Guest
On Jun 13, 6:37 am, Neal <nealcr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Integration and has been around for at least 20 years. A Wikipedia
article on wafer scale integration can be found at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wafer-scale_integration. It states "The
vast majority of the cost of fabrication (typically 30%-50%) is
related to testing and packaging the individual chips. Further cost is
associated with connecting the chips into an integrated system
(usually via a printed circuit board). Wafer-scale integration seeks
to reduce this cost, as well as improve performance, by building
larger chips in a single package in principle, chips as large as a
full wafer.
Of course this is not easy, since given the flaws on the wafers a
single large design printed onto a wafer would almost always not work.
It has been an ongoing goal to develop methods to handle faulty areas
of the wafers through logic, as opposed to sawing them out of the
wafer. Generally, this approach uses a grid pattern of sub-circuits
and "rewires" around the damaged areas using appropriate logic. If the
resulting wafer has enough working sub-circuits, it can be used
despite faults."
This wikipedia article also states "Wafer-scale integration, WSI for
short, is a yet-unused system of building very-large integrated
circuit networks that use an entire silicon wafer to produce a single
"super-chip". Through a combination of large size and reduced
packaging, WSI could lead to dramatically reduced costs for some
systems, notably massively parallel supercomputers."
The following abstract from http://www.springerlink.com/content/xg4r721l1hxl4r78/.
states
Alessandro Zorat1, 2
(1) Department of Computer Science, State University of New York at
Stony Brook, 11794 Stony Brook, New York, USA
(2) Present address: Istituto di Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica,
Loc. Pantč di Povo, 38050 Trento, Italy
Received: 25 July 1986
Abstract With the advent of wafer-scale integration (WSI), the
placement of several processors on a single VLSI wafer is becoming a
realistic possibility. To avoid the problems of a very low yield
inherent in any silicon component of (very) large area, redundant
components will be used.
In this article we examine three different solutions for reconnecting
the nonfaulty processors so that the resulting network is a square
grid. We then present results of simulations for various percentages
of faulty processors, which show that a small amount of redundancy is
the interprocessors paths and a simple back-track based algorithm can
produce a resulting grid that, while not necessarily optimal, includes
most of the nonfaulty processors.
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation, under
grants ECS-80-25376 and ECS-83-05195."
The technique described in the proposal is also known as Wafer ScaleOn Jun 12, 1:26 pm, iajzens...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
The IBM Roadrunner Supercomputer, with Petaflop capacity can be scaled
down in size and power consumption to
desktop form factor by expanding the size of the standard microchip to
that of a full 12 inch silicon wafer. Network
all the processing cores and memory on the wafer together, with
infiniband or optics or other technologies, and you have a system of
systems on a very large silicon chip which is silicon wafer size. If
this does not provide enough processing power, any number of the
silicon wafers with the networked processor cores can be stacked
vertically and
networked together. Power supply and heat dissipation will have to be
dealt with. The design can be optimised
using electronic design automation software, soft computing and
computational intelligence technologies. Thus,
you can produce petaflop processors in desktop form factor. This can
be called MacroProcessors on MacroChips.
Ian Martin Ajzenszmidt
One question... what are your thoughts on yield for such a proposal?
Neal- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Integration and has been around for at least 20 years. A Wikipedia
article on wafer scale integration can be found at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wafer-scale_integration. It states "The
vast majority of the cost of fabrication (typically 30%-50%) is
related to testing and packaging the individual chips. Further cost is
associated with connecting the chips into an integrated system
(usually via a printed circuit board). Wafer-scale integration seeks
to reduce this cost, as well as improve performance, by building
larger chips in a single package in principle, chips as large as a
full wafer.
Of course this is not easy, since given the flaws on the wafers a
single large design printed onto a wafer would almost always not work.
It has been an ongoing goal to develop methods to handle faulty areas
of the wafers through logic, as opposed to sawing them out of the
wafer. Generally, this approach uses a grid pattern of sub-circuits
and "rewires" around the damaged areas using appropriate logic. If the
resulting wafer has enough working sub-circuits, it can be used
despite faults."
This wikipedia article also states "Wafer-scale integration, WSI for
short, is a yet-unused system of building very-large integrated
circuit networks that use an entire silicon wafer to produce a single
"super-chip". Through a combination of large size and reduced
packaging, WSI could lead to dramatically reduced costs for some
systems, notably massively parallel supercomputers."
The following abstract from http://www.springerlink.com/content/xg4r721l1hxl4r78/.
states
Alessandro Zorat1, 2
(1) Department of Computer Science, State University of New York at
Stony Brook, 11794 Stony Brook, New York, USA
(2) Present address: Istituto di Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica,
Loc. Pantč di Povo, 38050 Trento, Italy
Received: 25 July 1986
Abstract With the advent of wafer-scale integration (WSI), the
placement of several processors on a single VLSI wafer is becoming a
realistic possibility. To avoid the problems of a very low yield
inherent in any silicon component of (very) large area, redundant
components will be used.
In this article we examine three different solutions for reconnecting
the nonfaulty processors so that the resulting network is a square
grid. We then present results of simulations for various percentages
of faulty processors, which show that a small amount of redundancy is
the interprocessors paths and a simple back-track based algorithm can
produce a resulting grid that, while not necessarily optimal, includes
most of the nonfaulty processors.
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation, under
grants ECS-80-25376 and ECS-83-05195."