Car powered by compressed air?

[Kabuki Bob]

On Apr 2, 8:59 am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:

At one time, not so long ago, yumhuyk <wostyn...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 1, 8:22 pm, womanGoddess <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Added groups to show what Greg is doing in the sci electronics group.
No doubt Hanson will edit them out, coward that he is.

BTW Greg, turnabout is fair play. You do this to others, lets see how
you feel when its done to you.

Moe

Addded groups to show you are insane and possessed with the domons of
Anger, OCD, Lust, Moose and Heron.  You are phasing in and out of
reality and are a danger to yourself and your loved ones.  

     You've confused Moe with Greg.
     Moe's post show she's firmly rooted in reality.  While it is
possible it's an act, it's not too likely.

I'd hate to admit it, but I am one of the types of Pagans that has my
life firmly in reality. Then, there's the OTHER types, like fluffy
bunnies Pagans, the Goth types and the just plain Coast to Coast AM
types.

     Just as Greg's post show he's not had a firm grasp on reality for
roughly 10 years.  Probably longer, though there is no available
evidence to show it.
     It could be an act, used as part of his 25+ year Rope-A-Dope
plan, but it's not too likely. The mental illnesses (plural) that Greg
displays on-line are an accurate representation of himself in real
life.

I pray
that the proper authorities place you in a supervised environment
where your cannot hurt anyone.  Pray to Bob Larson for salvation.

     Lar$on can't grant salvation.

Exactly what I said. Larson is a human being, though IMO a lower
version of human, one without conscience. He cannot nor will he ever "
grant salvation" for anyone, including himself.

     How long have you held the delusion that Lar$on is God?  Serious
question.

Kent, you know as well as I do some Christians are so intent on
following some minister or preacher or " prophet" that they end up
losing their free will and pretty much worship that person.

Moe

--
Always follow your dream!
Unless it's the one where you're at work in your underwear during a
fire drill.

 

[Kabuki Bob]

On Apr 2, 2:03 pm, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:

At one time, not so long ago, "Herbert John \"Jackie\" Gleason"

BufordTJust...@Texarkanacops.gov> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 09:52:58 -0700 (PDT), Gregory Scott Hanson
greego...@gmail.com> wrote:

Nymbecile has made numerous death threats
and he just loves Police Officers!

 To whom do you refer, idiot?

 I have no such nym.

     It won't be long before he claims you are me.
     In Greg's drug addled mind, I am the only person on Usenet.  In
fact, he claimed that I, and Moe (who according to Greg is me),
invented him.  Yep, Greg believes he's a figment of my imagination.

 However, if it is me that is the target of your lies, do feel free to
give even a single citation to back your false claims up.

     You may as well ask a wall for such.  A wall will surely honor
such a request long before Greg.
     He's NEVER offered anything to prove any claim he's made.  He
frequently posts information he's openly admitted is not about me as
if it is about me.  
     Despite numerous requests from countless people, he never offered
any proof that any of these Kent Wills are me.  Since, as he's also
admitted, my first name in real life isn't Kent, he can't.

 Just remember that me telling you "what I think you need" is an
opinion, not a threat.  Were I to declare that it would be me effecting
the fulfillment of such a 'needed' condition, then you might come close
to having a case.

     Greg frequently makes threats.
     He actually threatened to report my wife to the American Medical
Association because of my exposure of his lies.  Someone was able to
get him to understand she's not a medical doctor, since he did cease
making the threat.
     He threatened to report me to the State of Iowa Board of
Inspections and Appeals in an attempt to have my teaching credentials
taken away.  Upon realizing he was failing, he was reduced to LYING
and claiming I was not a teacher.
     Shortly after that LIE was exposed, he took to claiming I'm not
married and have no children.
     Then, for reasons no one has been able to figure out, he took to
claiming Lindsay and I got divorced and she move to Illinois with our
son.  The same wife and child he claimed never existed.
     Upon that LIE being exposed, he tried to cover his lie by stating
he never said the ex was/is my ex-wife.
     That the few women who could be called ex-girlfriends from the
Chicago area never had a child by me didn't matter to him at all.  So
long as he could satisfy his deeply rooted psychological NEED to lie
is all he cared about.
     He's neglected to state what was to have become of our daughter.
He has ceased claiming she's fictional, but that's all he's done.
     I do hope she's OK in whatever world Greg's self admitted use and
abuse of illegal drugs has developed for him.

 I do not, however, expect you to even come close to having the aptitude
to understand the point that was just iterated, since it was you that got
it wrong to begin with, and you have to back up your bullshit with more
bullshit, even though it was exposed as bullshit.

     It's all he can do.  It's all he's ever done.
     Even when he posted with the name Lisa Rene Watkins, he did
nothing else.

Good job, greegor, aka Gregory Scott Hanson.  I rest my case.  You dumb
sumbitch!  Bwuahahahahahahahahaa!

     Greg is stupid.  The mental retardation he displays on-line is
NOT an act.

He is stupid. Witness his recent crap about my former Centruyel
internet account and my new Verizon internet account. He's so stupid
he doesn't know which type of service I used in each case.

Moe

     So stupid is he that in regards to my 'Truth about Gregory
Hanson' sig, he claimed it is as accurate as the comment that water is
wet.

A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (Greg states they are as believable as the comment that
water is wet):

Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
      (DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT   04/10/1996
     Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION   04/10/1996
     Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
     GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT

"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
    Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead

Me:  "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg.  Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?

Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."

"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
   -- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser

" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
                         April 2000, Gregory Hansonhttp://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson

Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <greego...@gmail.com
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services

With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.)  After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end.  I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water.  Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms.  I brought her up and she
gasped for air.  When she'd caught her breath, I asked her,  "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo?  Pokemon?  Rhianna?"
She shook her head.  "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded.  She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."

"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.

--a true story

As of Sunday, Feb. 27, 2011:

SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE    
     Comments: OPA $2805.04
     COPIES TO PA
     VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT

JUDGEMENT DEFAULT
     Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04
               + INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS.

Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
          TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
          FEES $35.60

Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
him.  There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed
has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still
can't risk getting a job due to it.

 

[Kabuki Bob]

On Apr 2, 2:04 pm, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:

At one time, not so long ago, IMBJR <im...@cloon.fucker> wrote:



On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 06:50:47 -0700, yumhuyk wrote:

On Apr 2, 7:43 am, IMBJR <im...@cloon.fucker> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 06:43:17 -0700, yumhuyk wrote:
yours in Christ

So you fuck Christ?

So you dress your poodle up in a Waffen-SS uniform and fuck him in the
ass?

yours in Christ,
isamu

I did not sign my posts that way, dumbfuck, but your sign-off does
suggest you are a Christfucker.

     Yukkie is a Satanist who worships demons using the names jesus
and christ.  This was established some time ago, though I don't know
that the proof ever went outside the Bob Lar$on news group.

Yukkie claims to enjoy peeing in the Disney pool, among other things.
My view is that he's not a Satanist but some idiot playing a game
pretending to be a Polynesian standing at a city corner with a broken
Ipod.

     Yukkie actually claims Bob Lar$on has offer salvation.  More than
once he's told people to pray to Bob for salvation.
     I don't know your religious views, if any, but I presume you're
aware that under Christianity, only God/Jesus can offer salvation.  

Don't forget that Kensmithiscool did that as well years ago and its
highly likely KSIC was Bob Larson.

Moe

--
'Life is pain. Anybody that says different is selling something.'
     -- Fezzik's mother

 

[Don Lancaster]

On 4/2/2011 3:04 PM, John Larkin wrote:

On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 14:37:05 -0700, Don Lancaster<don@tinaja.com
wrote:

On 4/2/2011 12:25 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:19:28 -0700 (PDT), Nunya<jack_shephard@cox.net
wrote:


Hydrogen, AND AIR OR oxygen mixed is a perfect and absolutely clean
replacement fuel petrol and does the job in a standard combustion
engine with a mere brain chip change for the injectors.

A very small bottle of H will get me to work and back. No need for
vast amounts.

OK, show us the math.


John




Total bullshit.

See http://www.tinaja.com/h2gas01.asp for the arguments against hydrogen
power.

There are --> no<-- valid arguments for hydrogen power.

Meanwhile, compressed air vehicles have a ridiculous number of obvious
flaws. Three of the worst of which are the abysmal energy density of
compressed air (MUCH less than lead-acid), that there is no known way to
efficiently compress air, and the ludicrous performance of compressed
air motors.

An efficient pneumatic motor would, of course, have to always exit air
with zero velocity and zero noise, regardless of load. Which is why you
ain't gonna build a windmill with 60 percent efficiency.

I don't know why so many people keep wanting to replace cars that use
internal combustion engines. They work fabulously well.

But hydrogen is great fuel. It's easy to store: just stick it to some
carbon.

John

Few people realize that there is more hydrogen in a gallon of gasoline
than there is in a gallon of liquid hydrogen.

Has to do with the mole fraction exceeding the density ratio.

http://www.tinaja.com/h2gas01.asp

--
Many thanks,

Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: don@tinaja.com

Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com

 

[Greegor]

G > Hey Archie, rub up REALLY close to Maureen McAllister!

Moe >  He greg run and hide like the coward you are.

G > You're just engaging in wishful thinking!

Moe > More like your usual tactic when
Moe > faced with the truth about you.
Moe > You've done that so many times before.

Nice bluff, but what if I challenged you
to post a link showing where I ran and hid.

If I did it so "many times before", that should be easy!

G > Have you told Nymbecile why you're so PO'd at me?

Moe >  Your claims and distortions noted.

It was a question.

 

[WhySoSerious?]

On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 12:19:07 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <greegor47@gmail.com>
wrote:

You think I should not have refuted the KentMoe screed?
Have you figured out yet that Kent and Moe are butt hurt?
Have you figured out WHY?

Again, you act as if I give a fat flying fuck about you or any of your
toils, greegor, you stupid, worthless twit.

 

[Chieftain of the Carpet C]

On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 14:37:05 -0700, Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> wrote:

Total bullshit.

You are an idiot.

There are entire fleets of ambulances that run on propane and there
were few induction system mods needs for a standard engine to be a
propane engine.

It uses a propane/air mix and operates EXACTLY as a petrol engine does,
only better. Hydrogen would be a further advancement.

Hydrogen has more energy output than Propane does.

You do not see the rocket scientists making rockets that run on liquid
Propane.

YOU are the idiots.

 

[Chieftain of the Carpet C]

On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 15:04:37 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 14:37:05 -0700, Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com
wrote:

On 4/2/2011 12:25 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:19:28 -0700 (PDT), Nunya<jack_shephard@cox.net
wrote:


Hydrogen, AND AIR OR oxygen mixed is a perfect and absolutely clean
replacement fuel petrol and does the job in a standard combustion
engine with a mere brain chip change for the injectors.

A very small bottle of H will get me to work and back. No need for
vast amounts.

OK, show us the math.


John




Total bullshit.

See http://www.tinaja.com/h2gas01.asp for the arguments against hydrogen
power.

There are --> no <-- valid arguments for hydrogen power.

Meanwhile, compressed air vehicles have a ridiculous number of obvious
flaws. Three of the worst of which are the abysmal energy density of
compressed air (MUCH less than lead-acid), that there is no known way to
efficiently compress air, and the ludicrous performance of compressed
air motors.

An efficient pneumatic motor would, of course, have to always exit air
with zero velocity and zero noise, regardless of load. Which is why you
ain't gonna build a windmill with 60 percent efficiency.

I don't know why so many people keep wanting to replace cars that use
internal combustion engines.

Where did you get that idea, idiot?

They work fabulously well.

They work even better with a Hydrogen / Air mix than with gas, and they
pollute not at all. You lose, again.

But hydrogen is great fuel. It's easy to store: just stick it to some
carbon.

Liquid Hydrogen "stores" just fine. Take a course, loser.

 

[Greegor]

On Apr 2, 4:37 pm, Don Lancaster <d...@tinaja.com> wrote:

On 4/2/2011 12:25 PM, John Larkin wrote:





On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:19:28 -0700 (PDT), Nunya<jack_sheph...@cox.net
wrote:

  Hydrogen, AND AIR OR oxygen mixed is a perfect and absolutely clean
replacement fuel petrol and does the job in a standard combustion
engine with a mere brain chip change for the injectors.

  A very small bottle of H will get me to work and back.  No need for
vast amounts.

OK, show us the math.

John

Total bullshit.

Seehttp://www.tinaja.com/h2gas01.aspfor the arguments against hydrogen
power.

There are --> no <--  valid arguments for hydrogen power.

Meanwhile, compressed air vehicles have a ridiculous number of obvious
flaws. Three of the worst of which are the abysmal energy density of
compressed air (MUCH less than lead-acid), that there is no known way to
efficiently compress air, and the ludicrous performance of compressed
air motors.

An efficient pneumatic motor would, of course, have to always exit air
with zero velocity and zero noise, regardless of load. Which is why you
ain't gonna build a windmill with 60 percent efficiency.

--
Many thanks,

Thank you, Mr. Lancaster.

 

[hifi-tek]

"Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers"
<theslipperman@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:0cdfp6509vno1vruk3livli5rheu638d5i@4ax.com...

On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 14:37:05 -0700, Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> wrote:


Total bullshit.

You are an idiot.

There are entire fleets of ambulances that run on propane and there
were few induction system mods needs for a standard engine to be a
propane engine.

It uses a propane/air mix and operates EXACTLY as a petrol engine does,
only better. Hydrogen would be a further advancement.

Hydrogen has more energy output than Propane does.

You do not see the rocket scientists making rockets that run on liquid
Propane.

YOU are the idiots.

Hey dude, don't go away mad, just go away. Your ignorance is showing -
again.

 

[Kabuki Bob]

On Apr 2, 4:32 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:

G > Hey Archie, rub up REALLY close to Maureen McAllister!

Moe >  He greg run and hide like the coward you are.

G > You're just engaging in wishful thinking!

Moe > More like your usual tactic when
Moe > faced with the truth about you.
Moe > You've done that so many times before.

Nice bluff, but what if I challenged you
to post a link showing where I ran and hid.

If I did it so "many times before", that should be easy!

G > Have you told Nymbecile why you're so PO'd at me?

Moe >  Your claims and distortions noted.

It was a question.

In your " question" you made claims.

Quit lying.

Moe

 

[John Larkin]

On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 16:05:36 -0700, Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com>
wrote:

On 4/2/2011 3:04 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 14:37:05 -0700, Don Lancaster<don@tinaja.com
wrote:

On 4/2/2011 12:25 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:19:28 -0700 (PDT), Nunya<jack_shephard@cox.net
wrote:


Hydrogen, AND AIR OR oxygen mixed is a perfect and absolutely clean
replacement fuel petrol and does the job in a standard combustion
engine with a mere brain chip change for the injectors.

A very small bottle of H will get me to work and back. No need for
vast amounts.

OK, show us the math.


John




Total bullshit.

See http://www.tinaja.com/h2gas01.asp for the arguments against hydrogen
power.

There are --> no<-- valid arguments for hydrogen power.

Meanwhile, compressed air vehicles have a ridiculous number of obvious
flaws. Three of the worst of which are the abysmal energy density of
compressed air (MUCH less than lead-acid), that there is no known way to
efficiently compress air, and the ludicrous performance of compressed
air motors.

An efficient pneumatic motor would, of course, have to always exit air
with zero velocity and zero noise, regardless of load. Which is why you
ain't gonna build a windmill with 60 percent efficiency.

I don't know why so many people keep wanting to replace cars that use
internal combustion engines. They work fabulously well.

But hydrogen is great fuel. It's easy to store: just stick it to some
carbon.

John



Few people realize that there is more hydrogen in a gallon of gasoline
than there is in a gallon of liquid hydrogen.

Has to do with the mole fraction exceeding the density ratio.

http://www.tinaja.com/h2gas01.asp

And there's more hydrogen in a liter of natural gas than there is in a
liter of hydrogen. About 3 or 4 times as much.

John

 

[John Larkin]

On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 16:53:21 -0700, Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers
<theslipperman@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 15:04:37 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 14:37:05 -0700, Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com
wrote:

On 4/2/2011 12:25 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:19:28 -0700 (PDT), Nunya<jack_shephard@cox.net
wrote:


Hydrogen, AND AIR OR oxygen mixed is a perfect and absolutely clean
replacement fuel petrol and does the job in a standard combustion
engine with a mere brain chip change for the injectors.

A very small bottle of H will get me to work and back. No need for
vast amounts.

OK, show us the math.


John




Total bullshit.

See http://www.tinaja.com/h2gas01.asp for the arguments against hydrogen
power.

There are --> no <-- valid arguments for hydrogen power.

Meanwhile, compressed air vehicles have a ridiculous number of obvious
flaws. Three of the worst of which are the abysmal energy density of
compressed air (MUCH less than lead-acid), that there is no known way to
efficiently compress air, and the ludicrous performance of compressed
air motors.

An efficient pneumatic motor would, of course, have to always exit air
with zero velocity and zero noise, regardless of load. Which is why you
ain't gonna build a windmill with 60 percent efficiency.

I don't know why so many people keep wanting to replace cars that use
internal combustion engines.

Where did you get that idea, idiot?

They work fabulously well.

They work even better with a Hydrogen / Air mix than with gas, and they
pollute not at all. You lose, again.

I assume you know this because you run your car on hydrogen.

But hydrogen is great fuel. It's easy to store: just stick it to some
carbon.

Liquid Hydrogen "stores" just fine. Take a course, loser.

It does not. Density is low, it requires absurd insulation, and it
continuously vents explosive gaseous hydrogen. And hydrogen embrittles
metals, which could be bad news in an engine.

John

 

[John Larkin]

On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 16:50:41 -0700, Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers
<theslipperman@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 14:37:05 -0700, Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> wrote:


Total bullshit.

You are an idiot.

There are entire fleets of ambulances that run on propane and there
were few induction system mods needs for a standard engine to be a
propane engine.

It uses a propane/air mix and operates EXACTLY as a petrol engine does,
only better. Hydrogen would be a further advancement.

Hydrogen has more energy output than Propane does.

You do not see the rocket scientists making rockets that run on liquid
Propane.

Kerosene is a popular rocket fuel. Hydrogen is hard to handle.

John

 

[Greegor]

G > Hey Archie, rub up REALLY close to Maureen McAllister!

Moe >  He greg run and hide like the coward you are.

G > You're just engaging in wishful thinking!

Moe > More like your usual tactic when
Moe > faced with the truth about you.
Moe > You've done that so many times before.

G > Nice bluff, but what if I challenged you
G > to post a link showing where I ran and hid.

G > If I did it so "many times before", that should be easy!

G > Have you told Nymbecile why you're so PO'd at me?

Moe >  Your claims and distortions noted.

G > It was a question.

Moe > In your " question" you made claims.
Moe > Quit lying.

Are you saying your not PO'd at me?

What other "claims" did my question make?

 

[Chieftain of the Carpet C]

On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 17:08:12 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

vents explosive gaseous hydrogen.

That is what you mix with the air and put into the engine each time the
piston drops when the intake valve is open.

You seem to have a problem with basic premises.

 

[Dirk Bruere at NeoPax]

On 02/04/2011 22:37, Don Lancaster wrote:

On 4/2/2011 12:25 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:19:28 -0700 (PDT), Nunya<jack_shephard@cox.net
wrote:


Hydrogen, AND AIR OR oxygen mixed is a perfect and absolutely clean
replacement fuel petrol and does the job in a standard combustion
engine with a mere brain chip change for the injectors.

A very small bottle of H will get me to work and back. No need for
vast amounts.

OK, show us the math.


John




Total bullshit.

See http://www.tinaja.com/h2gas01.asp for the arguments against hydrogen
power.

There are --> no <-- valid arguments for hydrogen power.

Meanwhile, compressed air vehicles have a ridiculous number of obvious
flaws. Three of the worst of which are the abysmal energy density of
compressed air (MUCH less than lead-acid), that there is no known way to
efficiently compress air, and the ludicrous performance of compressed
air motors.

An efficient pneumatic motor would, of course, have to always exit air
with zero velocity and zero noise, regardless of load. Which is why you
ain't gonna build a windmill with 60 percent efficiency.

LN2 has been tried, at about 200kJ/kg

--
Dirk

http://www.neopax.com/technomage/ - My new book - Magick and Technology

 

[Greegor]

G > Have you told Nymbecile why you're so PO'd at me?

Archie > snipped 400 plus lines of proof that you are
Archie > the dumb little bastard I have always said
Archie > you were. Not so much whether it is or is
Archie > not "you", but the fact that you fucking posted it here.

You think I should not have refuted the KentMoe screed?
Have you figured out yet that Kent and Moe are butt hurt?
Have you figured out WHY?

Archie > What makes you think we are interested in
Archie > this stupid horseshit, you dumb son of a bitch?

It's so cute when you use the emperious "we" !

Archie > Go away, little dweeb.

Did you REALLY think that was likely?

Archie > Again, you act as if I give a fat flying fuck
Archie > about you or any of your toils, greegor,
Archie > you stupid, worthless twit.

Toils?

 

[VWWall]

Don Lancaster wrote:

On 4/2/2011 3:04 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 14:37:05 -0700, Don Lancaster<don@tinaja.com
wrote:

On 4/2/2011 12:25 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:19:28 -0700 (PDT), Nunya<jack_shephard@cox.net
wrote:


Hydrogen, AND AIR OR oxygen mixed is a perfect and absolutely clean
replacement fuel petrol and does the job in a standard combustion
engine with a mere brain chip change for the injectors.

A very small bottle of H will get me to work and back. No need for
vast amounts.

OK, show us the math.


John




Total bullshit.

See http://www.tinaja.com/h2gas01.asp for the arguments against hydrogen
power.

There are --> no<-- valid arguments for hydrogen power.

Meanwhile, compressed air vehicles have a ridiculous number of obvious
flaws. Three of the worst of which are the abysmal energy density of
compressed air (MUCH less than lead-acid), that there is no known way to
efficiently compress air, and the ludicrous performance of compressed
air motors.

An efficient pneumatic motor would, of course, have to always exit air
with zero velocity and zero noise, regardless of load. Which is why you
ain't gonna build a windmill with 60 percent efficiency.

I don't know why so many people keep wanting to replace cars that use
internal combustion engines. They work fabulously well.

But hydrogen is great fuel. It's easy to store: just stick it to some
carbon.

John



Few people realize that there is more hydrogen in a gallon of gasoline
than there is in a gallon of liquid hydrogen.

Has to do with the mole fraction exceeding the density ratio.

http://www.tinaja.com/h2gas01.asp

What do you think of this:

<quote>
Air hybrid cars could halve fuel consumption
Researchers are exploring air hybrid automobiles as possible
alternatives to electric hybrid cars, claiming they could be more
efficient and less expensive to manufacture.

"My simulations show that buses in cities could reduce their fuel
consumption by 60%", said Sasa Trajkovic, a doctoral student in
Combustion Engines at Lund University who recently defended a thesis on
the subject. Trajkovic adds that 48% of the brake energy, which the
technology compresses and saves in a small air tank connected to the
engine to be reused later. This means that the degree of reuse for air
hybrids could match that of today's electric hybrids.
<end quote>

http://www.edn.com/article/512633-Air_hybrid_cars_could_halve_fuel_consumption.php

Maybe they should have waited to publish it on 1 April!

--
Virg Wall, P.E.