Driver to drive?

On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:34:28 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:22:54 -0500, amdx <amdx@knologynotthis.net> wrote:

On 4/26/2012 2:28 PM, Joel Koltner wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ-4gnNz0vc&feature=player_embedded

Well, hey... it's pretty well-produced; definitely gives Michael Moore
some "competition," I suppose.


One video leads to another and I end up here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=bavou_SEj1E

At 2:18 she says "somebody needs to pay for all my children...take care
of all our suffering... somebody needs to be held accountable."

Mikek

The poor thang ;-)

What we need is a welfare rule where adding a kid _after_ you go on welfare
_reduces_ the take.

...Jim Thompson
The problem with notions of what is, in essence, a 'child tax' is it
punishes not only the 'excess' child but the others as well.
 
Paul Hovnanian P.E. wrote:
I'm attempting to diagnose some strange electronics behavior. And it seems
to be coming down to this question:

What types of components have failure modes that are temperature independent
and are self healing over a time period of days?

Been umpteen years..i think some oil-filled (paper?) capacitors and
some electrolytics (notably the older, obsolete wet ones) had that property.
Certainly not solid state items (transformers, relays, inductors).
 
flipper wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:34:28 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:22:54 -0500, amdx<amdx@knologynotthis.net> wrote:

On 4/26/2012 2:28 PM, Joel Koltner wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ-4gnNz0vc&feature=player_embedded

Well, hey... it's pretty well-produced; definitely gives Michael Moore
some "competition," I suppose.


One video leads to another and I end up here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=bavou_SEj1E

At 2:18 she says "somebody needs to pay for all my children...take care
of all our suffering... somebody needs to be held accountable."

Mikek

The poor thang ;-)

What we need is a welfare rule where adding a kid _after_ you go on welfare
_reduces_ the take.

...Jim Thompson

The problem with notions of what is, in essence, a 'child tax' is it
punishes not only the 'excess' child but the others as well.
THAT is _exactly_ the point...
 
On Apr 29, 11:13 am, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <p...@hovnanian.com> wrote:
Arfa Daily wrote:


Another possibility is bad joints, particularly with anything manufactured
in the last 5 years, which will make use of lead-free solder. Bad joints
in this hateful stuff, can give rise to the most bizarre intermittent
symptoms, which can on occasion have apparent self-healing behaviour.

You need to tell us a bit more about the actual failures you are seeing,
and what the actual equipment is.

Arfa

This is a further symptom of some weird problems my truck's electronic
ignition module is having. It seems that when it begins to misbehave badly,
if I park it for a week or so, the problems go away for a few days. Then
they start to reappear. Temperature doesn't seem to have anything to do
with it, as the failures are just as likely to occur on a cold start as
after having driven on a warm day.

I don't think its due to lead free solder. The truck is 33 years old. I
re-heated all of the solder joints I could get to (most of the module is
potted). I added an external cap (on the theory that an internal cap inside
the possting may have failed open). No difference. Cleaned all the
connections and added a dedicated ground lead from the battery negative to
the module (on the theory that body rust somethere might have taken out the
original ground path). No change.

The symptoms are that every once in a while (about once a day) the ignition
will just cut out. Every time a coast to the side of the road and start
poking around with a voltmeter, all is well (12 volts is present where its
supposed to be). I've replaced everything except for the module. Those go
for about $350. If one can be found. The really funny thing is that: in
order to test the coil output, I hooked up an old timing light (a direct
connect type that triggers off the coil secondary). The presence of that
strobe in the ignition circuit fixes whatever is wrong within a few
seconds. And the fix lasts for a day or two. I don't have to leave the
strobe connected. Once it starts, its OK without it. Otherwise, it just
never starts unless I leave it parked for a week or two, which seems to be
when the 'self healing' kicks in.

Since the problem has been narrowed down to that module, its pretty certain
I'll just need a new one (something other than the $350 OEM part). I might
try building my own (there's not much to one of these). But the failure
mode has me puzzled and I'd like to understand what might be wrong here.
Even if it has no bearing on the eventual fix.
Remember under the hood it is extremely hot and electrically quite
noisy from the ignition pulses. Try to figure out how either could
affect performance of this module.

The last time you asked about this, I recommended replacing it with a
module from a junked vehicle. I like the idea of monitoring waveforms
at various points because I suspect that high voltage pulses are
getting into the module and affecting it. At least you would see what
was happening right before the engine died. Have you tried asking on
internet forums for that particular vehicle/vintage/manufacturer? Who
made the module, anyways? It might have been common to more than one
vehicle. Was this module replaced with another during the production
run? There might have been a weakness that was found and fixed.
 
On Apr 30, 7:03 am, Robert Baer <robertb...@localnet.com> wrote:
flipper wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:34:28 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@On-My-Web-Site.com>  wrote:

On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:22:54 -0500, amdx<a...@knologynotthis.net>  wrote:

On 4/26/2012 2:28 PM, Joel Koltner wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ-4gnNz0vc&feature=player_embedded

Well, hey... it's pretty well-produced; definitely gives Michael Moore
some "competition," I suppose.

  One video leads to another and I end up here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=bavou_SEj1E

At 2:18 she says "somebody needs to pay for all my children...take care
of all our suffering... somebody needs to be held accountable."

              Mikek

The poor thang ;-)

What we need is a welfare rule where adding a kid _after_ you go on welfare
_reduces_ the take.

                                       ...Jim Thompson

The problem with notions of what is, in essence, a 'child tax' is it
punishes not only the 'excess' child but the others as well.

   THAT is _exactly_ the point...
Which is what makes it immoral and moronic. It isn't the child's fault
that it was born to a mother without a sound grasp of social
realities, and it doesn't make much sense to punish the child for its
mother's errors.

It's in society's interest to see that the child is well enough fed
and educated while it grows up to be able to become potentially useful
adult.

Punishing the mother provides instant gratification, but risks
damaging the child. Taking the children away and putting them into
care is a theoretical possibility. but in practice it's too expensive
to be used as a matter of routine, and even good care-givers aren't
all that much better for the child than a tolerably bad biological
mother.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
 
"Artemus" <bogus@invalid.org> wrote in message
news:jnk70k$3ts$1@dont-email.me...
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." <paul@hovnanian.com> wrote in message
news:Nfqdnb5ALLQxGQDSnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@posted.isomediainc...

This is a further symptom of some weird problems my truck's electronic
ignition module is having. It seems that when it begins to misbehave
badly,
if I park it for a week or so, the problems go away for a few days. Then
they start to reappear. Temperature doesn't seem to have anything to do
with it, as the failures are just as likely to occur on a cold start as
after having driven on a warm day.

I don't think its due to lead free solder. The truck is 33 years old. I
re-heated all of the solder joints I could get to (most of the module is
potted). I added an external cap (on the theory that an internal cap
inside
the possting may have failed open). No difference. Cleaned all the
connections and added a dedicated ground lead from the battery negative
to
the module (on the theory that body rust somethere might have taken out
the
original ground path). No change.

One of the sensors that feed the ignition module may have a flakey
ground. There shouldn't be a lot of them on something that old. My
'75 280Z had an intermittant problem like yours which drove me crazy.
2 dealers were stumped. I finally nailed it by driving around with a
battery powered o'scope, DMM, and a bunch of wires going to the
engine to tap various test points. Turned out it was one of the water
temp sensors which caused the fuel injection pulses to jump to max
width, flooding the engine.
Art

The symptoms are that every once in a while (about once a day) the
ignition
will just cut out. Every time a coast to the side of the road and start
poking around with a voltmeter, all is well (12 volts is present where
its
supposed to be). I've replaced everything except for the module. Those go
for about $350. If one can be found. The really funny thing is that: in
order to test the coil output, I hooked up an old timing light (a direct
connect type that triggers off the coil secondary). The presence of that
strobe in the ignition circuit fixes whatever is wrong within a few
seconds. And the fix lasts for a day or two. I don't have to leave the
strobe connected. Once it starts, its OK without it. Otherwise, it just
never starts unless I leave it parked for a week or two, which seems to
be
when the 'self healing' kicks in.

Since the problem has been narrowed down to that module, its pretty
certain
I'll just need a new one (something other than the $350 OEM part). I
might
try building my own (there's not much to one of these). But the failure
mode has me puzzled and I'd like to understand what might be wrong here.
Even if it has no bearing on the eventual fix.

Since I have enough vehicles at my disposal, I don't actually have to fix
this any time soon. So I'm trying to solve the puzzle rather then just
throw parts out.

--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a pleasant Terran revolution.
I had a similar problem on one of my cars a few years back. It would also
just randomly cut out, and refuse to restart, but for minutes rather than
days. I too thought that it was an ignition problem, and suspected the
electronic ignition module. However, I connected a whole bunch of LEDs to
various points in the system, and discovered that when it failed, it was the
feed to the electric fuel pump that was going off, and the problem
ultimately proved to be bad joints in the fuel pump relay, which had a PCB
inside, with its own driver transistor and a few other bits and bobs on it.

Just a few weeks ago, my current car started doing something similar. It
would just completely fail to start, even though the engine was warm and had
been running just fine only minutes before. But if you left it for a few
hours and then came back to it, it would start first flick of the key.
Again, I suspected either an ignition or ECU problem as when it was failing
to start, it put the engine management error light on, but it turned out to
be the fuel pump motor failing to start.

Arfa
 
Artemus wrote:

One of the sensors that feed the ignition module may have a flakey
ground. There shouldn't be a lot of them on something that old. My
'75 280Z had an intermittant problem like yours which drove me crazy.
2 dealers were stumped. I finally nailed it by driving around with a
battery powered o'scope, DMM, and a bunch of wires going to the
engine to tap various test points. Turned out it was one of the water
temp sensors which caused the fuel injection pulses to jump to max
width, flooding the engine.
Art
This isn't an ECM. Its just an ignition module to replace points ignition.

It has a magnetic pickup which is OK and puts out pulses even when the
system is dead. It has +12 in from the ignition switch (connections checked
and cleaned). It has a ground (cleaned and an additional ground ran down to
the battery/frame ground bolt) and connection to the coil (-). The coil
also has +12V through an ignition resistor* (replaced in the process of
diagnosis, no improvement). So its a very simple system.

I've caught in inoperative a few times parked in the driveway, so I've been
able to check the basic voltage levels and the pickup output**. When I'm
not trying to get someplace, that is. More often than not, its a matter of
just saying "Screw it. I've gotta be someplace" and just switch vehicles.
Fortunately, this is one of my rather large fleet of 4x4s.

*Sort of an ignition resistor. Toyota had this genius idea to run a
resistance wire (about 5 feet long) through the wiring bundle. Try
inspecting and/or replacing that. So I put in a standard ceramic block type
resistor in the coil (+) side, bypassing that wire.

**The interesting diagnostic was checking the coil output with the timing
light. Putting the strobe on the coil fixes the problem. Every time, within
seconds. In fact, the fix is so reliable, I just carry the damned timing
light around with me.

--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Help stamp out philately.
 
On Tue, 1 May 2012 02:32:11 +0100, "Arfa Daily" <arfa.daily@ntlworld.com>
wrote:

"Artemus" <bogus@invalid.org> wrote in message
news:jnk70k$3ts$1@dont-email.me...

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." <paul@hovnanian.com> wrote in message
news:Nfqdnb5ALLQxGQDSnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@posted.isomediainc...

This is a further symptom of some weird problems my truck's electronic
ignition module is having. It seems that when it begins to misbehave
badly,
if I park it for a week or so, the problems go away for a few days. Then
they start to reappear. Temperature doesn't seem to have anything to do
with it, as the failures are just as likely to occur on a cold start as
after having driven on a warm day.

I don't think its due to lead free solder. The truck is 33 years old. I
re-heated all of the solder joints I could get to (most of the module is
potted). I added an external cap (on the theory that an internal cap
inside
the possting may have failed open). No difference. Cleaned all the
connections and added a dedicated ground lead from the battery negative
to
the module (on the theory that body rust somethere might have taken out
the
original ground path). No change.

One of the sensors that feed the ignition module may have a flakey
ground. There shouldn't be a lot of them on something that old. My
'75 280Z had an intermittant problem like yours which drove me crazy.
2 dealers were stumped. I finally nailed it by driving around with a
battery powered o'scope, DMM, and a bunch of wires going to the
engine to tap various test points. Turned out it was one of the water
temp sensors which caused the fuel injection pulses to jump to max
width, flooding the engine.
Art

The symptoms are that every once in a while (about once a day) the
ignition
will just cut out. Every time a coast to the side of the road and start
poking around with a voltmeter, all is well (12 volts is present where
its
supposed to be). I've replaced everything except for the module. Those go
for about $350. If one can be found. The really funny thing is that: in
order to test the coil output, I hooked up an old timing light (a direct
connect type that triggers off the coil secondary). The presence of that
strobe in the ignition circuit fixes whatever is wrong within a few
seconds. And the fix lasts for a day or two. I don't have to leave the
strobe connected. Once it starts, its OK without it. Otherwise, it just
never starts unless I leave it parked for a week or two, which seems to
be
when the 'self healing' kicks in.

Since the problem has been narrowed down to that module, its pretty
certain
I'll just need a new one (something other than the $350 OEM part). I
might
try building my own (there's not much to one of these). But the failure
mode has me puzzled and I'd like to understand what might be wrong here.
Even if it has no bearing on the eventual fix.

Since I have enough vehicles at my disposal, I don't actually have to fix
this any time soon. So I'm trying to solve the puzzle rather then just
throw parts out.

--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a pleasant Terran revolution.




I had a similar problem on one of my cars a few years back. It would also
just randomly cut out, and refuse to restart, but for minutes rather than
days. I too thought that it was an ignition problem, and suspected the
electronic ignition module. However, I connected a whole bunch of LEDs to
various points in the system, and discovered that when it failed, it was the
feed to the electric fuel pump that was going off, and the problem
ultimately proved to be bad joints in the fuel pump relay, which had a PCB
inside, with its own driver transistor and a few other bits and bobs on it.
I had those symptoms on my Vision TSi, a decade or so ago. It started out as
the engine just stumbling, then restarting before the car even slowed. After
a while I had to pull over and restart it. Then nothing, for maybe hours.
After a dozen trips into the garage and a couple of long walks in the Vermont
Winter (I did eventually find some place to call a cab). It finally happened
when they were watching it. The flywheel sensor was going intermittent, no
RPMs = no gas.

Just a few weeks ago, my current car started doing something similar. It
would just completely fail to start, even though the engine was warm and had
been running just fine only minutes before. But if you left it for a few
hours and then came back to it, it would start first flick of the key.
Again, I suspected either an ignition or ECU problem as when it was failing
to start, it put the engine management error light on, but it turned out to
be the fuel pump motor failing to start.
I had that several times on my '78 Ford Granada. I got suspicious of the carb
when gas came shooting out of the venturi and spraying all over the
windshield. "I don't think that's supposed to happen", said I.
 
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." <paul@hovnanian.com> wrote in message
news:pc6dnV9hzKxG1gLSnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@posted.isomediainc...
Artemus wrote:


One of the sensors that feed the ignition module may have a flakey
ground. There shouldn't be a lot of them on something that old. My
'75 280Z had an intermittant problem like yours which drove me crazy.
2 dealers were stumped. I finally nailed it by driving around with a
battery powered o'scope, DMM, and a bunch of wires going to the
engine to tap various test points. Turned out it was one of the water
temp sensors which caused the fuel injection pulses to jump to max
width, flooding the engine.
Art

This isn't an ECM. Its just an ignition module to replace points ignition.

It has a magnetic pickup which is OK and puts out pulses even when the
system is dead. It has +12 in from the ignition switch (connections checked
and cleaned). It has a ground (cleaned and an additional ground ran down to
the battery/frame ground bolt) and connection to the coil (-). The coil
also has +12V through an ignition resistor* (replaced in the process of
diagnosis, no improvement). So its a very simple system.

I've caught in inoperative a few times parked in the driveway, so I've been
able to check the basic voltage levels and the pickup output**. When I'm
not trying to get someplace, that is. More often than not, its a matter of
just saying "Screw it. I've gotta be someplace" and just switch vehicles.
Fortunately, this is one of my rather large fleet of 4x4s.

*Sort of an ignition resistor. Toyota had this genius idea to run a
resistance wire (about 5 feet long) through the wiring bundle. Try
inspecting and/or replacing that. So I put in a standard ceramic block type
resistor in the coil (+) side, bypassing that wire.

**The interesting diagnostic was checking the coil output with the timing
light. Putting the strobe on the coil fixes the problem. Every time, within
seconds. In fact, the fix is so reliable, I just carry the damned timing
light around with me.

--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Help stamp out philately.
Since a timing light always remedies the problem that points to the
HV side of the ignition. In particular the coil to distributor wire. You
say you've replaced everything. Does that include all the HV wires,
dist cap, rotor, coil, and plugs? All of those together are cheap
compared the ignition module.

My old Toyota truck is only 28 years old so you have me beat.
A couple of years ago it started acting up by intermittently missing
and failing emissions inspection big time. Long story short, a new
set of plug wires had things humming again and added 2mpg to
boot.
Art
 
Artemus wrote:

Since a timing light always remedies the problem that points to the
HV side of the ignition. In particular the coil to distributor wire. You
say you've replaced everything. Does that include all the HV wires,
dist cap, rotor, coil, and plugs? All of those together are cheap
compared the ignition module.
Yes. New coil, wires, cap, rotor, plugs. Although this is an all on/off
problem, so its doubtfull all the plugs would fail simultaneously.

My old Toyota truck is only 28 years old so you have me beat.
A couple of years ago it started acting up by intermittently missing
and failing emissions inspection big time. Long story short, a new
set of plug wires had things humming again and added 2mpg to
boot.
Art
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
 
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." <paul@hovnanian.com> wrote in message
news:OYWdnWdOELZtzgLSnZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d@posted.isomediainc...
Artemus wrote:

Since a timing light always remedies the problem that points to the
HV side of the ignition. In particular the coil to distributor wire. You
say you've replaced everything. Does that include all the HV wires,
dist cap, rotor, coil, and plugs? All of those together are cheap
compared the ignition module.

Yes. New coil, wires, cap, rotor, plugs. Although this is an all on/off
problem, so its doubtfull all the plugs would fail simultaneously.

Agreed. Having ruled out everything downstream of the ign module ...
The only electrical effect I can think of is that the timing light added
capacitance to the coil output. This got reflected across the coil and
"fixes" the ign module. Have you considered going to an aftermarket
CDI? This is the first one I found and it's considerably less than the
OEM module.
http://www.carbodyparts.net/1980-toyota-pickup/direct_ignition_coil-a18302850.html
Art
 
Bill Sloman wrote:
On Apr 30, 7:03 am, Robert Baer<robertb...@localnet.com> wrote:
flipper wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:34:28 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:22:54 -0500, amdx<a...@knologynotthis.net> wrote:

On 4/26/2012 2:28 PM, Joel Koltner wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ-4gnNz0vc&feature=player_embedded

Well, hey... it's pretty well-produced; definitely gives Michael Moore
some "competition," I suppose.

One video leads to another and I end up here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=bavou_SEj1E

At 2:18 she says "somebody needs to pay for all my children...take care
of all our suffering... somebody needs to be held accountable."

Mikek

The poor thang ;-)

What we need is a welfare rule where adding a kid _after_ you go on welfare
_reduces_ the take.

...Jim Thompson

The problem with notions of what is, in essence, a 'child tax' is it
punishes not only the 'excess' child but the others as well.

THAT is _exactly_ the point...

Which is what makes it immoral and moronic. It isn't the child's fault
that it was born to a mother without a sound grasp of social
realities, and it doesn't make much sense to punish the child for its
mother's errors.

It's in society's interest to see that the child is well enough fed
and educated while it grows up to be able to become potentially useful
adult.

Punishing the mother provides instant gratification, but risks
damaging the child. Taking the children away and putting them into
care is a theoretical possibility. but in practice it's too expensive
to be used as a matter of routine, and even good care-givers aren't
all that much better for the child than a tolerably bad biological
mother.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Well...reward both with death.
 
On Apr 29, 7:08 pm, flipper <flip...@fish.net> wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:34:28 -0700, Jim Thompson









To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:22:54 -0500, amdx <a...@knologynotthis.net> wrote:

On 4/26/2012 2:28 PM, Joel Koltner wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ-4gnNz0vc&feature=player_embedded

Well, hey... it's pretty well-produced; definitely gives Michael Moore
some "competition," I suppose.

 One video leads to another and I end up here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=bavou_SEj1E

At 2:18 she says "somebody needs to pay for all my children...take care
of all our suffering... somebody needs to be held accountable."

             Mikek

The poor thang ;-)

What we need is a welfare rule where adding a kid _after_ you go on welfare
_reduces_ the take.

                                      ...Jim Thompson

The problem with notions of what is, in essence, a 'child tax' is it
punishes not only the 'excess' child but the others as well.
Giving someone money, just less, is punishment?

But, if they just published a schedule showing a decreasing
incremental benefit, the extra kid-for-ransom production would drop.

Of course that'll never happen, since the formulas are always too
complicated for anyone to understand. Measuring everyone's "need" is
complicated.

--
Cheers,
James Arthur
 
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:21:22 -0800, Robert Baer wrote:

Punishing the mother provides instant gratification, but risks damaging
the child. Taking the children away and putting them into care is a
theoretical possibility. but in practice it's too expensive to be used
as a matter of routine, and even good care-givers aren't all that much
better for the child than a tolerably bad biological mother.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Well...reward both with death.
hey, great idea! Got a problem? Kill someone who pisses you off. Let's
get back to the good old days when that's how we solved all our
problems. It would make everything so much simpler, wouldn't it?


--
An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says
'Beam me up, Scotty'.
 
On Tue, 01 May 2012 05:46:33 -0700, dagmargoodboat wrote:

Of course that'll never happen, since the formulas are always too
complicated for anyone to understand. Measuring everyone's "need" is
complicated.
Not so difficult. We all need roughly the same things - food, water,
shelter, clothing, medical care, safe place to live. We just don't want
to ensure everyone has those things, because we feel some people don't
"deserve" it - they are unworthy.

As long as we keep trying to decide who "deserves" resources, we're going
to have some mighty bizarre rules about who gets what. So we invent a
sort of merit-based structure; yes, we'll feed you if you're "worthy."
But if you're an addict, we won't - no benefits, including no treatment
for your addiction. Get clean, and *then* we'll help you.

Not saying I want to subsidize a person's alcohol or drug use; just
saying that we need to be treating such people as sick, not bad, and to
ensure that they can get the treatment they need. Otherwise they stay
sick, but don't necessarily die before producing offspring they can't
nurture.

I don't think there's a quick fix for all this, and I'm not advocating
just throwing money at the problem, since that isn't going to work. But
I do think we could simplify things if we quit worrying about who
"deserves" things, and focus more on who needs them - and make sure they
get it in time to make a difference.

But as someone hinted, it would be cheaper to just execute anyone who
doesn't work out in society. Don't think of it as the death penalty;
think of it as putting them out of our misery.

--
For reservations, call your travel agent.
 
On Tue, 1 May 2012 02:32:11 +0100, "Arfa Daily"
<arfa.daily@ntlworld.com> wrote:

"Artemus" <bogus@invalid.org> wrote in message
news:jnk70k$3ts$1@dont-email.me...

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." <paul@hovnanian.com> wrote in message
news:Nfqdnb5ALLQxGQDSnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@posted.isomediainc...

This is a further symptom of some weird problems my truck's electronic
ignition module is having. It seems that when it begins to misbehave
badly,
if I park it for a week or so, the problems go away for a few days. Then
they start to reappear. Temperature doesn't seem to have anything to do
with it, as the failures are just as likely to occur on a cold start as
after having driven on a warm day.

I don't think its due to lead free solder. The truck is 33 years old. I
re-heated all of the solder joints I could get to (most of the module is
potted). I added an external cap (on the theory that an internal cap
inside
the possting may have failed open). No difference. Cleaned all the
connections and added a dedicated ground lead from the battery negative
to
the module (on the theory that body rust somethere might have taken out
the
original ground path). No change.

One of the sensors that feed the ignition module may have a flakey
ground. There shouldn't be a lot of them on something that old. My
'75 280Z had an intermittant problem like yours which drove me crazy.
2 dealers were stumped. I finally nailed it by driving around with a
battery powered o'scope, DMM, and a bunch of wires going to the
engine to tap various test points. Turned out it was one of the water
temp sensors which caused the fuel injection pulses to jump to max
width, flooding the engine.
Art

The symptoms are that every once in a while (about once a day) the
ignition
will just cut out. Every time a coast to the side of the road and start
poking around with a voltmeter, all is well (12 volts is present where
its
supposed to be). I've replaced everything except for the module. Those go
for about $350. If one can be found. The really funny thing is that: in
order to test the coil output, I hooked up an old timing light (a direct
connect type that triggers off the coil secondary). The presence of that
strobe in the ignition circuit fixes whatever is wrong within a few
seconds. And the fix lasts for a day or two. I don't have to leave the
strobe connected. Once it starts, its OK without it. Otherwise, it just
never starts unless I leave it parked for a week or two, which seems to
be
when the 'self healing' kicks in.

Since the problem has been narrowed down to that module, its pretty
certain
I'll just need a new one (something other than the $350 OEM part). I
might
try building my own (there's not much to one of these). But the failure
mode has me puzzled and I'd like to understand what might be wrong here.
Even if it has no bearing on the eventual fix.

Since I have enough vehicles at my disposal, I don't actually have to fix
this any time soon. So I'm trying to solve the puzzle rather then just
throw parts out.

--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a pleasant Terran revolution.




I had a similar problem on one of my cars a few years back. It would also
just randomly cut out, and refuse to restart, but for minutes rather than
days. I too thought that it was an ignition problem, and suspected the
electronic ignition module. However, I connected a whole bunch of LEDs to
various points in the system, and discovered that when it failed, it was the
feed to the electric fuel pump that was going off, and the problem
ultimately proved to be bad joints in the fuel pump relay, which had a PCB
inside, with its own driver transistor and a few other bits and bobs on it.

Just a few weeks ago, my current car started doing something similar. It
would just completely fail to start, even though the engine was warm and had
been running just fine only minutes before. But if you left it for a few
hours and then came back to it, it would start first flick of the key.
Again, I suspected either an ignition or ECU problem as when it was failing
to start, it put the engine management error light on, but it turned out to
be the fuel pump motor failing to start.

Arfa
We had one car that kept not starting. The solenoid would click, but
nothing would happen. Then, a few moment later, it would work just
fine. One day, it was showing the problem, and I got under the hood
while a co-worker would try the starter. I put my hand down, and it
started up! Looked where I had set my hand, and it was the ground
cable to the battery. Loosened the battery clamp, and the clamp fell
off the cable. During the installation of the 'new' wiring harness
(another long story!) they had put in a too short battery ground
cable. Vibration and corrosion had broken the cable inside the
insulation so that it was 'just' touching, sometimes. Replaced the
cable with much more flexible copper braid and never had problems
again!

Charlie
 
On Tue, 1 May 2012 05:46:33 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com wrote:

On Apr 29, 7:08 pm, flipper <flip...@fish.net> wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:34:28 -0700, Jim Thompson









To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:22:54 -0500, amdx <a...@knologynotthis.net> wrote:

On 4/26/2012 2:28 PM, Joel Koltner wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ-4gnNz0vc&feature=player_embedded

Well, hey... it's pretty well-produced; definitely gives Michael Moore
some "competition," I suppose.

 One video leads to another and I end up here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=bavou_SEj1E

At 2:18 she says "somebody needs to pay for all my children...take care
of all our suffering... somebody needs to be held accountable."

             Mikek

The poor thang ;-)

What we need is a welfare rule where adding a kid _after_ you go on welfare
_reduces_ the take.

                                      ...Jim Thompson

The problem with notions of what is, in essence, a 'child tax' is it
punishes not only the 'excess' child but the others as well.

Giving someone money, just less, is punishment?

But, if they just published a schedule showing a decreasing
incremental benefit, the extra kid-for-ransom production would drop.

Of course that'll never happen, since the formulas are always too
complicated for anyone to understand. Measuring everyone's "need" is
complicated.
On welfare? Lose any children. It's child abuse to allow children to grow up
in a welfare home and become the next generation of dependents.
 
Jim Thompson wrote:
What we need is a welfare rule where adding a kid _after_ you go on welfare
_reduces_ the take.
It's not fair to punish the kids for the misdeeds of their parents.

If you want to be draconian about this, take away any kids after #2 (or
whatever) -- there are plenty of people out there who'd like to adopt
newborns.
 
On Tue, 01 May 2012 13:04:00 -0700, Joel Koltner <zapwire-usenet@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
What we need is a welfare rule where adding a kid _after_ you go on welfare
_reduces_ the take.

It's not fair to punish the kids for the misdeeds of their parents.
Of course not. My thoughts were toward _prevention_.

Maybe we make it a requirement to take the injection-style birth control to
ensure no more kids while on welfare?

Or simply neuter them ?:)

If you want to be draconian about this, take away any kids after #2 (or
whatever) -- there are plenty of people out there who'd like to adopt
newborns.
Perhaps.

...Jim Thompson
--

| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
On 4/30/2012 11:36 AM, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Apr 30, 7:03 am, Robert Baer<robertb...@localnet.com> wrote:
flipper wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:34:28 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:22:54 -0500, amdx<a...@knologynotthis.net> wrote:

On 4/26/2012 2:28 PM, Joel Koltner wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ-4gnNz0vc&feature=player_embedded

Well, hey... it's pretty well-produced; definitely gives Michael Moore
some "competition," I suppose.

One video leads to another and I end up here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=bavou_SEj1E

At 2:18 she says "somebody needs to pay for all my children...take care
of all our suffering... somebody needs to be held accountable."

Mikek

The poor thang ;-)

What we need is a welfare rule where adding a kid _after_ you go on welfare
_reduces_ the take.

...Jim Thompson

The problem with notions of what is, in essence, a 'child tax' is it
punishes not only the 'excess' child but the others as well.

THAT is _exactly_ the point...

Which is what makes it immoral and moronic. It isn't the child's fault
that it was born to a mother without a sound grasp of social
realities, and it doesn't make much sense to punish the child for its
mother's errors.

It's in society's interest to see that the child is well enough fed
and educated while it grows up to be able to become potentially useful
adult.

Punishing the mother provides instant gratification, but risks
damaging the child. Taking the children away and putting them into
care is a theoretical possibility. but in practice it's too expensive
to be used as a matter of routine, and even good care-givers aren't
all that much better for the child than a tolerably bad biological
mother.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
What ratio would you accept?
Can we damage one to prevent 20, 50, or 200 from be put into that
cesspool, which creates it's own damage.
Mikek
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top