R
R. Steve Walz
Guest
FEerguy9 wrote:
Electronic devices CONTROL energy, they don't "make" it!
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
You're an idiot.feerguy9@cs.com (FEerguy9) wrote in message
news:<20040918044818.27462.00000234@mb-m01.news.cs.com>...
feerguy9@cs.com (FEerguy9) wrote in message
news:<20040915034456.07779.00000497@mb-m25.news.cs.com>...
But, wouldn't the capacitor plates be bigger than the vehicle?
Well, yes they would, unless a way to increase the surface area of
the plates *within a small perimeter* could be fashioned.
The plates (and the dielectric) *must* match exactly, to gain
optimum charge.
No, the capacitor plates will not be bigger than the vehicle
because smaller plates will store much more energy for the same
charge. Why do you want to use big plates?
I do not.
I was just setting the stage for cap use+.+.+.+.+.read on, and I go to
LENGTHS
TO EXPlain how to keep the pLATE SMAlL+.
Good one Frank, you got me. I should have said "big capacitances"
instead of "big plates". The point is that large capacitances
such as you suggest using large surface area plates, store LESS energy
for the same charge than small capacitances with less plate surface area.
In other words, your theory of increasing capacitance to increase energy
in the same perimeter is pure Bull S@#$.
Do you have a problem with that?
NaturaLly+.
ELECTRONIC DEVICES WIll REPlace coaL AND OIl+. period!
YOU work out the detailS+.
fRANK
-------------
Electronic devices CONTROL energy, they don't "make" it!
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public