R
Ricky
Guest
On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 8:14:36 PM UTC-4, Clifford Heath wrote:
https://youtu.be/ghrjJ1OL6jM?t=21
https://youtu.be/ghrjJ1OL6jM?t=21
S
server
Guest
Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote in
news:36df6057-1e26-47a2-90e4-501925414d3fn@googlegroups.com:
They too fracture and that is why copper pipe runs for plumbing are
done with straight sections and then \"elbows\" and such are used to
make turns. Soft copper comes in rolls but get straightened for
installation and many runs And does not lend to being bent much as
the diameter collapses and flow suffers.
Wiring is similar inasmuch as nobody makes hard turns in wiring
runs, and the little loops made at the ends for termination should be
made in a slow fashion to minimize the effect of \'work hardening\'.
It is in fact taught in a proper electrical wiring / electrician\'s
class.
Sarcasm can be funny, but not so bright sarcasm, not so much.
news:36df6057-1e26-47a2-90e4-501925414d3fn@googlegroups.com:
torsdag den 21. april 2022 kl. 01.48.35 UTC+2 skrev
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org:
Lasse Langwadt Christensen <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote in
news:50ac279e-89b5-44b5...@googlegroups.com:
torsdag den 21. april 2022 kl. 00.12.14 UTC+2 skrev
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org:
\"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote in
newsp.1kucb...@ryzen.lan:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 23:58:13 +0100, bitrex
us...@example.net> wrote:
I thought they were extruded, but no!
https://youtu.be/wwWIyHo3yJM
Like carving a turkey dinner
How does that even work? The bit at the end of each one
where it magically bends up to the vertical.
Copper \"work hardens\" and such a bend would create
micro-fractures right at the bend joint.
only if you try to bend it back, annealed copper is dead soft
only gets hard once you have bend it
I guess you are not very observant. The bend happens at the end
of each skiving, and the speed of the bending is what causes the
IMMEDIATE \'work hardening\' and no, \"bending it back\" is not
required. The solid matrix of copper atoms shears and
micro-fractures occur immediately. Regardless of the fact that
you are too inexperienced to understand the process. Your
precious \"full annealing\" disappears right at the bend and does
so immediately. Copper is one of the worst mediums for it too.
good thing we don\'t use copper pipes or wires then ...
They too fracture and that is why copper pipe runs for plumbing are
done with straight sections and then \"elbows\" and such are used to
make turns. Soft copper comes in rolls but get straightened for
installation and many runs And does not lend to being bent much as
the diameter collapses and flow suffers.
Wiring is similar inasmuch as nobody makes hard turns in wiring
runs, and the little loops made at the ends for termination should be
made in a slow fashion to minimize the effect of \'work hardening\'.
It is in fact taught in a proper electrical wiring / electrician\'s
class.
Sarcasm can be funny, but not so bright sarcasm, not so much.
C
Cydrome Leader
Guest
Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
copper is a much better heat conductor than Al. It also costs more and
weighs more. In the processor world, you have to transfer the heat from
the relatively small surface of the procesor to the rest of the heatsink
in addition to transferring the heat to the air. So you\'ll see heatsinks
made of multiple metals. Everything is always a trade-off, somewhere.
All copper heatsinks are surpringly heavy, and still don\'t conduct heat
as well as good heat pipe, so you\'ll see heatpipes in some heatsinks even
where there is no need to move the heat somewhere else due to space
constraints, like in a laptop.
copper is a much better heat conductor than Al. It also costs more and
weighs more. In the processor world, you have to transfer the heat from
the relatively small surface of the procesor to the rest of the heatsink
in addition to transferring the heat to the air. So you\'ll see heatsinks
made of multiple metals. Everything is always a trade-off, somewhere.
All copper heatsinks are surpringly heavy, and still don\'t conduct heat
as well as good heat pipe, so you\'ll see heatpipes in some heatsinks even
where there is no need to move the heat somewhere else due to space
constraints, like in a laptop.
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:31:19 +0100, Cydrome Leader <presence@mungepanix.com> wrote:
Ah! Thankyou. I thought they were just making it look pretty as a marketing gimmick, my faith has been restored in science. Makes sense - I\'ve only ever seen dual metals on big heavy ones.
Ah! Thankyou. I thought they were just making it look pretty as a marketing gimmick, my faith has been restored in science. Makes sense - I\'ve only ever seen dual metals on big heavy ones.
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 23:45:19 +0100, Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
Because you\'re wrong, if you have two 6 inch fans on your water cooler radiator, you have the same air to heatsink cooling.
https://www.thoughtco.com/buy-by-and-bye-1689328
> aftermarket CPU cooling. So there\'s literally no point in this discussion.
If they\'re not doing it to lower the temperature, they\'re not right in the head.
Because he puts GPUs bang up against each other with no air gap, and wants the heat outside the house.
> What a tool. Like the other discussion, there\'s no point in continuing. I think you are a self contradiction.
Saying that after you\'ve responded to every point makes you a silly little child who has to get the last word in. Were you bullied at school?
Because you\'re wrong, if you have two 6 inch fans on your water cooler radiator, you have the same air to heatsink cooling.
https://www.thoughtco.com/buy-by-and-bye-1689328
> aftermarket CPU cooling. So there\'s literally no point in this discussion.
If they\'re not doing it to lower the temperature, they\'re not right in the head.
Because he puts GPUs bang up against each other with no air gap, and wants the heat outside the house.
> What a tool. Like the other discussion, there\'s no point in continuing. I think you are a self contradiction.
Saying that after you\'ve responded to every point makes you a silly little child who has to get the last word in. Were you bullied at school?
R
Ricky
Guest
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 7:58:10 PM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Clearly there is no reason to think you are going to understand, but the fans are not the only factor in the equation of removing heat. If they were, they would just put the fans to blow on the CPU and a heat sink would not be needed. The design of the heat sink and fins are important to optimize heat removal from the CPU and transfer it to the air. That\'s what the water cooler or heat pipe do better than a simple, metal heat sink.
You are the one who just said the CPU runs at 90°C, so there\'s no reason to cool further.
As I expected. No point at all. You may be unwilling to learn anything, but I\'m starting to think you actually are unable. I don\'t get why you can\'t understand that most people who buy water cooling and heat pipes for the hot rod CPUs is to cool them as much as possible, so they can overclock them.
--
Rick C.
+--- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+--- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Clearly there is no reason to think you are going to understand, but the fans are not the only factor in the equation of removing heat. If they were, they would just put the fans to blow on the CPU and a heat sink would not be needed. The design of the heat sink and fins are important to optimize heat removal from the CPU and transfer it to the air. That\'s what the water cooler or heat pipe do better than a simple, metal heat sink.
You are the one who just said the CPU runs at 90°C, so there\'s no reason to cool further.
As I expected. No point at all. You may be unwilling to learn anything, but I\'m starting to think you actually are unable. I don\'t get why you can\'t understand that most people who buy water cooling and heat pipes for the hot rod CPUs is to cool them as much as possible, so they can overclock them.
--
Rick C.
+--- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+--- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
P
Phil Hobbs
Guest
John Larkin wrote:
1957 Chevys are awesome.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
1957 Chevys are awesome.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 22:29:21 +0100, Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
If only computers were still desktops and not towers.... Who thought it would be a good idea to have stuff hanging off things?
If only computers were still desktops and not towers.... Who thought it would be a good idea to have stuff hanging off things?
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 23:28:06 +0100, Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
Use an IR thermometer to test one of your own.
> Or just go with water cooling. I\'ve always liked that idea. I was going to build a water cooling system from scratch for a desktop. I ended up with a laptop before I got it ready for test. They already use heat pipes. It\'s hard to beat that. They have really tiny radiators with very, very thin fins, but lots of them. I wonder how they get any air to flow through them??? It must be magic.
Best watercooler has no fans on the radiator, or the radiator is in another room.
Use an IR thermometer to test one of your own.
> Or just go with water cooling. I\'ve always liked that idea. I was going to build a water cooling system from scratch for a desktop. I ended up with a laptop before I got it ready for test. They already use heat pipes. It\'s hard to beat that. They have really tiny radiators with very, very thin fins, but lots of them. I wonder how they get any air to flow through them??? It must be magic.
Best watercooler has no fans on the radiator, or the radiator is in another room.
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 05:29:20 +0100, Don <g@crcomp.net> wrote:
The one on the right is shit, it lets my i5-8600K reach 100C and thermally throttle if I use all 6 cores and the onboard GPU to the max.
The one on the right is shit, it lets my i5-8600K reach 100C and thermally throttle if I use all 6 cores and the onboard GPU to the max.
R
Ricky
Guest
On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 1:16:14 AM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Sometimes you just have no fucking clue! Well, for a wide range of \"sometimes\".
--
Rick C.
+--+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+--+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Sometimes you just have no fucking clue! Well, for a wide range of \"sometimes\".
--
Rick C.
+--+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+--+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 05:22:25 +0100, Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
If you\'re going to disagree with me, to prevent yourself from looking like a wanker, explain why you believe I\'m wrong. I have such a thermometer and can very quickly tell the temperature of every part of a heatsink. Having 96 CPU cores and 8 GPUs, I tend to analyze temperatures a lot.
If you\'re going to disagree with me, to prevent yourself from looking like a wanker, explain why you believe I\'m wrong. I have such a thermometer and can very quickly tell the temperature of every part of a heatsink. Having 96 CPU cores and 8 GPUs, I tend to analyze temperatures a lot.
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 03:26:12 +0100, Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
And the heatsink on watercoolers is no better than the ones directly on the CPU. The bottleneck is moving heat from fins to air. Traditional watercooling doesn\'t change this.
I\'ve never seen a CPU get that high with decent air cooling.
That\'s a yes then. Do you have specs?
> You may be unwilling to learn anything, but I\'m starting to think you actually are unable. I don\'t get why you can\'t understand that most people who buy water cooling and heat pipes for the hot rod CPUs is to cool them as much as possible, so they can overclock them.
Then they are fools.
And the heatsink on watercoolers is no better than the ones directly on the CPU. The bottleneck is moving heat from fins to air. Traditional watercooling doesn\'t change this.
I\'ve never seen a CPU get that high with decent air cooling.
That\'s a yes then. Do you have specs?
> You may be unwilling to learn anything, but I\'m starting to think you actually are unable. I don\'t get why you can\'t understand that most people who buy water cooling and heat pipes for the hot rod CPUs is to cool them as much as possible, so they can overclock them.
Then they are fools.
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 4:19:03 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:
<snip>
The fool here is Comander Kinsey. He sees the CPU at one end of the heat dissipating arrangement and the finned heat sink at the other dissipating the heat generated, and hasn\'t noticed that there\'s a thermal gradient from the CPU to the surface of the air-cooled heat sink.
The copper block next to the CPU get almost as hot as the CPU. A heat pipe soldered onto that copper block can carry a lot of heat (as the latent heat of fusion of vaporised water) with very little temperature drop and dump it on to a much larger condensing area at the other end of the heat pipe where it can get spread across a fairly wide area under a large number of air-cooled fins, none of which have to get all that hot to transfer their little bit of heat to the passing air.
More dissipating fin area means the CPU doesn\'t need to get as hot to get rid of the heat it is dissipating. This might have dumbed it all down enough to make it comprehensible to Commander Kinsey, but since he isn\'t all that interested in understanding what\'s going, comprehension isn\'t his favourite activity. Poncing around telling people that stuff doesn\'t really matter is more his line.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
<snip>
The fool here is Comander Kinsey. He sees the CPU at one end of the heat dissipating arrangement and the finned heat sink at the other dissipating the heat generated, and hasn\'t noticed that there\'s a thermal gradient from the CPU to the surface of the air-cooled heat sink.
The copper block next to the CPU get almost as hot as the CPU. A heat pipe soldered onto that copper block can carry a lot of heat (as the latent heat of fusion of vaporised water) with very little temperature drop and dump it on to a much larger condensing area at the other end of the heat pipe where it can get spread across a fairly wide area under a large number of air-cooled fins, none of which have to get all that hot to transfer their little bit of heat to the passing air.
More dissipating fin area means the CPU doesn\'t need to get as hot to get rid of the heat it is dissipating. This might have dumbed it all down enough to make it comprehensible to Commander Kinsey, but since he isn\'t all that interested in understanding what\'s going, comprehension isn\'t his favourite activity. Poncing around telling people that stuff doesn\'t really matter is more his line.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
R
Ricky
Guest
On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 2:19:03 AM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey wrote:
It\'s not a bottleneck. It\'s a resistance. Thermal flow is exactly like resistance in an electrical circuit. The total resistance is the sum of the individual series resistances. You have no basis for claiming the thermal resistance at the metal to air interface is significantly larger than the resistance elsewhere. So reducing the resistance of the heat flow to the fins already reduces the total thermal resistance. In addition, you are assuming the fins, fans and everything else are the same. There\'s no reason to think that. Moving the bulk of the heat sink off the CPU means it can be designed without restriction to the weight. Noting the fans have the same diameter blades does not make the whole thing equivalent.
I know you aren\'t going to understand this and are going to be in denial about it. But, whatever. You clearly have your intellectual limitations.
Now you are doubling down on the idea. ;
LOL
Yes, anyone who does things you don\'t, is a fool. That cuts both ways.
--
Rick C.
+-+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+-+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
It\'s not a bottleneck. It\'s a resistance. Thermal flow is exactly like resistance in an electrical circuit. The total resistance is the sum of the individual series resistances. You have no basis for claiming the thermal resistance at the metal to air interface is significantly larger than the resistance elsewhere. So reducing the resistance of the heat flow to the fins already reduces the total thermal resistance. In addition, you are assuming the fins, fans and everything else are the same. There\'s no reason to think that. Moving the bulk of the heat sink off the CPU means it can be designed without restriction to the weight. Noting the fans have the same diameter blades does not make the whole thing equivalent.
I know you aren\'t going to understand this and are going to be in denial about it. But, whatever. You clearly have your intellectual limitations.
Now you are doubling down on the idea. ;
LOL
Yes, anyone who does things you don\'t, is a fool. That cuts both ways.
--
Rick C.
+-+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+-+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 18:12:40 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
Probably removed by the health and softy committee in case you reverse at high speed in to a pedestrian.
Donald Trump\'s car drifting in reverse very fast: https://youtu.be/6elLDemrDls
I was once told by the police I had to get my car reg number replaced because it was loose, so it could fly off, spin round, and chop somebody\'s head off. His reasoning? He\'d seen it in the film Blade Runner 2. Telling him that was fictional got him very angry indeed. But then he did have beard.
Probably removed by the health and softy committee in case you reverse at high speed in to a pedestrian.
Donald Trump\'s car drifting in reverse very fast: https://youtu.be/6elLDemrDls
I was once told by the police I had to get my car reg number replaced because it was loose, so it could fly off, spin round, and chop somebody\'s head off. His reasoning? He\'d seen it in the film Blade Runner 2. Telling him that was fictional got him very angry indeed. But then he did have beard.
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 14:26:07 +0100, Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
I know very well what it is, I have a fucking physics degree. But bottleneck is a reasonable colloquial term for anything which is the main cause of a reduction in something. Think of traffic flowing along a highway then through a one lane roadworks, that\'s a bottleneck. It\'s also a resistance.
> You have no basis for claiming the thermal resistance at the metal to air interface is significantly larger than the resistance elsewhere.
Basic physics tells us it is. Air doesn\'t conduct like solid.
> So reducing the resistance of the heat flow to the fins already reduces the total thermal resistance. In addition, you are assuming the fins, fans and everything else are the same. There\'s no reason to think that.. Moving the bulk of the heat sink off the CPU means it can be designed without restriction to the weight. Noting the fans have the same diameter blades does not make the whole thing equivalent.
You\'re adding more resistance, metal to water than back to metal again.
> I know you aren\'t going to understand this and are going to be in denial about it. But, whatever. You clearly have your intellectual limitations.
Anybody who uses the term \"in denial\" is probably one those greenies who thinks logical people are denying their hippy warming movement.
WTF? I\'m pointing out air cooling keeps it well below the max.
That\'s also a yes. Electronic analysis of this thread determines this has a 76% chance of being you:
https://st2.depositphotos.com/1026266/10481/i/450/depositphotos_104819176-stock-photo-computer-geek-typing-on-keyboard.jpg
Poor eyesight, unable to shave, no muscles, not worthy of anything.
No it doesn\'t. You can\'t just put in cliches and make them apply to me.
There\'s a reason your 4GHz CPU isn\'t sold at 4.4GHz. Because it\'s not reliable at that speed.
I know very well what it is, I have a fucking physics degree. But bottleneck is a reasonable colloquial term for anything which is the main cause of a reduction in something. Think of traffic flowing along a highway then through a one lane roadworks, that\'s a bottleneck. It\'s also a resistance.
> You have no basis for claiming the thermal resistance at the metal to air interface is significantly larger than the resistance elsewhere.
Basic physics tells us it is. Air doesn\'t conduct like solid.
> So reducing the resistance of the heat flow to the fins already reduces the total thermal resistance. In addition, you are assuming the fins, fans and everything else are the same. There\'s no reason to think that.. Moving the bulk of the heat sink off the CPU means it can be designed without restriction to the weight. Noting the fans have the same diameter blades does not make the whole thing equivalent.
You\'re adding more resistance, metal to water than back to metal again.
> I know you aren\'t going to understand this and are going to be in denial about it. But, whatever. You clearly have your intellectual limitations.
Anybody who uses the term \"in denial\" is probably one those greenies who thinks logical people are denying their hippy warming movement.
WTF? I\'m pointing out air cooling keeps it well below the max.
That\'s also a yes. Electronic analysis of this thread determines this has a 76% chance of being you:
https://st2.depositphotos.com/1026266/10481/i/450/depositphotos_104819176-stock-photo-computer-geek-typing-on-keyboard.jpg
Poor eyesight, unable to shave, no muscles, not worthy of anything.
No it doesn\'t. You can\'t just put in cliches and make them apply to me.
There\'s a reason your 4GHz CPU isn\'t sold at 4.4GHz. Because it\'s not reliable at that speed.
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 7:13:56 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:
It\'s hard to find a cliche that doesn\'t apply to Commander Kinsey. He is a very stereotyped wanker.
> There\'s a reason your 4GHz CPU isn\'t sold at 4.4GHz. Because it\'s not reliable at that speed.
Actually its more that only some parts keep on working when clocked that fast. The specifications that manufacturers slap on a part are set by the production yield that they get when they test to that specification. They seem to want 95% yield or better, if they can get it, so the specifications tend to be conservative.
Over-clockers are interested in seeing how fast they can run the part they happen to have bought, with the chip cooler they decided to put on it.
When we put in select on test parts to compensate for production tolerances, parts from the same batch were a lot more similar to one another than parts from different batches (and we bought in batches that covered about six months production, so the guys doing the testing got pretty bored with putting in the same resistor for months on end). Parts that came from the same wafer might be even more similar.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
It\'s hard to find a cliche that doesn\'t apply to Commander Kinsey. He is a very stereotyped wanker.
> There\'s a reason your 4GHz CPU isn\'t sold at 4.4GHz. Because it\'s not reliable at that speed.
Actually its more that only some parts keep on working when clocked that fast. The specifications that manufacturers slap on a part are set by the production yield that they get when they test to that specification. They seem to want 95% yield or better, if they can get it, so the specifications tend to be conservative.
Over-clockers are interested in seeing how fast they can run the part they happen to have bought, with the chip cooler they decided to put on it.
When we put in select on test parts to compensate for production tolerances, parts from the same batch were a lot more similar to one another than parts from different batches (and we bought in batches that covered about six months production, so the guys doing the testing got pretty bored with putting in the same resistor for months on end). Parts that came from the same wafer might be even more similar.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
R
Ricky
Guest
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 5:13:56 AM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey wrote:
If you have a physics degree, you would understand the differences between traffic and electrical resistance. So clearly I have caught you in a lie.
I don\'t need a poor analogy, because I understand resistance. Why not just work with thermal resistance, rather than talking in analogies that you clearly don\'t understand.
Lol! So that\'s physicist talk, \"Air doesn\'t conduct like a solid\"? The air in this situation doesn\'t need to conduct heat. It accepts heat from contact with the heat sink fins, and the movement of the air transports that heat away. Conduction has little to do with it other than possibly the very thin layer at the air-metal surface where it does conduct just like any other material.
Again, you can\'t understand that the remainder of the system does not need to be the same. You can\'t look at one portion of the system and talk about the entire system. You want desperately for the two systems to be otherwise identical, but there is no reason to believe that.
Or they are discussing something with someone who is in denial.
Which is an irrelevant point. People buy water cooling to get as low a CPU temperature as possible, so they can overclock as high a speed as they can get. It\'s like any other pursuit where the the goal is to optimize something, far beyond what is useful. It\'s a hobby.
You are right about the eyesight. Not so right about the muscles, etc. I was captain of the wrestling team and have been very successful in life. You, meanwhile, are reduced to the pathetic presence you project in this group, completely unable to have a meaningful discussion, largely devoid of friends.
Again, you fail to understand anything at all about this thread. You are an interesting case, but I think you have been explored enough. This is pretty much a hobby, and you are getting boring.
--
Rick C.
+-++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+-++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
If you have a physics degree, you would understand the differences between traffic and electrical resistance. So clearly I have caught you in a lie.
I don\'t need a poor analogy, because I understand resistance. Why not just work with thermal resistance, rather than talking in analogies that you clearly don\'t understand.
Lol! So that\'s physicist talk, \"Air doesn\'t conduct like a solid\"? The air in this situation doesn\'t need to conduct heat. It accepts heat from contact with the heat sink fins, and the movement of the air transports that heat away. Conduction has little to do with it other than possibly the very thin layer at the air-metal surface where it does conduct just like any other material.
Again, you can\'t understand that the remainder of the system does not need to be the same. You can\'t look at one portion of the system and talk about the entire system. You want desperately for the two systems to be otherwise identical, but there is no reason to believe that.
Or they are discussing something with someone who is in denial.
Which is an irrelevant point. People buy water cooling to get as low a CPU temperature as possible, so they can overclock as high a speed as they can get. It\'s like any other pursuit where the the goal is to optimize something, far beyond what is useful. It\'s a hobby.
You are right about the eyesight. Not so right about the muscles, etc. I was captain of the wrestling team and have been very successful in life. You, meanwhile, are reduced to the pathetic presence you project in this group, completely unable to have a meaningful discussion, largely devoid of friends.
Again, you fail to understand anything at all about this thread. You are an interesting case, but I think you have been explored enough. This is pretty much a hobby, and you are getting boring.
--
Rick C.
+-++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+-++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Thu, 05 May 2022 15:19:18 +0100, Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
> ----a reply to my post after you claimed you weren\'t going to reply again, after I made a Jewish comment. So you\'re a liar. Or your killfile broke.
> ----a reply to my post after you claimed you weren\'t going to reply again, after I made a Jewish comment. So you\'re a liar. Or your killfile broke.