Extremely High Voltage, Extremely Low Amperage, 1 watt?

[Radium]

Hi:

How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?

Yup, 1 electron per second is an extremely weak amperage.


Thanks,

Radium

 

[Uncle Al]

Radium wrote:

Hi:

How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?

Yup, 1 electron per second is an extremely weak amperage.

One mole of electrons is 96,485 coulombs. Work it out, dipshit.
One eV is 1.602177x10^(-19) joules. Work it out, dipshit.

Work it out, dipshit. Work it out, dipshit. Work it out, dipshit.
Work it out, dipshit. Work it out, dipshit. Work it out, dipshit.
Work it out, dipshit. Work it out, dipshit. Work it out, dipshit.
Work it out, dipshit.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

 

[Androcles]

"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:463FB48E.CCD91DEB@hate.spam.net...
[snip wet fart]

Fuck Off and Die, this is the river of shit, remember?

 

[Richard Tobin]

In article <1178579674.122077.159630@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
Radium <glucegen1@gmail.com> wrote:

How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?

A coulomb is about 10 micro-moles of electrons.

-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.

 

[David L. Jones]

On May 8, 9:14 am, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi:

How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?

Yup, 1 electron per second is an extremely weak amperage.

Thanks,

Radium

42

Dave.

 

[Eric Gisse]

On May 7, 4:14 pm, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi:

How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?

Yup, 1 electron per second is an extremely weak amperage.

Thanks,

Radium

_______ ____ ____
|__ __/ __ \ / __ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | |__| | |__| |
|_| \____/ \____/

_____ _____ ______ ______ _____ _____ _ _ _ _______
| __ \_ _| ____| ____|_ _/ ____| | | | | |__ __|
| | | || | | |__ | |__ | || | | | | | | | |
| | | || | | __| | __| | || | | | | | | | |
| |__| || |_| | | | _| || |____| |__| | |____| |
|_____/_____|_| |_| |_____\_____|\____/|______|_|

______ ____ _____ __ ______ _ _
| ____/ __ \| __ \ \ \ / / __ \| | | |
| |__ | | | | |__) | \ \_/ / | | | | | |
| __|| | | | _ / \ /| | | | | | |
| | | |__| | | \ \ | | | |__| | |__| |
|_| \____/|_| \_\ |_| \____/ \____/

 

[Radium]

On May 7, 4:58 pm, rich...@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) wrote:

In article <1178579674.122077.159...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,

Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:
How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?

A coulomb is about 10 micro-moles of electrons.

6.24150948×10-to-the-power-18 = 6.24150948×1,000,000,000,000,000,000 624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000

1 amp = 624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000 electrons per second

Watt = volt × amp

1 = v × 1/624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000

1(624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000) = v × 1

v = 1(624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000)/1

v = 624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000

So if the amperage is only 1 electron per second, the potential
difference must be 624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000 volts in order
to gain a power of 1 watt.

Am I right?

 

On May 7, 7:14 pm, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi:

How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?

Yup, 1 electron per second is an extremely weak amperage.

Thanks,

Radium

xxein: I might suspect that you will intend to 'prove' some physics
with this, but beware that a volt is a 'potential difference'. And
therefor, the watt is a power of a particular referrence frame. Even
1 electron/sec is subject to a time dilation in the "identical clock"
that will measure it. Be advised.

But on the classical scale, it is simple. 1 Ev/sec will produce 1
val(Ev) x watts of energy per sec (in accumulative power), by
definition. If this is stored off-line, the stored quantity is
generally available for use in any manner you would care to use it
(minus the variable losses). In general, a 1 watt lightbulb will
consume (use) 1/Ev electrons/sec. If on-line you only get Ev watts/
sec.

But if this is a 'trick' question, it takes 1 volt's worth of energy
to produce 1 watt of available energy (called power because it can be
stored and used in many ways until you use it up as a quantity of the
differential force available).

If this seems confusing, think of water. Water will not flow if there
is not a potential difference due to gravity (but this is not
completely analagous).

There is a lot more. What are you willing to accept as an explanation?

 

[Radium]

On May 7, 5:44 pm, x...@bellsouth.net wrote:

xxein: I might suspect that you will intend to 'prove' some physics
with this, but beware that a volt is a 'potential difference'. And
therefor, the watt is a power of a particular referrence frame. Even
1 electron/sec is subject to a time dilation in the "identical clock"
that will measure it. Be advised.

But on the classical scale, it is simple. 1 Ev/sec will produce 1
val(Ev) x watts of energy per sec (in accumulative power), by
definition. If this is stored off-line, the stored quantity is
generally available for use in any manner you would care to use it
(minus the variable losses). In general, a 1 watt lightbulb will
consume (use) 1/Ev electrons/sec. If on-line you only get Ev watts/
sec.

But if this is a 'trick' question, it takes 1 volt's worth of energy
to produce 1 watt of available energy (called power because it can be
stored and used in many ways until you use it up as a quantity of the
differential force available).

If this seems confusing, think of water. Water will not flow if there
is not a potential difference due to gravity (but this is not
completely analagous).

There is a lot more. What are you willing to accept as an explanation?

Well, I was wondering if high-voltage, low-amperage electricity could
move through air much like the electricity of lightning and stun-guns.

If so, would electronic equipment that uses such "air" electricity
[for power, as well as processing, amplifying, attenuating, recording/
playing-back signals] have any advantages over electronic equipment
using today's electricity?

 

[The TimeLord]

David L. Jones wrote:

On May 8, 9:14 am, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi:

How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?

Yup, 1 electron per second is an extremely weak amperage.

Thanks,

Radium

42

Dave.

[ROTFLOL] Great! By the way, it wasn't the dolphins that left; it was
the bees. [smile] Take care and thanks for the laugh.

--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us!

 

[Eric Gisse]

On May 7, 5:43 pm, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

Learn scientific notation, idiot.

 

[The TimeLord]

Radium wrote:

On May 7, 5:44 pm, x...@bellsouth.net wrote:

xxein: I might suspect that you will intend to 'prove' some physics
with this, but beware that a volt is a 'potential difference'. And
[...]
There is a lot more. What are you willing to accept as an explanation?

Well, I was wondering if high-voltage, low-amperage electricity could
move through air much like the electricity of lightning and stun-guns.

Whether or not electricity will move through air is dependent on more
than just volts and amps. First the electricity has to overcome the
work function of the interface between conductor and air. Then there
is the probability of collision with air molecules. All this is
usually incorporated in the concept of resistance. However, you need
to understand that to answer a specific instance with just one
electron and one volt is probably to oversimplify what you might be
after to the point of absurdity.

If so, would electronic equipment that uses such "air" electricity
[for power, as well as processing, amplifying, attenuating, recording/
playing-back signals] have any advantages over electronic equipment
using today's electricity?

I don't think so. I mean there is a reason that vacuum tubes had to
have a vacuum for them to work: probability of molecule collision
adversely affecting function.

Like I said, you're probably after something that shouldn't be
oversimplified with only volts and amps.

--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us!

 

[Radium]

On May 7, 5:43 pm, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:

On May 7, 4:58 pm, rich...@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) wrote:

In article <1178579674.122077.159...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:
How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?
A coulomb is about 10 micro-moles of electrons.

6.24150948×10-to-the-power-18 = 6.24150948×1,000,000,000,000,000,000 > 624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000

1 amp = 624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000 electrons per second

Watt = volt × amp

1 = v × 1/624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000

1(624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000) = v × 1

v = 1(624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000)/1

v = 624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000

So if the amperage is only 1 electron per second, the potential
difference must be 624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000 volts in order
to gain a power of 1 watt.

Am I right?

OOOOOPS

1 = v × 1/624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000

1/624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000 0.00160217652989930250013815568217322

1 = v × 0.00160217652989930250013815568217322

v = 1/0.00160217652989930250013815568217322 624.150948000000000000000000067479

F--k! It still doesn't make sense!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WTF is going on here????????????!!!!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!

624.150948000000000000000000067479 volts couldn't possibly be enough
to generate 1 watt with 0.00160217652989930250013815568217322 amp.

I am so f--------------------kin confused!!!!!!!!!

 

[Eric Gisse]

On May 7, 6:36 pm, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

I am so f--------------------kin confused!!!!!!!!!

_______ ____ ____
|__ __/ __ \ / __ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | |__| | |__| |
|_| \____/ \____/

_____ _____ ______ ______ _____ _____ _ _ _ _______
| __ \_ _| ____| ____|_ _/ ____| | | | | |__ __|
| | | || | | |__ | |__ | || | | | | | | | |
| | | || | | __| | __| | || | | | | | | | |
| |__| || |_| | | | _| || |____| |__| | |____| |
|_____/_____|_| |_| |_____\_____|\____/|______|_|

______ ____ _____ __ ______ _ _
| ____/ __ \| __ \ \ \ / / __ \| | | |
| |__ | | | | |__) | \ \_/ / | | | | | |
| __|| | | | _ / \ /| | | | | | |
| | | |__| | | \ \ | | | |__| | |__| |
|_| \____/|_| \_\ |_| \____/ \____/

 

[The Great Attractor]

On 7 May 2007 17:10:21 -0700, "David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com> wrote:

On May 8, 9:14 am, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi:

How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?

Yup, 1 electron per second is an extremely weak amperage.

Thanks,

Radium

42

WHAT A NUMBER! :-]


Ya fuckin' cross posting RETARDS!

 

[mike3]

On May 7, 5:14 pm, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi:

How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?

Yup, 1 electron per second is an extremely weak amperage.

Thanks,

Radium

1 electron / second is a charge of around 1.602 * 10^-19 Coulomb
per second, or 1.602 x 10^-19 Amperes. Since the power =
voltage * current, then the voltage = power / current, so we
divide one watt by 1.602 x 10^-19 amp, giving 6.242 x 10^18
volts approximate, ie. 6,242,000,000,000,000,000 volts (!)
(approximately)

 

[Salmon Egg]

On 5/7/07 4:14 PM, in article
1178579674.122077.159630@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com, "Radium"
<glucegen1@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi:

How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?

Yup, 1 electron per second is an extremely weak amperage.


Thanks,

Radium

It is hard to believe that someone can be this incredibly stupid and be

alive. My conclusion is this Radium radical is playing this stupid on
purpose so that we wear out our fingers by typing.

Bill
-- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.

 

[mike3]

On May 7, 7:36 pm, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:

On May 7, 5:43 pm, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:





On May 7, 4:58 pm, rich...@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) wrote:

In article <1178579674.122077.159...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:
How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?
A coulomb is about 10 micro-moles of electrons.

6.24150948×10-to-the-power-18 = 6.24150948×1,000,000,000,000,000,000 > > 624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000

1 amp = 624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000 electrons per second

Watt = volt × amp

1 = v × 1/624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000

1(624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000) = v × 1

v = 1(624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000)/1

v = 624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000

So if the amperage is only 1 electron per second, the potential
difference must be 624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000 volts in order
to gain a power of 1 watt.

Am I right?

OOOOOPS

1 = v × 1/624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000


1/624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000 > 0.00160217652989930250013815568217322

No, 1/624,150,948,000,000,000,000,000,000 0.000000000000000000160217652989930250013815568217322...

Notice all those zeroes. Also, notice how many
places the denominator has. Perhaps you
confused one of those commas in there
with a decimal point, and tried to reciprocal
624.150948000000000000000000? Different
number, you know.

1 = v × 0.00160217652989930250013815568217322

v = 1/0.00160217652989930250013815568217322 > 624.150948000000000000000000067479

You're off by 16 orders of magnitude.

F--k! It still doesn't make sense!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Of course not when you neglect 16 orders of
magnitude.

WTF is going on here????????????!!!!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!

Neglecting 16 orders of magnitude.

624.150948000000000000000000067479 volts couldn't possibly be enough
to generate 1 watt with 0.00160217652989930250013815568217322 amp.

Nope, it sure ain't.

I am so f--------------------kin confused!!!!!!!!!

Only because you neglected 16 orders of magnitude.

 

[mike3]

On May 7, 6:10 pm, "David L. Jones" <altz...@gmail.com> wrote:

On May 8, 9:14 am, Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi:

How many volts of electricity are required to gain 1 watt of power, if
the current is only 1 electron per second?

Yup, 1 electron per second is an extremely weak amperage.

Thanks,

Radium

42

Dave.

That some sort of joke?

That number is waaay too tiny.

Got to be a joke...

 

[CWatters]

"mike3" <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1178607011.194069.155250@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...

42

Dave.

That some sort of joke?

That number is waaay too tiny.

Got to be a joke...

HHGTTG