Understanding Fuel Quantity indicating systems in large airc

J

Jeremy D. Grotte

Guest
I work B-52's, which use a DC fuel quantity indicating system, capacitance
sensing probes, indicators, wiring, C/B's, etc.etc.
I guess over the years, we've gotten so 'stupid' that now all we do is
troubleshoot down to bad parts and swap them out, and when that fails, we do
'swap-tronics' until it's fixed. Anyways, I want to learn more about this
type of indication system. So here goes...
I remember reading somewhere that the system sends a negative going DC
square wave pulse of 20v down the wires at 6200hz, 50% duty cycle, very low
current. So, I can assume that charges the capacitors (probes). The
indicator takes the pulse on the return line (reading the probes discharge?)
and does some 'magic' on it, and basically what you end up with would be
some sort of wheat-stone bridge type of circuit using phase-shift and
capacitors on the motor driven re-balance side instead of resistors and
motor driven re-balance resistors. The probes themselves have 3 wires going
to them, I assume a center, a positive return and a negative return, or a
ground of some sort, and on the circuit card attached to the probes are a
couple of diodes and resistors (if that helps anybody).
Am I even close on this subject? Does anybody have any better ideas on how
this works? I'm getting up in years in my career and need better info to
pass along to my youngsters just getting started in the job and of course,
knowing the guts of the system would sure help for troubleshooting. (i.e.
one leg open/shorted will cause the indicator to drive one way, the other
line open/shorted, drives the other way, etc.etc.)
JDG
 
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:02:01 -0600, "Jeremy D. Grotte"
<jdgrotte@ndak.net> wrote:

I work B-52's, which use a DC fuel quantity indicating system, capacitance
sensing probes, indicators, wiring, C/B's, etc.etc.
I guess over the years, we've gotten so 'stupid' that now all we do is
troubleshoot down to bad parts and swap them out, and when that fails, we do
'swap-tronics' until it's fixed. Anyways, I want to learn more about this
type of indication system. So here goes...
I remember reading somewhere that the system sends a negative going DC
square wave pulse of 20v down the wires at 6200hz, 50% duty cycle, very low
current. So, I can assume that charges the capacitors (probes). The
indicator takes the pulse on the return line (reading the probes discharge?)
and does some 'magic' on it, and basically what you end up with would be
some sort of wheat-stone bridge type of circuit using phase-shift and
capacitors on the motor driven re-balance side instead of resistors and
motor driven re-balance resistors. The probes themselves have 3 wires going
to them, I assume a center, a positive return and a negative return, or a
ground of some sort, and on the circuit card attached to the probes are a
couple of diodes and resistors (if that helps anybody).
Am I even close on this subject? Does anybody have any better ideas on how
this works? I'm getting up in years in my career and need better info to
pass along to my youngsters just getting started in the job and of course,
knowing the guts of the system would sure help for troubleshooting. (i.e.
one leg open/shorted will cause the indicator to drive one way, the other
line open/shorted, drives the other way, etc.etc.)
JDG
I worked with (not for) Simmonds Precision on a couple of fuel
measurement systems, and I got to see their standard capacitance
gauging stuff. They did, probably still do, lots of aircraft systems.
Their gauge was a coaxial probe, one pipe inside another with vent
holes to let the liquid in/out. They used a sinewave oscillator (at a
few KHz, as I recall) to poke a sinewave onto the outer tube. A cable
came back from the inner tube to the summing point of another opamp,
so the AC current induced to the inner electrode was measured, and
that's proportional to the capacitance between the outer and inner
pipes. The returned AC current is lowest when the tank is empty,
highest when the probe is full of fuel with its higher dielectric
constant. They did all this with ordinary IC opamps, with a bunch of
intrinsic-safety networks in the cables (resistors, fuses, zeners) to
ensure that no electronic failure could create a spark in the tank. It
was all very simple circuitry.

I interfaced their stuff to a PDP-11, measuring LNG in huge tanks on a
barge-mounted gas liquefaction plant in Indonesia. I calculated how
much LNG was in board, based on the shapes of the tanks and the roll
and pitch of the barge. Nasty work, in assembly language.

John
 
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:50:39 +0100, John Larkin wrote:

Nasty work, in assembly language.
But pretty damn' satisfying when it finally works the way you want it to.

What's a PDP-11? I hear people saying.

--
Then there's duct tape ...
(Garrison Keillor)
nofr@sbhevre.pbzchyvax.pb.hx
 
Fred Abse wrote:
What's a PDP-11? I hear people saying.

--
The son of a PDP-8, of course! ;-)
--


Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 19:42:36 +0100, Fred Abse
<excretatauris@cerebrumconfus.it> wrote:

What's a PDP-11? I hear people saying.
it's an old, big Digital Equipment computer.
Try a search on google.
bye

---------------------------------------
Saluti
<kranz2@libero.it.CUT.TH.IS>
"Speak softly and carry a big stick"
Theodore Roosvelt
IRAN libero!
 
On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 11:19:40 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

Its instruction set was as much beauty as 16 bits can contain.
I'm not an expert. I've only an idea of what was the PDP-11... :)
bye

---------------------------------------
Saluti
Paolo Squaratti <kranz2@libero.it.CUT.TH.IS>
"Speak softly and carry a big stick"
Theodore Roosvelt
 
On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 20:22:20 +0100, Fred Abse
<excretatauris@cerebrumconfus.it> wrote:

On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 15:00:38 +0100, PaoloS wrote:

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 19:42:36 +0100, Fred Abse
excretatauris@cerebrumconfus.it> wrote:

What's a PDP-11? I hear people saying.

it's an old, big Digital Equipment computer. Try a search on google. bye


I KNEW that! I was around when they were.

My point was: how many people reading this NG have ever heard of one?

It was an admittedly poor attempt at irony.
I worked around one in the 80's. It was part of a Teledon videotex
system. Now who has heard of that? If you have...did I spell Teledon
correctly? :)

Tom
 
Yes, the instruction set was beautiful because it was orthogonal.
I used to play around (software) with a PDP11/23 which was a PDP11 in a
DEC103 terminal chassis.

Dana Raymond

"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote in
message news:v20oivslffe5rhe9gmo8vgnm9dbh4smpu6@4ax.com...
On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 15:00:38 +0100, PaoloS
kranz2@libero.it.CUT.TH.IS> wrote:

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 19:42:36 +0100, Fred Abse
excretatauris@cerebrumconfus.it> wrote:

What's a PDP-11? I hear people saying.

it's an old, big Digital Equipment computer.
Try a search on google.
bye


Its instruction set was as much beauty as 16 bits can contain.

John
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top