Analysing 4046 PC2

A

Andrew Holme

Guest
I prefer to design PLLs with current output charge pumps, having equal
source and sink currents, where the loop filter is analysed as a
"trans-resistance" network i.e. current-in, voltage-out. I'm confused by
the 4046-style 3-state output. I find this far less intuitive than a
current output charge pump. It's not a simple voltage source, since part of
the time it's hi-Z. The source and sink currents are not equal, except when
the loop filter capacitor voltage is half-rail. Mathematically, how is it
justified to model this as a simple voltage source? Is there an assumption
about the VCO control voltage being half rail? Is the design really out by
a factor of 2 at the tuning range extremes?

TIA
Andrew.
 
Andrew Holme wrote:
I prefer to design PLLs with current output charge pumps, having equal
source and sink currents, where the loop filter is analysed as a
"trans-resistance" network i.e. current-in, voltage-out. I'm
confused by the 4046-style 3-state output. I find this far less
intuitive than a current output charge pump. It's not a simple
voltage source, since part of the time it's hi-Z. The source and
sink currents are not equal, except when the loop filter capacitor
voltage is half-rail. Mathematically, how is it justified to model
this as a simple voltage source? Is there an assumption about the
VCO control voltage being half rail? Is the design really out by a
factor of 2 at the tuning range extremes?

TIA
Andrew.
Oops, of course I meant "trans-impedance" there, and, I suppose a
current-output charge pump is also 3-state, but you know what I mean ....
 
Andrew Holme wrote:
I prefer to design PLLs with current output charge pumps, having equal
source and sink currents, where the loop filter is analysed as a
"trans-resistance" network i.e. current-in, voltage-out. I'm confused by
the 4046-style 3-state output. I find this far less intuitive than a
current output charge pump. It's not a simple voltage source, since part of
the time it's hi-Z. The source and sink currents are not equal, except when
the loop filter capacitor voltage is half-rail. Mathematically, how is it
justified to model this as a simple voltage source? Is there an assumption
about the VCO control voltage being half rail? Is the design really out by
a factor of 2 at the tuning range extremes?
If you don't want to deal with the approximations, add an opamp with
the resistor from the phase detector feeding its virtual ground. But
I recommend you split that resistor in half and add a small shunt
capacitor to ground at the midpoint, to keep the amplifier from having
to deal with the full spectrum of frequencies present in the detector
output. A high frequency pole much higher than the oscillator cycle
does not change the loop filter much.

--
John Popelish
 
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 23:44:49 -0000, "Andrew Holme" <andrew@nospam.com>
wrote:

I prefer to design PLLs with current output charge pumps, having equal
source and sink currents, where the loop filter is analysed as a
"trans-resistance" network i.e. current-in, voltage-out. I'm confused by
the 4046-style 3-state output. I find this far less intuitive than a
current output charge pump. It's not a simple voltage source, since part of
the time it's hi-Z. The source and sink currents are not equal, except when
the loop filter capacitor voltage is half-rail. Mathematically, how is it
justified to model this as a simple voltage source? Is there an assumption
about the VCO control voltage being half rail? Is the design really out by
a factor of 2 at the tuning range extremes?
Answer: there is no *mathematical* justification. It's done that way
because it turns this hard-to-solve non-linear circuit into one that's
linear and easy-to-solve. The fact that this no longer represents the
actual design (or its performance) seems to be lost on most app note
authors.

Consider another issue: stray capacitance between the PC2 output and
ground will get quickly charged up to the rail when the output is on,
then slowly discharge through the resistor in the filter. This leads
to another non-linearity in the phase detector characteristic.


If you want predicable performance, use a phase detector with a
current source output, such as the (pin-compatible) 9046.

Regards,
Allan
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top