What a mess!

Terry Given wrote:
<larkin attempts to devour chocolate replica of small furry creature>
A PIC would be the best solution here. Place 5000 SOIC8 PICs in a sock,
then thump the rabbit. If that doesnt work, program the PICs then try
again (1's weigh more than 0's).
Here is yet another good use for Windows XP. Put the rabbit inside the
case, near the pentium chip. Make sure the rabbit is standing in a
left-over coffee cup. Wait 10 minutes. Enjoy delicious chocolaty bunny
drink.

Regards,
Bob Monsen
 
Bob Monsen wrote:
Terry Given wrote:
larkin attempts to devour chocolate replica of small furry creature


A PIC would be the best solution here. Place 5000 SOIC8 PICs in a
sock, then thump the rabbit. If that doesnt work, program the PICs
then try again (1's weigh more than 0's).


Here is yet another good use for Windows XP. Put the rabbit inside the
case, near the pentium chip. Make sure the rabbit is standing in a
left-over coffee cup. Wait 10 minutes. Enjoy delicious chocolaty bunny
drink.

Regards,
Bob Monsen
ROTFLMAO!

Cheers
Terry
 
Frithiof Andreas Jensen wrote:.
He recently broke the hammer while installing XP ;-))

It must have been a Microsoft hammer! ;-)

--
Former professional electron wrangler.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:31:31 +0000, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

It must have been a Microsoft hammer! ;-)
Is that the sort with the wooden head and steel handle?

--
"Electricity is of two kinds, positive and negative. The difference
is, I presume, that one comes a little more expensive, but is more
durable; the other is a cheaper thing, but the moths get into it."
(Stephen Leacock)
 
Fred Abse wrote:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:31:31 +0000, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

It must have been a Microsoft hammer! ;-)

Is that the sort with the wooden head and steel handle?

Steel handle, C4 head. You only use it once! ;-)

--
Former professional electron wrangler.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:19:35 -0700, Chris Carlen
<crcarleRemoveThis@BOGUSsandia.gov> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

Still working on my manual, I need a chocolate fix. There's this nice
Joseph Schmitt chocolate bunny rabbit, left over from Easter, so

John, what do you think of Scharffenberger? I'm hooked on their 62%
bittersweet. I'll be mainlining it soon. Never tasted better chocolate.
I saw one of those yesterday at Tower Market, so tried it. Just a tad
too bitter for my taste, which is just as well since it cost almost
$5. The Lindt (Swiss) bittersweet (plain or hazelnut) tastes better to
me, and I can get them for $1.95. The black Tobler triangles are good,
too. We have a local guy here, Joseph Schmitt, that makes fabulous
truffles and turtles and stuff.

$5 chocolate is one habit I'd rather not cultivate!

Is chocolate a business expense?

John
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Fred Abse
<excretatauris@cerebrumconfus.it> wrote (in
<pan.2005.04.23.14.08.24.741057@cerebrumconfus.it>) about 'What a
mess!', on Sun, 24 Apr 2005:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:31:31 +0000, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

It must have been a Microsoft hammer! ;-)

Is that the sort with the wooden head and steel handle?
Of course. What else could 'software' mean?
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
There are two sides to every question, except
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote (in
<uqls615i1rslic8p6dcg295acgj8qbknci@4ax.com>) about 'What a mess!', on
Tue, 26 Apr 2005:

Is chocolate a business expense?
Maybe for young, accommodating women.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
There are two sides to every question, except
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:50:09 +0100, John Woodgate
<jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote (in
uqls615i1rslic8p6dcg295acgj8qbknci@4ax.com>) about 'What a mess!', on
Tue, 26 Apr 2005:

Is chocolate a business expense?

Maybe for young, accommodating women.

Darn. I don't like my women to be too young or too accommodating.

John
 
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:01:18 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:50:09 +0100, John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote (in
uqls615i1rslic8p6dcg295acgj8qbknci@4ax.com>) about 'What a mess!', on
Tue, 26 Apr 2005:

Is chocolate a business expense?

Maybe for young, accommodating women.


Darn. I don't like my women to be too young or too accommodating.
....and your wife? ;-)

--
Keith
> John
 
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:14:24 -0400, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:01:18 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:50:09 +0100, John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote (in
uqls615i1rslic8p6dcg295acgj8qbknci@4ax.com>) about 'What a mess!', on
Tue, 26 Apr 2005:

Is chocolate a business expense?

Maybe for young, accommodating women.


Darn. I don't like my women to be too young or too accommodating.

...and your wife? ;-)
Smart, tough, skinny, funny, feminine, and just a bit younger than me.
Makes lots of money, too, which is another esteemed characteristic in
a mate.

John
 
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:25:47 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:14:24 -0400, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:01:18 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:50:09 +0100, John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote (in
uqls615i1rslic8p6dcg295acgj8qbknci@4ax.com>) about 'What a mess!', on
Tue, 26 Apr 2005:

Is chocolate a business expense?

Maybe for young, accommodating women.


Darn. I don't like my women to be too young or too accommodating.

...and your wife? ;-)

Smart, tough, skinny, funny, feminine, and just a bit younger than me.
Makes lots of money, too, which is another esteemed characteristic in
a mate.
She's not too young? Somehow I doubt you've told her that she's old,
though I tell mine that all time. She is 5 months older than I. ;-)

She's not too accomodating? Well, I guess life's a bitch.

;-)

--
Keith
 
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:29:54 -0400, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:25:47 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:14:24 -0400, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:01:18 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:50:09 +0100, John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote (in
uqls615i1rslic8p6dcg295acgj8qbknci@4ax.com>) about 'What a mess!', on
Tue, 26 Apr 2005:

Is chocolate a business expense?

Maybe for young, accommodating women.


Darn. I don't like my women to be too young or too accommodating.

...and your wife? ;-)

Smart, tough, skinny, funny, feminine, and just a bit younger than me.
Makes lots of money, too, which is another esteemed characteristic in
a mate.

She's not too young? Somehow I doubt you've told her that she's old,

I tell her that she looks like she's 17, and that everybody assumes
that I'm her grandfather. That seems to go over well.

John
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top