incredible advance!

[Phil Hobbs]

On 11/12/2013 10:42 AM, RobertMacy wrote:

On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:30:23 -0700, Greegor <greegor47@gmail.com> wrote:

I prefer only genuine quack devices.
Look for the Monster label on your cable.
RIP Robert W. McCoy 1927-2010
http://www.museumofquackery.com/
Is there a museum like this for
quack electronics claims?
Monster should sponsor it.

find his letter in response to Monster 'suing' him...

Kurt Denke, Founder/Pres
Blue Jeans Cable
1419 Elliott Ave. W, Suite C
Seattle WA 98119
tel: (206) 284-2924
fax: (206) 284-2931
http://www.bluejeanscable.com

If you can't find, I have a text copy.

Great letter.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net

 

[Syd Rumpo]

On 12/11/2013 17:01, George Herold wrote:

On Monday, November 11, 2013 5:51:44 PM UTC-5, Syd Rumpo wrote:
On 11/11/2013 21:12, John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:32:36 -0800 (PST), George Herold
snip
I think you need to recall, that though Syd is a smart guy, he also claims to have worked on the hendershot generator.

George H

So, why harvest energy when it's free?
It's a question of quality. For example, while free energy is great for
heating your house, you wouldn't really want to use it for cooking.
Likewise, you could run your TV from free power for the soaps or
'reality TV', but you wouldn't use it for serious drama or classical music.

Essentially, harvested energy uses better quality electrons, and
organically harvested energy is among the best you can get. Many people
claim that electrons are indistinguishable, but it is a fact that no two
have ever been measured to be the same.

Hi Syd, I assume your tongue is firmly in your cheek.
Am I mistaken in my claim that you 'worked on' the hendershot generator?
(If so I apologize.)

George H.

The Hendershot is old news. I sold the rights to my version to some
gentlemen who would prefer not to be named for reasons of 'national
security'.

They seemed to be really nice guys, if a little heavily built.
Hopefully they'll commercialise it properly and the dream of 'energy too
cheap to meter' will become reality.

Cheers
--
Syd

 

[hamilton]

On 11/12/2013 8:42 AM, RobertMacy wrote:

On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:30:23 -0700, Greegor <greegor47@gmail.com> wrote:

I prefer only genuine quack devices.
Look for the Monster label on your cable.
RIP Robert W. McCoy 1927-2010
http://www.museumofquackery.com/
Is there a museum like this for
quack electronics claims?
Monster should sponsor it.

find his letter in response to Monster 'suing' him...

Do you have a direct link to this letter ?

Kurt Denke, Founder/Pres
Blue Jeans Cable
1419 Elliott Ave. W, Suite C
Seattle WA 98119
tel: (206) 284-2924
fax: (206) 284-2931
http://www.bluejeanscable.com

If you can't find, I have a text copy.

 

[Spehro Pefhany]

On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:31:57 -0700, the renowned hamilton
<hamilton@nothere.com> wrote:

On 11/12/2013 8:42 AM, RobertMacy wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:30:23 -0700, Greegor <greegor47@gmail.com> wrote:

I prefer only genuine quack devices.
Look for the Monster label on your cable.
RIP Robert W. McCoy 1927-2010
http://www.museumofquackery.com/
Is there a museum like this for
quack electronics claims?
Monster should sponsor it.

find his letter in response to Monster 'suing' him...

Do you have a direct link to this letter ?

http://www.bluejeanscable.com/legal/mcp/


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com

 

[George Herold]

On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:26:32 PM UTC-5, Syd Rumpo wrote:

On 12/11/2013 17:01, George Herold wrote:
On Monday, November 11, 2013 5:51:44 PM UTC-5, Syd Rumpo wrote:
On 11/11/2013 21:12, John Larkin wrote
Hi Syd, I assume your tongue is firmly in your cheek.
Am I mistaken in my claim that you 'worked on' the hendershot generator?
(If so I apologize.)

George H.

The Hendershot is old news. I sold the rights to my version to some
gentlemen who would prefer not to be named for reasons of 'national
security'.

They seemed to be really nice guys, if a little heavily built.
Hopefully they'll commercialise it properly and the dream of 'energy too
cheap to meter' will become reality.

Great, that's what I recall. Mind if I ask how many hendershot generators are running in your house, and what was your electrical bill for the last month/year?

George H.

Cheers

--

Syd

 

On Saturday, November 9, 2013 2:27:51 PM UTC-5, John Larkin wrote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2493931/New-device-harvests-electricity-background-radiation-like-Wi-Fi.html



You could use the energy captured from your cell phone to charge your cell

phone!





--



John Larkin Highland Technology Inc

www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com



Precision electronic instrumentation

Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators

Custom timing and laser controllers

Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links

VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer

Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators

Ambient energy harvesting technology from microwave, RF and wireless sources is a
mature technology -- variations of this
are commercially available : www.enocean.com
The groundbreaking advance would be when
energy harvesting can be achieved from
the infra-red, visible (higher frequency)
bands of the electromagnetic spectrum. The
major challenge is that as frequency increases, the wavelength decreases, and then making
antenna is very difficult. The Idaho NREL
researchers have experimented with using
micro chip fabrication technology to test
micro-antennas. but a lot of work needs to
be done before this becomes a viable
technology.

 

[John Larkin]

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:55:36 -0800 (PST), dakupoto@gmail.com wrote:

On Saturday, November 9, 2013 2:27:51 PM UTC-5, John Larkin wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2493931/New-device-harvests-electricity-background-radiation-like-Wi-Fi.html



You could use the energy captured from your cell phone to charge your cell

phone!





--



John Larkin Highland Technology Inc

www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com



Precision electronic instrumentation

Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators

Custom timing and laser controllers

Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links

VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer

Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators

Ambient energy harvesting technology from microwave, RF and wireless sources is a
mature technology -- variations of this
are commercially available : www.enocean.com

That's insane. One lithium cell would deliver more power for decades and cost
much less.

The groundbreaking advance would be when
energy harvesting can be achieved from
the infra-red, visible (higher frequency)

Solar cells. Mature technology.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators

 

On Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:42:10 PM UTC-5, John Larkin wrote:
> That's insane. One lithium cell would deliver more power for decades and cost
Possibly insane, but someone has cooked up a device
to make some money!
> Solar cells. Mature technology.
Too mature, that it is headed for retirement home.
Once again, unless there is a groundbreaking
enhancement in core solar cell technology that
drastically improves their energy conversion
efficiency, there is not much hope for solar
cell technology. Solar

--



John Larkin Highland Technology Inc

www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com



Precision electronic instrumentation

Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators

Custom timing and laser controllers

Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links

VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer

Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Saturday, 16 November 2013 14:29:18 UTC+11, daku...@gmail.com wrote:

On Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:42:10 PM UTC-5, John Larkin wrote:

That's insane. One lithium cell would deliver more power for decades and cost less.

Possibly insane, but someone has cooked up a device to make some money!

Solar cells. Mature technology.

Too mature, that it is headed for retirement home. Once again, unless there is a groundbreaking enhancement in core solar cell technology that drastically improves their energy conversion efficiency, there is not much hope for solar cell technology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FileVeff%28rev131111%29a2.jpg

The best multilayer technologies are up at 44%, which doesn't leave much room for drastic improvement in energy conversion efficiency.

Since there is a thriving market for less efficient - but more cost-effective - solar cells, one has to conclude that daku is out of his tree.

Thermal solar power is still cheaper for really large installations, but there are a whole lot of applications where photovoltaic cells really are the cheapest and most practical option, and we've probably still got a few more iterations of increasing the production volume by a factor of ten and halving the unit cost left to go.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[josephkk]

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:04:18 -0800, josephkk
<joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:00:41 -0500, Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 11/12/2013 10:42 AM, RobertMacy wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:30:23 -0700, Greegor <greegor47@gmail.com> wrote:

I prefer only genuine quack devices.
Look for the Monster label on your cable.
RIP Robert W. McCoy 1927-2010
http://www.museumofquackery.com/
Is there a museum like this for
quack electronics claims?
Monster should sponsor it.

find his letter in response to Monster 'suing' him...

Kurt Denke, Founder/Pres
Blue Jeans Cable
1419 Elliott Ave. W, Suite C
Seattle WA 98119
tel: (206) 284-2924
fax: (206) 284-2931
http://www.bluejeanscable.com

If you can't find, I have a text copy.

Great letter.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

I didn't find it, not that i looked all that hard. Could someone give me
a tip on where it is located?

?-/

Nevermind, SPeff put it up already.

?-)

 

[josephkk]

On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:00:41 -0500, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 11/12/2013 10:42 AM, RobertMacy wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:30:23 -0700, Greegor <greegor47@gmail.com> wrote:

I prefer only genuine quack devices.
Look for the Monster label on your cable.
RIP Robert W. McCoy 1927-2010
http://www.museumofquackery.com/
Is there a museum like this for
quack electronics claims?
Monster should sponsor it.

find his letter in response to Monster 'suing' him...

Kurt Denke, Founder/Pres
Blue Jeans Cable
1419 Elliott Ave. W, Suite C
Seattle WA 98119
tel: (206) 284-2924
fax: (206) 284-2931
http://www.bluejeanscable.com

If you can't find, I have a text copy.

Great letter.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

I didn't find it, not that i looked all that hard. Could someone give me
a tip on where it is located?

?-/

 

[Greegor]

krw > Yes, there is a difference between individuals
krw > trying to solve these problems and statists
krw > doing their thing. Statists *always* make
krw > things worse. One tsar can't out-think 350M people.

Socialists and others who worship the STATE
never acknowledge the idiocy of bureaucracy.

They're like thoroughly indoctrinated cult members.

 

[hamilton]

On 11/15/2013 10:28 PM, josephkk wrote:

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:04:18 -0800, josephkk
joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:00:41 -0500, Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 11/12/2013 10:42 AM, RobertMacy wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:30:23 -0700, Greegor <greegor47@gmail.com> wrote:

I prefer only genuine quack devices.
Look for the Monster label on your cable.
RIP Robert W. McCoy 1927-2010
http://www.museumofquackery.com/
Is there a museum like this for
quack electronics claims?
Monster should sponsor it.

find his letter in response to Monster 'suing' him...

Kurt Denke, Founder/Pres
Blue Jeans Cable
1419 Elliott Ave. W, Suite C
Seattle WA 98119
tel: (206) 284-2924
fax: (206) 284-2931
http://www.bluejeanscable.com

If you can't find, I have a text copy.

Great letter.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

I didn't find it, not that i looked all that hard. Could someone give me
a tip on where it is located?

?-/

Nevermind, SPeff put it up already.

?-)

Please post that location.

 

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:29:18 -0800 (PST), dakupoto@gmail.com wrote:

On Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:42:10 PM UTC-5, John Larkin wrote:
That's insane. One lithium cell would deliver more power for decades and cost
Possibly insane, but someone has cooked up a device
to make some money!
Solar cells. Mature technology.
Too mature, that it is headed for retirement home.
Once again, unless there is a groundbreaking
enhancement in core solar cell technology that
drastically improves their energy conversion
efficiency, there is not much hope for solar
cell technology. Solar

There's also that little problem of moonlight having less power density than
sunlight.

We have gobs of uranium and natural gas and oil and coal. We don't have a
problem that needs fixing. Greenies and politicians live to screw up things that
are working fine; they follow the money and the power and get in the way, for
their own fun and profit. They should put their energy into things that need
work, like war and poverty and disease.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators

 

On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 07:15:14 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:29:18 -0800 (PST), dakupoto@gmail.com wrote:

On Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:42:10 PM UTC-5, John Larkin wrote:
That's insane. One lithium cell would deliver more power for decades and cost
Possibly insane, but someone has cooked up a device
to make some money!
Solar cells. Mature technology.
Too mature, that it is headed for retirement home.
Once again, unless there is a groundbreaking
enhancement in core solar cell technology that
drastically improves their energy conversion
efficiency, there is not much hope for solar
cell technology. Solar


There's also that little problem of moonlight having less power density than
sunlight.

We have gobs of uranium and natural gas and oil and coal. We don't have a
problem that needs fixing. Greenies and politicians live to screw up things that
are working fine; they follow the money and the power and get in the way, for
their own fun and profit. They should put their energy into things that need
work, like war and poverty and disease.

Oh, good God, no! They've already proven what damage they can do
there.

 

[John Larkin]

On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 12:01:21 -0500, krw@attt.bizz wrote:

On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 07:15:14 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:29:18 -0800 (PST), dakupoto@gmail.com wrote:

On Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:42:10 PM UTC-5, John Larkin wrote:
That's insane. One lithium cell would deliver more power for decades and cost
Possibly insane, but someone has cooked up a device
to make some money!
Solar cells. Mature technology.
Too mature, that it is headed for retirement home.
Once again, unless there is a groundbreaking
enhancement in core solar cell technology that
drastically improves their energy conversion
efficiency, there is not much hope for solar
cell technology. Solar


There's also that little problem of moonlight having less power density than
sunlight.

We have gobs of uranium and natural gas and oil and coal. We don't have a
problem that needs fixing. Greenies and politicians live to screw up things that
are working fine; they follow the money and the power and get in the way, for
their own fun and profit. They should put their energy into things that need
work, like war and poverty and disease.

Oh, good God, no! They've already proven what damage they can do
there.

There are lots of people working to reduce poverty and disease. I help some of
them, as we all should. But those people are out there, on the ground, quietly
trying to make things better one step at a time, not spewing class-warfare hate
and jockeying for power.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators

 

On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 09:17:16 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 12:01:21 -0500, krw@attt.bizz wrote:

On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 07:15:14 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:29:18 -0800 (PST), dakupoto@gmail.com wrote:

On Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:42:10 PM UTC-5, John Larkin wrote:
That's insane. One lithium cell would deliver more power for decades and cost
Possibly insane, but someone has cooked up a device
to make some money!
Solar cells. Mature technology.
Too mature, that it is headed for retirement home.
Once again, unless there is a groundbreaking
enhancement in core solar cell technology that
drastically improves their energy conversion
efficiency, there is not much hope for solar
cell technology. Solar


There's also that little problem of moonlight having less power density than
sunlight.

We have gobs of uranium and natural gas and oil and coal. We don't have a
problem that needs fixing. Greenies and politicians live to screw up things that
are working fine; they follow the money and the power and get in the way, for
their own fun and profit. They should put their energy into things that need
work, like war and poverty and disease.

Oh, good God, no! They've already proven what damage they can do
there.

There are lots of people working to reduce poverty and disease. I help some of
them, as we all should. But those people are out there, on the ground, quietly
trying to make things better one step at a time, not spewing class-warfare hate
and jockeying for power.

Yes, there is a difference between individuals trying to solve these
problems and statists doing their thing. Statists *always* make
things worse. One tsar can't out-think 350M people.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Sunday, 17 November 2013 04:29:34 UTC+11, k...@attt.bizz wrote:

On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 09:17:16 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 12:01:21 -0500, krw@attt.bizz wrote
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 07:15:14 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:29:18 -0800 (PST), dakupoto@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:42:10 PM UTC-5, John Larkin wrote:

<snipped the usual hogwash>

> Yes, there is a difference between individuals trying to solve these problems and statists doing their thing. Statists *always* make things worse.

Or so krw believes. He does believe a lot of other things that are equally nonsensical.

>One tsar can't out-think 350M people.

I sat the university entrance examination in Tasmania in 1959 in competition with about 5000 other children - I ended up twelfth on the list of results.

A similarly talented tsar could - on that basis - be expected to out-think all but 840,000 of 350 million people.

He'd probably be bright enough to know that the current US populations is about 313 million people, rather than 350 million.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Sunday, 17 November 2013 06:33:06 UTC+11, Greegor wrote:

krw > Yes, there is a difference between individuals
krw > trying to solve these problems and statists
krw > doing their thing. Statists *always* make
krw > things worse. One tsar can't out-think 350M people.

Socialists and others who worship the STATE never acknowledge the idiocy of bureaucracy.

They're like thoroughly indoctrinated cult members.

Greegor never misses an opportunity to post this mantra.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Phil Hobbs]

On 11/16/2013 12:04 AM, josephkk wrote:

On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:00:41 -0500, Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 11/12/2013 10:42 AM, RobertMacy wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:30:23 -0700, Greegor <greegor47@gmail.com> wrote:

I prefer only genuine quack devices.
Look for the Monster label on your cable.
RIP Robert W. McCoy 1927-2010
http://www.museumofquackery.com/
Is there a museum like this for
quack electronics claims?
Monster should sponsor it.

find his letter in response to Monster 'suing' him...

Kurt Denke, Founder/Pres
Blue Jeans Cable
1419 Elliott Ave. W, Suite C
Seattle WA 98119
tel: (206) 284-2924
fax: (206) 284-2931
http://www.bluejeanscable.com

If you can't find, I have a text copy.

Great letter.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

I didn't find it, not that i looked all that hard. Could someone give me
a tip on where it is located?

?-/

Googled "Blue Jeans Cable" monster letter -- first link is the right one:

http://tinyurl.com/nd9v6nr

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 USA
+1 845 480 2058

hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net