RoHS just a thought

  • Thread starter greenplanetsolutions@gmai
  • Start date
G

greenplanetsolutions@gmai

Guest
Hello

I operate an industrial surplus reuse store site called
reusestore.com. We deal with a lot of older obsolete parts. I also run
a company called Green Planet Solutions inc. We specialize in WEEE and
RoHS directives and engineering support. (www.atotalgps.com)

One of the reasons why I wanted to write in this message board is to
share some information with every one as are part of the data
collection on what we are seeing and some thing to think about.

When RoHS and WEE were first introduced to our clients here in the US
we saw a tendency to have a knee jerk reaction. Some clients wanted to
buy up as many old leaded parts as they could while they tried to
cross over to totally lead free products and processes.

While this can be a good plan it can damage you greatly also.

One of the first problems, among hundreds of others, is that when you
buy up older leaded components you have no idea if your states local
EPA laws will be changed and effect the use of your now thousands of
dollars worth of store leaded components.

Take for instance California EPA local prop 65. Certain fire
retardants that are found in some electronic component packages are
now deemed illegal for use in this state.

Others like cadmium, among other materials, are not only restricted
from use in the EU, but now the US is starting to adopt the EU RoHS
regulations.

Most components that are not RoHS compliant will not be able to be
sold into the market in new products.

Most of our stock in our reusestore.com is only slated to be used as
replacement parts for products put on to the market before Jan 2006.

In most cases we research the components to see if they are higher in
the levels and then we send them to the proper recycling channels.

My worry I think here is, that in most cases, companies are putting
off this effort to change over to RoHS compliancy until the very last
moment where they could get caught in the local EPA laws cross fire.

What do you think?

Mike Dolbow
 
"greenplanetsolutions@gmail.com"
<greenplanetsolutions@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1181878705.910941.87530@o11g2000prd.googlegroups.com:

Hello

I operate an industrial surplus reuse store site called
reusestore.com. We deal with a lot of older obsolete parts.
I also run a company called Green Planet Solutions inc. We
specialize in WEEE and RoHS directives and engineering
support. (www.atotalgps.com)

One of the reasons why I wanted to write in this message
board is to share some information with every one as are
part of the data collection on what we are seeing and some
thing to think about.

When RoHS and WEE were first introduced to our clients here
in the US we saw a tendency to have a knee jerk reaction.
Some clients wanted to buy up as many old leaded parts as
they could while they tried to cross over to totally lead
free products and processes.

While this can be a good plan it can damage you greatly
also.

One of the first problems, among hundreds of others, is
that when you buy up older leaded components you have no
idea if your states local EPA laws will be changed and
effect the use of your now thousands of dollars worth of
store leaded components.

Take for instance California EPA local prop 65. Certain
fire retardants that are found in some electronic component
packages are now deemed illegal for use in this state.

Others like cadmium, among other materials, are not only
restricted from use in the EU, but now the US is starting
to adopt the EU RoHS regulations.

Most components that are not RoHS compliant will not be
able to be sold into the market in new products.

Most of our stock in our reusestore.com is only slated to
be used as replacement parts for products put on to the
market before Jan 2006.

In most cases we research the components to see if they are
higher in the levels and then we send them to the proper
recycling channels.

My worry I think here is, that in most cases, companies are
putting off this effort to change over to RoHS compliancy
until the very last moment where they could get caught in
the local EPA laws cross fire.

What do you think?

Mike Dolbow
I think it is not hard enough to need any kind of engineering
consultancy to help with ROHS/WEEE. Just keep up with the regs
and treat it as any other risk management exercise. This is
not relevant though in Australia for domestic manufacturing,
only in the USA is this an issue for state by state issues.

No knee jerk here, we have years to comply with our industry
sector, and yes, we have hoarded some leaded parts.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top