Latest News

J

Jim Thompson

Guest
Just on the news...

Kerry concedes in call to Bush.

Daschle loses Senate race!

"It's a wonderful day in the neighborhood" ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
Jim Thompson wrote:
Just on the news...

Kerry concedes in call to Bush.

Daschle loses Senate race!

"It's a wonderful day in the neighborhood" ;-)

...Jim Thompson
Not to about 150 million seriously disgruntled Americans it's not! The
price your party will pay for seriously underhanded and criminal
behavior will become obvious even to you in the coming months.
 
Fred Bloggs wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Just on the news...

Kerry concedes in call to Bush.

Daschle loses Senate race!

"It's a wonderful day in the neighborhood" ;-)

...Jim Thompson


Not to about 150 million seriously disgruntled Americans it's not! The
price your party will pay for seriously underhanded and criminal
behavior will become obvious even to you in the coming months.
And what price will the Dems pay for their similar behaviors?

Mark L. Fergerson
 
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 09:50:02 -0700, Mark Fergerson wrote:

Fred Bloggs wrote:



Jim Thompson wrote:

Just on the news...

Kerry concedes in call to Bush.

Daschle loses Senate race!

"It's a wonderful day in the neighborhood" ;-)

...Jim Thompson


Not to about 150 million seriously disgruntled Americans it's not! The
price your party will pay for seriously underhanded and criminal
behavior will become obvious even to you in the coming months.

And what price will the Dems pay for their similar behaviors?
You do mean, "notwithstanding they haven't perpetrated any discretionary
assault that has resulted in the deaths of thousands in the last four
years"?

Thanks,
Rich
 
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:41:00 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com
wrote:



Jim Thompson wrote:

Just on the news...

Kerry concedes in call to Bush.

Daschle loses Senate race!

"It's a wonderful day in the neighborhood" ;-)

...Jim Thompson

Not to about 150 million seriously disgruntled Americans it's not! The
price your party will pay for seriously underhanded and criminal
behavior will become obvious even to you in the coming months.


Methinks I read Bloggs as a terrorist. Time to track his ass down and
turn him in.

...Jim Thompson
How come I am not already in custody and being interrogated and tortured
at Guantanomo if your homeland security is so perfect...
 
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:55:43 -0700, uvcceet wrote:

Not to about 150 million seriously disgruntled Americans it's not!

Well, they ought to have turned out and voted. Best I can see is less than 60
million of them showed up. (of course you are including babies and school
children in your total, which is ludicrous at best)

" In the 37 elections since 1860 - the first won by a Republican - Democrats
have won only 14. Only twice in 15 post-World War II elections has the
Democratic nominee achieved 50 percent of the vote."

George F. Will 11-4-04

Not a good 150 years for the demos. I think most of them would prefer it if
the liberal end of the party went its own way, and let the rest of them, the
majority of them, go back to there basic roots and beliefs. Liberals have
wiped out any hope for the democratic ticket.

There are three or four democrats who could have beaten Bush. Maybe instead of
wringing their hands in despair, democrats ought to consider doing something
about the Primary process, which basically allowed Iowa and NH to choose their
candidate. Perhaps that choice ought to be made at the convention, rather than
on the farm in the midwest?

Both sides whine about the electoral college, voter registration process
failures, and disenfranchised voters, but most all democrats were totally
disenfranchised when two or three small states basically told all the others
that Kerry was the one who would run. How stupid is that?
Evidently pretty stupid. Even I can see that Kerry was about the worst
possible choice to put up against Bush. And when he started saying that
he'd be just as aggressive as Pres. Bush in his pursuit of terrorism,
he suddenly was pretty much indistinguishable.

Actually, I have to admit I've been doing one-issue ranting, focusing
entirely on the invasion.

Well, I believe I have successfully demonstrated that I can't swing an
election by sitting here at my computer and ranting. :-\
Thanks,
Rich
 
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 01:52:25 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:41:00 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com
wrote:



Jim Thompson wrote:

Just on the news...

Kerry concedes in call to Bush.

Daschle loses Senate race!

"It's a wonderful day in the neighborhood" ;-)

...Jim Thompson

Not to about 150 million seriously disgruntled Americans it's not! The
price your party will pay for seriously underhanded and criminal
behavior will become obvious even to you in the coming months.


Methinks I read Bloggs as a terrorist. Time to track his ass down and
turn him in.

...Jim Thompson

How come I am not already in custody and being interrogated and tortured
at Guantanomo if your homeland security is so perfect...

Probably because you're white.

Cheers!
Rich
 
"Jim Thompson" <thegreatone@example.com> schreef in bericht
news:l4oko01crtpbbmm3e9e08d3u5qav6o7mid@4ax.com...
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:41:00 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com
wrote:



Jim Thompson wrote:
Just on the news...

Kerry concedes in call to Bush.

Daschle loses Senate race!

"It's a wonderful day in the neighborhood" ;-)

...Jim Thompson

Not to about 150 million seriously disgruntled Americans it's not! The
price your party will pay for seriously underhanded and criminal
behavior will become obvious even to you in the coming months.

Methinks I read Bloggs as a terrorist. Time to track his ass down and
turn him in.
If you think that, it suddenly all becomes clear why you are the
idiot I held you for. If you read things wrong, you better stop
reading all together. Can't think of better therapy here.

Having said that, and 'looking' at SED, I see a mix of contributions
in all kinds of flavors. Wise stuff, stupid remarks, ranting, reasonable
folks, nutcases and what have you. We all stick labels on each other.

Time will tell who has put the right labels on. One excuse the Americans
will never be able to use is 'We didn't know'.

--
Thanks, Frank.
(remove 'x' and 'invalid' when replying by email)
 
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 09:23:28 -0700, Jim Thompson
<thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

Just on the news...

Kerry concedes in call to Bush.

Daschle loses Senate race!

"It's a wonderful day in the neighborhood" ;-)

...Jim Thompson

Jim,

This is hilarious:

http://slate.msn.com/id/2109218/


Seems the Dems lost because America is populated by ignorant religious
inbred finatics.

It just ocurred to me, walking down the hill to work, that the roles
of the two major parties have reversed in the last 70 years. The
Democrats were the champions of the oppressed farming/working class,
but are now the party of Manhattan and Hollywood, of Volvo-driving
upper-middle-class urban coast-dwellers, and the Republicans now speak
for the working class, rural, "heartland" of America. It seems to me
that the Dems don't understand this, which is why they are now calling
their own claimed constituancy stupid and ignorant because they didn't
do as they were told.

Has anybody read "What's Wrong With Kansas"? Sounds like it might be
interesting.

John
 
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 09:23:28 -0700, Jim Thompson
<thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

Just on the news...

Kerry concedes in call to Bush.

Daschle loses Senate race!

"It's a wonderful day in the neighborhood" ;-)

...Jim Thompson
And this is even funnier:

http://slate.msn.com/id/2109217/


John
 
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 08:04:46 -0700, Mark Fergerson wrote:

Now, once again, I ask you to tell me what exactly the
9-11 events were supposedly a "righteous" response to.
Afghanistan, Lebanon, Palestine, to name a few.

Thanks,
Rich
 
Rich Grise wrote:

On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 08:04:46 -0700, Mark Fergerson wrote:

Now, once again, I ask you to tell me what exactly the
9-11 events were supposedly a "righteous" response to.

Afghanistan, Lebanon, Palestine, to name a few.
Afghanistan was about OBL. Don't ask me what it's about
now. Note that they had less trouble with their election
than we did now that OBL's in a cave somewhere.

Lebanon was somebody else's party we got dragged into due
to treaty obligations. Bad idea, but we did sign up for it.
Also, try to remember that we weren't in there alone, much
less first. Lebanon ought to be the "modern Vietnam" you
like to rail about anyway, not Iraq.

Where the hell _is_ Palestine, anyway? What makes the
"Palestinians'" current claim to that particular sandpatch
any more valid than anyone else's? How the fuck is what's
happening there _my_ fault, anyway?

Where does some fucking jumped-up wannabe prophet get off
blaming _me_ for a local warlord's inability to convince the
locals to build a society instead of continuing centuries of
idiotic Hatfield/McCoyism? Fucking braindead asshole Arafat
does _not_ deserve to die peacefully in his sleep.

Mark L. Fergerson
 
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 10:50:23 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote:

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 09:23:28 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

Just on the news...

Kerry concedes in call to Bush.

Daschle loses Senate race!

"It's a wonderful day in the neighborhood" ;-)

...Jim Thompson

And this is even funnier:

http://slate.msn.com/id/2109217/


John
It is especially funny...even in my small province of Nova Scotia
(about 3% of the population, and a far smaller % of the land mass),
there are a number of accents, and also numerous languages, eh. The
guy who wrote that is a hoser. :)

Tom
 
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 20:34:57 +0100, "Frank Bemelman"
<f.bemelmanx@xs4all.invalid.nl> wrote:

"Mark Fergerson" <nunya@biz.ness> schreef in bericht
news:KCMid.45358$G15.36434@fed1read03...

Now, once again, I ask you to tell me what exactly the
9-11 events were supposedly a "righteous" response to.

Bin laded explained that quite clear in his latest video.

IMO it boils down to the continious interfering in the middle
east, such as financial aid to Isreal, and to Egypt perhaps.
Jimmy Carter purchased his Nobel Prize (and Arafat's, thrown into the
bargain) with six billion dollars worth of bribes to Israel and Egypt,
perhaps the most expensive handshake in history.

John
 
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote ...
This is hilarious:

http://slate.msn.com/id/2109218/

Seems the Dems lost because America is populated by ignorant religious
inbred finatics.
I've noticed that the current attitude of the Dems is
"Anyone who disagrees with me is stupid and/or evil."
Yeah, that arrogance will win 'em new friends. NOT.

I begin to believe the party I've been registered to
for almost three decades is self-destructing in
an orgy of arrogance, envy and hatred.
--
Dennis M. O'Connor dmoc@primenet.com
 
"Mark Fergerson" <nunya@biz.ness> schreef in bericht
news:BhTid.45540$G15.43971@fed1read03...
Frank Bemelman wrote:
"Mark Fergerson" <nunya@biz.ness> schreef in bericht
news:hAQid.45384$G15.6541@fed1read03...


Where does some fucking jumped-up wannabe prophet get off
blaming _me_ for a local warlord's inability to convince the
locals to build a society instead of continuing centuries of
idiotic Hatfield/McCoyism? Fucking braindead asshole Arafat
does _not_ deserve to die peacefully in his sleep.

Arafat has won a Nobel Prize for Peace. Would you care to
explain? It's not a prize you win for sitting around the
table just once.

No, he was awarded that for not blowing up Stockholm.

Exactly _what_ has Arafat done to stop all the killing?
Nothing.
Exactly what has Isreal done?

Deaths since september 2000, look here:

http://www.geocities.com/tents444/counters.htm#bann

974 Isrealis, 3426 Palestines.

Who is killing who?

Who gives a fuck? The "Palestinians" cannot build a
society anyway.
Who gives a fuck??? What kind of an answer is that? If
Isreal keeps on killing 3+ palestines for each israeli,
the tragedies will never end.

If you choose to claim that Israel couldn't
either without massive U.S. aid, where were all the
"helpful" Arabs when the "Palestinians" were in need?
Covering their own asses and hoping the Jews would kill all
the "Palestinians", that's where.
I have no idea why the Arabs have not given more financial
aid to the Palestines. Maybe they want to stay neutral,
need to stay neutral. Perhaps someone can shed some light
on this, I don't think your explanation is the correct
one.

--
Thanks, Frank.
(remove 'x' and 'invalid' when replying by email)
 
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 15:15:13 -0500, Spehro Pefhany wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 10:50:23 -0800, the renowned John Larkin
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 09:23:28 -0700, Jim Thompson
....
"It's a wonderful day in the neighborhood" ;-)

...Jim Thompson

And this is even funnier:

http://slate.msn.com/id/2109217/


John

What an idiotic stunt that was.

"The world will endure four more years of idiocy, arrogance and
unwarranted bloodshed, with no benevolent deity to watch over and save
us. John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Hinckley Jr.—where are
you now that we need you?"

Would this be the first time a British newspaper has openly called for
the assassination of an American president?
Didn't Hinckley miss?

Thanks,
Rich
 
On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 00:19:09 +0100, Frank Bemelman wrote:

"Mark Fergerson" <nunya@biz.ness> schreef in bericht
news:BhTid.45540$G15.43971@fed1read03...
Frank Bemelman wrote:
"Mark Fergerson" <nunya@biz.ness> schreef in bericht
news:hAQid.45384$G15.6541@fed1read03...


Where does some fucking jumped-up wannabe prophet get off
blaming _me_ for a local warlord's inability to convince the
locals to build a society instead of continuing centuries of
idiotic Hatfield/McCoyism? Fucking braindead asshole Arafat
does _not_ deserve to die peacefully in his sleep.

Arafat has won a Nobel Prize for Peace. Would you care to
explain? It's not a prize you win for sitting around the
table just once.

No, he was awarded that for not blowing up Stockholm.

Exactly _what_ has Arafat done to stop all the killing?
Nothing.

Exactly what has Isreal done?


Deaths since september 2000, look here:

http://www.geocities.com/tents444/counters.htm#bann

974 Isrealis, 3426 Palestines.

Who is killing who?

Who gives a fuck? The "Palestinians" cannot build a
society anyway.

Who gives a fuck??? What kind of an answer is that? If
Isreal keeps on killing 3+ palestines for each israeli,
the tragedies will never end.

If you choose to claim that Israel couldn't
either without massive U.S. aid, where were all the
"helpful" Arabs when the "Palestinians" were in need?
Covering their own asses and hoping the Jews would kill all
the "Palestinians", that's where.

I have no idea why the Arabs have not given more financial
aid to the Palestines. Maybe they want to stay neutral,
need to stay neutral. Perhaps someone can shed some light
on this, I don't think your explanation is the correct
one.
The US has "treaty obligations" to Israel, and they've seen
what the Israel/US war machine can do.

I.e., they're scared shitless. But simmering.

Cheers!
Rich
 
uvcceet@juno.com wrote:

In <418bd5a5$0$21106$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, on 11/05/04 at 08:34 PM,
"Frank Bemelman" <f.bemelmanx@xs4all.invalid.nl> said:


"Mark Fergerson" <nunya@biz.ness> schreef in bericht
news:KCMid.45358$G15.36434@fed1read03...


Now, once again, I ask you to tell me what exactly the
9-11 events were supposedly a "righteous" response to.


Bin laded explained that quite clear in his latest video.



Yes, and by all means, we must accept what he said as the truth. No way its
for his own personal agenda. He is the world's fountain of truth, and everyone
else, except every liberal, is lying all the time, and always.

I am pretty sure most of you pretending to be leftists and liberals are really
just conservatives, out for a few jollies in usenet, saying incendiary stuff
just to get a rise out of people. Its a pretty good scam, to a point, but its
getting old. I could rattle off the usernames of half a dozen of you who are
only posting to see if you can get a rise out of others.

Its a good show, but it is probably time to move on, as whining only gets you
so far. To those who are "debating" with these coneheads, I suggest you wake
up and realize they are actually on your side, and just playing with you to
pass the time of day. Unemployed people living off the dole have very little
else to do with their time, so they come to usenet and assume a position they
know with incite arguments. Please don't encourage them. They need to get off
their butts and get jobs and contibute, rather than living off of welfare.

Time to change the channel.

John
I like that one, i could not have said it any better my self!.
and don't forget, most of those on welfare most likely got their
computers and internet connection given to them as well.
like the welfare idiots we have in this town, they actually have Debit
cares issued from the town for them to buy what ever they want!.
 
Frank Bemelman wrote:

Jimmy Carter purchased his Nobel Prize (and Arafat's, thrown into the
bargain) with six billion dollars worth of bribes to Israel and Egypt,
perhaps the most expensive handshake in history.


I didn't know that. Typical US response, if they don't fancy
a plain war, they start throwing money at it, or whatever it takes
to upset someone elses neighbourhood.

it works don't it? ;)
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top