Driver to drive?

[Bart!]

On 02 Feb 2012 01:12:09 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:

Chiron <chiron613 gmail.com> wrote:

beryl wrote:

snip

I complained to Roadrunner abuse dept. about one of their
users, and I included the offender's full message headers
because I knew they'd need that.

They wrote back requesting that I send them the message
headers, so I replied and included them again.

Then Roadrunner wrote back again, telling me that I needed to
supply them the message headers ... I replied, reminding them
that I'd been including the headers every time, and here they
are once again.

And Roadrunner wrote back again, telling me that I needed to
supply them the message headers ... My last email told them
that I was through wasting my time with them.


I got into a similar loop with some ISP - don't recall which
one, but it was a big one. They kept sending me automated
responses, asking for material (the same material) I kept
sending them. Highly annoying. I'm not sure if they just set
it up sloppily, or whether it was a simple way to give an
appearance of doing something, without actually having to do
anything. But I quickly learned that it wasn't worth the
hassle.

However, some people apparently have managed to get a response.
Good for them.

Roadrunner is the only ISP I have ever heard of that censored its
own users. Roadrunner no longer serves UseNet. They have to obey
court orders, but real news servers don't care about netcop
wannabes.

They DO care about ridding their accounts of clueless, SPAMMING, group
abusing retards like you though.

Consider yourself on the list for continued complaint messages. You
will raise their ire, and that right soon, if I have my way about it,
boy.

 

[beryl]

On 02/01/2012 07:31 PM, Mark Datter wrote:

On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:24:46 -0800, beryl<fourl@rd.net> wrote:

MassiveWrong wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:23:05 -0800, beryl<fourl@rd.net> wrote:

On 01/31/2012 08:11 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:30:04 -0800, beryl<fourl@rd.net> wrote:
...
He has to weigh in on EVERYthing. Would be an asset if he really were
AlwaysWrong but, often as not, he's right.

Uh, when?

For instance, he just confirmed that often as not he's right.


That is not exactly what I did.

Hey, you did it again.

Ok. So if I say fuck off and die, there is a 50% chance that you'll do
it?

You'll have to try it, then
come to your own conclusion.

Give it a rest, ditz.

Rested. Now what?

 

[josephkk]

On 01 Feb 2012 16:50:17 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:

Bwahahahah. This is Usenet twit. If you can find it you are invited by
definition.

Nobody invited you to this thread.

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell earthlink.net> wrote:

Snip

 

[John Doe]

You missed the point, moron.

josephkk <joseph_barrett sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Path: news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
From: josephkk <joseph_barrett sbcglobal.net
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,free.UseNet
Subject: Re: Simple way to bind wires, without ties
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:22:10 -0800
Message-ID: <r37ki7pvnf6l6on8k2cvtubafnrni8jtgb 4ax.com
References: <qpnei756hhheaesot8nm9hnek4m2ll9abq 4ax.com> <4f2760ae$0$2171$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6 news.astraweb.com> <pjpei717jr4gd9j7aq5bfgftdg3suo5s2m 4ax.com> <jg7r1j$bt6$1 dont-email.me> <iaednUhIytdaB7XSnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d earthlink.com> <4f28a992$0$9571$c3e8da3$9b4ff22a news.astraweb.com> <cqchi7tld86csdgbdfdfib10qm93mg53mj 4ax.com> <0c3Wq.5532$Qb1.4705 newsfe20.iad> <q7SdnZINhbw28bTSnZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d earthlink.com> <4f296d49$0$8486$c3e8da3$cc4fe22d news.astraweb.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 10
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ec853718.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=SQ<hS2Jbn_oOl^j[\5YH4nL?0kYOcDh j7:55Ud h`lc4B81KWZLGd`jRQE:JQeY?afO_l6mMBgYlFG5Vj5nF=ahg<NQLFB4a<aKNCHE8I5ARn

On 01 Feb 2012 16:50:17 GMT, John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:

Bwahahahah. This is Usenet twit. If you can find it you are invited by
definition.

Nobody invited you to this thread.

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell earthlink.net> wrote:

Snip

 

[josephkk]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:19:14 GMT, Chiron <chiron613@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:19:13 +0000, John Doe wrote:

snip

Look, John Doe, your idea is not original. The reason that no one is
able to find any prior description of the idea is simple: The people to
whom it would be news, haven't yet learned how to read. Kids usually
learn how to tie a knot before they learn how to read - or at least,
before they are able to readily use Usenet.

No, he is a patent troll wannabe. Nothing really new, probably older than
my mere 6 decades or so. Nobody responds because it is not "all that" for
keeping wire organized. Thus John Doe takes being ignored as nobody
having something else that works, which is hardly the case. Nor is his
knots all that good of a solution, all the more so with today's higher
line signaling speeds. Which are more and more frequently imposed over
the ordinary power conductors.

?-)

 

[VelCrowPhly]

On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:48:22 -0800, josephkk
<joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Nothing really new, probably older than
my mere 6 decades or so.

It is older than shipping itself.

Before there were ships, there were boats.

I'd say that we can quite firmly believe that man has used that knot
since the Vikings' ancestors tooled around in boats 8 plus thousand years
ago.

 

[josephkk]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:23:05 -0800, beryl <fourl@rd.net> wrote:

On 01/31/2012 08:11 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:30:04 -0800, beryl<fourl@rd.net> wrote:
...
He has to weigh in on EVERYthing. Would be an asset if he really were
AlwaysWrong but, often as not, he's right.

Uh, when?

For instance, he just confirmed that often as not he's right.

No, AlwaysWrong did not so confirm. AlwaysWrong claims it is always
right. Confusions on your part do not count. I have counted some two
time in five years where NymNoNuts (the same person/group) was correct;
nothing like half and half.

?-)

 

[Chiron]

On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:48:22 -0800, josephkk wrote:

<snip>

No, he is a patent troll wannabe. Nothing really new, probably older
than my mere 6 decades or so. Nobody responds because it is not "all
that" for keeping wire organized. Thus John Doe takes being ignored as
nobody having something else that works, which is hardly the case. Nor
is his knots all that good of a solution, all the more so with today's
higher line signaling speeds. Which are more and more frequently
imposed over the ordinary power conductors.

?-)

It's funny you say that, because a similar thought crossed my mind when I
realized he was seriously trying to claim his idea was unique and
original. At first I had trouble believing him; but he got so worked up
over it all that I figure he's either serious about his "invention," or
else he's a consummate troll. Maybe both, come to think of it...
certainly got loads of attention for zero contribution.

I think I made a mistake trying to talk to him; it just encouraged him.
As they say, "don't feed the trolls."



--
Q: Why did the programmer call his mother long distance?
A: Because that was her name.

 

[The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra]

On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:08:06 -0800, josephkk
<joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

it is always
right.

You using the term "it". That's rich.

Grow the fuck up, boy.

 

[josephkk]

On 01 Feb 2012 23:06:27 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:

Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_ charter.net> wrote:

The problem with the young these days are they want to be the
chief before an indian.

Old people with any responsibility should be aware of the fact
that young people are swamped with information. The way they learn
will be different than prior generations. The floodgates are open.
Learning skills required will be more like the ability to filter
information that they don't need or that might even be harmful.
The current generation is not like "my kid is learning algebra at
an early age".

If you think that what you have learned is a big deal, you should
think again. Kids that survive in this time are going to be
extremely intelligent. Simple knowledge is not valuable, for that
reason.

Yes and no. The real tricky part is learning how create a self-model that
reasonably represents the physical universe. The signal is about 40 dB
under the noise (QRN not QRM) today. Sorting out what connects and is
reasonably self-consistent is just part of the task. It gets really
difficult if you have never hear that there are tools to determine such.
Let alone the difference if you get introduced to them. Do you need
introductions? Polite questions here (sed) will provide pointers.

?-)

 

[beryl]

On 02/01/2012 10:08 PM, josephkk wrote:

Confusions on your part do not count. I have counted some two
time in five years where NymNoNuts (the same person/group) was correct;
nothing like half and half.

?-)

Got it. AlwaysWrong *is* reliably wrong, which is great. He's something
freakish to gawk at too, and nobody need feel guilty at being caught
staring. All good.

 

[John Doe]

An incessant liar.

Chiron <chiron613 gmail.com> wrote:

Path: news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.21.MISMATCH!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe02.iad.POSTED!7ed62f90!not-for-mail
From: Chiron <chiron613 gmail.com
Subject: Re: Simple way to bind wires, without ties
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics
References: <4f236128$0$32059$c3e8da3$40d4fd75 news.astraweb.com> <mapfi7tk3mqgc3a6lhtthrms0s2r7hklof 4ax.com> <4f281481$0$27996$c3e8da3$f017e9df news.astraweb.com> <mVYVq.15291$Sh7.7234 newsfe15.iad> <5f8ki7pkf77nl06t878jk3tmgbq95oua3q 4ax.com
User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <iPpWq.4060$W87.543 newsfe02.iad
X-Complaints-To: abuse teranews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:12:30 UTC
Organization: TeraNews.com
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:12:30 GMT

On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:48:22 -0800, josephkk wrote:

snip

No, he is a patent troll wannabe. Nothing really new, probably older
than my mere 6 decades or so. Nobody responds because it is not "all
that" for keeping wire organized. Thus John Doe takes being ignored as
nobody having something else that works, which is hardly the case. Nor
is his knots all that good of a solution, all the more so with today's
higher line signaling speeds. Which are more and more frequently
imposed over the ordinary power conductors.

?-)

It's funny you say that, because a similar thought crossed my mind when I
realized he was seriously trying to claim his idea was unique and
original. At first I had trouble believing him; but he got so worked up
over it all that I figure he's either serious about his "invention," or
else he's a consummate troll. Maybe both, come to think of it...
certainly got loads of attention for zero contribution.

I think I made a mistake trying to talk to him; it just encouraged him.
As they say, "don't feed the trolls."



--
Q: Why did the programmer call his mother long distance?
A: Because that was her name.

 

[John Doe]

josephkk <joseph_barrett sbcglobal.net> wrote:

No, he is a patent troll wannabe.

Patience might be one of my virtues. But I try to reply in kind,
not to troll.

But here you are very late to the party, making straw men.

Nobody responds

Get a better news server. A bunch of people have responded.

because it is not "all that" for keeping wire organized.

That is just another straw man. In fact, I haven't even mentioned
that it's for keeping wire organized.

Thus John Doe takes being ignored

You misspelled "trolled". I have received more than enough
attention in this thread.

as nobody having something else that works, which is hardly the
case.

Another straw man. I have never said anything remotely resembling
that. I freely admit that there are other things that work. There
are other things that work without ties, but none that I have seen
are as simple.

Nor is his knots all that good of a solution,

It is potentially useful to practically everybody on the planet,
and it doesn't require tools or ties. Individuals can decide for
themselves whether it's a good solution. Most of the people I've
run into in real life have been impressed. But that's not how it
works here on UseNet, good ideas rub some people the wrong way,
having something to do with their big egos.

all the more so with today's higher line signaling speeds.

I never suggested otherwise. In fact, I have plainly stated that
it might not be useful for all wire. But it's probably good for
99% of wires ordinary people use.

And so that anybody reading this doesn't have to wade through all
of the garbage trying to find it...

Take a wire of whatever sort that is about 4 feet long. Fold it in
half. Fold it in half again. Now it is 1 foot long. Grab both ends
and tie an overhand knot. That's it. It stays stuck together in a
much more compact and easy to manage form. The same method can be
used for tying up the ends of wires that are currently being used
(plugged in at both ends) by doing as described above with the
folded excess wire.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=uf_Fe9VKGbY#t=61s

That one is more to the point, but if it don't work...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uf_Fe9VKGbY

The first picture on this page.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/27532210@N04/

--

Which are more and more frequently imposed over
the ordinary power conductors.

?-)


Path: news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
From: josephkk <joseph_barrett sbcglobal.net
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Simple way to bind wires, without ties
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:48:22 -0800
Message-ID: <5f8ki7pkf77nl06t878jk3tmgbq95oua3q 4ax.com
References: <4f236128$0$32059$c3e8da3$40d4fd75 news.astraweb.com> <mapfi7tk3mqgc3a6lhtthrms0s2r7hklof 4ax.com> <4f281481$0$27996$c3e8da3$f017e9df news.astraweb.com> <mVYVq.15291$Sh7.7234 newsfe15.iad
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 24
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ec853718.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=G0mDkGe0S0BI]J2Y9=AF]JL?0kYOcDh JJJbE^=;e9?La?5S97XMjGA58Z8MMN8fYMm: DE8nPBXCYF8a<^ZheMNaHmWRiWiFXHbC8cnWS>kkDkf47CAi R^J

 

[JW]

On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:42:47 -0500 "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in Message id:
<q7SdnZANhbwD9rTSnZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d@earthlink.com>:

"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:

On 31 Jan 2012 15:55:03 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:

I didn't say that I cut headers off of IDE cables,
you raving lunatic troll.

MrTallyman <MrTallyman BananaCountersRUs.org> wrote:

changes subject line
nym-shifting
See also:
BarnCat <BarnCat keepingthevermindownatthebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
Hellequin <Hellequin yourpipesaremypipes.org
MassiveProng <MassiveProng thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
MrTallyman <MrTallyman BananaCountersRUs.org
Numer0 Un0 <Numer0Un0 abettermanthanyou.org
Pueblo Dancer <Kachina AllHopiIsLost.org
scorpius <scorpius thewormholethatemptiesontheothersideoftheuniverse.org
TheKraken <ReachUpandSuckYouDowntotheDepths yup.org> wrote:
UltimatePatriot <UltimatePatriot thebestcountry.org> wrote:
...maybe dozens more

At least a *hundred* more. Michael Terrell keeps a list of Nymbecile's nyms.

I lost some, when I lost that Seagate hard drive during backup. This
is what I had, on an older backup that's a year old.

THE DIMBULB SCORECARD

[snip]

Don't forget to add VelCrowPhly <VelCrowPhly@thetiethatbindsUall.org>

 

[Pomegranate Bastard]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:07:25 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:17:26 -0800, MassiveProng
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On 31 Jan 2012 15:52:23 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:

Nobody forces anybody else to do anything on UseNet. Your mother
should have taught you self-control.

Nobody forces you to make absolutely retarded, meaningless posts, yet
you insist on doing so. The word is Usenet, idiot.

Your RETARDED, CRIMINAL mother should be jailed for failing to flush
you, the moment the stupid slut shat you.

You keep repeating that image. That's sick in so many way

This is Nymbecile's favourite insult.

It's yet another demonstration of what a sad, useless life this
imbecile leads.

 

[Bart!]

On 02 Feb 2012 06:49:11 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:

An incessant liar.

STOP abusing these groups with your utter stupidity, boy!

 

[VelCrowPhly]

On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:52:15 -0500, JW <none@dev.null> wrote:

Don't forget to add VelCrowPhly <VelCrowPhly@thetiethatbindsUall.org

The degree to which you stupid fucks act like bacteria is amazing.

 

[StickThatInYourPipeAndSmo]

On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:55:35 +0000, Pomegranate Bastard
<pommyB@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:

It's yet another demonstration of what a sad, useless life this
imbecile leads.

Better than the criminal life your whore mother has spent after
shitting you out onto the world.

 

[Pomegranate Bastard]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:26:01 -0800, MassiveProng
<MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On 31 Jan 2012 16:19:13 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:

Your video shows you to be a dopey, poor dexterity fucktard.

I can juggle three balls!

But you do not even own TWO, because if you did, you would be man
enough to stop spewing your utter horseshit in these newsgroups, where
everyone who acts like you do gets the treatment you are getting. So, I
just gave you a clue. Lets see if you have the balls to actually be a
man, and STOP SPAMMING THESE GROUPS, ASSWIPE!

NONE of us are trolls, asshole. YOU are the troll.

You, Nymbecile are not a troll? Hahahahahahaha.

You do know that you'll never get to Heaven if you lie like that!

Now knock it off, and get the fuck out.

 

[Pomegranate Bastard]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:30:02 -0800, MassiveProng
<MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On 31 Jan 2012 16:19:13 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:

What is your YouTube ID? Show us how coordinated you are.
My crystal ball says you are too chicken to answer that.

I do not post retarded stupidity on Youtube, you pathetic fuck.

No, Nymbecile. You clearly reserve it for all the unfortunate groups
you infest.

I would love to post a video of me strapping you to a table, and
performing a complete vivisection on you. Sorry, chump, but yes, you
ARE too stupid, and you WILL have to go look that one up, boy.

Now THAT video would get some views! Especially by those that have
endured your utter stupidity thus far.