Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The ones you designed? 99.999% drop out rate.Probably unloading the defective converters from the service trucks.
You're a goddamned retard.On 2/10/2012 10:18 PM, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:07:24 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:
He was a cable grunt when Time Warner built Cube in Cincinnati,
You're a goddamned idiot, and you know nothing of my work history, much
less what position I held.
so I'd
say that he's at least 50 and still a very angry failure.
Hit.
I don't give a fat flying fuck what you retarded stupid fucks think orHe's very sensitive in this area.
That's because withered nuts don'tproduce, boy. But do please exitOn the other hand, probably nothing.
Please, fuck off and die, and 'forget' this group.Forget it.
Yes, YOU, fuckhead!tom
K0TAR
Man oh man you are funny!!!!On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:31:58 -0600, tom<news4792@taring.org> wrote:
If you are so talented that your employers don't care what you say then
tell us who you work for.
Fuck you, asswipe. You list your fucking stats, boy!
Usenet is anon for a fucking reason. To keep assholes like you away
from me AND my employers, AND to keep assholes like me from TERMINATING
retarded fucks like you as the opportunity presents itself.
Back in the old west, if a man brushed up against a man standing on the
street with his horse, the man on the street pulled out a gun and dropped
the fucker, and then his horse too!
THAT is the kind of response retarded fucks like you should get.
Fine.On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:31:58 -0600, tom<news4792@taring.org> wrote:
You are so much more talented than all of us here
No such claim has ever been made.
and you are so
valuable to your current employer
That I am. And I am going to stay that way too, idiot.
that there should be no problem
admitting who you are and who you work for.
I will. In person only, and you have to give your info first.
Feeling paranoid yet? That's right, asshole. I would use the info to
make the meeting less savoury than you expect. You would end up in the
sewer, where you belong, and where your mind already is.
Are you seeing the reason why Usenet is anon yet, dumbfuck?
Correct. I supplied the minimum necessary for you to notice thatOn Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:23:49 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com
wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:13:12 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
GeorgeTirebiter@drmemory.org> wrote:
WTF are you attempting to do here, asswipe?
Inspire you to clean up your act. However, judging by your response,
you're not worth the time and effort. As you were...
You did not put forth any effort, you lying piece of shit.
Not true. Had you responded with even the slightest interest, I wouldYou had no
intention of putting forth any effort either, you lying piece of shit.
You are just like all the "intelligent" cops out there.
(...)
I never said it wasn't.I was playing with Moonrakers way back in the early seventies.
Junk
I bet your employers just love you.On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:31:58 -0600, tom<news4792@taring.org> wrote:
If you are so talented that your employers don't care what you say then
tell us who you work for.
Fuck you, asswipe. You list your fucking stats, boy!
Usenet is anon for a fucking reason. To keep assholes like you away
from me AND my employers, AND to keep assholes like me from TERMINATING
retarded fucks like you as the opportunity presents itself.
Back in the old west, if a man brushed up against a man standing on the
street with his horse, the man on the street pulled out a gun and dropped
the fucker, and then his horse too!
THAT is the kind of response retarded fucks like you should get.
Criminy, over 100 failed tries and still you persist? That is notOn Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:58:54 -0800, josephkk
joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:22:23 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:55:35 +0000, Pomegranate Bastard <pommyB@dsl.pipex.com
wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:07:25 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:17:26 -0800, MassiveProng
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
On 31 Jan 2012 15:52:23 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
Nobody forces anybody else to do anything on UseNet. Your mother
should have taught you self-control.
Nobody forces you to make absolutely retarded, meaningless posts, yet
you insist on doing so. The word is Usenet, idiot.
Your RETARDED, CRIMINAL mother should be jailed for failing to flush
you, the moment the stupid slut shat you.
You keep repeating that image. That's sick in so many way
This is Nymbecile's favourite insult.
It's yet another demonstration of what a sad, useless life this
imbecile leads.
Yet other imbeciles persist in feeding the troll, ensuring his position at the
podium. If everyone shunned him, he'd become invisible... and cease being
annoying.
...Jim Thompson
Larkin's narcissism is such that he thinks he can rescue even such as
NymNoNuts.
?-)
It never hurts to experiment.
Why are you still trolling this group?It's yet another demonstration of what a sad, useless life this
imbecile leads.
Beyond sad. Really, really sick.
So why do you keep responding to AlwaysWrong?
The post was four days ago. Are you still trolling this thread?
No, idiot. I moved the line, and simply failed to delete the original.I was playing with Moonrakers way back in the early seventies at 15 yo.
You are repeating yourself, sort of. Probably forgot what you typed 3
ago. Perfectly understandable.
Get a job.On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:30:34 -0800, John Larkin
jlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:58:54 -0800, josephkk
joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:22:23 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:55:35 +0000, Pomegranate Bastard <pommyB@dsl.pipex.com
wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:07:25 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:17:26 -0800, MassiveProng
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
On 31 Jan 2012 15:52:23 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
Nobody forces anybody else to do anything on UseNet. Your mother
should have taught you self-control.
Nobody forces you to make absolutely retarded, meaningless posts, yet
you insist on doing so. The word is Usenet, idiot.
Your RETARDED, CRIMINAL mother should be jailed for failing to flush
you, the moment the stupid slut shat you.
You keep repeating that image. That's sick in so many way
This is Nymbecile's favourite insult.
It's yet another demonstration of what a sad, useless life this
imbecile leads.
Yet other imbeciles persist in feeding the troll, ensuring his position at the
podium. If everyone shunned him, he'd become invisible... and cease being
annoying.
...Jim Thompson
Larkin's narcissism is such that he thinks he can rescue even such as
NymNoNuts.
?-)
It never hurts to experiment.
Criminy, over 100 failed tries and still you persist? That is not
experimenting, that is arrogance and narcissism of high purity.
?-)
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:57:48 -0600, tom <news4792@taring.org> wrote:
I was playing with Moonrakers way back in the early seventies at 15 yo.
You are repeating yourself, sort of. Probably forgot what you typed 3
ago. Perfectly understandable.
No, idiot. I moved the line, and simply failed to delete the original.
But I wouldn't expect an immature little bitch like you to have any
vision of reality, even when it is right there in your face.
Just remember,dipshit. *You* are slow scan. *I* am at a rate in which
the very first packet carries more data than the entire set that
encompasses what you have passed in your entire life.
Hell, my ride to work with GPS and cell, and my droid playing a movie
is a bigger datagram than anything you ever fucking did.
And THEN, the guys I work for and strive to give more, better, and
faster data to EACH get a bigger datagram than an old fuck like you was
ever worth.
Remember what I said about your mother? Now, go back and read your
first response to me, and discover why it is that YOU are the uncivil
fucking bastard in this thread. You don't get to live in both worlds at
your fucking leisure, and at my expense boy.
You mouthed off, and you got it back in your face. YOU are still the
primary offender, and YOU will never change that fact.
You are too goddamned blind to see WHERE the problem is located.Correct. I supplied the minimum necessary for you to notice that
there is a problem.
I plonked the guy days ago. It would be so-o-o-o great if people quoted himtom
K0TAR
True. But they will say "sorry" if they think it will help them get whatOn Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:39:07 -0800 (PST), Bill Bowden
bperryb@bowdenshobbycircuits.info> wrote:
On Feb 9, 8:32 am, John Larkin
jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 07:08:07 -0800 (PST), dagmargoodb...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Feb 9, 12:45 am, josephkk <joseph_barr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:06:30 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:31:32 -0500, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
It must be hell to be manic depressive.
Nah, some of my favourite transistors are bipolar.
Mine, too >:-}
Often useful for tran' sisters. Not necessarily good for engineers.
One wonders about that. Looking through history, the more brilliant
someone is, the more likely they're crazy.
Of course. Ideas come from permeability in the barriers that segrate
ideas and brain functions. Schitzophrenia comes from a more complete
breakdown.
I guess attachment to reality works the same way. If you can
reasonably suspend conventional concepts of what's possible and
impossible, you can better explore the solution space. If you suspend
all limits on the possible, you become a loonie.
Here's another interesting relationship: the more politically powerful
a person is, the more likely that they are sociopaths.
But Jimmy Carter admitted to lusting after women and committing
adultery in his heart. He must be a remorseful sociopath? And Ted
Kennedy was sorry about Mary Jo. Sociopaths don't feel sorrow.
-Bill
Many lie about being sorrowful, however.
D'oh!
Wait until they pull your son over, and then there are five cruisers,You probably have no idea how much you reveal about yourself with such
comments.
Why do you not refrain from attacking me?Why are you so angry? You've been cursing and ranting here all day,
flailing at everyone.
This isn't healthy. All that anger will wreck your immune system and
make you old fast. You'll stroke out eventually, and not have much fun
meanwhile. Really.
"tom" <news4792@taring.org> wrote in message
news:4f35df2e$0$74950$8046368a@newsreader.iphouse.net...
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:52:31 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
wrote:
nuclear snippage
tom
K0TAR
I plonked the guy days ago. It would be so-o-o-o great if people quoted him
back little or none. I have no objection to appropriate profanity (and have
been known to howl the unprintable on occasion, myself.) But when overused
to no good end, fuck/fucking,fucker/fucked-up/fuckwad get tedious.
"Sal"
When the foo shits...
The people that have to write propaganda to tell the rest of us "whoOn Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:45:26 -0500, default wrote:
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:32:15 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 07:08:07 -0800 (PST), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Feb 9, 12:45 am, josephkk <joseph_barr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:06:30 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:31:32 -0500, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
It must be hell to be manic depressive.
Nah, some of my favourite transistors are bipolar.
Mine, too >:-}
Often useful for tran' sisters. Not necessarily good for engineers.
One wonders about that. Looking through history, the more brilliant
someone is, the more likely they're crazy.
Of course. Ideas come from permeability in the barriers that segrate
ideas and brain functions. Schitzophrenia comes from a more complete
breakdown.
I guess attachment to reality works the same way. If you can
reasonably suspend conventional concepts of what's possible and
impossible, you can better explore the solution space. If you suspend
all limits on the possible, you become a loonie.
Here's another interesting relationship: the more politically powerful
a person is, the more likely that they are sociopaths.
Profound observation.
May I add?:
The more "god-fearing" a person, the greater likelihood of a
sociopath.
You have that entirely backwards. Read this:
http://tinyurl.com/829rwty
The book was written by a leftists statistician who started hisOn Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:07:05 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:45:26 -0500, default wrote:
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:32:15 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 07:08:07 -0800 (PST), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Feb 9, 12:45 am, josephkk <joseph_barr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:06:30 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:31:32 -0500, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
It must be hell to be manic depressive.
Nah, some of my favourite transistors are bipolar.
Mine, too >:-}
Often useful for tran' sisters. Not necessarily good for engineers.
One wonders about that. Looking through history, the more brilliant
someone is, the more likely they're crazy.
Of course. Ideas come from permeability in the barriers that segrate
ideas and brain functions. Schitzophrenia comes from a more complete
breakdown.
I guess attachment to reality works the same way. If you can
reasonably suspend conventional concepts of what's possible and
impossible, you can better explore the solution space. If you suspend
all limits on the possible, you become a loonie.
Here's another interesting relationship: the more politically powerful
a person is, the more likely that they are sociopaths.
Profound observation.
May I add?:
The more "god-fearing" a person, the greater likelihood of a
sociopath.
You have that entirely backwards. Read this:
http://tinyurl.com/829rwty
The people that have to write propaganda to tell the rest of us "who
'really' care"
Read the book, then we can discuss it.perhaps feathering their own nests...
The most vociferous champions or detractors, of a cause or issue,
often turn out to be the very people who adopt the opposite tack in
their own lives.
Wrong yet again.If you have to brag about how charitable you are, that is just your
way of dealing with the guilt you feel. Likewise, if you feel the
need to keep score...
Freely give to those who are deserving, then forget about it;
anything else is just to bolster your ego or assuage your guilt.