Welcome Notice

Register Log in

Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad...

R

Ricketty C

Guest
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 2:52:24 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 4:59:37 PM UTC+11, Ricketty C wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 9:32:48 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 11:43:09 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 5:21:28 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 4:44:10 PM UTC-7, John Robertson wrote:
On 2020/10/14 4:30 p.m., whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 1:40:42 PM UTC-7, bloggs.fred...@gmail.com wrote:
This is pretty damning, and with plenty of additional corroboration from key players like the Ukraine prosecutor and Joe Biden himself, establishing authenticity.

What\'s \"damning\" about it? A father meets with his son, and is introduced to one of his son\'s colleagues?
Why would anyone care about that? It\'s just normal politeness, not a business or foreign
relations encounter.

snip

Moreover, what is interesting is the phone number Hunter concludes his email with, 202.333.1880. If you Google this number you will get just 4 hits, that\'s right, FOUR! Three of those are reverse phone number lookup services. Put that number into Firefox and you get many pages of hits, several of which are for Seneca Global Advisors, the law firm Hunter Biden works for. WHY is Google censoring this simple search???

Firefox is a web- browser. Google is a search engine that you can get at from any web-browser. Flyguy is too silly to realise that he needed to identify the search engine that his copy of Firefox had used. Presumably it is one that doesn\'t dealt with privacy issues as carefully as Google does.

One of the problems with the world-wide web is that it can be used by unscrupulous people to collect phone numbers and e-mails addresses that can be sold on to spammer to spread unwanted advertising very cheaply. Google has presumably put in editing to make this more difficult.

Google doesn\'t block phone numbers for privacy. It is giving higher priority to the scammy phone number lookups most likely because of payments. Not ads, which are reported as ads, but you can bribe Google to boost your search ranking.

Flyguys complaint was that he only got four hits out of Google and pages of hits from some other search engine which his copy of Firefox appears to rely on.

Google might adjust the order in which search results are presented if bribed to do it, but they\'d have to suppress a lot of search results to get them down from some pages to just four entries. Your hypothesis doesn\'t look all that useful.
You are right. It would seem the problem was the fly idiot not being able to use Google properly. I got over 1,700 hits with Rosemont Seneca right there on the first page. I guess the fly idiot doesn\'t know we use dashes in the US to break up phone numbers 202-333-1880 rather than periods.

--

Rick C.

-- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
F

Fred Bloggs

Guest
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 6:25:38 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:40:28 -0700 (PDT),
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com wrote:

This is pretty damning, and with plenty of additional corroboration from key players like the Ukraine prosecutor and Joe Biden himself, establishing authenticity.

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/
Oh, that\'s just Joe being Joe.
Makes no difference anyway. About 50% of votes have already been cast in a bunch of states. And most of them have been for Biden. This probably explains the fake USPS scandal to suppress the vote manufactured by the Democrats, to get people to vote early. They saw this coming. Then Biden will drop dead sometime in 2021 and Harris will become president which is what they wanted all along.
 
J

John Larkin

Guest
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:09:15 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 6:25:38 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:40:28 -0700 (PDT),
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com wrote:

This is pretty damning, and with plenty of additional corroboration from key players like the Ukraine prosecutor and Joe Biden himself, establishing authenticity.

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/
Oh, that\'s just Joe being Joe.

Makes no difference anyway. About 50% of votes have already been cast in a bunch of states. And most of them have been for Biden. This probably explains the fake USPS scandal to suppress the vote manufactured by the Democrats, to get people to vote early. They saw this coming. Then Biden will drop dead sometime in 2021 and Harris will become president which is what they wanted all along.
People who are afraid to vote in person are mostly Democrats, namely
Biden voters. So mail-ins will lean left.

The polls are wrong because lefties are people-people who like to talk
about themselves. They answer pollsters. Conservative-libertarians
want to be left alone so they hang up.
 
R

Ricketty C

Guest
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 3:09:22 PM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 6:25:38 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:40:28 -0700 (PDT),
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com wrote:

This is pretty damning, and with plenty of additional corroboration from key players like the Ukraine prosecutor and Joe Biden himself, establishing authenticity.

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/
Oh, that\'s just Joe being Joe.

Makes no difference anyway. About 50% of votes have already been cast in a bunch of states. And most of them have been for Biden. This probably explains the fake USPS scandal to suppress the vote manufactured by the Democrats, to get people to vote early. They saw this coming. Then Biden will drop dead sometime in 2021 and Harris will become president which is what they wanted all along.
A vote having been cast is not the same as having been counted.

There\'s many a slip \'twixt cup and lip.

--

Rick C.

-+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
B

Bill Sloman

Guest
On Friday, October 16, 2020 at 6:09:22 AM UTC+11, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 6:25:38 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:40:28 -0700 (PDT),
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com wrote:

This is pretty damning, and with plenty of additional corroboration from key players like the Ukraine prosecutor and Joe Biden himself, establishing authenticity.

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/
Oh, that\'s just Joe being Joe.
Makes no difference anyway. About 50% of votes have already been cast in a bunch of states. And most of them have been for Biden. This probably explains the fake USPS scandal to suppress the vote manufactured by the Democrats, to get people to vote early. They saw this coming. Then Biden will drop dead sometime in 2021 and Harris will become president which is what they wanted all along.
Fred Bloggs does seem to need a better crystal ball. Biden is unlikely to drop dead in 2021 - it could happen, but healthy 78-year-olds don\'t drop dead all that frequently.

https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html

says that his probability of death - as a US male of that age - in that year would be 0.047826. He\'s college-educated, and well off so the real number is going to be lower.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
F

Flyguy

Guest
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 11:52:24 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 4:59:37 PM UTC+11, Ricketty C wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 9:32:48 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 11:43:09 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 5:21:28 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 4:44:10 PM UTC-7, John Robertson wrote:
On 2020/10/14 4:30 p.m., whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 1:40:42 PM UTC-7, bloggs.fred...@gmail.com wrote:
This is pretty damning, and with plenty of additional corroboration from key players like the Ukraine prosecutor and Joe Biden himself, establishing authenticity.

What\'s \"damning\" about it? A father meets with his son, and is introduced to one of his son\'s colleagues?
Why would anyone care about that? It\'s just normal politeness, not a business or foreign
relations encounter.

snip

Moreover, what is interesting is the phone number Hunter concludes his email with, 202.333.1880. If you Google this number you will get just 4 hits, that\'s right, FOUR! Three of those are reverse phone number lookup services. Put that number into Firefox and you get many pages of hits, several of which are for Seneca Global Advisors, the law firm Hunter Biden works for. WHY is Google censoring this simple search???

Firefox is a web- browser. Google is a search engine that you can get at from any web-browser. Flyguy is too silly to realise that he needed to identify the search engine that his copy of Firefox had used. Presumably it is one that doesn\'t dealt with privacy issues as carefully as Google does.

One of the problems with the world-wide web is that it can be used by unscrupulous people to collect phone numbers and e-mails addresses that can be sold on to spammer to spread unwanted advertising very cheaply. Google has presumably put in editing to make this more difficult.

Google doesn\'t block phone numbers for privacy. It is giving higher priority to the scammy phone number lookups most likely because of payments. Not ads, which are reported as ads, but you can bribe Google to boost your search ranking.

Flyguys complaint was that he only got four hits out of Google and pages of hits from some other search engine which his copy of Firefox appears to rely on.

Google might adjust the order in which search results are presented if bribed to do it, but they\'d have to suppress a lot of search results to get them down from some pages to just four entries. Your hypothesis doesn\'t look all that useful.

--
SL0W MAN, Sydney
Hey SL0W MAN, your \"hypothesis\" is BULLSHIT. Google is suppressing a simple search for political purposes, SURPRISE!
 
B

Bill Sloman

Guest
On Friday, October 16, 2020 at 2:29:20 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 11:52:24 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 4:59:37 PM UTC+11, Ricketty C wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 9:32:48 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 11:43:09 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 5:21:28 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 4:44:10 PM UTC-7, John Robertson wrote:
On 2020/10/14 4:30 p.m., whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 1:40:42 PM UTC-7, bloggs.fred...@gmail.com wrote:
This is pretty damning, and with plenty of additional corroboration from key players like the Ukraine prosecutor and Joe Biden himself, establishing authenticity.

What\'s \"damning\" about it? A father meets with his son, and is introduced to one of his son\'s colleagues?
Why would anyone care about that? It\'s just normal politeness, not a business or foreign
relations encounter.

snip

Moreover, what is interesting is the phone number Hunter concludes his email with, 202.333.1880. If you Google this number you will get just 4 hits, that\'s right, FOUR! Three of those are reverse phone number lookup services. Put that number into Firefox and you get many pages of hits, several of which are for Seneca Global Advisors, the law firm Hunter Biden works for. WHY is Google censoring this simple search???

Firefox is a web- browser. Google is a search engine that you can get at from any web-browser. Flyguy is too silly to realise that he needed to identify the search engine that his copy of Firefox had used. Presumably it is one that doesn\'t dealt with privacy issues as carefully as Google does.

One of the problems with the world-wide web is that it can be used by unscrupulous people to collect phone numbers and e-mails addresses that can be sold on to spammer to spread unwanted advertising very cheaply. Google has presumably put in editing to make this more difficult.

Google doesn\'t block phone numbers for privacy. It is giving higher priority to the scammy phone number lookups most likely because of payments. Not ads, which are reported as ads, but you can bribe Google to boost your search ranking.

Flyguys complaint was that he only got four hits out of Google and pages of hits from some other search engine which his copy of Firefox appears to rely on.

Google might adjust the order in which search results are presented if bribed to do it, but they\'d have to suppress a lot of search results to get them down from some pages to just four entries. Your hypothesis doesn\'t look all that useful.


Your \"hypothesis\" is BULLSHIT. Google is suppressing a simple search for political purposes, SURPRISE!
When Rick C. did the same search with Google, he got the same multiple pages of output from Google as you got from whatever search engine your copy of Firefox is set up to use. This falsifies out my privacy hypothesis.

Rick C.\'s hypothesis is that you are an incompetent idiot who didn\'t format the phone number in your search string correctly. This is a lot more plausible than my hypothesis, and a great deal more plausible than your hypothesis that Google is editing search results for political purposes. I should have thought of it for myself - I do keep pointing out that you are an incompetent idiot, but I don\'t seem to have a proper idea of quite how incompetent you are.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
S

server

Guest
On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 4:40:42 PM UTC-4, bloggs.fre...@gmail.com wrote:
This is pretty damning, and with plenty of additional corroboration from key players like the Ukraine prosecutor and Joe Biden himself, establishing authenticity.

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/
There are more reports all over the place and this isn\'t necessarily
the best example, but yes, the nut is that Biden\'s family has been in
the business of selling access to his office, for their personal gain.

Here\'s Hunter, selling \'introductions\' for millions--

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8842965/Hunter-Biden-pursued-deals-interesting-family-major-Chinese-firm.html

And of course Hunter got $85k/month from Burisma for three (?) years,
just for being fabulous.

Cheers,
James Arthur
 
W

whit3rd

Guest
On Friday, October 16, 2020 at 3:24:43 PM UTC-7, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:

And of course Hunter got $85k/month from Burisma for three (?) years,
just for being fabulous.
Well, yeah, that\'s possible. If there\'s a possibility of suspicion, it might
help attract investors to have someone on the board of directors who is well-known.
The knowledge that a well-connected American has access to the company
books might open some US investors\' checkbooks.

Nelson Mandela held a few board positions.
 
S

server

Guest
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:24:36 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:

On Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 4:40:42 PM UTC-4, bloggs.fre...@gmail.com wrote:
This is pretty damning, and with plenty of additional corroboration from key players like the Ukraine prosecutor and Joe Biden himself, establishing authenticity.

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/


There are more reports all over the place and this isn\'t necessarily
the best example, but yes, the nut is that Biden\'s family has been in
the business of selling access to his office, for their personal gain.

Here\'s Hunter, selling \'introductions\' for millions--

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8842965/Hunter-Biden-pursued-deals-interesting-family-major-Chinese-firm.html

And of course Hunter got $85k/month from Burisma for three (?) years,
just for being fabulous.

Cheers,
James Arthur
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/oct/15/hunter-biden-demanded-chinese-billionaire-pay-10-m/


“It’s really hard. But don’t worry unlike Pop I won’t make you give me
half your salary.”




--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

Science teaches us to doubt.

Claude Bernard
 
W

whit3rd

Guest
On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 9:48:17 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

> https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...

Oh, get a clue! The Washington Times isn\'t a real news outlet, it\'s an
organ of the Moonies and suitable for wrapping fish.
 
S

server

Guest
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:51:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 9:48:17 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...

Oh, get a clue! The Washington Times isn\'t a real news outlet, it\'s an
organ of the Moonies and suitable for wrapping fish.
Do you think Hunter didn\'t send that? That it\'s fake? What if the Wash
Times published Newton\'s Laws of motion? Would you then call them
fake?

The New York Times would never publish anything like this. They are
crudely anti-Trump, all the time, every page.

The news is so polarized, there is no honest middle. To see what\'s
actually happening, you have to look at both sides and guess about
what might be true.

It\'s sad that we can\'t trust journalists or news sources any more, to
do objective research for us. We can\'t even trust scientists.





--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

Science teaches us to doubt.

Claude Bernard
 
J

John Robertson

Guest
On 2020/10/17 12:13 p.m., jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:51:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 9:48:17 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...

....

The New York Times would never publish anything like this. They are
crudely anti-Trump, all the time, every page.

The news is so polarized, there is no honest middle. To see what\'s
actually happening, you have to look at both sides and guess about
what might be true.

It\'s sad that we can\'t trust journalists or news sources any more, to
do objective research for us. We can\'t even trust scientists.
The New York Times publishes periodic opinion letters and columnists who
praise Trump, or at least something he did.

Not near as many as the letters and columnists who don\'t care for the
man I admit, but not entirely one-sided reporting as is claimed by some...

John :-#)#
 
U

Uwe Bonnes

Guest
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:51:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 9:48:17 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...

Oh, get a clue! The Washington Times isn\'t a real news outlet, it\'s an
organ of the Moonies and suitable for wrapping fish.

Do you think Hunter didn\'t send that? That it\'s fake? What if the Wash
Times published Newton\'s Laws of motion? Would you then call them
fake?

The New York Times would never publish anything like this. They are
crudely anti-Trump, all the time, every page.

The news is so polarized, there is no honest middle. To see what\'s
actually happening, you have to look at both sides and guess about
what might be true.

It\'s sad that we can\'t trust journalists or news sources any more, to
do objective research for us. We can\'t even trust scientists.
Could you please take this thread to a more appropriate group?
--
Uwe Bonnes bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de

Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 1623569 ------- Fax. 06151 1623305 ---------
 
S

server

Guest
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 12:24:31 -0700, John Robertson <spam@flippers.com>
wrote:

On 2020/10/17 12:13 p.m., jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:51:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 9:48:17 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...

...

The New York Times would never publish anything like this. They are
crudely anti-Trump, all the time, every page.

The news is so polarized, there is no honest middle. To see what\'s
actually happening, you have to look at both sides and guess about
what might be true.

It\'s sad that we can\'t trust journalists or news sources any more, to
do objective research for us. We can\'t even trust scientists.



The New York Times publishes periodic opinion letters and columnists who
praise Trump, or at least something he did.

Not near as many as the letters and columnists who don\'t care for the
man I admit, but not entirely one-sided reporting as is claimed by some...

John :-#)#
I get the NY Times, because Mo likes it.

It is crudely anti-Trump on virtully every page, usually several times
per page. Every section. Formerly respected journalists just make up
juvenile, snarky insults. I can\'t recall any pro-T letters to the
editor, and maybe two articles in the last six months.

Not only bad journalism, but boring.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

Science teaches us to doubt.

Claude Bernard
 
S

server

Guest
On 17 Oct 2020 19:24:50 GMT, Uwe Bonnes
<bon@hertz.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:51:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 9:48:17 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...

Oh, get a clue! The Washington Times isn\'t a real news outlet, it\'s an
organ of the Moonies and suitable for wrapping fish.

Do you think Hunter didn\'t send that? That it\'s fake? What if the Wash
Times published Newton\'s Laws of motion? Would you then call them
fake?

The New York Times would never publish anything like this. They are
crudely anti-Trump, all the time, every page.

The news is so polarized, there is no honest middle. To see what\'s
actually happening, you have to look at both sides and guess about
what might be true.

It\'s sad that we can\'t trust journalists or news sources any more, to
do objective research for us. We can\'t even trust scientists.


Could you please take this thread to a more appropriate group?
I don\'t know how to transport a thread. Can you do it for us?

It is sad that we don\'t have objective journalism, or objective
science, any more.

Fortunately, the kind of science that EEs need is not (yet) distorted
by politics.

Have you designed anything cool lately? Show us.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

Science teaches us to doubt.

Claude Bernard
 
W

whit3rd

Guest
On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 12:13:59 PM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:51:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 9:48:17 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...

Oh, get a clue! The Washington Times isn\'t a real news outlet, it\'s an
organ of the Moonies and suitable for wrapping fish.

Do you think Hunter didn\'t send that? That it\'s fake? What if the Wash
Times published Newton\'s Laws of motion? Would you then call them
fake?
I won\'t trust a Washington Times article; on Newton\'s laws, I\'ve studied and worked in
lecture demonstrations of those. No publication can match that.


...
The news is so polarized, there is no honest middle. To see what\'s
actually happening, you have to look at both sides and guess about
what might be true.
Liar. On the laws of physics, there are no \'both sides\' available, but there
ARE observations. What is in a computer, is PLACED in a computer, and
not always by the first guy you think. We know Burisma was hacked by
Russians, for instance, and deep-faking isn\'t the only way to falsify
a message. Where exactly DID the laptop come from? Could it
be accepted as evidence in court?

Could it be falsified? Hell, yes.

It\'s sad that we can\'t trust journalists or news sources any more, to
do objective research for us. We can\'t even trust scientists.

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

Science teaches us to doubt.
Where\'s your doubt? Anyone quoting from the Washington Times does have a
doubt deficiency. You\'re much too credulous for your own welfare.
 
R

Ricketty C

Guest
On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 6:02:01 PM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 12:13:59 PM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:51:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 9:48:17 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...

Oh, get a clue! The Washington Times isn\'t a real news outlet, it\'s an
organ of the Moonies and suitable for wrapping fish.

Do you think Hunter didn\'t send that? That it\'s fake? What if the Wash
Times published Newton\'s Laws of motion? Would you then call them
fake?

I won\'t trust a Washington Times article; on Newton\'s laws, I\'ve studied and worked in
lecture demonstrations of those. No publication can match that.


...
The news is so polarized, there is no honest middle. To see what\'s
actually happening, you have to look at both sides and guess about
what might be true.

Liar. On the laws of physics, there are no \'both sides\' available, but there
ARE observations. What is in a computer, is PLACED in a computer, and
not always by the first guy you think. We know Burisma was hacked by
Russians, for instance, and deep-faking isn\'t the only way to falsify
a message. Where exactly DID the laptop come from? Could it
be accepted as evidence in court?

Could it be falsified? Hell, yes.

It\'s sad that we can\'t trust journalists or news sources any more, to
do objective research for us. We can\'t even trust scientists.

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

Science teaches us to doubt.

Where\'s your doubt? Anyone quoting from the Washington Times does have a
doubt deficiency. You\'re much too credulous for your own welfare.
The whole Hunter Biden thing is BS independent of the source because it shows nothing about Joe Biden, only Hunter Biden.

I\'m happy to look at evidence of wrong doing by anyone. But I\'m not going to try to pin something one person has done on someone else. If we want to play that game, the Trumps would all end up in jail.

--

Rick C.

+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
S

server

Guest
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 15:01:55 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 12:13:59 PM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:51:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 9:48:17 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...

Oh, get a clue! The Washington Times isn\'t a real news outlet, it\'s an
organ of the Moonies and suitable for wrapping fish.

Do you think Hunter didn\'t send that? That it\'s fake? What if the Wash
Times published Newton\'s Laws of motion? Would you then call them
fake?

I won\'t trust a Washington Times article; on Newton\'s laws, I\'ve studied and worked in
lecture demonstrations of those. No publication can match that.


...
The news is so polarized, there is no honest middle. To see what\'s
actually happening, you have to look at both sides and guess about
what might be true.

Liar.
Gosh, you are obnoxious.

Bye.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

Science teaches us to doubt.

Claude Bernard
 
R

Ricketty C

Guest
On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 6:17:14 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 15:01:55 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 12:13:59 PM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:51:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 9:48:17 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...

Oh, get a clue! The Washington Times isn\'t a real news outlet, it\'s an
organ of the Moonies and suitable for wrapping fish.

Do you think Hunter didn\'t send that? That it\'s fake? What if the Wash
Times published Newton\'s Laws of motion? Would you then call them
fake?

I won\'t trust a Washington Times article; on Newton\'s laws, I\'ve studied and worked in
lecture demonstrations of those. No publication can match that.


...
The news is so polarized, there is no honest middle. To see what\'s
actually happening, you have to look at both sides and guess about
what might be true.

Liar.

Gosh, you are obnoxious.
That may be your perception, but it doesn\'t make him wrong.

--

Rick C.

++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
Toggle Sidebar

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top