R
R. Steve Walz
Guest
Rich The Philosophizer wrote:
educated.
defective mathematical background. Anyone who understands Theory
of Science knows you flunked the course.
"Agenda" of yours be?? Sounds politically paranoid to me.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
No, all THAT proves is that the ignorant can, for a time, outnumber the{Re:Smoking]
Why do you think that everybody seems to believe these studies?
For the same reason so many people seem to think George W. Bush is
the best thing since Abe Lincoln.
---------------------------
educated.
You clearly do not understand statistical causation and have aAlso, do you smoke? Is it possible that you are attempting to
rationalize your habit?
Of course not.
The blamers miss one very important fact:
If smoking _caused_ cancer, not only would there be no smoker
who ever escaped, but there would be no non-smoker who ever
got cancer.
-------------------------------
defective mathematical background. Anyone who understands Theory
of Science knows you flunked the course.
Nor does it have to be for smoking to cause disease.And that simply is not true.
-----------------------------
If it were not true, praytell, what in the world would this imaginaryBut they've never let the truth get in the way of their agenda.
Good Luck!
Rich
--------------------------
"Agenda" of yours be?? Sounds politically paranoid to me.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public