AUS.TV = bunch of f*cking assholes

[Graham Cooper]

get fucked you utter repugnant morons

most disgusting pieces of SHIT in history all of you

I've never heard of such fucking abuse

you're a fucking MOB of DERELICTS

10,000 put downs non stop for 10 years

Graham Cooper
Groom Computer
Wife Finder
Sex Machine
KINGS Beach
QUEENSland

 

[Government Shill #2]

On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:15:33 -0800 (PST), Graham Cooper
<grahamcooper7@gmail.com> wrote:

get fucked you utter repugnant morons

most disgusting pieces of SHIT in history all of you

I've never heard of such fucking abuse

you're a fucking MOB of DERELICTS

10,000 put downs non stop for 10 years

Graham Cooper
Groom Computer
Wife Finder
Sex Machine
KINGS Beach
QUEENSland
NUTbag

 

[DavidW]

Graham Cooper wrote:

get fucked you utter repugnant morons

most disgusting pieces of SHIT in history all of you

I've never heard of such fucking abuse

you're a fucking MOB of DERELICTS

10,000 put downs non stop for 10 years

Is this a delayed reaction to something? What's the problem?

 

[Duggy]

On Feb 23, 5:15 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:

get fucked you utter repugnant morons

most disgusting pieces of SHIT in history all of you

I've never heard of such fucking abuse

you're a fucking MOB of DERELICTS

10,000 put downs non stop for 10 years

Graham Cooper
Groom Computer
Wife Finder
Sex Machine
KINGS Beach
QUEENSland

 

[SG1]

"Graham Cooper" <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e707cf7b-059b-4963-8af2-213b0836b1c8@oy2g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...

they let you out again jerk, put the hat on tighter...

 

[SG1]

"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4njak7t2ngad8b4dhdjd9lb2le5le6ao3s@4ax.com...

On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:15:33 -0800 (PST), Graham Cooper
grahamcooper7@gmail.com> wrote:

get fucked you utter repugnant morons

most disgusting pieces of SHIT in history all of you

I've never heard of such fucking abuse

you're a fucking MOB of DERELICTS

10,000 put downs non stop for 10 years

Graham Cooper
Groom Computer
Wife Finder
Sex Machine
KINGS Beach
QUEENSland
NUTbag

nutbag without nuts, high voice!!!!!

 

[terryc]

DavidW wrote:

Is this a delayed reaction to something? What's the problem?

The nursing home hasn't paid there pharmaeutical bills and have been
cutting dosages so all the "personalities" are let loose again.

 

[Kangaroo Court Australia]

VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION
ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LIST VCAT
Refernce: A226/2011
Le Tuan Pham vs Victoria Police (Ethical Standards), S. Const B
Heisey
(Clayton Police), S. Const Dean Fraser, S. Const Fred Cantsilieris,
Const Rachel Dunn (Moorabbin Police)
APPLICANT SUBMISSION
1. On the 20th February 2012, Senior Member G Nihill, reinstated
this
matter and adjourned to an administrative mention on 19 March 2012;
2. The Applicant sought on that same day that Written Statements
of
Reasons be given for every and ALL decisions, henceforth;
3. In order to assist the Applicant in seeking legal advice as
advised
by Senior Member, written statements of reasons are required for the
following questions:
4. In the event that the Senior Member accepts that Medical
certificate(s) of Medical/Cardiovascular condition are valid, is it
not in the interest of Justice to proceed to directions in order to
expand and articulate Particulars of the case to spell the
grievances;
5. It may be that the other party is so incompetent that they
cannot
see the discrimination; the horde of Commonwealth legal counsels lost
the Malaysia Refugee Swap case in the High Court.
6. No material evidence/document was presented at the hearing on
the
20th February to indicate or challenge the discrimination grievance
already submitted; Police procedure document was asked of Ms
Katherine
Francis, Solicitor, none was proffered.
7. The Applicant’s main concern was the two statements the
Senior
Member G Nihill made to the Respondent(s):
8. “File Strike out papers prior to19th March”, “Are there any
other
quicker way”
9. Those two statements sounded like illegal legal advice and
illegal
instruction from the Senior Member to the Respondent(s) that
prejudice
the case;
10. It sounded like collusion and conspiracy to pervert the
course
of
justice from the Senior Member;
11. If the Senior Member cannot conduct the proceedings in the
impartial manner, is it not in the best of justice for the Senior
Member to disqualify herself?
12. The Applicant seeks to be heard FULLY, orally and in writing
and
in person, on any strike-out application from the Respondents;
13. The Justice Michael Kirby has already accused the High Court
Australia of racial discrimination in depriving Aborigines access to
the Whiteman’s legal system;
14. The Applicant seeks to see how Black Deaths In Custody might
have
been initiated: collusion between the Judiciary and Police,
conspiring
to cause injuries and deaths;
15. Brief History:
a. On the Friday of the period in question, at closing time
4-5pm and
no way to contact his medical doctor, the Applicant approached the
Clayton police station and corresponded with Senior Constable Heisey/
Heisley;
b. The Applicant sought to obtain the heart medication left with
Anthony Stephan of Monash Florist, in addition to his other
properties;
c. Senior Constable Heisey/Heisley physically threatened to
throw
the
Applicant out of the police station, without any reasons;
d. On the weekend of the period in question, the Applicant
sought
Senior Constable Cantsilieris and his partner, come by Monash Florist
in order to assist the Applicant recover his properties;
e. All and full properties were refused to the Applicant by the
Police
and Anthony Stephan;
f. On the following Monday, the Applicant sought an Order from
VCAT to
retrieve his properties;
g. Constable Rachel Dunn refused to carry out the Order; when
asked if
she had more power than VCAT, she said “Yeah”
h. Police Ethical standards refused to identify the Respondents;
Heisey was the name noted on the name tag, VCAT has renamed it;
16. FOI applications will now be sought for recordings,
statements
and
reports, inter alia, of this matter from Victoria Police and
government solicitors;
17. The Applicant has requested to be notified my email; VCAT has
refused to do so in order to prejudice the Applicant; the Applicant
would like it to be corrected asap, and be notified by email;
18. The Applicant gives notice of change of postal
address: PO BOX
1255
St Albans,
3021
19. Authority:
a. QANTAS vs Gama NSD 2539/2006: Discrimination cases should not
be
approached on the assumption that a higher standard of evidence
contemplated in Briginshaw automatically applies. In general,
discrimination claims would not require application of a higher
standard than is usual.
b. Lehane J stated in Travers v. NSW [2000] FCA 1565, “the power
of
Summary Dismissal is to be used with caution”
c. Lehane J stated in Travers v. NSW [2000] FCA 1565 at [8], “it
must
be recognised that the terms of section 46PO(3) suggests a degree of
flexibility ... and a complaint, which usually will not be drawn by a
lawyer, should not be construed as if it were a pleading”.
d. Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Limited [2010] HCA 32
e. Gurnett v The Macquarie Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd [No 2][126]
cc. Federal Attorney General Nicola Roxson
Victoria Attorney General Peter Ryan
Le Tuan PHAM
PO BOX 1255
St Albans 3021


/

 

[Kangaroo Court Australia]

On Feb 23, 12:22 pm, Kangaroo Court Australia
<nwn.webmas...@gmail.com> wrote:

VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION
ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LIST                                        VCAT
Refernce: A226/2011
Le Tuan Pham vs Victoria Police (Ethical Standards), S. Const B
Heisey
(Clayton Police), S. Const Dean Fraser, S. Const Fred Cantsilieris,
Const Rachel Dunn (Moorabbin Police)
APPLICANT SUBMISSION
1.      On the 20th February 2012, Senior Member G Nihill, reinstated
this
matter and adjourned to an administrative mention on 19 March 2012;
2.      The Applicant sought on that same day that Written Statements
of
Reasons be given for every and ALL decisions, henceforth;
3.      In order to assist the Applicant in seeking legal advice as
advised
by Senior Member, written statements of reasons are required for the
following questions:
4.      In the event that the Senior Member accepts that Medical
certificate(s) of Medical/Cardiovascular condition are valid, is it
not in the interest of Justice to proceed to directions in order to
expand and articulate Particulars of the case to spell the
grievances;
5.      It may be that the other party is so incompetent that they
cannot
see the discrimination; the horde of Commonwealth legal counsels lost
the Malaysia Refugee Swap case in the High Court.
6.      No material evidence/document was presented at the hearing on
the
20th February to indicate or challenge the discrimination grievance
already submitted; Police procedure document was asked of Ms
Katherine
Francis, Solicitor, none was proffered.
7.      The Applicant’s main concern was the two statements the
Senior
Member G Nihill made to the Respondent(s):
8.       “File Strike out papers prior to19th March”, “Are there any
other
quicker way”
9.      Those two statements sounded like illegal legal advice and
illegal
instruction from the Senior Member to the Respondent(s) that
prejudice
the case;
10.     It sounded like collusion and conspiracy to pervert the
course
of
justice from the Senior Member;
11.     If the Senior Member cannot conduct the proceedings in the
impartial manner, is it not in the best of justice for the Senior
Member to disqualify herself?
12.     The Applicant seeks to be heard FULLY, orally and in writing
and
in person, on  any strike-out application from the Respondents;
13.     The Justice Michael Kirby has already accused the High Court
Australia of racial discrimination in depriving Aborigines access to
the Whiteman’s legal system;
14.     The Applicant seeks to see how Black Deaths In Custody might
have
been initiated: collusion between the Judiciary and Police,
conspiring
to cause injuries and deaths;
15.     Brief History:
a.      On the Friday of  the period in question, at closing time
4-5pm and
no way to contact his medical doctor, the Applicant approached the
Clayton police station and corresponded with Senior Constable Heisey/
Heisley;
b.      The Applicant sought to obtain the heart medication left with
Anthony Stephan of Monash Florist, in addition to his other
properties;
c.      Senior Constable Heisey/Heisley physically threatened to
throw
the
Applicant out of the police station, without any reasons;
d.      On the weekend of the period in question, the Applicant
sought
Senior Constable Cantsilieris and his partner, come by Monash Florist
in order to assist the Applicant recover his properties;
e.      All and full properties were refused to the Applicant by the
Police
and Anthony Stephan;
f.      On the following Monday, the Applicant sought an Order from
VCAT to
retrieve his properties;
g.      Constable Rachel Dunn refused to carry out the Order; when
asked if
she had more power than VCAT, she said “Yeah”
h.      Police Ethical standards refused to identify the Respondents;
Heisey was the name noted on the name tag, VCAT has renamed it;
16.     FOI applications will now be sought for recordings,
statements
and
reports, inter alia, of this matter from Victoria Police and
government solicitors;
17.     The Applicant has requested to be notified my email; VCAT has
refused to do so in order to prejudice the Applicant; the Applicant
would like it to be corrected asap, and be notified by email;
18.     The Applicant gives notice of change of postal
address:         PO BOX
1255
St Albans,
                                3021
19.     Authority:
a.      QANTAS vs Gama NSD 2539/2006: Discrimination cases should not
be
approached on the assumption that a higher standard of evidence
contemplated in Briginshaw automatically applies. In general,
discrimination claims would not require application of a higher
standard than is usual.
b.      Lehane J stated in Travers v. NSW [2000] FCA 1565, “the power
of
Summary Dismissal is to be used with caution”
c.      Lehane J stated in Travers v. NSW [2000] FCA 1565 at [8], “it
must
be recognised that the terms of section 46PO(3) suggests a degree of
flexibility ... and a complaint, which usually will not be drawn by a
lawyer, should not be construed as if it were a pleading”.
d.      Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Limited [2010] HCA 32
e.      Gurnett v The Macquarie Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd [No 2][126]
cc.     Federal Attorney General Nicola Roxson
        Victoria Attorney General Peter Ryan
Le Tuan PHAM
PO BOX 1255
St Albans 3021

/

 

[SG1]

"Kangaroo Court Australia" <nwn.webmaster@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:adf1d270-f161-4567-9a3d-6c5ade3b78a8@qt10g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 23, 12:22 pm, Kangaroo Court Australia

Hop on out

 

[SG1]

Call lifeline "They Care"

 

[Kangaroo Court Australia]

VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION
ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LIST VCAT
Refernce: A226/2011
Le Tuan Pham vs Victoria Police (Ethical Standards), S. Const B
Heisey
(Clayton Police), S. Const Dean Fraser, S. Const Fred Cantsilieris,
Const Rachel Dunn (Moorabbin Police)
APPLICANT SUBMISSION
1. On the 20th February 2012, Senior Member G Nihill, reinstated
this
matter and adjourned to an administrative mention on 19 March 2012;
2. The Applicant sought on that same day that Written Statements
of
Reasons be given for every and ALL decisions, henceforth;
3. In order to assist the Applicant in seeking legal advice as
advised
by Senior Member, written statements of reasons are required for the
following questions:
4. In the event that the Senior Member accepts that Medical
certificate(s) of Medical/Cardiovascular condition are valid, is it
not in the interest of Justice to proceed to directions in order to
expand and articulate Particulars of the case to spell the
grievances;
5. It may be that the other party is so incompetent that they
cannot
see the discrimination; the horde of Commonwealth legal counsels lost
the Malaysia Refugee Swap case in the High Court.
6. No material evidence/document was presented at the hearing on
the
20th February to indicate or challenge the discrimination grievance
already submitted; Police procedure document was asked of Ms
Katherine
Francis, Solicitor, none was proffered.
7. The Applicant’s main concern was the two statements the
Senior
Member G Nihill made to the Respondent(s):
8. “File Strike out papers prior to19th March”, “Are there any
other
quicker way”
9. Those two statements sounded like illegal legal advice and
illegal
instruction from the Senior Member to the Respondent(s) that
prejudice
the case;
10. It sounded like collusion and conspiracy to pervert the
course
of
justice from the Senior Member;
11. If the Senior Member cannot conduct the proceedings in the
impartial manner, is it not in the best of justice for the Senior
Member to disqualify herself?
12. The Applicant seeks to be heard FULLY, orally and in writing
and
in person, on any strike-out application from the Respondents;
13. The Justice Michael Kirby has already accused the High Court
Australia of racial discrimination in depriving Aborigines access to
the Whiteman’s legal system;
14. The Applicant seeks to see how Black Deaths In Custody might
have
been initiated: collusion between the Judiciary and Police,
conspiring
to cause injuries and deaths;
15. Brief History:
a. On the Friday of the period in question, at closing time
4-5pm and
no way to contact his medical doctor, the Applicant approached the
Clayton police station and corresponded with Senior Constable Heisey/
Heisley;
b. The Applicant sought to obtain the heart medication left with
Anthony Stephan of Monash Florist, in addition to his other
properties;
c. Senior Constable Heisey/Heisley physically threatened to
throw
the
Applicant out of the police station, without any reasons;
d. On the weekend of the period in question, the Applicant
sought
Senior Constable Cantsilieris and his partner, come by Monash Florist
in order to assist the Applicant recover his properties;
e. All and full properties were refused to the Applicant by the
Police
and Anthony Stephan;
f. On the following Monday, the Applicant sought an Order from
VCAT to
retrieve his properties;
g. Constable Rachel Dunn refused to carry out the Order; when
asked if
she had more power than VCAT, she said “Yeah”
h. Police Ethical standards refused to identify the Respondents;
Heisey was the name noted on the name tag, VCAT has renamed it;
16. FOI applications will now be sought for recordings,
statements
and
reports, inter alia, of this matter from Victoria Police and
government solicitors;
17. The Applicant has requested to be notified my email; VCAT has
refused to do so in order to prejudice the Applicant; the Applicant
would like it to be corrected asap, and be notified by email;
18. The Applicant gives notice of change of postal
address: PO BOX
1255
St Albans,
3021
19. Authority:
a. QANTAS vs Gama NSD 2539/2006: Discrimination cases should not
be
approached on the assumption that a higher standard of evidence
contemplated in Briginshaw automatically applies. In general,
discrimination claims would not require application of a higher
standard than is usual.
b. Lehane J stated in Travers v. NSW [2000] FCA 1565, “the power
of
Summary Dismissal is to be used with caution”
c. Lehane J stated in Travers v. NSW [2000] FCA 1565 at [8], “it
must
be recognised that the terms of section 46PO(3) suggests a degree of
flexibility ... and a complaint, which usually will not be drawn by a
lawyer, should not be construed as if it were a pleading”.
d. Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Limited [2010] HCA 32
e. Gurnett v The Macquarie Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd [No 2][126]
cc. Federal Attorney General Nicola Roxson
Victoria Attorney General Peter Ryan
Le Tuan PHAM
PO BOX 1255
St Albans 3021
/ .

 

[Grant]

On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:30:47 +1100, terryc <newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:

DavidW wrote:

Is this a delayed reaction to something? What's the problem?

The nursing home hasn't paid there pharmaeutical bills and have been
cutting dosages so all the "personalities" are let loose again.

s/there/their/ ?