Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good ol\' boys to rally in DC for Stop The Steal demonstration
https://tinyurl.com/y2awjfll
To show their support for their duly elected president.
On Saturday, November 14, 2020 at 6:35:32 AM UTC-5, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Good ol\' boys to rally in DC for Stop The Steal demonstration
https://tinyurl.com/y2awjfll
To show their support for their duly elected president.
Next pictures you will see is these people laid out on a slab in the morgue with their heads blown clean off by a 50-cal sniper round.
Cursitor Doom wrote:
Good ol\' boys to rally in DC for Stop The Steal demonstration
https://tinyurl.com/y2awjfll
To show their support for their duly elected president.
Next pictures you will see is these people laid out on a slab in the
morgue with their heads blown clean off by a 50-cal sniper round.
Cursitor Doom <c...@noreply.com> wrote:
Good ol\' boys to rally in DC for Stop The Steal demonstration
https://tinyurl.com/y2awjfll
To show their support for their duly elected president.
Other than peaceful protesting (as opposed to looting and burning buildings),
the best thing Americans can do is stand by and see what our Supreme Court
does. What our Supreme Court says is the law.
Quite what kind of labels they stick on themselves to get labelled \"Antifa\" is an interesting question - \"antifascist\" is an umbrella label for a lose and informal collection of America-hating left-wing lunatics, anarchists, Marxists and vandals.
No need to wait; our Supreme Court won\'t consider rumors, and there\'s nothing
else in the legal-challenge category going on, just a lot of posturing and generation of
sound bites. There\'s no \'stop\' required. There was no \'steal\' involved.
On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 18:24:45 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman
bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
Quite what kind of labels they stick on themselves to get labelled \"Antifa\" is an interesting question - \"antifascist\" is an umbrella label for a lose and informal collection of left-wing activists, and presumably it is the observer who has labelled them \"Antifa\", since they\'d probably call themselves something more specific which wouldn\'t be recognised by kind of right-wing loon like Cursiotr Doom who is the intended audience.
On Sunday, November 15, 2020 at 9:10:17 PM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 18:24:45 -0800 (PST), Bill Sloman
bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
Quite what kind of labels they stick on themselves to get labelled \"Antifa\" is an interesting question - \"antifascist\" is an umbrella label for a lose and informal collection of left-wing activists, and presumably it is the observer who has labelled them \"Antifa\", since they\'d probably call themselves something more specific which wouldn\'t be recognised by kind of right-wing loon like Cursiotr Doom who is the intended audience.
Cursitor Doom snipped \"leftwing activists\" without marking the snip and substituted
\"America-hating left-wing lunatics, anarchists, Marxists and vandals \" which may be what he understands by Antifa - and perhaps this is what ZeroHedge would like him to understand, - but does happens to
be wishful thinking .
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 01:53:25 -0800 (PST), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
No need to wait; our Supreme Court won\'t consider rumors, and there\'s nothing
else in the legal-challenge category going on, just a lot of posturing and generation of
sound bites. There\'s no \'stop\' required. There was no \'steal\' involved.
Well, if you rely on your \"news\" provided solely by the MSM
you could
conceivably come to that conclusion I guess. Fortunately there are
multiple independent sources ...
aggregating evidence of massive fraud for
Trump\'s lawyers to avail themselves of.
On Sunday, November 15, 2020 at 2:26:00 AM UTC-8, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 01:53:25 -0800 (PST), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
No need to wait; our Supreme Court won\'t consider rumors, and there\'s nothing
else in the legal-challenge category going on, just a lot of posturing and generation of
sound bites. There\'s no \'stop\' required. There was no \'steal\' involved.
Well, if you rely on your \"news\" provided solely by the MSM
... because mainstream media does fact-checking before publication
you could
conceivably come to that conclusion I guess. Fortunately there are
multiple independent sources ...
Not so, rather a coordinated effort by rumor-planting agents!
aggregating evidence of massive fraud for
Trump\'s lawyers to avail themselves of.
... according to Trump\'s lawyers, that\'s what\'s happening. They are some of
the rumor-planting agents, hirelings just as you describe, but there are
others behind them, and \"useful idiots\" like yourself.
It\'s rather telling that Trump\'s lawyers, like the ones supposed to be
bringing the case in Pennsylvania, are running away from the
embarrassing position of trying to argue a case for which they have no
evidence. You\'d think that if there really were any evidence of
election fraud, someone would have given a copy to Trump\'s lawyers.
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 09:55:00 -0800 (PST), Rickster C
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
One of the things that makes this country great is how our leaders welcome open dissent and discussion of different viewpoints.
Ha! Only in the dream world you inhabit, I\'m sorry to say.
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 22:57:53 +0100, David Brown
david...@hesbynett.no> wrote:
It\'s rather telling that Trump\'s lawyers, like the ones supposed to be
bringing the case in Pennsylvania, are running away from the
embarrassing position of trying to argue a case for which they have no
evidence. You\'d think that if there really were any evidence of
election fraud, someone would have given a copy to Trump\'s lawyers.
What makes you think they haven\'t already?
https://tinyurl.com/y5hra8to
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 22:57:53 +0100, David Brown
david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
It\'s rather telling that Trump\'s lawyers, like the ones supposed to be
bringing the case in Pennsylvania, are running away from the
embarrassing position of trying to argue a case for which they have no
evidence. You\'d think that if there really were any evidence of
election fraud, someone would have given a copy to Trump\'s lawyers.
What makes you think they haven\'t already?
https://tinyurl.com/y5hra8to
It\'s rather telling that Trump\'s lawyers, like the ones supposed to be
bringing the case in Pennsylvania, are running away from the
embarrassing position of trying to argue a case for which they have no
evidence. You\'d think that if there really were any evidence of
election fraud, someone would have given a copy to Trump\'s lawyers.
Cursitor Doom wrote:
David Brown wrote:
You\'d think that if there really were any evidence of election fraud,
someone would have given a copy to Trump\'s lawyers.
What makes you think they haven\'t already?
https://tinyurl.com/y5hra8to
When the only reference you can give is to a lunatic fringe conspiracy
theory rag, this is no more convincing than Trump\'s claims to have
evidence. And even then, all the article is saying is that this lawyer
/says/ she has evidence of voter fraud - when it has been well
established by more reputable sources that the theory of the
vote-switching supercomputer is total nonsense.
On the other hand, the fact that law firms are abandoning Trump\'s
anti-democracy court cases can be easily found from all sorts of
sources.
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:476b:: with SMTP id d11mr13554276qvx.57.1605490804497; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 17:40:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:13cb:: with SMTP id i11mr12229346qtj.390.1605490804328; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 17:40:04 -0800 (PST)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 17:40:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1rd3rf5nkj8lfftvkb5eoufbuagefa9g2h@4ax.com
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=202.53.36.8; posting-account=SJ46pgoAAABuUDuHc5uDiXN30ATE-zi-
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.53.36.8
References: <svfvqf5s0q1cop0l7a6rodsasq374slq7j@4ax.com> <roqlj5$egc$1@dont-email.me> <94de7e5c-3f7e-4242-a481-1b7bcd1bae27n@googlegroups.com> <2d02rf9n98qb004247rsmfn08f17en6oj3@4ax.com> <33fb00ec-3566-4b56-bcf6-cff9eeaedfa8n@googlegroups.com> <ros892$56m$1@dont-email.me> <1rd3rf5nkj8lfftvkb5eoufbuagefa9g2h@4ax.com
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5d6a0773-556a-4d59-8fdc-7bd53545371bn@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: OT: Sybil Waugh II?
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 01:40:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=\"UTF-8\"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:613741
On Monday, November 16, 2020 at 10:19:40 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 22:57:53 +0100, David Brown
david...@hesbynett.no> wrote:
It\'s rather telling that Trump\'s lawyers, like the ones supposed to be
bringing the case in Pennsylvania, are running away from the
embarrassing position of trying to argue a case for which they have no
evidence. You\'d think that if there really were any evidence of
election fraud, someone would have given a copy to Trump\'s lawyers.
What makes you think they haven\'t already?
https://tinyurl.com/y5hra8to
The fact that they haven\'t won a single case yet.
Quoting a piece from ZeroHedge where some lawyer claims that she has evidence that the software in election machines has been corrupted is not exactly persuasive.
Protecting that kind of software from malicious attack is routine, and there\'s a whole technology of error-detecting and error-correcting codes to do it. Lawyers don\'t get educated about it, and can be gullible suckers for this kind of claim, like Cursitor Doom and presumably Donald Trump. Of course if the lawyer believes the claim, she can get paid lots of money, and lots of publicity, for putting it to some court or other. If she were more sceptical she\'d lose the gig.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
No point in arguing with a chronic liar. When you refute its lies, it
simply makes up more lies to cover those prior lies. Its fiction never
ends...