Guest
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:48:41 +0000 (UTC), Charmed Snark
<snark@cogeco.ca> wrote:
acoustic power.
At the threshold of pain, at 120 dB SPL, the acoustic power density is
1 W/m˛. A 110 mm diameter speaker cone will have a surface area of
about 1 dm˛, thus it would be subjected to 10 mW of acoustic power.
If the noise level is dropped to 80 dB, which is assumed to be safe
for constant exposure, the available acoustic power drops to 1 uW.
A speaker electricity to sound efficiency is typically below 1 %, so I
guess it also as bad in the other direction, thus perhaps 10 nW would
be available.
Of course you could use some exponential horn for a limited frequency
range to get a higher efficiency and also collect sound from a larger
area
.
<snark@cogeco.ca> wrote:
One other way of analyzing things is to calculate the availableAre you:
- looking to generate _power_ ?
- or to use the mic to _sense_ movement?
If you are looking for _power_ from a microphone, then I believe you're
barking up the wrong tree. Here's why:
acoustic power.
At the threshold of pain, at 120 dB SPL, the acoustic power density is
1 W/m˛. A 110 mm diameter speaker cone will have a surface area of
about 1 dm˛, thus it would be subjected to 10 mW of acoustic power.
If the noise level is dropped to 80 dB, which is assumed to be safe
for constant exposure, the available acoustic power drops to 1 uW.
A speaker electricity to sound efficiency is typically below 1 %, so I
guess it also as bad in the other direction, thus perhaps 10 nW would
be available.
Of course you could use some exponential horn for a limited frequency
range to get a higher efficiency and also collect sound from a larger
area