of somekind
c) In Jail

Answer the question with a A, B, or C. I am conducting some figures that also
may be on the website. Answer the question honestly and accurately and your
vote will be counted. If you put multiple answers your vote will not be
counted.


Thank you!


John
-------
http://www.members.aol.com/crucifyself03/Rsteve -Steve Walz website
http://www.members.aol.com/crucifyself03/Rsteve/walz/index.htm -Topical
postings page.
Q.Should such a violent person be in a mental ward, behind bars or roaming
Newsgroups?

 

[BretCahill]

As I tell the robber baron media, if you don't like
free speech, you'll need to move to another
universe.


Bret Cahill

 

[Kim]

Exactly what part of my response was against free speech?
I simply stated that this may not be exactly the place for such drivelling
shyte...after all, it is a ELECTRONICS newsgroup.
Maybe we could discuss....oh lets
see.....hmmmmmm.....ummm..................................................
ELECTRONICS! for a change!
Kim


"BretCahill" <bretcahill@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041127202425.06291.00000775@mb-m26.aol.com...

As I tell the robber baron media, if you don't like
free speech, you'll need to move to another
universe.


Bret Cahill

 

[Kim]

Oh and Brett....please email me the article where you told "the robber baron
media"
ANYTHING!!...'cause I don't think they got your message.
Kim



"Kim" <ksleep@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:uYdqd.86002$Le1.1907956@news20.bellglobal.com...

Exactly what part of my response was against free speech?
I simply stated that this may not be exactly the place for such drivelling
shyte...after all, it is a ELECTRONICS newsgroup.
Maybe we could discuss....oh lets
see.....hmmmmmm.....ummm..................................................
ELECTRONICS! for a change!
Kim


"BretCahill" <bretcahill@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041127202425.06291.00000775@mb-m26.aol.com...
As I tell the robber baron media, if you don't like
free speech, you'll need to move to another
universe.


Bret Cahill

 

[BretCahill]

"Kim" ksleep@sympatico.ca in

Message-id: <uYdqd.86002$Le1.1907956@news20.bellglobal.com> writes:

.. . .

I simply stated that this may not be exactly the place for such drivelling
shyte...after all, it is a ELECTRONICS newsgroup.

That's the same public forum analysis adopted
by the Court where content based censorship
may be allowed but under no circumstances
can viewpoint based censorship be permitted.
See Lehman v City of Shaker Heights 418 U. S.
298 (1974), Cornelius v NAACP 473 U. S. 788
(1985) (rest of string cite omitted). Since I
NEVER go against the Court I am forced to
side with you on that one issue.

12 v to 4.8 v cell phone chargers use some kind
simple circuit to step down the voltage and
since it is coiless, it looks like it doesn't waste
much energy as heat. Leave it plugged in all
weekend and the truck will still start Monday
morning. I was wondering if it would be easy to
stick another resistor in parallel to double the
output voltage. I don't need or want much
current ~ 50 - 100 ma.

I figured if the RC time constant in the input
was cut in half the output voltage would double,
assuming it was, in fact an oscillator.

These things are cheap -- at dollar store -- and
I figured there might be some design point
wiggle room.


Bret Cahill

 

[BretCahill]

"Kim" ksleep@sympatico.ca in

Message-id: <Gdeqd.86011$Le1.1913445@news20.bellglobal.com> writes:

Oh and Brett....please email me the article where you told "the robber baron
media"
ANYTHING!!...

First email a $20 bill to: BretCahill@aol.com

'cause I don't think they got your message.

They certainly have given Jon Stewart job
security.

Just yesterday someone was on Tech Nation
selling his book about how cheap
communications has all the robber baron media
shills desperately looking for some fig leaf exit.

Problem is there IS NO fig leaf big enough for
THAT exit. There is no way to spin their way
out. No plausible rationalization for their
blatant hypocrisy.

They would be better off just admitting their
whole lives are complete scams -- defrauding
the people out of democratic freedom with their
lies by omission, cherry picking letters and
interviews, cause celebre du jouring and in
general looking so utterly ridiculous, so
pitifully arrogant they would be much better off
building a guillotine and chopping off their own
heads themselves.

They want to lash out and blame someone. I
say they should blame the EEs and computer
nerds responsible for cheap communications,
not me.

I didn't have a thing to do with it.

I cannot even figger out a simple on/off switch.


Bret Cahill


"America needs a war."

-- William Randolph Hearst

 

[John Fields]

On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:09:31 -0500, "Kim" <ksleep@sympatico.ca> wrote:

Exactly what part of my response was against free speech?
I simply stated that this may not be exactly the place for such drivelling
shyte...after all, it is a ELECTRONICS newsgroup.
Maybe we could discuss....oh lets
see.....hmmmmmm.....ummm..................................................
ELECTRONICS! for a change!

---
Lead by example

--
John Fields

 

[BretCahill]

John Fields jfields@austininstruments.com in

Message-id: <rr1kq0hq21j28erkrftt3lj6c26205gk3e@4ax.com> writes:

On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:09:31 -0500, "Kim" <ksleep@sympatico.ca> wrote:

Exactly what part of my response was against free speech?
I simply stated that this may not be exactly the place for such drivelling
shyte...after all, it is a ELECTRONICS newsgroup.
Maybe we could discuss....oh lets
see.....hmmmmmm.....ummm..................................................
ELECTRONICS! for a change!

---
Lead by example

Like U. S. Senator Bob Graham.

And by the way, how DO those 12v DC
chargers get the voltage down to 4.9 v?


Bret Cahill

 

[Charles Schuler]

RSW and his ilk have found a new and fertile venue via the Internet. A
seemingly endless supply of minds to corrupt. I cringe when I read about
teachers and professors who proudly acclaim their direction of students to
the Internet for projects, research (?), and general growth. Strange thing
the Internet; nuggets of gold floating in sewage.

 

[Kim]

Hows about option F.... for you are a fuckin' asshole.
We gotta stop these personal attacks on the newsgroups. They eat up
bandwidth, and waste everybody's time.
Grow up.
Kim

"John" <crucifyself03@aol.comREMOVE> wrote in message
news:20041127134141.11389.00001444@mb-m29.aol.com...

Should Richard Steve Walz be:

a) Roaming Newsgroups seeking anyone he may devour (over 20,000 posts
since
1992)!
b) In a mental hospital of somekind
c) In Jail

Answer the question with a A, B, or C. I am conducting some figures that
also
may be on the website. Answer the question honestly and accurately and
your
vote will be counted. If you put multiple answers your vote will not be
counted.


Thank you!


John
-------
http://www.members.aol.com/crucifyself03/Rsteve -Steve Walz website
http://www.members.aol.com/crucifyself03/Rsteve/walz/index.htm -Topical
postings page.
Q.Should such a violent person be in a mental ward, behind bars or roaming
Newsgroups?

 

[Kim]

Again, I asked the question, based on the statement "As I tell the robber
baron media,"
when and where did YOU tell 'em, cause as I said...I dont think they heard
you.

"BretCahill" <bretcahill@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041128085033.21692.00001159@mb-m11.aol.com...

"Kim" ksleep@sympatico.ca in
Message-id: <uYdqd.86002$Le1.1907956@news20.bellglobal.com> writes:

. . .

I simply stated that this may not be exactly the place for such
drivelling
shyte...after all, it is a ELECTRONICS newsgroup.

That's the same public forum analysis adopted
by the Court where content based censorship
may be allowed but under no circumstances
can viewpoint based censorship be permitted.
See Lehman v City of Shaker Heights 418 U. S.
298 (1974), Cornelius v NAACP 473 U. S. 788
(1985) (rest of string cite omitted). Since I
NEVER go against the Court I am forced to
side with you on that one issue.

12 v to 4.8 v cell phone chargers use some kind
simple circuit to step down the voltage and
since it is coiless, it looks like it doesn't waste
much energy as heat. Leave it plugged in all
weekend and the truck will still start Monday
morning. I was wondering if it would be easy to
stick another resistor in parallel to double the
output voltage. I don't need or want much
current ~ 50 - 100 ma.

I figured if the RC time constant in the input
was cut in half the output voltage would double,
assuming it was, in fact an oscillator.

These things are cheap -- at dollar store -- and
I figured there might be some design point
wiggle room.


Bret Cahill

 

[BretCahill]

"Kim" ksleep@sympatico.ca in

Message-id: <Mmzqd.4947$kI6.346763@news20.bellglobal.com> writes:

Again, I asked the question, based on the statement "As I tell the robber
baron media,"
when and where did YOU tell 'em, cause as I said...I dont think they heard
you.

Well I guess I'll just have to start clapping my
hands in their faces yelling "cause celebre
CAUSE CELEBRE! Can't you neanderthals
SEE how lofty I am?!?!? I'm doing a CAUSE
CELEBRE DU JOUR!!!! This means I get to
pre empt everything else from the national
debate 'cause I'm doing a cause celebre du
jour."

You think THAT would work?

"BretCahill" <bretcahill@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041128085033.21692.00001159@mb-m11.aol.com...
"Kim" ksleep@sympatico.ca in
Message-id: <uYdqd.86002$Le1.1907956@news20.bellglobal.com> writes:

. . .

I simply stated that this may not be exactly the place for such
drivelling
shyte...after all, it is a ELECTRONICS newsgroup.

That's the same public forum analysis adopted
by the Court where content based censorship
may be allowed but under no circumstances
can viewpoint based censorship be permitted.
See Lehman v City of Shaker Heights 418 U. S.
298 (1974), Cornelius v NAACP 473 U. S. 788
(1985) (rest of string cite omitted). Since I
NEVER go against the Court I am forced to
side with you on that one issue.

12 v to 4.8 v cell phone chargers use some kind
simple circuit to step down the voltage and
since it is coiless, it looks like it doesn't waste
much energy as heat. Leave it plugged in all
weekend and the truck will still start Monday
morning. I was wondering if it would be easy to
stick another resistor in parallel to double the
output voltage. I don't need or want much
current ~ 50 - 100 ma.

I figured if the RC time constant in the input
was cut in half the output voltage would double,
assuming it was, in fact an oscillator.

These things are cheap -- at dollar store -- and
I figured there might be some design point
wiggle room.


Bret Cahill

 

[Mark Fergerson]

John wrote:

Should Richard Steve Walz be:

a) Roaming Newsgroups seeking anyone he may devour (over
20,000 posts since
1992)!

Got his teethmarks on your stupid ass?

b) In a mental hospital of somekind

Only if you can show that he's mentally incompetent,
which you can't, otherwise you would have.

c) In Jail

Only if you can demonstrate that he's committed a crime,
which you can't, otherwise you would have.

d) None of the above since Steve Walz is a wonderful guy
and I too agree that
all Christian churches should be burned as Steve does.

I'm leaning toward this one.

Answer the question with a A, B, C or D. I am
conducting some figures that
also may be on the website. Answer the question honestly
and accurately and
your vote will be counted. If you put multiple answers
your vote will not be
counted.

How about:

e) John is a pathetic whiner who got seriously punked by
Steve and is _still_ trying to recruit help removing his
"tormentor". OTOH if John would just wise up, he'd no longer
_be_ tormented by his own inadequacy.

Mark L. Fergerson

 

[John Fields]

On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:37:45 -0500, "Charles Schuler"
<charleschuler@comcast.net> wrote:

RSW and his ilk have found a new and fertile venue via the Internet. A
seemingly endless supply of minds to corrupt.

---
More accurately, I think, "A seemingly endless supply of minds to
influence". There are many corrupting influences out there, among
them those who would silence dissent and opinions other than their
own. I think Steve is only trying to bring into being a system of
government where many of the weak can bring down a few of the strong,
but where a few of the strong get to make the rules about whom the
weak will not tolerate.
---

I cringe when I read about
teachers and professors who proudly acclaim their direction of students to
the Internet for projects, research (?), and general growth. Strange thing
the Internet; nuggets of gold floating in sewage.

---
Depends... For those who's gold is sewage, those nuggets are
everywhere.

For those who aspire to something higher, the search demands a descent
into the sewage.

--
John Fields

 

[John Fields]

On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 17:36:26 -0600, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:37:45 -0500, "Charles Schuler"
charleschuler@comcast.net> wrote:


RSW and his ilk have found a new and fertile venue via the Internet. A
seemingly endless supply of minds to corrupt.

---
More accurately, I think, "A seemingly endless supply of minds to
influence". There are many corrupting influences out there, among
them those who would silence dissent and opinions other than their
own. I think Steve is only trying to bring into being a system of
government where many of the weak can bring down a few of the strong,

Oops...

but where a few of the strong get to make the rules about whom the
^^^^^^

weak

weak will not tolerate.

^^^^
rest of the weak

---

I cringe when I read about
teachers and professors who proudly acclaim their direction of students to
the Internet for projects, research (?), and general growth. Strange thing
the Internet; nuggets of gold floating in sewage.

---
Depends... For those who's gold is sewage, those nuggets are
everywhere.

For those who aspire to something higher, the search demands a descent
into the sewage.

--
John Fields