H
Harry Newton
Guest
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:18:14 -0500, rickman wrote:
Rickman,
I must caution you about nospam.
He's vastly *different* from the other half-dozen or so fundamentalist
Apple Apologists *Jolly Roger, Lewis, BKonRamp, Savageduck*, etc.
While nospam has the same fact-free belief system that characterizes an
Apple Apologist, he's far smarter than the rest. And better informed. He's
apparently just as poorly educated, but he's smart nonetheless. So he
actually *might* be college educated even, but I think not.
Nontheless, nospam is duplicitously clever (like James Comey) with facts in
a way that is intended to frustrate a logical person out of his mind.
I've consistently said he'd make a great defense lawyer, and I'd even want
to hire him as my defense lawyer, but he'd make for a lousy prosecutor
because he brings up innuendo and magical possibility of "who done it", but
he never proves a word he says with facts.
The other half-dozen Apple Apologists actually *believe* what they write,
but nospam doesn't believe a word of what he writes. He's far too clever,
and you can tell by the exact words he uses, which are clever contortions
of actual facts.
The rest of the Apple Apologists are merely ignorant fundamentalists - but
nospam actually provides value - but you have to grasp that value out of
his contortions like an archeologist grasped the true story out of an
archeological dig in a rubbish heap.
The value of nospam is that you know he knows the truth when you read his
clever distortions of it. He drives logical people nuts, until they realize
he does it on purpose.
He's a classic Orwellian doublespeak artist, who will flatly and repeatedly
deny that 1+1=2, seemingly without a single twinge of guilt. Just watch.
Rickman,
I must caution you about nospam.
He's vastly *different* from the other half-dozen or so fundamentalist
Apple Apologists *Jolly Roger, Lewis, BKonRamp, Savageduck*, etc.
While nospam has the same fact-free belief system that characterizes an
Apple Apologist, he's far smarter than the rest. And better informed. He's
apparently just as poorly educated, but he's smart nonetheless. So he
actually *might* be college educated even, but I think not.
Nontheless, nospam is duplicitously clever (like James Comey) with facts in
a way that is intended to frustrate a logical person out of his mind.
I've consistently said he'd make a great defense lawyer, and I'd even want
to hire him as my defense lawyer, but he'd make for a lousy prosecutor
because he brings up innuendo and magical possibility of "who done it", but
he never proves a word he says with facts.
The other half-dozen Apple Apologists actually *believe* what they write,
but nospam doesn't believe a word of what he writes. He's far too clever,
and you can tell by the exact words he uses, which are clever contortions
of actual facts.
The rest of the Apple Apologists are merely ignorant fundamentalists - but
nospam actually provides value - but you have to grasp that value out of
his contortions like an archeologist grasped the true story out of an
archeological dig in a rubbish heap.
The value of nospam is that you know he knows the truth when you read his
clever distortions of it. He drives logical people nuts, until they realize
he does it on purpose.
He's a classic Orwellian doublespeak artist, who will flatly and repeatedly
deny that 1+1=2, seemingly without a single twinge of guilt. Just watch.
