eer

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:27:10 GMT, "Roger Gt" <not@here.net> wrote:

"CWatters" wrote
:
: 200+ miles is very acceptable for second cars use.
:

My "Second Car" will go 400 miles while towing a 6000 pound
trailer, can your dream car do that?
---
What's on the trailer, a huge gas tank?^)

--
John Fields
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:f177j0puscd8ov048q9gle50a5burodbi1@4ax.com...
: On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:27:10 GMT, "Roger Gt" <not@here.net>
wrote:
:
: >
: >"CWatters" wrote
: >:
: >: 200+ miles is very acceptable for second cars use.
: >:
: >
: >My "Second Car" will go 400 miles while towing a 6000 pound
: >trailer, can your dream car do that?
:
: ---
: What's on the trailer, a huge gas tank?^)
: John Fields

My Sail boat! Fixed Keel Cruiser.
 
"CWatters" <colin.watters@pandoraBOX.be> wrote in message
news:dmMYc.231236$2U7.11904044@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
I saw a recent article in Scientific American (or was it New Scientist?)
about hydrogen. If I remember correctly it discussed hydrogen in the
context
of our total need for energy and how to use and transport that energy
efficiently. I believe they concluded that if we manage to figure out how
to
make a lot of hydrogen cleanly then the best use for it is not in cars. It
would be better to use it for local power generation and home heating -
and
use the oil saved in our cars. I was a bit surprised but there you are.
Not surprising; hydrogen is difficult stuff to distribute,
deliver, and store, and so not well suited to being placed
in relatively small quantities, in a very large number of
individual devices, operated by "regular people."

It is simply not yet practical to produce a pure EV, battery
powered, with acceptable range to compete with gas-powered
IC vehicles.

200+ miles is very acceptable for second cars use.
Yes, but as I said - the device you pointed to really
doesn't compete with what most people mean by "car."
It's more of a competitor to a motorcyle or a scooter -
the only real advantage it has over either of those is that
of being enclosed. It has virtually no cargo space as far
as I could see, and certainly isn't something that you'd
want to take out on a major highway; in short, it's something
that one or two people might use for short urban runs,
a "getting to work and back" sort of vehicle.


The hybrids can actually better the purely-IC vehicles
already, and can be produced at a reasonable cost, so that's
what we're seeing now.

I believe I read the Jester cost only Ł6000 to make one off.
Yes, but again compare that to a truly comparable
vehicle - say, a motorcycle in the 250-500 cc class.



You mean something as quick as "unplugging" the battery and fitting a new
one? Batteries do wear out so it's likely that battery packs will be
rented
items anyway.
You're talking about removing and replacing something
that will likely weigh a fair fraction of a thousand pounds, if not
more - and will also, just to complicate things, likely have a
significant (dangerous) amount of residual charge at the time
it's being replaced. I fail to see how that will compare to the
convenience of simply driving up and sticking a nozzle (or
even a power cable) into the appropriate receptacle on the
vehicle, loading up on the energy needed, and driving off.
The latter is something that just about everyone can do right
now, as in self-service gas stations.

Further, in the "remove and replace" scenario, the "gas
station" (battery station?) will have to have a fair number of
fully-charged batteries on hand, ready to go, and some
system for delivering those to the vehicles in a timely
manner (not to mention the problem of testing and recharging
the spent batteries coming in - and the slower THAT
goes, the more charged batteries will have to be kept on
hand). Besides being a serious change to the existing
infrastructure, there are also safety and cost-of-inventory
issues likely to come up here. It's going to be hard to beat
the "dig a big hole and stick a tank in it" model for the
storage of gasoline.


That would appear to be a dual-seat vehicle with extremely
limited cargo space - and there's no mention of what running
various accessories (the headlights, heating or air conditioning,
etc.) would do to the range.

Oh I agree it's not an SUV but it's a heck of a lot better than the car
companies seem to manage with their all electric cars - it just seems like
they ain't really trying.
Like what? The "all-electrics" I've seen from the major
manufacturers have all been attempts at created reasonably
competitive vehicles, not glorified golf carts.

What's so bad about a hybrid electric, anyway? It's certainly
going to be FAR more efficient than current IC vehicles, can
be made in a range of competitive types/sizes already, and fits
the existing infrastructure. In addition, a small, relatively constant-
speed gasoline engine is a lot easier to make efficient AND
clean than one that's charged with being the direct drive power
for the wheels. A hybrid layout in which the electric motors
supply most or all of the actual driving power would also be
much more readily adaptable to alternate (although still chemical)
fuels.

Bob M.
 
"Bob Myers" <nospamplease@address.invalid> wrote in message news:<d7LYc.9091$yA1.487@news.cpqcorp.net>...

It is simply not yet practical to produce a pure EV, battery
powered, with acceptable range to compete with gas-powered
IC vehicles. The hybrids can actually better the purely-IC vehicles
already, and can be produced at a reasonable cost, so that's
what we're seeing now.
I don't understand the advantage of hybrids which are basically
gas powered vehicles. The only advantage I see is the gas engine
runs at optimal RPM, and braking is done by the electric motor
acting as a generator which recovers some of the kinetic energy.
The car may also be lighter weight than normal.

But so what? If I drive my little truck at 65 MPH for 2 hours
at optimum RPM without using the brakes, I get maybe 25 miles
per gallon, which is nowhere near the 70 MPG of the hybrid at
the same speed.

Actually, I haven't checked my truck milage under optimum
conditions, but I doubt it's anything close to the hybrid.

So what makes the hybrid so efficient compared to the normal IC?

-Bill
 
Bill Bowden wrote:
"Bob Myers" <nospamplease@address.invalid> wrote in message news:<d7LYc.9091$yA1.487@news.cpqcorp.net>...

It is simply not yet practical to produce a pure EV, battery
powered, with acceptable range to compete with gas-powered
IC vehicles. The hybrids can actually better the purely-IC vehicles
already, and can be produced at a reasonable cost, so that's
what we're seeing now.

I don't understand the advantage of hybrids which are basically
gas powered vehicles. The only advantage I see is the gas engine
runs at optimal RPM, and braking is done by the electric motor
acting as a generator which recovers some of the kinetic energy.
The car may also be lighter weight than normal.

But so what? If I drive my little truck at 65 MPH for 2 hours
at optimum RPM without using the brakes, I get maybe 25 miles
per gallon, which is nowhere near the 70 MPG of the hybrid at
the same speed.

Actually, I haven't checked my truck milage under optimum
conditions, but I doubt it's anything close to the hybrid.

So what makes the hybrid so efficient compared to the normal IC?

-Bill
----------------------
Hybrids are able to operate their engine at its optimum performance
at all times, and recover some energy by regenerative braking. Together
these offer about 60% increases in efficiency over your truck, which
doesn't get those conditions, but must vary its efficiency and operate
at various rpm's and torques.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
 
"Bill Bowden" <wrongaddress@att.net> wrote in message
news:ad025737.0409042145.72c727dd@posting.google.com...
"Bob Myers" <nospamplease@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:<d7LYc.9091$yA1.487@news.cpqcorp.net>...

It is simply not yet practical to produce a pure EV, battery
powered, with acceptable range to compete with gas-powered
IC vehicles. The hybrids can actually better the purely-IC vehicles
already, and can be produced at a reasonable cost, so that's
what we're seeing now.

I don't understand the advantage of hybrids which are basically
gas powered vehicles. The only advantage I see is the gas engine
runs at optimal RPM, and braking is done by the electric motor
acting as a generator which recovers some of the kinetic energy.
The car may also be lighter weight than normal.

But so what? If I drive my little truck at 65 MPH for 2 hours
at optimum RPM without using the brakes, I get maybe 25 miles
per gallon, which is nowhere near the 70 MPG of the hybrid at
the same speed.

If you only get 25mpg under such conditions either you have the most
enefficient truck currently available or your 'little truck' is about 40 ton
glw.


Actually, I haven't checked my truck milage under optimum
conditions, but I doubt it's anything close to the hybrid.

So what makes the hybrid so efficient compared to the normal IC?

-Bill
 
"R.Lewis" <h.lewis-not this bit-@connect-2.co.uk> wrote in message
news:chf84s$nif$1@thorium.cix.co.uk...
:
: "Bill Bowden" <wrongaddress@att.net> wrote in message
: news:ad025737.0409042145.72c727dd@posting.google.com...
: > "Bob Myers" <nospamplease@address.invalid> wrote in message
: news:<d7LYc.9091$yA1.487@news.cpqcorp.net>...
: >
: > >It is simply not yet practical to produce a pure EV, battery
: > >powered, with acceptable range to compete with gas-powered
: > >IC vehicles. The hybrids can actually better the purely-IC
vehicles
: > >already, and can be produced at a reasonable cost, so that's
: > >what we're seeing now.
: >
: > I don't understand the advantage of hybrids which are
basically
: > gas powered vehicles. The only advantage I see is the gas
engine
: > runs at optimal RPM, and braking is done by the electric motor
: > acting as a generator which recovers some of the kinetic
energy.
: > The car may also be lighter weight than normal.
: >
: > But so what? If I drive my little truck at 65 MPH for 2 hours
: > at optimum RPM without using the brakes, I get maybe 25 miles
: > per gallon, which is nowhere near the 70 MPG of the hybrid at
: > the same speed.
: >
: If you only get 25mpg under such conditions either you have the
most
: enefficient truck currently available or your 'little truck' is
about 40 ton
: glw.
: > Actually, I haven't checked my truck milage under optimum
: > conditions, but I doubt it's anything close to the hybrid.
: > So what makes the hybrid so efficient compared to the normal
IC?
: > -Bill

Currently available Hybrids are
1. not trucks, and
2. very underpowered for driving in traffic.

Everyone gets to decide for themselves what they will drive.
 
Bill Bowden wrote:

But so what? If I drive my little truck at 65 MPH for 2 hours
at optimum RPM without using the brakes, I get maybe 25 miles
per gallon, which is nowhere near the 70 MPG of the hybrid at
the same speed.

Actually, I haven't checked my truck milage under optimum
conditions, but I doubt it's anything close to the hybrid.

So what makes the hybrid so efficient compared to the normal IC?
The engine in the hybrid is smaller. When accelerating the electric
motor can help for a while. This means a smaller combustion engine.

Also the combustion engine does not need to be tuned to be resposive -
the electric side can handle that.

And then there is the desire to make the whole thing efficient - I guess
a truck will have the trade-off between cost and efficiency more to the
cost side where the hybrid will try to be more efficient.

For example the Prius seems to miss a throttle - no intake vacuum.
Instead the intake valves close at the moment the right amount of
mixture is in the cylinders. This means the engine is not running as a
vacuum pump all the time.

To run your truck in this mode you would need to quasi floor the pedal
and drive in very high gear. but the engine will not like that - while
the hybrid's engine can handle this because it is made for it.


Thomas
 
"Bill Bowden" <wrongaddress@att.net> wrote in message
news:ad025737.0409042145.72c727dd@posting.google.com...
"Bob Myers" <nospamplease@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:<d7LYc.9091$yA1.487@news.cpqcorp.net>...

It is simply not yet practical to produce a pure EV, battery
powered, with acceptable range to compete with gas-powered
IC vehicles. The hybrids can actually better the purely-IC vehicles
already, and can be produced at a reasonable cost, so that's
what we're seeing now.

I don't understand the advantage of hybrids which are basically
gas powered vehicles.
The battery in a hybrid is usually too small to power the car for very
long - it's really just used to improve the efficiency of the gas engine by
storing energy recovered during braking. Hybrids won't really delay the day
that the oil runs out.
 
"CWatters" <colin.watters@pandoraBOX.be> wrote in message
news:0KK_c.237499$tt1.12230793@phobos.telenet-ops.be...

Hybrids won't really delay the day that the oil runs out.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17039-2004Jun4.html
 
"Clarence" <No@No.Com> wrote in message news:<rVG_c.11925$QJ3.1670@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>...
"R.Lewis" <h.lewis-not this bit-@connect-2.co.uk> wrote in message
news:chf84s$nif$1@thorium.cix.co.uk...
:
: "Bill Bowden" <wrongaddress@att.net> wrote in message
: news:ad025737.0409042145.72c727dd@posting.google.com...
: > "Bob Myers" <nospamplease@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:<d7LYc.9091$yA1.487@news.cpqcorp.net>...
:
: > >It is simply not yet practical to produce a pure EV, battery
: > >powered, with acceptable range to compete with gas-powered
: > >IC vehicles. The hybrids can actually better the purely-IC
vehicles
: > >already, and can be produced at a reasonable cost, so that's
: > >what we're seeing now.
:
: > I don't understand the advantage of hybrids which are
basically
: > gas powered vehicles. The only advantage I see is the gas
engine
: > runs at optimal RPM, and braking is done by the electric motor
: > acting as a generator which recovers some of the kinetic
energy.
: > The car may also be lighter weight than normal.
:
: > But so what? If I drive my little truck at 65 MPH for 2 hours
: > at optimum RPM without using the brakes, I get maybe 25 miles
: > per gallon, which is nowhere near the 70 MPG of the hybrid at
: > the same speed.
:
: If you only get 25mpg under such conditions either you have the
most
: enefficient truck currently available or your 'little truck' is
about 40 ton
: glw.
: > Actually, I haven't checked my truck milage under optimum
: > conditions, but I doubt it's anything close to the hybrid.
: > So what makes the hybrid so efficient compared to the normal
IC?
: > -Bill

Currently available Hybrids are
1. not trucks, and
2. very underpowered for driving in traffic.

Everyone gets to decide for themselves what they will drive.
Why would it be underpowered? The electric motor should have
sufficient power in a small size. The gas motor may be
underpowered but it isn't needed to accelerate in traffic.

There seems to be quite a spread in performance of hybrids.
Chevy is offering a full sized hybrid truck that only gets 5-13%
better milage. Probably not worth the extra cost.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/hybrid_news.shtml

But VW has developed a very efficient hybrid car that gets 318 MPG
which is better than a motorcycle.

http://www.benerridge.freeserve.co.uk/economy.htm

So, the spread seems to be 5% to 1500% depending on what you
compare it to.

-Bill
 
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message news:<413ACA09.3ACE@armory.com>...
Bill Bowden wrote:

"Bob Myers" <nospamplease@address.invalid> wrote in message news:<d7LYc.9091$yA1.487@news.cpqcorp.net>...

It is simply not yet practical to produce a pure EV, battery
powered, with acceptable range to compete with gas-powered
IC vehicles. The hybrids can actually better the purely-IC vehicles
already, and can be produced at a reasonable cost, so that's
what we're seeing now.

I don't understand the advantage of hybrids which are basically
gas powered vehicles. The only advantage I see is the gas engine
runs at optimal RPM, and braking is done by the electric motor
acting as a generator which recovers some of the kinetic energy.
The car may also be lighter weight than normal.

But so what? If I drive my little truck at 65 MPH for 2 hours
at optimum RPM without using the brakes, I get maybe 25 miles
per gallon, which is nowhere near the 70 MPG of the hybrid at
the same speed.

Actually, I haven't checked my truck milage under optimum
conditions, but I doubt it's anything close to the hybrid.

So what makes the hybrid so efficient compared to the normal IC?

-Bill
----------------------
Hybrids are able to operate their engine at its optimum performance
at all times, and recover some energy by regenerative braking. Together
these offer about 60% increases in efficiency over your truck, which
doesn't get those conditions, but must vary its efficiency and operate
at various rpm's and torques.

-Steve
So, if my truck runs at optimum RPM on a flat road, without
braking, I should get a 60% increase in milage.

I'll have to check that out on a long trip. A 60% increase
over 20 MPG would be 32 MPG. Sounds kinda high, but maybe my
truck will do 32 MPG, I haven't driven on a long enough trip
to find out.

-Bill
 
Bill Bowden wrote:
So, if my truck runs at optimum RPM on a flat road, without
braking, I should get a 60% increase in milage.
Just one thing missing -- to achieve optimum MPG, the engine needs to be
running at full throttle. Replace the engine with a smaller one, and
you've got it.

--
John Miller
Email address: domain, n4vu.com; username, jsm

If it's worth doing, it's worth doing for money.
 
wrongaddress@att.net (Bill Bowden) wrote:
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message news:<413ACA09.3ACE@armory.com>...
[snip]
Hybrids are able to operate their engine at its optimum performance
at all times, and recover some energy by regenerative braking. Together
these offer about 60% increases in efficiency over your truck, which
doesn't get those conditions, but must vary its efficiency and operate
at various rpm's and torques.

So, if my truck runs at optimum RPM on a flat road, without
braking, I should get a 60% increase in milage.
You have a larger engine than would be required in a hybrid, which
adds friction, inertia and mass. It also means the optimum engine rpm
is unlikely to be matched to the optimum vehicle speed as well as it
can be in a hybrid, as you need more power in reserve not having the
electric motor to help out.

I don't get why vegetable oil isn't considered the fuel of the future.
It's carbon-neutral, so no global warming. It's entirely renewable. It
doesn't put anything worse out the back than a fossil-fuelled engine.
Energy density is comparable to fossil oil. The engine technology is
practically identical to existing engines (diesels at least). The
distribution channels would require minimal modification. Perhaps once
the fossil oil has run out Shell et al. will suddenly think it's a
great idea...


Tim
--
Guns Don’t Kill People, Rappers Do.
 
"Bill Bowden" <wrongaddress@att.net> wrote in message
news:ad025737.0409042145.72c727dd@posting.google.com...
I don't understand the advantage of hybrids which are basically
gas powered vehicles. The only advantage I see is the gas engine
runs at optimal RPM, and braking is done by the electric motor
acting as a generator which recovers some of the kinetic energy.
The car may also be lighter weight than normal.

But so what? If I drive my little truck at 65 MPH for 2 hours
at optimum RPM without using the brakes, I get maybe 25 miles
per gallon, which is nowhere near the 70 MPG of the hybrid at
the same speed.
There are a couple of problems here. First, your
truck as a whole likely is not designed to be as efficient
as today's typical hybrid. Look at the design of, say, the
current Prius - not only is it a hybrid, but it also has other
design features (low drag body shape, low rolling resistance
tires, etc.) to optimize its performance in this department vs.
what your truck does. Next - how are you determining
"optimum RPM"? Does you truck have any instrumentation
that provides a good instantaneous MPG indication?

Finally, though, and possibly most importantly, I doubt that
the engine in your truck is truly optimized for efficient operation
at a single, constant speed the same way as the engine of
a hybrid could be. It can't be, since it has to be flexible enough
to handle all the different conditions you throw at it in the
course of driving around.

Bob M.
 
"CWatters" <colin.watters@pandoraBOX.be> wrote in message
news:0KK_c.237499$tt1.12230793@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
Hybrids won't really delay the day
that the oil runs out.
Not as they're currently being made, now - meaning EVs
running off power generated by a more-efficient-than-usuall,
but still gasoline-burning, IC engine. But the beauty of the
hybrid model is that it really doesn't care what fuel, or what
type of engine, is being used to generate the electricity.
Once you've got a hybrid drive train in large-scale production,
it's not THAT big a step to move to another (but still
chemically based) generator system.

For instance - and I'm NOT really proposing this is better,
because I simply have NOT looked further into this and
am not expert in this field - perhaps a gas-turbine hybrid
might eventually come to the market. Turbines are pretty
good at handling a wide range of fuels and operating at
a constant speed...

Bob M.
 
"Bob Myers" <nospamplease@address.invalid> wrote in message news:<7cR_c.9773$d%1.3257@news.cpqcorp.net>...
"Bill Bowden" <wrongaddress@att.net> wrote in message
news:ad025737.0409042145.72c727dd@posting.google.com...

I don't understand the advantage of hybrids which are basically
gas powered vehicles. The only advantage I see is the gas engine
runs at optimal RPM, and braking is done by the electric motor
acting as a generator which recovers some of the kinetic energy.
The car may also be lighter weight than normal.

But so what? If I drive my little truck at 65 MPH for 2 hours
at optimum RPM without using the brakes, I get maybe 25 miles
per gallon, which is nowhere near the 70 MPG of the hybrid at
the same speed.


There are a couple of problems here. First, your
truck as a whole likely is not designed to be as efficient
as today's typical hybrid. Look at the design of, say, the
current Prius - not only is it a hybrid, but it also has other
design features (low drag body shape, low rolling resistance
tires, etc.) to optimize its performance in this department vs.
what your truck does. Next - how are you determining
"optimum RPM"? Does you truck have any instrumentation
that provides a good instantaneous MPG indication?
Yes, aerodynamics and tire friction are big factors, but the question
is, why do hybrid engines obtain so much better efficiency with
changing loads? Do they change RPM to compensate for load?

My truck always runs between 2000 and 3000 RPM, as do most other
cars, so that must be close to optimum, and it's a fairly narrow range.
So, why does a hybrid engine outperforn a standard IC engine by such
a large margin? They both do the same thing, with minor differences.

Finally, though, and possibly most importantly, I doubt that
the engine in your truck is truly optimized for efficient operation
at a single, constant speed the same way as the engine of
a hybrid could be. It can't be, since it has to be flexible enough
to handle all the different conditions you throw at it in the
course of driving around.
Yes, the truck engine is probably designed to operate over a wider
RPM range and loads, but I wouldn't think that accounts for a 60%
increase in milage of hybrids over normal ICs.

After all, IC engines are just pistons and valves and timing.
How many changes can you make to get a 60% milage increase?

-Bill
 
But so what? If I drive my little truck at 65 MPH for 2 hours
at optimum RPM without using the brakes, I get maybe 25 miles
per gallon, which is nowhere near the 70 MPG of the hybrid at
the same speed.
If I can throw in a question here, has anyone got real world experience
of the hybrid ( specifically prius) mpg?

My neighbor has a 2003 prius and is disappointed that she gets a yearly
average of 46mpg, daily driving including around town and some
interstate. She complained to the dealer and spoke to other owners at the
dealer. All basically say that's what they will do on average or it's
down to 'driving style'. This lady is early sixties and no lead foot.

My wife has a VW beetle diesel. Same conditions, mixed town and
interstate average last year was 49.6 mpg, even with me driving (with a
lead foot).

So - are these hybrids really as efficient as claimed?

Sure diesel has more specific energy per gallon than gas, but the bug is
nearly 350lbs heavier, a lot less aerodynamic and tyre with more rolling
resistance too...
 
"Bill Bowden" <wrongaddress@att.net> wrote in message
news:ad025737.0409061546.171612a7@posting.google.com...

Yes, aerodynamics and tire friction are big factors, but the question
is, why do hybrid engines obtain so much better efficiency with
changing loads? Do they change RPM to compensate for load?
The gasoline engine part of the hybrid power train
doesn't actually SEE that dramatically changing load;
that's the whole point. The battery (or, in some cases
a "supercapacitor" array) does just what the energy
storage or "main filter" caps do in a power supply -
smooth out instantaneous changes in the load such that
the primary power source sees a more-or-less steady
demand.

My truck always runs between 2000 and 3000 RPM, as do most other
cars, so that must be close to optimum, and it's a fairly narrow range.
But the question you need to ask here is what "optimum"
means in this context. It's pretty much guaranteed that
this range is NOT where your truck's engine is putting out
its maximum power output (that would occur much higher).
But since the truck doesn't NEED the maximum power of
the engine very often, "optimum" in this case means that it's
loafing along. It's burning the least amount of gas that it
could while still being capable of the flexibility you need of
it, but it's NOT as efficient as using a much smaller engine
that IS operating at or near its peak output all the time.

Which do you think is more efficient, overall - a
conventional engine of, say, 150 HP max output that's
"loafing" at 2200 RPM (vs., say, a 5500 or higher RPM
point where that peak power is actually produced), or
a smaller, lighter, 30 or 40 HP engine that's running at
max output whenever it's running at all?

Bob M.
 
"Jeff" <jeff@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:Xns955CE378BBB0Bjeffnospamcom@199.45.49.11...
But so what? If I drive my little truck at 65 MPH for 2 hours
at optimum RPM without using the brakes, I get maybe 25 miles
per gallon, which is nowhere near the 70 MPG of the hybrid at
the same speed.


If I can throw in a question here, has anyone got real world experience
of the hybrid ( specifically prius) mpg?
45-52 seem typical. Search for MPG on this forum...

http://priusonline.com/index.php?sid=e3fa38e41d13b0fe27745435a30291b0

You could tell her to pump the tyres up see....

http://priusonline.com/viewtopic.php?t=2138&highlight=mpg&sid=e3fa38e41d13b0fe27745435a30291b0
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top