A
Androcles
Guest
"CWatters" <colin.watters@turnersNOSPAMoak.plus.com> wrote in message news:464038c6$0$8738$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
D
David L. Jones
Guest
On May 8, 4:50 pm, mike3 <mike4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dave.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Answer_to_Life%2C_the_Universe%2C_and_Everything
Dave.
R
Rheilly Phoull
Guest
"Salmon Egg" <salmonegg@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:C2656AAC.76221%salmonegg@sbcglobal.net...
gratification. Given a few years this behaviour settles down for most pimply
adolescents
--
Cheers .......... Rheilly P
news:C2656AAC.76221%salmonegg@sbcglobal.net...
narcotics, sending up the 'establishment' is another source of
gratification. Given a few years this behaviour settles down for most pimply
adolescents
--
Cheers .......... Rheilly P
R
Richard Tobin
Guest
In article <1178585015.335505.147170@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
Radium <glucegen1@gmail.com> wrote:
Anyway you're making this far too difficult. watts = volts x amps,
and amps = coulombs / second. A single electron per second is
(1 / 6.2415 x 10^18) amps so you need 6.2415 x 10^18 volts.
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
Radium <glucegen1@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes.
No.
Anyway you're making this far too difficult. watts = volts x amps,
and amps = coulombs / second. A single electron per second is
(1 / 6.2415 x 10^18) amps so you need 6.2415 x 10^18 volts.
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
F
fritzius@bellsouth.net
Guest
On May 7, 6:14 pm, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:
The voltage required would be 1 Watt / 1,6 x10 exp-19 Amp = .62 x 10
exp 19 Volts
or 6.2 x 10exp 18 Volts. That's 6,200,000,000,000,000,000 Volts
That's a lotta voltage.
Bob Fritzius
An electron has a charge of 1.602 x 10 exp-19 Coulombs
The voltage required would be 1 Watt / 1,6 x10 exp-19 Amp = .62 x 10
exp 19 Volts
or 6.2 x 10exp 18 Volts. That's 6,200,000,000,000,000,000 Volts
That's a lotta voltage.
Bob Fritzius
B
boson boss
Guest
On May 8, 1:14 am, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, yeah but is it safe then if its just one electron? Even at high
frequency? And how many protons in one place is that potential?
Well, yeah but is it safe then if its just one electron? Even at high
frequency? And how many protons in one place is that potential?
Guest
In sci.physics.electromag Radium <glucegen1@gmail.com> wrote:
you could pull this off. Think of it: Just turn a knob, and instantly,
"air electricity" would make your device sing just like Britney Spears!
--
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russel
Wel, for example, you could listen to the top ten records of the day if
you could pull this off. Think of it: Just turn a knob, and instantly,
"air electricity" would make your device sing just like Britney Spears!
--
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russel
T
The Great Attractor
Guest
On 7 May 2007 23:50:11 -0700, mike3 <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> wrote:
You have to hang out at the bar at the end of the universe to get it.
You have to hang out at the bar at the end of the universe to get it.
T
The Great Attractor
Guest
On Tue, 8 May 2007 18:58:28 +0800, "Rheilly Phoull"
<rheilly@bigpong.com.au> wrote:
You're really full of it. :-]
<rheilly@bigpong.com.au> wrote:
"Salmon Egg" <salmonegg@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:C2656AAC.76221%salmonegg@sbcglobal.net...
On 5/7/07 4:14 PM, in article
1178579674.122077.159630@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com, "Radium"
glucegen1@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi:
How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?
Yup, 1 electron per second is an extremely weak amperage.
Thanks,
Radium
It is hard to believe that someone can be this incredibly stupid and be
alive. My conclusion is this Radium radical is playing this stupid on
purpose so that we wear out our fingers by typing.
Bill
-- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.
I second that, it would seem second to destroying their brains with
narcotics, sending up the 'establishment' is another source of
gratification. Given a few years this behaviour settles down for most pimply
adolescents
You're really full of it. :-]
R
Radium
Guest
On May 8, 7:40 am, boson boss <junker...@gmail.com> wrote:
lot more extreme. Electricity from a stun gun can move through air
despite the wattage being significantly less that your average 110V
socket. Most sockets -- whether 110v or 220v -- cannot transmit
electricity via air because the voltage is not high enough to break
through the ohms of air.
A stun gun's wattage is isn't much, however, with its super-high
voltage [around 50,000 volts]; its current can flow through air. The
high-voltage allows those electrons to "cut" through the extreme
resistance of the air.
Think about what 6,200,000,000,000,000,000-volt, 1-watt, electric
current can do. With potential-differences that extreme, we don't need
wires.
Even an electric current that's 6,200,000,000,000,000,000 volts and
10^-200 [10-to-the-power-negative-200] watts does not need wires.
At such high voltages, electricity can easily pass through air. Might
do wonders for those who want wireless power.
BTW, you asked about "high frequency." How does that relate?
What makes it unsafe?
The electricity I am talking about is similar to a stun gun except a
lot more extreme. Electricity from a stun gun can move through air
despite the wattage being significantly less that your average 110V
socket. Most sockets -- whether 110v or 220v -- cannot transmit
electricity via air because the voltage is not high enough to break
through the ohms of air.
A stun gun's wattage is isn't much, however, with its super-high
voltage [around 50,000 volts]; its current can flow through air. The
high-voltage allows those electrons to "cut" through the extreme
resistance of the air.
Think about what 6,200,000,000,000,000,000-volt, 1-watt, electric
current can do. With potential-differences that extreme, we don't need
wires.
Even an electric current that's 6,200,000,000,000,000,000 volts and
10^-200 [10-to-the-power-negative-200] watts does not need wires.
At such high voltages, electricity can easily pass through air. Might
do wonders for those who want wireless power.
BTW, you asked about "high frequency." How does that relate?
E
Eric Gisse
Guest
On May 8, 5:41 pm, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:
[snip idiocy]
Learn scientific notation, you prolific idiot. Watching a person write
a dozen zeroes is just sad and is a sign they either never graduated
high school or are not there yet.
[snip idiocy]
Learn scientific notation, you prolific idiot. Watching a person write
a dozen zeroes is just sad and is a sign they either never graduated
high school or are not there yet.
B
Bob Cain
Guest
Salmon Egg wrote:
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
Proved, however, by the length of this thread.
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
Guest
On May 8, 9:25 pm, Bob Cain <arc...@arcanemethods.com> wrote:
Simple. No questions asked.
xxein: Cool. I throw a brick that contacts Einstein's head.Salmon Egg wrote:
On 5/7/07 4:14 PM, in article
1178579674.122077.159...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com, "Radium"
gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi:
How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?
Yup, 1 electron per second is an extremely weak amperage.
Thanks,
Radium
It is hard to believe that someone can be this incredibly stupid and be
alive.
Proved, however, by the length of this thread.
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Simple. No questions asked.
O
operator jay
Guest
"David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1178615557.346532.148780@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
http://www.google.ca/search?num=20&hl=en&q=answer+to+life+the+universe+and+everything
news:1178615557.346532.148780@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
also see what the google calculator thinks
http://www.google.ca/search?num=20&hl=en&q=answer+to+life+the+universe+and+everything
A
Autymn D. C.
Guest
On May 8, 6:01 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
resistanse?
A person is not a they. When are you goun to bring up the junction
resistanse?
T
The Great Attractor
Guest
On 10 May 2007 12:42:34 -0700, "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
"goun"?? "resistanse"?? Neither are words, dipshit.
wrote:
"goun"?? "resistanse"?? Neither are words, dipshit.
E
Eric Gisse
Guest
On May 10, 12:42 pm, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Around the same time you stop being a vapid cunt. ie: never
A
Autymn D. C.
Guest
On May 10, 5:31 pm, The Great Attractor
<Sup...@ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote:
oblique prospective tense. resistanse is the proper Latin spelling of
the property, where se is the letter|staffr seo|shoe. Nuke English-
speakkr-illiterati like you tom hell.
-Aut
<Sup...@ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote:
Learn how wittun speakts, nitwit. goun is the dative infinitiv or
oblique prospective tense. resistanse is the proper Latin spelling of
the property, where se is the letter|staffr seo|shoe. Nuke English-
speakkr-illiterati like you tom hell.
-Aut
P
Phineas T Puddleduck
Guest
In article <1179009101.444729.298800@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
"Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Why do you insist that this literal abortion is English? Its totally
discombobulate and predistgraphiates any melingtonological discustretions.....
--
COOSN-174-07-82116: Official Science Team mascot and alt.astronomy's favourite
poster (from a survey taken of the saucerhead high command).
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.
"Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Why do you insist that this literal abortion is English? Its totally
discombobulate and predistgraphiates any melingtonological discustretions.....
--
COOSN-174-07-82116: Official Science Team mascot and alt.astronomy's favourite
poster (from a survey taken of the saucerhead high command).
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.