Kimberly K Barnard (Kali) (262) 595-2669 Pyschology Instruct

The Secretary of HomIntern wrote:
Daedalus wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:01:47 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:48:50 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org
wrote:

My only interest is in love and peace on usenet.

Jade
And not electronics?

No not really. I mean I use electronics constantly and appreciate the
conveniences they provide. I certainly don't know what I'd do without
such inventions as the electric wine bottle opener and electric
peppercorn grinder. (lol)
You forgot to mention yer electronic dildo, skank

How odd.

It is all too odd, my friend. I wish more people cared about love and
peace on usenet. It would be a lot happier place.
All you care about is your next trick, whore

What about you, John? What makes you tick?

Stop sniffing around his crotch, skank.
Jade
Is this Bowtie?
 
On 04 Apr 2007 I stormed the castle called sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and heard Daedalus cry out in news:78181354qfd1k12tgl7je6jo4iq1bvq77l@
4ax.com...

On 4 Apr 2007 12:52:01 -0700, "Linda" <Indomitable2@netzero.com
wrote:

On Apr 4, 11:57 am, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
Web-Site.com> wrote:
On 4 Apr 2007 11:50:19 -0700, "Linda" <Indomitab...@netzero.com
wrote:

[snip]

How the fuck did this crap get cross-posted to
sci.electronics.design?

It's not crap.

Two plus years ago, Kimberly K Barnard placed the lives of me and
mine in unestimable danger, when, out of the clear blue, Kimberly K
Barnard stalked me into my home ng and posted posts *saying* her
university advisor received emails about her usenet activites, and,
falsely accusing me (who had never even had an exchange with Barnard)
of being responsible for authoring/sending them.

The crimes committed against me and mine following Kimberly K
Barnard's leveling false accusations against me were crimes
necessitating the removal of my child(ren) from their school to
preclude my child(ren) from being kidnapped, sexually assaulted, set
on fire, killed etc by any of the convicted child molesters,
convicted arsonists, 2 time killers, who participate in the criminal
vigilante stalking organized by the AUK/SPP Criminal Stalking Ring.

Once Kimberly K Barnard had successfully destroyed the lives of my
child(ren)---Kimberly K Barnard ceased accusing me, and began placing
the lives of one person after another in unestimable danger by falsely
accusing them of having authored/sent the ALLLEGED email to her
university advisor.


Oh stop your whining.

Now that Kimberly K Barnard is once again "saying" someone sent
emails to her university colleagues---accompanied by public
accusations against specified person(s) ...every dang person whom
Barnard hates needs to haul ass to a court of law and obtain a
restraining order enjoining Kimberly K Barnard, R. Vince Lamb, Sean
Monaghan, Albert C. Young, Carl R. Osterwald, Jamie Eckles, Steve
Whitacre, Leola Stilmack, Judith Fitzgerald, Peter J. Ross,
Daniel L Rogers, from publicly accusing them of authoring/sending the
alleged emails-----since the lives of both the accused and their loved
ones are place in unestimable danger whenever any of the members of
the SPP/AUK Criminal Stalking Ring publicly accuse people of stuff
that may or may not have happened.

(Hate ng snipped, SED re-inserted).

Linda, Jim was very clear that he wasn't interested in hearing it. By
our own insane definition, you are stalking and committing crimes
against him if you continue to address him. Leave Jim and his group
alone.

BTW - How do I get on your net.kook haet lits?
You have to be cool like me... don't actually do anything other than post
to SPP and call Linda a kook..

That's all I did and now she includes me in all her haet lits's...

It's the most I've ever accomplished without actually doing anything!

--
ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7

Pissing off the planet, one person at a time.
 
On 4 Apr 2007 13:18:31 -0700, "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com> wrote:

The Secretary of HomIntern wrote:
Daedalus wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:01:47 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:48:50 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org
wrote:

My only interest is in love and peace on usenet.

Jade
And not electronics?

No not really. I mean I use electronics constantly and appreciate the
conveniences they provide. I certainly don't know what I'd do without
such inventions as the electric wine bottle opener and electric
peppercorn grinder. (lol)
You forgot to mention yer electronic dildo, skank

How odd.

It is all too odd, my friend. I wish more people cared about love and
peace on usenet. It would be a lot happier place.
All you care about is your next trick, whore

What about you, John? What makes you tick?

Stop sniffing around his crotch, skank.
Jade

Is this Bowtie?
No. It's another angry young man who is intent on disrupting usenet.

It's a shame their type have to try and sabotage the sharing and
getting to know your neighbor type relationship building that I'm all
about.

I hope John will ignore him and get back to me. I was really enjoying
our chat.

Jade
 
From : Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org>
Message-ID : <78181354qfd1k12tgl7je6jo4iq1bvq77l@4ax.com>


BTW - How do I get on your net.kook haet lits?

Jade



'caus you are a nasty bitch and deserve to be in it








--

Honorable Professeur Von TwoSteps OA
*I* care
 
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:18:31 -0700, marcia wrote:

The Secretary of HomIntern wrote:
Daedalus wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:01:47 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:48:50 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org
wrote:

My only interest is in love and peace on usenet.

Jade
And not electronics?

No not really. I mean I use electronics constantly and appreciate the
conveniences they provide. I certainly don't know what I'd do without
such inventions as the electric wine bottle opener and electric
peppercorn grinder. (lol)
You forgot to mention yer electronic dildo, skank

How odd.

It is all too odd, my friend. I wish more people cared about love and
peace on usenet. It would be a lot happier place.
All you care about is your next trick, whore

What about you, John? What makes you tick?

Stop sniffing around his crotch, skank.
Jade

Is this Bowtie?
No it's a sock of Porchmonkey, AUK's favorite punching bag.
--
#1 Offishul Ruiner of Usenet, March 2007
#1 Usenet Asshole, March 2007
#1 Bartlo Pset, March 13-24 2007
#10 Most hated Usenetizen of all time
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004
COOSN-266-06-25794
 
Daedalus wrote:
On 4 Apr 2007 13:18:31 -0700, "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com> wrote:

The Secretary of HomIntern wrote:
Daedalus wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:01:47 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:48:50 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org
wrote:

My only interest is in love and peace on usenet.

Jade
And not electronics?
No not really. I mean I use electronics constantly and appreciate the
conveniences they provide. I certainly don't know what I'd do without
such inventions as the electric wine bottle opener and electric
peppercorn grinder. (lol)
You forgot to mention yer electronic dildo, skank
How odd.
It is all too odd, my friend. I wish more people cared about love and
peace on usenet. It would be a lot happier place.
All you care about is your next trick, whore
What about you, John? What makes you tick?

Stop sniffing around his crotch, skank.
Jade
Is this Bowtie?

No. It's another angry young man who is intent on disrupting usenet.

It's a shame their type have to try and sabotage the sharing and
getting to know your neighbor type relationship building that I'm all
about.

I hope John will ignore him and get back to me. I was really enjoying
our chat.

I was just pointing out that you're a skank.. Excoooooose ME!
Jade
 
Kimberly Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology, wrote:
Widdershins said:
: 4 Apr 2007 01:42:39 -0700, "Orville Wright" <Orville@deafemail.net
: licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:

: >Kimberly K. Barnard (known as "Kali" on Usenet)
: >(262) 595-2669
: >Pyschology Instructor at Univesity of Winconsin at Parkside

: What had you hoped to accomplsih by going RL on Kali,
: you nadless asswipe?

Both Steve Young and Michael Cranston enjoy trying to intimidate
me by posting my office address to Usenet.
Speak to your own motives and emotional states, and stop imagining
mine. I get no enjoyment out of it whatsoever.

Someone forged my name and harassed several of my colleagues at
the University this morning. It looks like a Bowtie job, but
when I saw Cranston's post this morning, I suspected him, as
well, and would be remiss to not tell investigators about him.
I recently received forged email from someone claiming to be Clayton
McGill. The headers are as follows:

Delivered-To: mjc101@gmail.com
Received: by 10.100.122.2 with SMTP id u2cs21219anc;
Mon, 2 Apr 2007 23:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.143.12 with SMTP id q12mr11627385qbd.1175582564872;
Mon, 02 Apr 2007 23:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <apache@arkansas.movieflix.com>
Received: from arkansas.movieflix.com ([216.206.179.148])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id
38si9728634nzf.2007.04.02.23.42.44;
Mon, 02 Apr 2007 23:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 216.206.179.148 is neither
permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of
apache@arkansas.movieflix.com)
Received: from arkansas.movieflix.com (arkansas.movieflix.com
[127.0.0.1])
by arkansas.movieflix.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
l336gVdg021525
for <mjc101@gmail.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 23:42:31 -0700
Received: (from apache@localhost)
by arkansas.movieflix.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id
l336gVm2021523;
Mon, 2 Apr 2007 23:42:31 -0700
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 23:42:31 -0700

Mike,

You're a total scumbag for posting residential
RL data in the way that you did, ***.

You made your bed, motherfucker. Lie in it.

- Pope Snarky


The State of Wisconsin has very strict policies about harassment
of its employees, forgery, and abuse of its network, and all
concerned been very supportive of me today. The incident was
reported to network people and police before I even woke up this
morning. I have just sent the intimidating posts and full RL
information about both Cranston and Young to network services
and the police, and there will be an investigation.
Well, I certainly don't welcome wasting any of my time with any police
or investigators from Wisconsin, but I will spend as much time with
them as they might require. I will be certain to let them know that
you have a long long history of picking on the weak and infirm on
usenet, and deriving sick, sociopathic pleasure from it. I will
compile your posts over the past three years for their review. That
should significantly lengthen their list of possible suspects.

I wonder if they will share the results of their investigation with
your department chair? It seems reasonable to predict that they might,
inasmuch as the person who forged you involved your academic
department in a way I find deplorable.

What do you suppose the result will be for your employment, if your
department chair finds out that you've been poking sick people on
usenet for years, unleashing the chain of events that caused the
university to have to respond to deal with one of many enemies you've
created for yourself over the years?

You might also want to carefully reflect on whether anybody (some law
abiding citizen who would turn over email to police officers on
request, and would not require a subpoena), might have evidence that
would be interpreted to indicate that you have malice toward me and
motive to name me to investigators as a result of that malice.

This was not a bright move on your part, Dr. Barnard.

Kimberly Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology
http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/
Office: Molinaro Hall, 262
Phone: 262 / 595 - 2669
Email: barnard@uwp.edu
Fixxored again!

hth

miguel

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
Meat Plow wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:18:31 -0700, marcia wrote:

The Secretary of HomIntern wrote:
Daedalus wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:01:47 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:48:50 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org
wrote:

My only interest is in love and peace on usenet.

Jade
And not electronics?
No not really. I mean I use electronics constantly and appreciate the
conveniences they provide. I certainly don't know what I'd do without
such inventions as the electric wine bottle opener and electric
peppercorn grinder. (lol)
You forgot to mention yer electronic dildo, skank
How odd.
It is all too odd, my friend. I wish more people cared about love and
peace on usenet. It would be a lot happier place.
All you care about is your next trick, whore
What about you, John? What makes you tick?

Stop sniffing around his crotch, skank.
Jade
Is this Bowtie?

No it's a sock of Porchmonkey, AUK's favorite punching bag.
Tofu Plow is AUK's favorite jizz receptacle...
 
marcia wrote:
The Secretary of HomIntern wrote:
Daedalus wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:01:47 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:48:50 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org
wrote:

My only interest is in love and peace on usenet.

Jade
And not electronics?
No not really. I mean I use electronics constantly and appreciate the
conveniences they provide. I certainly don't know what I'd do without
such inventions as the electric wine bottle opener and electric
peppercorn grinder. (lol)
You forgot to mention yer electronic dildo, skank
How odd.
It is all too odd, my friend. I wish more people cared about love and
peace on usenet. It would be a lot happier place.
All you care about is your next trick, whore
What about you, John? What makes you tick?

Stop sniffing around his crotch, skank.
Jade

Is this Bowtie?

Nope. It's the famous skank-buster
 
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:12:39 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org>
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:01:47 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:48:50 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org
wrote:


My only interest is in love and peace on usenet.

Jade

And not electronics?

No not really. I mean I use electronics constantly and appreciate the
conveniences they provide. I certainly don't know what I'd do without
such inventions as the electric wine bottle opener and electric
peppercorn grinder. (lol)

How odd.

It is all too odd, my friend. I wish more people cared about love and
peace on usenet. It would be a lot happier place.
Lots of people care. Few do anything about it; talk is cheap.

What about you, John? What makes you tick?

Jade
Was I ticking? Sorry, that was rude.

I design electronics, which is fun because it involves all sorts of
tangents into math, physics, thermodynamics, mechanics, optics,
programming, art, and especially human behavior. The intellectual
challenges of electronic design are an excellent excuse for consuming
masses of cafe latte and chocolate.

Off the job, I do silly undisciplined things to keep from growing up
too fast. What do you do?

John
 
Ah Humps Art Deco Daily <Perv@perv.com> wrote:

Kimberly Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology, wrote:
Widdershins said:
: 4 Apr 2007 01:42:39 -0700, "Orville Wright" <Orville@deafemail.net
: licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:

: >Kimberly K. Barnard (known as "Kali" on Usenet)
: >(262) 595-2669
: >Pyschology Instructor at Univesity of Winconsin at Parkside

: What had you hoped to accomplsih by going RL on Kali,
: you nadless asswipe?

Both Steve Young and Michael Cranston enjoy trying to intimidate
me by posting my office address to Usenet.

Speak to your own motives and emotional states, and stop imagining
<looks at From: header>
<notches new UV point>

[whineage flushed]

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert
 
Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:31:51 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:11:24 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org
transparently proposed:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:57:01 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On 4 Apr 2007 11:50:19 -0700, "Linda" <Indomitable2@netzero.com
wrote:

[snip]

How the fuck did this crap get cross-posted to sci.electronics.design?

Knock it off!

...Jim Thompson

Don't worry. I'll take care of this for you. Sorry about the
intrusion.

Jade

You are such a caring person.
This is all fun and games until somebody gets killed. Yesterday,
in our town a woman was killed in her work place by a stalker.
He pumped five shots into her, and saved the sixth for himself.

She had filed a no contact order. A lot of fucking good it did.
Whoever posted Kali's RL has not only put her inhjoepardy,
he/she has endangered an entire community. Whoever is responsible
should roast in Hell.



Widdershins
 
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 06:17:21 +1000, Honorable Professeur Von TwoSteps
OA <.@.> wrote:

*Yes* *you* *are*. *Back* *to* *your* *work* *with* *the* *truckers*,
*beehatch*.
________________
Reventado
 
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:57:01 -0700, Jim Thompson attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
On 4 Apr 2007 11:50:19 -0700, "Linda" wrote:

[snip]

How the fuck did this crap get cross-posted to sci.electronics.design?
Ask BowTie.

Knock it off!

...Jim Thompson
Request DENIED.

--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pigfucker In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #16
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.

Official Chung Demon

VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, March 2007
Message-ID: <Xns9905E2BDB827wranglercaballista@204.153.245.131>

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: <Xns98EE28E1C58ABwranglercaballista@204.153.245.131>

"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain."
-- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID:
<jljOe.5348$ZD4.3...@bignews3.bellsouth.net>

I mourned:
The Mop Jockey did most oddly state:
DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!!

the oversized check is in the mail.

Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl shit
under several of my nyms.
"DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and
cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a
*Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his
own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot
stove. Message-ID: <77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05>

Said I:
You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence
who does not and cannot own Hatter.
"[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that
you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't
know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey.
Message-ID: <gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01>

"Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a
relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules
do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this
situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill
and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." --
Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID:
<45e625dd$0$16280$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>

"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID: <oorbs2pt3dc6b8t4aps7a68k0s9stn2e4i@4ax.com>

"I say you are out of your fucking mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" <exebuyola@yanospamhoo.com>, tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:
<ka4lo.338.19.1@news.alt.net>

"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: <1167007805.998087.289050@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>

If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks before:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml

"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.

Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner <wfh_jr@hotmail.com> on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so fucking scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pigfucker in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: <1156587081.123977.43800@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
1159678991.838385.310840@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com

"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v

To Whom It May Concern: Michael J. Cranston attorney kook is a dogfucker
 
Kali <kali@powder.keg> wrote in news:ev0e0e$nn$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

In <3vc71353cojg7l0ua7tnggkqgpvkneq8v7@4ax.com>, Widdershins
sinistre@liripipe.com said:
: 4 Apr 2007 01:42:39 -0700, "Orville Wright" <Orville@deafemail.net
: licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:
:
: >Kimberly K. Barnard (known as "Kali" on Usenet)
: >(262) 595-2669
: >Pyschology Instructor at Univesity of Winconsin at Parkside
:
: What had you hoped to accomplsih by going RL on Kali, you nadless
: asswipe?

Both Steve Young and Michael Cranston enjoy trying to intimidate
me by posting my office address to Usenet.

Someone forged my name and harassed several of my colleagues at
the University this morning. It looks like a Bowtie job, but
when I saw Cranston's post this morning, I suspected him, as
well, and would be remiss to not tell investigators about him.
FWIW, I've witness Cranston's usenet activities for 10 years and no matter
what you may think of him, that just doesn't sound like his style. Sending
harassing mail, forged in your name, but made to look like it was being
forged by miguel *does* seem like something someone else here would do.

The State of Wisconsin has very strict policies about harassment
of its employees, forgery, and abuse of its network, and all
concerned been very supportive of me today. The incident was
reported to network people and police before I even woke up this
morning. I have just sent the intimidating posts and full RL
information about both Cranston and Young to network services
and the police, and there will be an investigation.
So what you're saying is that an appropriate response to someone posting
words about you on the internet is to take it to real life by filing a
police report and specifically accusing someone that *may* have nothing to
do with this mornings incident? Why is justifiable when you take it to real
life but results in kook award nominations when someone who busts the chops
of kookologists does it?
 
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:48:50 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org>
transparently proposed:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:31:51 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:11:24 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org
transparently proposed:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:57:01 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On 4 Apr 2007 11:50:19 -0700, "Linda" <Indomitable2@netzero.com
wrote:

[snip]

How the fuck did this crap get cross-posted to sci.electronics.design?

Knock it off!

...Jim Thompson

Don't worry. I'll take care of this for you. Sorry about the
intrusion.

Jade

You are such a caring person.

Well, look how upset he is. (I'm assuming Jim is a he and not one of
those new trendy, in your face, tomboy sometimes stripper names like
Randy)

My only interest is in love and peace on usenet.
AND BOOBIE PICCIES!!!!!

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2
 
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:18:31 -0700, marcia attempted to confuse the issue
further by squeaking:
The Secretary of HomIntern wrote:
Daedalus wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:01:47 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:48:50 -0400, Daedalus wrote:

My only interest is in love and peace on usenet.

Jade
And not electronics?

No not really. I mean I use electronics constantly and appreciate the
conveniences they provide. I certainly don't know what I'd do without
such inventions as the electric wine bottle opener and electric
peppercorn grinder. (lol)
You forgot to mention yer electronic dildo, skank

How odd.

It is all too odd, my friend. I wish more people cared about love and
peace on usenet. It would be a lot happier place.
All you care about is your next trick, whore

What about you, John? What makes you tick?

Stop sniffing around his crotch, skank.
Jade

Is this Bowtie?
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pigfucker In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #16
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.

Official Chung Demon

VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, March 2007
Message-ID: <Xns9905E2BDB827wranglercaballista@204.153.245.131>

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: <Xns98EE28E1C58ABwranglercaballista@204.153.245.131>

"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain."
-- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID:
<jljOe.5348$ZD4.3...@bignews3.bellsouth.net>

I mourned:
The Mop Jockey did most oddly state:
DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!!

the oversized check is in the mail.

Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl shit
under several of my nyms.
"DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and
cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a
*Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his
own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot
stove. Message-ID: <77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05>

Said I:
You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence
who does not and cannot own Hatter.
"[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that
you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't
know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey.
Message-ID: <gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01>

"Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a
relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules
do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this
situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill
and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." --
Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID:
<45e625dd$0$16280$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>

"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID: <oorbs2pt3dc6b8t4aps7a68k0s9stn2e4i@4ax.com>

"I say you are out of your fucking mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" <exebuyola@yanospamhoo.com>, tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:
<ka4lo.338.19.1@news.alt.net>

"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: <1167007805.998087.289050@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>

If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks before:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml

"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.

Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner <wfh_jr@hotmail.com> on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so fucking scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pigfucker in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: <1156587081.123977.43800@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
1159678991.838385.310840@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com

"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v

To Whom It May Concern: Michael J. Cranston attorney kook is a dogfucker
 
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:12:39 -0400, in alt.usenet.kooks, Daedalus
<jade@netk0o0oks.org> wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:01:47 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:48:50 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org
wrote:


My only interest is in love and peace on usenet.

Jade

And not electronics?

No not really. I mean I use electronics constantly and appreciate the
conveniences they provide. I certainly don't know what I'd do without
such inventions as the electric wine bottle opener and electric
peppercorn grinder. (lol)
maybe learn to operate a steam powered one... (or maybe one using a
100% pure aluminum laser/free powers one.

How odd.

It is all too odd, my friend. I wish more people cared about love and
peace on usenet. It would be a lot happier place.

What about you, John? What makes you tick?
A balance wheel regulator gear?

Jade


John

--
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005
 
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ev0lpu$kns$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
: "marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com> wrote in message
: news:1175705223.587188.200510@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
: > On Apr 4, 10:51 am, Kali <k...@powder.keg> wrote:
: >> In <3vc71353cojg7l0ua7tnggkqgpvkneq...@4ax.com>, Widdershins
: >> sinis...@liripipe.com said:
: >>> 4 Apr 2007 01:42:39 -0700, "Orville Wright"
<Orvi...@deafemail.net>
: >>> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:
: >>>
: >>>> Kimberly K. Barnard (known as "Kali" on Usenet)
: >>>> (262) 595-2669
: >>>> Pyschology Instructor at Univesity of Winconsin at Parkside
: >>>
: >>> What had you hoped to accomplsih by going RL on Kali,
: >>> you nadless asswipe?
: >>
: >> Both Steve Young and Michael Cranston enjoy trying to intimidate
: >> me by posting my office address to Usenet.
: >>
: >> Someone forged my name and harassed several of my colleagues at
: >> the University this morning. It looks like a Bowtie job, but
: >> when I saw Cranston's post this morning, I suspected him, as
: >> well, and would be remiss to not tell investigators about him.
: >>
: >> The State of Wisconsin has very strict policies about harassment
: >> of its employees, forgery, and abuse of its network, and all
: >> concerned been very supportive of me today. The incident was
: >> reported to network people and police before I even woke up this
: >> morning. I have just sent the intimidating posts and full RL
: >> information about both Cranston and Young to network services
: >> and the police, and there will be an investigation.
: >>
: >>> Widdershins
: >>>
: >>> If ignorance is bliss, Guth must be orgasmic.
: >>
: >> Kali
: >
: > And don't forget Brad, who recently resurrected himself on usenet
and
: > has a history of going rl on people (my money's on Cranston, tho).
:
: Got any evidence for that libel?
:
: Because I'll tell you something: the one sure fact that will come out
of
: this investigation is that Mike had nothing to do with the email.
:

You could only know that if you were with him the last 72hrs, every
minute of the day or....you did it yourself.

: > This is despicable behavior.
:
: Indeed it is. Maliciously making a police report is about as low as it
: gets.
:

Not very bright are you. :(

Had you read the post mixed in with a little reading comprehension you
would have noted that others called and reported well before Kali awoke.

:
: --
: Rhonda Lea Kirk
 
"Dr. Wee Hung Lo" <dr.whl@hocho.org> wrote in message
news:46142e34_3@x-privat.org
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ev0lpu$kns$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
"marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com> wrote in message
news:1175705223.587188.200510@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
On Apr 4, 10:51 am, Kali <k...@powder.keg> wrote:
In <3vc71353cojg7l0ua7tnggkqgpvkneq...@4ax.com>, Widdershins
sinis...@liripipe.com said:
4 Apr 2007 01:42:39 -0700, "Orville Wright"
Orvi...@deafemail.net> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil,
and wrote:

Kimberly K. Barnard (known as "Kali" on Usenet)
(262) 595-2669
Pyschology Instructor at Univesity of Winconsin at Parkside

What had you hoped to accomplsih by going RL on Kali,
you nadless asswipe?

Both Steve Young and Michael Cranston enjoy trying to intimidate
me by posting my office address to Usenet.

Someone forged my name and harassed several of my colleagues at
the University this morning. It looks like a Bowtie job, but
when I saw Cranston's post this morning, I suspected him, as
well, and would be remiss to not tell investigators about him.

The State of Wisconsin has very strict policies about harassment
of its employees, forgery, and abuse of its network, and all
concerned been very supportive of me today. The incident was
reported to network people and police before I even woke up this
morning. I have just sent the intimidating posts and full RL
information about both Cranston and Young to network services
and the police, and there will be an investigation.

Widdershins

If ignorance is bliss, Guth must be orgasmic.

Kali

And don't forget Brad, who recently resurrected himself on usenet
and has a history of going rl on people (my money's on Cranston,
tho).

Got any evidence for that libel?

Because I'll tell you something: the one sure fact that will come
out of this investigation is that Mike had nothing to do with the
email.


You could only know that if you were with him the last 72hrs, every
minute of the day or....you did it yourself.
Well, my personal life is none of your business, but he still didn't do
it.

And if she thinks it was me, then she'd best add me into the report.

This is despicable behavior.

Indeed it is. Maliciously making a police report is about as low as
it gets.


Not very bright are you. :(
This has been a banner day. My mental stability, my ethics and my
intelligence all down the toilet. In less than a couple of hours, no
less.

Good thing this is only usenet, or I might be devastated.

Had you read the post mixed in with a little reading comprehension you
would have noted that others called and reported well before Kali
awoke.
They weren't the ones who named Steve and Mike as the likely culprits.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top