A
atec77
Guest
TT wrote:
A
Alan Rutlidge
Guest
"atec77" <atec77NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fnhnsf$51r$1@aioe.org...
The closest you're likely to get is if and when he ventures out down the
road to WES
to pick up a few spare toaster and jug elements.
Cheers,
Alan
news:fnhnsf$51r$1@aioe.org...
Not much chance of that.
The closest you're likely to get is if and when he ventures out down the
road to WES
to pick up a few spare toaster and jug elements.
Cheers,
Alan
S
Steve
Guest
Blocked: Alan Rutlidge, TT, Atec77, Phil Allison
S
Steve
Guest
"atec77" <atec77NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fnh7br$kbm$1@aioe.org...
Do you ever post on electronic issues? Or only when you see one of
Phil's posts, to rip it up him? A very quick search leads me to believe the
latter. Grow up, or you risk being painted with the same brush, along with
several others.
Believe it or not, (and I too have had my issues with him in the past),
he has contributed a lot over the years, both on the web and in EA and SC. I
think that a few people need to be a bit more sympathetic towards his views
and motivation.
Much as I hate to do it, I'm about ready to killfile all of those
involved in this bullshit, but it would be a shame and not the ideal
response since many of you have a fair bit to contribute.
I know that you guys will continue regardless, but it's a bit sad. I thought
that the spamming was enough to worry about.
.... Steve
news:fnh7br$kbm$1@aioe.org...
Wow, nothing real to post...
Do you ever post on electronic issues? Or only when you see one of
Phil's posts, to rip it up him? A very quick search leads me to believe the
latter. Grow up, or you risk being painted with the same brush, along with
several others.
Believe it or not, (and I too have had my issues with him in the past),
he has contributed a lot over the years, both on the web and in EA and SC. I
think that a few people need to be a bit more sympathetic towards his views
and motivation.
Much as I hate to do it, I'm about ready to killfile all of those
involved in this bullshit, but it would be a shame and not the ideal
response since many of you have a fair bit to contribute.
I know that you guys will continue regardless, but it's a bit sad. I thought
that the spamming was enough to worry about.
.... Steve
A
atec77
Guest
Steve wrote:
another sock puppet I suspect
Or only when you see one of
or you risk being painted with the same brush, along with
Coincidently who are you ?
another sock puppet I suspect
S
Steve
Guest
"TT" <TTenceNOSPAM@westnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:13poingfh3jsec3@corp.supernews.com...
can I say?
This is an electronics group. I've seen you and others jump on spammers
etc. Instead, take a good look in a mirror. (You look just like Phil, to the
rest of us who are serious.)
If you seriously have a grudge, killfile him, otherwise, shut your
mouths. I'm not the only one who's sick of all your shit, both Phil's and
all of the senseless, childish replies like yours. Get a fucking life, all
of you, including Phil, and leave the rest of us to use the group as it was
intended.
(And what's this bullshit, "cheers", at the end of your message? You abuse
people then wish them well??
I won't bother to say any more. You guys aren't worth the effort. Don't
bother to reply. As of now, all of you are blocked.
.... Steve
news:13poingfh3jsec3@corp.supernews.com...
This goes especially for Atec?, TT and Alan Rutlidge. For adults, well, what
can I say?
This is an electronics group. I've seen you and others jump on spammers
etc. Instead, take a good look in a mirror. (You look just like Phil, to the
rest of us who are serious.)
If you seriously have a grudge, killfile him, otherwise, shut your
mouths. I'm not the only one who's sick of all your shit, both Phil's and
all of the senseless, childish replies like yours. Get a fucking life, all
of you, including Phil, and leave the rest of us to use the group as it was
intended.
(And what's this bullshit, "cheers", at the end of your message? You abuse
people then wish them well??
I won't bother to say any more. You guys aren't worth the effort. Don't
bother to reply. As of now, all of you are blocked.
.... Steve
A
atec77
Guest
Steve wrote:
sex and travel sonny ..
S
Steve
Guest
"atec77" <atec77NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fnsdv4$f0h$1@aioe.org...
another sock puppet I suspect
Very bright!!! Best you can do??? No wonder you act the way you do. (Maybe
you just don't know any better. Perhaps you should include a footnote to
your e-mails, advising receivers of the fact that you are mentally disabled,
or they may come to the same conclusions that I did.) You are obviously a
chronic whinger, and a fool. If you aren't interested in posting questions
or replies on electronic issues, fuck off and find a group suited to your
tastes. Don't fuck it up for others.
... Again, this is not only meant for you, but for the other (vandals) in
your league who inhabit this group.
.... Steve
news:fnsdv4$f0h$1@aioe.org...
another sock puppet I suspect
Very bright!!! Best you can do??? No wonder you act the way you do. (Maybe
you just don't know any better. Perhaps you should include a footnote to
your e-mails, advising receivers of the fact that you are mentally disabled,
or they may come to the same conclusions that I did.) You are obviously a
chronic whinger, and a fool. If you aren't interested in posting questions
or replies on electronic issues, fuck off and find a group suited to your
tastes. Don't fuck it up for others.
... Again, this is not only meant for you, but for the other (vandals) in
your league who inhabit this group.
.... Steve
A
atec77
Guest
Steve wrote:
oh and get fucked ( with all due respect you plonker)
P
Phil Allison
Guest
"Steve"
** I have now posted well over 7,000 messages on this NG - commencing back
in April 2001 - that is way more than anyone else has, ever. Any and all
of them make good reading.
So consequently I am the resident " tall poppy" here.
You must know what always happens to them.
Prior to that I posted regularly on the Electronics Australia "Q &A Forum "
where Richard Freeman and I teamed up to answer the majority of technical
queries that appeared.
Unfortunately that EA forum, just like usenet, was not moderated - so it
also allowed any anonymous, ignorant ass who felt inclined to aggrandise
themself ( ie wank off in public ) the ability to abuse and libel the
leading posters at whim.
These sort people are mentally ill and get a sick pleasure out of defiling
anyone with a higher IQ than them or with something valuable to say. Like
vandals do to public property.
As in normal life, there are two possible ways to deal with this:
1. Ignore the harassers.
2. Mitigate the perceived injury by thoroughly outing the harassers as the
intellectual fakes and gutless pricks they are.
Also, and as in normal life, most folk are too timid to take on these kind
of bullies - even when they are the targets of the harassers themselves.
Plus, it is very rare for anyone to publicly come to the aid of someone who
is being made into such a target - lest they also become a target. How
fucking gutless - I say.
This is how all bullies operate and succeed over others - something that
goes on in all walks of life, everywhere and everyday.
So usenet becomes an object lesson in how society REALLY works.
That IS pretty much usenet's only redeeming value.
If one has the stomach for such unpalatable lessons.
....... Phil
** I have now posted well over 7,000 messages on this NG - commencing back
in April 2001 - that is way more than anyone else has, ever. Any and all
of them make good reading.
So consequently I am the resident " tall poppy" here.
You must know what always happens to them.
Prior to that I posted regularly on the Electronics Australia "Q &A Forum "
where Richard Freeman and I teamed up to answer the majority of technical
queries that appeared.
Unfortunately that EA forum, just like usenet, was not moderated - so it
also allowed any anonymous, ignorant ass who felt inclined to aggrandise
themself ( ie wank off in public ) the ability to abuse and libel the
leading posters at whim.
These sort people are mentally ill and get a sick pleasure out of defiling
anyone with a higher IQ than them or with something valuable to say. Like
vandals do to public property.
As in normal life, there are two possible ways to deal with this:
1. Ignore the harassers.
2. Mitigate the perceived injury by thoroughly outing the harassers as the
intellectual fakes and gutless pricks they are.
Also, and as in normal life, most folk are too timid to take on these kind
of bullies - even when they are the targets of the harassers themselves.
Plus, it is very rare for anyone to publicly come to the aid of someone who
is being made into such a target - lest they also become a target. How
fucking gutless - I say.
This is how all bullies operate and succeed over others - something that
goes on in all walks of life, everywhere and everyday.
So usenet becomes an object lesson in how society REALLY works.
That IS pretty much usenet's only redeeming value.
If one has the stomach for such unpalatable lessons.
....... Phil
T
TT
Guest
"Steve" <no@thiswontwork.com> wrote in message
news:47a1c2ed$0$5200$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
All the best TT
news:47a1c2ed$0$5200$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
All the best TT
T
TT
Guest
"Phil Allison" <philallison@tpg.com.au> wrote in message
news:60e0f2F1pqnucU1@mid.individual.net...
embarrass with your antics.
virgin!
your tirades on others!
had the opportunity on several occasions to see who was "gutless" and you
ran a mile. Remind your admiring public of the offers that Ruff has given
you to sort out your differences and I also wanted to catch up with you
personally as well.
and the one that always uses the first insults.
are usually others that will lend support. When you are getting your just
deserts everyone of the *normals* is glad. Also be very careful how you use
the gutless word because you just may start to believe that you really are
soooo brave at heart.
an anti-social misfit that needs to curtailed. The majority wants your
abuse to cease.
lot.
band of sockpuppets now when you need them or do you see Steve as a new
recruit. Have you tried to personally email him yet and get his phone
number so you can start to weasel your way into his life?
TT (numero uno PA's hit list from aus.hi-fi)
news:60e0f2F1pqnucU1@mid.individual.net...
Delusions of grandeur noted! ROTFL
Tall poppies or abusers like you?
Richard Freeman is a very amiable and knowledgeable fellow whom you
embarrass with your antics.
*IF* it was you would never have got a post in!
to see what you are and what you do?
What do you know of normal? A sad little old man who is still technically a
virgin!
I tried this with you but you only considered it a green light to continue
your tirades on others!
Pot - Kettle - Toaster - Black! Again!!! And again!!! Gutless eh? You
had the opportunity on several occasions to see who was "gutless" and you
ran a mile. Remind your admiring public of the offers that Ruff has given
you to sort out your differences and I also wanted to catch up with you
personally as well.
There you go again! You forget that *YOU* are the harasser, the intimidator
and the one that always uses the first insults.
Lets get this straight. When real *normal* people are abused by you there
are usually others that will lend support. When you are getting your just
deserts everyone of the *normals* is glad. Also be very careful how you use
the gutless word because you just may start to believe that you really are
soooo brave at heart.
Yep you're actually getting close to the truth now. Society has deamed you
an anti-social misfit that needs to curtailed. The majority wants your
abuse to cease.
Pretty narrow view if you ask me. But then your skewed outlook explains a
lot.
cut 'n' paste rubbish you have come up with for other groups? Where's your
band of sockpuppets now when you need them or do you see Steve as a new
recruit. Have you tried to personally email him yet and get his phone
number so you can start to weasel your way into his life?
TT (numero uno PA's hit list from aus.hi-fi)
A
Alan Rutlidge
Guest
"Steve" <no@thiswontwork.com> wrote in message
news:47a1c64e$0$22095$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
This will shit Phil off. He's only 4th on the list with TT and atec77 ahead
of him.
I think "Steve" is being a bit of an oversensitive little petal. In all
this thread I didn't once abuse anyone, let alone Phil. Add some light
humour - yes. Abuse - no.
Steve needs to look at the bigger picture. Clearly he hasn't been a victim
of Phil by being accused of being a paedophile, dishonest, running a
sheltered workshop, harassing one's business partner (who incidentally
doesn't even know who Phil Allison is) and a whole host of other untruths,
let alone being stalked at work and at home by Phil and his cronies. But
then by killfiling Phil Allison I guess he's taking a proactive step towards
reducing the possibility of this happening.
Cheers,
Alan
news:47a1c64e$0$22095$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
Yeehaaa !!! Finally made it to someone's killfile and head of the list too.
This will shit Phil off. He's only 4th on the list with TT and atec77 ahead
of him.
I think "Steve" is being a bit of an oversensitive little petal. In all
this thread I didn't once abuse anyone, let alone Phil. Add some light
humour - yes. Abuse - no.
Steve needs to look at the bigger picture. Clearly he hasn't been a victim
of Phil by being accused of being a paedophile, dishonest, running a
sheltered workshop, harassing one's business partner (who incidentally
doesn't even know who Phil Allison is) and a whole host of other untruths,
let alone being stalked at work and at home by Phil and his cronies. But
then by killfiling Phil Allison I guess he's taking a proactive step towards
reducing the possibility of this happening.
Cheers,
Alan
B
briang
Guest
"Alan Rutlidge" <don't_spam_me_rutlidge@iinet.net.au> wrote
Yeehaaa !!! Finally made it to someone's killfile and head of the list too.
This will shit Phil off. He's only 4th on the list with TT and atec77 ahead
of him.
****** Wota wanker,you really don't get it do you?You just can't stop
dribbling,dribbling,dribbling!
Brian G
Yeehaaa !!! Finally made it to someone's killfile and head of the list too.
This will shit Phil off. He's only 4th on the list with TT and atec77 ahead
of him.
****** Wota wanker,you really don't get it do you?You just can't stop
dribbling,dribbling,dribbling!
Brian G
T
Terry Given
Guest
Phil Allison wrote:
observer and an abusee, I see exactly the opposite. Sure, rant at people
like TT et al, who never seem to have anything useful to say. But
whenever someone posts a technical comment you dont like (or even worse,
dont understand) you go off. For example, an s.e.d. post of mine re. PFC
of battery chargers. The entire content of my post was:
********************************************************************
some do, some dont. most PFC chips (eg UC3854) have a multiplier,
forcing the peak current to be proportional to the full-wave rectified
input voltage (many actually normalise this voltage, using A*B/C).
Others use constant on-time control, which only really works for DCM
boost & flyback PFCs. when you crank thru the maths of a conventional
PFC controller, you see that the actual effect of the normalised
multiplier is to give a constant on-time.
in either case the error-amp comes thru and scales the setpoint to
provide output voltage control.
380V - 400Vdc
operating from 120Vac or 230Vac. one could add circuitry to scale Vout
as a function of Vac - the net result would be higher duty cycle and
lower stress on the PFC switch - but I havent seen it done. it also
takes more components.
********************************************************************
To which you replied:
********************************************************************
"Terry Given the Pinball Wanker "
The AC current drawn MUST track the AC input voltage for the PF to be
close
to unity.
********************************************************************
Nary a word of abuse in my post (there seldom are). yet you immediately
get horribly offensive. Clearly you DIDNT UNDERSTAND my post, which is
technically correct - it can easily be verified with a little bit of
maths - and then launched into a highly abusive rant.
my response:
********************************************************************
try learning some power electronics.
for a DCM PFC (boost or flyback), if the duty cycle is CONSTANT, you get:
Vin = Vpk*|sin(wt)|
Vin = LpfcdI/dt
DCM so dI = Ipk
dt = Ton
so Ipk = (Vpk*Ton/Lpfc)*|sin(wt)|
voila, the peak current is directly proportional to |sin(wt)|
and the duty cycle doesnt have to vary AT ALL.
a slow feedback loop then varies Ton as a function of output load, to
maintain regulation
********************************************************************
your response:
********************************************************************
** Try learning to READ - you stinking, criminal Kiwi CUNT !!
The AC current drawn MUST track the AC input voltage for the PF to be close
to unity.
********************************************************************
my response:
********************************************************************
A bit of reading comprehension would work wonders for you, too, phil.
for example you wrote:
current to track the AC voltage. Which, as you say, is required for good
PF (by definition).
********************************************************************
your response:
Change the thread title to "Terry Given the FUCKWIT Pinball Wanker"
and post:
********************************************************************
** But it DOES do exactly that -
YOU VILE, SLIMY, AUTISTIC
** CRIMINAL ** PILE of FUCKING SHIT !!!
........ Phil
********************************************************************
As all can clearly see, you are extremely unpleasant, for no reason
whatsoever.
Steve, I'd love to see you come up with a plausible defense for this
sort of behaviour, which alas is all too common for Phil - perhaps half
of his posts are like this.
that being said, Steves point re. TT et al is fairly pertinent - few (if
any) technical posts, and a level of maturity right down there with
phils worst excesses. People like them have indeed helped wreck a.e.
Grow up and get a life, children.
BUT you are not only not blameless Phil, you are one of the
perpetrators. Although about half of your posts are technical, the other
half are awful.
Cheers
Terry
Phil, the above implies *you* never randomly abuse. yet both as an
observer and an abusee, I see exactly the opposite. Sure, rant at people
like TT et al, who never seem to have anything useful to say. But
whenever someone posts a technical comment you dont like (or even worse,
dont understand) you go off. For example, an s.e.d. post of mine re. PFC
of battery chargers. The entire content of my post was:
********************************************************************
it could also be a PFC flyback. but straight boost PFC is more common.
some do, some dont. most PFC chips (eg UC3854) have a multiplier,
forcing the peak current to be proportional to the full-wave rectified
input voltage (many actually normalise this voltage, using A*B/C).
Others use constant on-time control, which only really works for DCM
boost & flyback PFCs. when you crank thru the maths of a conventional
PFC controller, you see that the actual effect of the normalised
multiplier is to give a constant on-time.
in either case the error-amp comes thru and scales the setpoint to
provide output voltage control.
for universal input one generally considers 80-265Vac, and sets Vout =
380V - 400Vdc
380Vdc, but yes it has to be, as the PFC doesnt know whether it will be
operating from 120Vac or 230Vac. one could add circuitry to scale Vout
as a function of Vac - the net result would be higher duty cycle and
lower stress on the PFC switch - but I havent seen it done. it also
takes more components.
********************************************************************
To which you replied:
********************************************************************
"Terry Given the Pinball Wanker "
** Try learning to read - you stinking, criminal Kiwi cunthead.
The AC current drawn MUST track the AC input voltage for the PF to be
close
to unity.
********************************************************************
Nary a word of abuse in my post (there seldom are). yet you immediately
get horribly offensive. Clearly you DIDNT UNDERSTAND my post, which is
technically correct - it can easily be verified with a little bit of
maths - and then launched into a highly abusive rant.
my response:
********************************************************************
try learning some power electronics.
for a DCM PFC (boost or flyback), if the duty cycle is CONSTANT, you get:
Vin = Vpk*|sin(wt)|
Vin = LpfcdI/dt
DCM so dI = Ipk
dt = Ton
so Ipk = (Vpk*Ton/Lpfc)*|sin(wt)|
voila, the peak current is directly proportional to |sin(wt)|
and the duty cycle doesnt have to vary AT ALL.
a slow feedback loop then varies Ton as a function of output load, to
maintain regulation
********************************************************************
your response:
********************************************************************
** Try learning to READ - you stinking, criminal Kiwi CUNT !!
The AC current drawn MUST track the AC input voltage for the PF to be close
to unity.
********************************************************************
my response:
********************************************************************
A bit of reading comprehension would work wonders for you, too, phil.
for example you wrote:
and I just proved that it doesnt have to do that, in order for the AC
current to track the AC voltage. Which, as you say, is required for good
PF (by definition).
indeed. nor did I say otherwise.
perhaps you should have finished off that tertiary education
********************************************************************
your response:
Change the thread title to "Terry Given the FUCKWIT Pinball Wanker"
and post:
********************************************************************
** But it DOES do exactly that -
YOU VILE, SLIMY, AUTISTIC
** CRIMINAL ** PILE of FUCKING SHIT !!!
........ Phil
********************************************************************
As all can clearly see, you are extremely unpleasant, for no reason
whatsoever.
Steve, I'd love to see you come up with a plausible defense for this
sort of behaviour, which alas is all too common for Phil - perhaps half
of his posts are like this.
that being said, Steves point re. TT et al is fairly pertinent - few (if
any) technical posts, and a level of maturity right down there with
phils worst excesses. People like them have indeed helped wreck a.e.
Grow up and get a life, children.
BUT you are not only not blameless Phil, you are one of the
perpetrators. Although about half of your posts are technical, the other
half are awful.
Cheers
Terry
T
TT
Guest
"Terry Given" <my_name@ieee.org> wrote in message
news:1201818536.461309@ftpsrv1...
: : that being said, Steves point re. TT et al is fairly
pertinent - few (if
: any) technical posts, and a level of maturity right down
there with
: phils worst excesses. People like them have indeed helped
wreck a.e.
: Grow up and get a life, children.
:
: Cheers
: Terry
So I am as bad as Philthy eh? I rant, rave and randomly
abuse everyone here do I? Please show me one post from this
group where I have sworn at anyone or for that matter abused
them? While you're at it please demonstrate how I am
wrecking this group and Philthy is constructively adding to
it?
Yes I have an issue with Philthy as he has set out to defame
and libel me all over Usenet. I have on many occasions had
the full brunt of his malicious and disgusting rantings so I
know too well what he is capable of.
Ignoring him does not work. Warning newbies about him does
some good. Sniping at him has the most effect and actually
gives the most satisfaction To show him up as the
pathetic, abusive creature he is actually makes the most
sense.
Also Terry bear in mind I am not the cause - just a symptom.
So go on, have a laugh at Philthy's expense and don't try
too hard to have meaningful conversation with him.
Cheers TT
news:1201818536.461309@ftpsrv1...
: : that being said, Steves point re. TT et al is fairly
pertinent - few (if
: any) technical posts, and a level of maturity right down
there with
: phils worst excesses. People like them have indeed helped
wreck a.e.
: Grow up and get a life, children.
:
: Cheers
: Terry
So I am as bad as Philthy eh? I rant, rave and randomly
abuse everyone here do I? Please show me one post from this
group where I have sworn at anyone or for that matter abused
them? While you're at it please demonstrate how I am
wrecking this group and Philthy is constructively adding to
it?
Yes I have an issue with Philthy as he has set out to defame
and libel me all over Usenet. I have on many occasions had
the full brunt of his malicious and disgusting rantings so I
know too well what he is capable of.
Ignoring him does not work. Warning newbies about him does
some good. Sniping at him has the most effect and actually
gives the most satisfaction
To show him up as the pathetic, abusive creature he is actually makes the most
sense.
Also Terry bear in mind I am not the cause - just a symptom.
So go on, have a laugh at Philthy's expense and don't try
too hard to have meaningful conversation with him.
Cheers TT
A
atec77
Guest
Alan Rutlidge wrote:
stevy is being just a little precious imho .
B
bassett
Guest
"Steve" <no@thiswontwork.com> wrote in message >
of intellect, That's after you finish being the forth wise monkey,
** thinks all**
bassett
**** So shut the fuck up
as you both think alike, act alike, and no doubt have the same sort
of intellect, That's after you finish being the forth wise monkey,
** thinks all**
bassett
C
Clifford Heath
Guest
TT wrote:
You seem unable to do it, and that makes a.e worse for all of us.
Please stop, you and Rutledge and all. Just stop, please.
There are useful things to do in life, and this isn't one of them.
No. Ignoring his rants has the most effect for all such attention-seekers.
You seem unable to do it, and that makes a.e worse for all of us.
Please stop, you and Rutledge and all. Just stop, please.
There are useful things to do in life, and this isn't one of them.
B
bassett
Guest
"Steve" <no@thiswontwork.com> wrote in message news:47a1c010$0$12542
as the rest of us missed it. .
Don't come round here telling people what they can and can't post,
you have no authority to do anything, except piss in your own pocket.
As for blocking people from a newsgroup, Now you really are pulling
yourself into shape. Tell me how would you like me to flood this
group with porn, It's a very simply operation. Then you like others
will see just who's in control of nothing. Now run along and behave
yourself, there's not a lot of point in you running your mouth, You've
blocked all the main contributors , who might not benefit from your
knowledge.
In other words sunny -boy. Don't be a cunt all your life, take a day
off.
Pick me, pick me, I want to be blocked next. Or you could try
reporting me to my ISP.. Now that would really be like you, a
Bloody joke.
bassett
Tell me Cum stain, when was the meeting that made you the moderator,
as the rest of us missed it. .
Don't come round here telling people what they can and can't post,
you have no authority to do anything, except piss in your own pocket.
As for blocking people from a newsgroup, Now you really are pulling
yourself into shape. Tell me how would you like me to flood this
group with porn, It's a very simply operation. Then you like others
will see just who's in control of nothing. Now run along and behave
yourself, there's not a lot of point in you running your mouth, You've
blocked all the main contributors , who might not benefit from your
knowledge.
In other words sunny -boy. Don't be a cunt all your life, take a day
off.
Pick me, pick me, I want to be blocked next. Or you could try
reporting me to my ISP.. Now that would really be like you, a
Bloody joke.
bassett