P
Pomegranate Bastard
Guest
On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 00:25:08 +0100, Cursitor Doom
<curd@notformail.com> wrote:
You are an utter imbecile.
<curd@notformail.com> wrote:
You are an utter imbecile.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Sunday, September 27, 2020 at 9:31:09 PM UTC+10, Pomegranate Bastard wrote:
<snip>
Not entirely true. He\'s definitely ill-informed, and susceptible to particularly fatuous right-wing propaganda. but if he were an utter imbecile he\'d be slightly less irritating.
If what he posted was merely stupid, he\'d be a nuisance, but there\'s an unpleasant streak of malice which makes him even less attractive.
It takes particularly foolish arrogance to let him declare that \"time-wasting trolls aren\'t welcome here\" when he\'s a decidedly unpleasant example of the breed who is in no position to speak for the group as a whole (not that anybody else is either - it\'s an un-moderated group and includes a very wide range of people, though few as persistently obnoxious as he is).
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 00:25:08 +0100, Cursitor Doom
cu...@notformail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 19:12:42 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:53:37 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:58:22 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:55:21 -0700, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:36:25 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:02:01 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:08:51 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:40:24 -0700, jla...@highlandsniptechnology..com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:28:46 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:02:11 -0700, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:56:06 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:32:28 +0100, Cursitor Doom
cu...@notformail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:
<snip>
Oh, and one more thing: <*PLONK*
Time wasting trolls are not welcome here.
You are an utter imbecile.
Not entirely true. He\'s definitely ill-informed, and susceptible to particularly fatuous right-wing propaganda. but if he were an utter imbecile he\'d be slightly less irritating.
If what he posted was merely stupid, he\'d be a nuisance, but there\'s an unpleasant streak of malice which makes him even less attractive.
It takes particularly foolish arrogance to let him declare that \"time-wasting trolls aren\'t welcome here\" when he\'s a decidedly unpleasant example of the breed who is in no position to speak for the group as a whole (not that anybody else is either - it\'s an un-moderated group and includes a very wide range of people, though few as persistently obnoxious as he is).
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
W
whit3rd
Guest
On Sunday, September 27, 2020 at 9:11:58 AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
> The people in U.S. actually do not vote for the presidential candidates. They vote for the electors in their state of residence, and that is where their influence ends- THANK GOD.
The people DO vote for the presidential candidates; those are the only names that are on the
ballots that are cast. The intermediate electors are a vestigial relic, it seemed like a good idea
when an election might be interrupted by an invasion.
>...There is no such thing as a popular vote and that so-called tally is fake.
False, misleading, and \'not a small-state favoring biased result\' would be much closer to correct than \'fake\'.
This initiative is a counteragent that some favor <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact>
>People too stupid to understand this shouldn\'t be allowed to vote.
By \'too stupid to understand\', you mean anyone who disagrees with you?
>...The mob is going to get its way this time,
That\'s a normal expectation in a ballot-based democracy
>...electing a demented
False; clearly an election-runup lie
>... lifelong crook to office, Biden.
Long-serving politician, never accused, nor indicted for anything, except in the fevered imagination
of some opposition tricksters. Methinks someone believes too much in lies. What\'s your take
on Obama\'s birth certificate?
> The people in U.S. actually do not vote for the presidential candidates. They vote for the electors in their state of residence, and that is where their influence ends- THANK GOD.
The people DO vote for the presidential candidates; those are the only names that are on the
ballots that are cast. The intermediate electors are a vestigial relic, it seemed like a good idea
when an election might be interrupted by an invasion.
>...There is no such thing as a popular vote and that so-called tally is fake.
False, misleading, and \'not a small-state favoring biased result\' would be much closer to correct than \'fake\'.
This initiative is a counteragent that some favor <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact>
>People too stupid to understand this shouldn\'t be allowed to vote.
By \'too stupid to understand\', you mean anyone who disagrees with you?
>...The mob is going to get its way this time,
That\'s a normal expectation in a ballot-based democracy
>...electing a demented
False; clearly an election-runup lie
>... lifelong crook to office, Biden.
Long-serving politician, never accused, nor indicted for anything, except in the fevered imagination
of some opposition tricksters. Methinks someone believes too much in lies. What\'s your take
on Obama\'s birth certificate?
P
Pomegranate Bastard
Guest
On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 20:30:40 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
Remember that old saying, Bill? \"A pig-ignorant far-right thicko and
his money are soon parted.\"
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2020 at 9:25:16 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 19:12:42 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:53:37 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:58:22 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:55:21 -0700, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:36:25 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:02:01 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:08:51 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:40:24 -0700, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:28:46 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:02:11 -0700, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:56:06 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:32:28 +0100, Cursitor Doom
cu...@notformail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:
OK, I will ignore you. All you do is cackle anyhow.
Thank goodness for that. I can\'t say I\'ll miss you.
Now fuck off.
John has over the last 25 years or so been one of the most valued
contributors here so WTH are you, an obvious TROLL, to tell him or
anyone else here to fuck off?
John Larkin has been one of the most prolific contributors here for more than twenty years. The idea that he might be a valued contributor - let alone one of the most valued contributors - is a stretch.
Since Cursitor Doom is a pig-ignorant twit, with a habit of posting links to the dimmest kind of right-wing propaganda, his endorsement isn\'t exactly valuable.
You called me an imbecile for my remarks about the level of CO2 in the
atmosphere. I went to a massive amount of trouble and expense to
acquire reputable, accredited sources of information in physical print
form going right back to the closing years of the 19th C. in an effort
to establish whether the persistent whinings of climate alarmists like
Greta Thunberg and Al Gore were in any way justified. They were not.
Sadly. you don\'t seem to have gone to the trouble of acquiring the scientific training that would have revealed that what got published about CO2 levels at the end of the 19th century wasn\'t all that informative. Ice-core data dug up more recently (and processed with much better tools than were around at the end of the 19th century) have made it clear that the published data wasn\'t worth publishing.
Not even remotely. The level of atmospheric CO2 has remained largely
constant at ~380ppm since 1898, despite that 122 year period seeing
the advent of the motor car and the huge growth of carbon-intensive
mass manufacturing the world has ever seen.
This is based on very few measurements down inside laboratories being heated by coal fires. Ice core data reflects the sate of the atmosphere over
Greenland and the Antarctic when the snow was falling. It\'s a whole lot more informative.
I\'m not pointing this out
for YOUR benefit because YOU are a troll and *no amount of evidence*
will ever disabuse you of your ignorance, but there will be others
with open minds reading this who will derive some benefit from it and
perhaps even pursue their own studies of the matter to eliminate any
doubt whatsoever in their minds as to who is the real imbecile here.
It\'s Curstor Doom - there\'s no doubt about that. What\'s truly imbecilic is his claim that he had to go to any trouble ofr expense to find journal articles from the end of the 19th century. University libraries have bound journals going back that , and you can consult them for free, and copy the relevant pages on their xerox machines remarkably cheaply.
Remember that old saying, Bill? \"A pig-ignorant far-right thicko and
his money are soon parted.\"
In reality he\'s almost certainly relying on denialist propaganda which has done all this kind of work for him.
Oh, and one more thing: <*PLONK*
Time wasting trolls are not welcome here.
And Cursitor Doom is a classical example of the breed.
S
stratus46
Guest
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 1:28:37 PM UTC-7, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
If the senate was DEMOCRAT when Obama (DEMOCRAT) was president, Garland would have been in in a heartbeat. If the president and senate are the same party, it can happen fast. There is nothing in the constitution to prevent this so stop spouting off about things you don\'t understand.
G²
Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote:
If the Cultural Marxist-Anarchist-BLM-ANTIFA brigade attempt to
interfere with Trump\'s pick of the new judge, THERE WILL BE TROUBLE.
Just sayin\'.
Such a bigottery:
2016: We won\'t confirm until the election.
2020: Of course we confirm before the election.
--
Uwe Bonnes bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 1623569 ------- Fax. 06151 1623305 ---------
If the senate was DEMOCRAT when Obama (DEMOCRAT) was president, Garland would have been in in a heartbeat. If the president and senate are the same party, it can happen fast. There is nothing in the constitution to prevent this so stop spouting off about things you don\'t understand.
G²
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Friday, October 2, 2020 at 12:45:33 AM UTC+10, stratus46 wrote:
What should be at issue is the quality of the jurists that get appointed to the Supreme Court, not whether one political party or the other likes them on the basis that their decisions will suit one party or the other when they get onto the bench.
Justice is supposed to be impartial.
>There is nothing in the constitution to prevent this so stop spouting off about things you don\'t understand.
The US constitution is clearly defective here, as it is in several other places. Most foreigners haven\'t been indoctrinated as children with the idea that the US founding tax evaders were super-humanly wise - they clearly weren\'t - and while they don\'t understand quite how the indoctrinated can be quite as silly about the subject as they frequently are, they probably should spout off about it more rather than less. We may not \"understand\" the US constitution in the way you do - as something precious passed down to you - but this does leaves us able to see where it falls short in a way that the indoctrinated don\'t seem to be able to manage.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 1:28:37 PM UTC-7, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
Cursitor Doom <cu...@notformail.com> wrote:
If the Cultural Marxist-Anarchist-BLM-ANTIFA brigade attempt to
interfere with Trump\'s pick of the new judge, THERE WILL BE TROUBLE.
Just sayin\'.
Such a bigottery:
2016: We won\'t confirm until the election.
2020: Of course we confirm before the election.
If the senate was DEMOCRAT when Obama (DEMOCRAT) was president, Garland would have been in in a heartbeat.
If the president and senate are the same party, it can happen fast.
What should be at issue is the quality of the jurists that get appointed to the Supreme Court, not whether one political party or the other likes them on the basis that their decisions will suit one party or the other when they get onto the bench.
Justice is supposed to be impartial.
>There is nothing in the constitution to prevent this so stop spouting off about things you don\'t understand.
The US constitution is clearly defective here, as it is in several other places. Most foreigners haven\'t been indoctrinated as children with the idea that the US founding tax evaders were super-humanly wise - they clearly weren\'t - and while they don\'t understand quite how the indoctrinated can be quite as silly about the subject as they frequently are, they probably should spout off about it more rather than less. We may not \"understand\" the US constitution in the way you do - as something precious passed down to you - but this does leaves us able to see where it falls short in a way that the indoctrinated don\'t seem to be able to manage.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
P
Phil Allison
Guest
Bill Sloman wrote:
===============>
** Gotta agree with Bill here - the US voting system is mind blowingly obtuse. Compared to Australia, it is wide open to skewed outcomes and anti- democratic manipulation by parties and big media.
FYI:
Here, all eligible adults (over 18) must register themselves AND vote at all elections - local govt, state and federal.
Compulsory voting *eliminates* the need to either bribe or frighten people to actually cast their vote. Candidates need *only* to convince them to vote their way.
Proportional / preferential vote counting makes sure the winner is the genuine favorite - minority candidates can affect the outcome but not win.
Having no president means we have no-one with royal power. The winning party elects their leader and he or she can be replaced at any time by vote of the same party. That leader becomes the Prime Minister who forms a \"cabinet\" of other ministers in order to run the country via the public service.
State governments control police forces in their state while the federal government runs a Federal police force for all non state matters. We have only 8 different forces - not hundreds. Voters get no direct say in who controls any of these forces so carrying out unpopular actions does not put such folk in jeopardy.
It amases me how Yanks can imagine their way is better - when proof beyond all doubt is staring them in the face right now.
...... Phil
===============>
The US constitution is clearly defective here, as it is in several other places. Most foreigners haven\'t been indoctrinated as children with the idea that the US founding tax evaders were super-humanly wise - they clearly weren\'t - and while they don\'t understand quite how the indoctrinated can be quite as silly about the subject as they frequently are, they probably should spout off about it more rather than less. We may not \"understand\" the US constitution in the way you do - as something precious passed down to you - but this does leaves us able to see where it falls short in a way that the indoctrinated don\'t seem to be able to manage.
** Gotta agree with Bill here - the US voting system is mind blowingly obtuse. Compared to Australia, it is wide open to skewed outcomes and anti- democratic manipulation by parties and big media.
FYI:
Here, all eligible adults (over 18) must register themselves AND vote at all elections - local govt, state and federal.
Compulsory voting *eliminates* the need to either bribe or frighten people to actually cast their vote. Candidates need *only* to convince them to vote their way.
Proportional / preferential vote counting makes sure the winner is the genuine favorite - minority candidates can affect the outcome but not win.
Having no president means we have no-one with royal power. The winning party elects their leader and he or she can be replaced at any time by vote of the same party. That leader becomes the Prime Minister who forms a \"cabinet\" of other ministers in order to run the country via the public service.
State governments control police forces in their state while the federal government runs a Federal police force for all non state matters. We have only 8 different forces - not hundreds. Voters get no direct say in who controls any of these forces so carrying out unpopular actions does not put such folk in jeopardy.
It amases me how Yanks can imagine their way is better - when proof beyond all doubt is staring them in the face right now.
...... Phil
B
bitrex
Guest
On 10/6/2020 1:53 AM, Phil Allison wrote:
Yes, even Amtrak (passenger rail system) have their own police force,
who occasionally must defend the choo choos with force, sending
passengers scrambling for their lives:
<https://abc7ny.com/news/amtrak-police-use-taser-on-man-inside-penn-station/1874936/>
We used to call them the \"Choo Choo Cops\" as kids e.g. \"Donnie was
slamming brewskis in South Station and got busted by the choo choo cops\"
(drinking your personal liquor on railroad property or on passenger
trains outside of sleeping compartments is VERY VERBOTEN in America.)
Bill Sloman wrote:
================
The US constitution is clearly defective here, as it is in several other places. Most foreigners haven\'t been indoctrinated as children with the idea that the US founding tax evaders were super-humanly wise - they clearly weren\'t - and while they don\'t understand quite how the indoctrinated can be quite as silly about the subject as they frequently are, they probably should spout off about it more rather than less. We may not \"understand\" the US constitution in the way you do - as something precious passed down to you - but this does leaves us able to see where it falls short in a way that the indoctrinated don\'t seem to be able to manage.
** Gotta agree with Bill here - the US voting system is mind blowingly obtuse. Compared to Australia, it is wide open to skewed outcomes and anti- democratic manipulation by parties and big media.
FYI:
Here, all eligible adults (over 18) must register themselves AND vote at all elections - local govt, state and federal.
Compulsory voting *eliminates* the need to either bribe or frighten people to actually cast their vote. Candidates need *only* to convince them to vote their way.
Proportional / preferential vote counting makes sure the winner is the genuine favorite - minority candidates can affect the outcome but not win.
Having no president means we have no-one with royal power. The winning party elects their leader and he or she can be replaced at any time by vote of the same party. That leader becomes the Prime Minister who forms a \"cabinet\" of other ministers in order to run the country via the public service.
State governments control police forces in their state while the federal government runs a Federal police force for all non state matters. We have only 8 different forces - not hundreds. Voters get no direct say in who controls any of these forces so carrying out unpopular actions does not put such folk in jeopardy.
It amases me how Yanks can imagine their way is better - when proof beyond all doubt is staring them in the face right now.
..... Phil
Yes, even Amtrak (passenger rail system) have their own police force,
who occasionally must defend the choo choos with force, sending
passengers scrambling for their lives:
<https://abc7ny.com/news/amtrak-police-use-taser-on-man-inside-penn-station/1874936/>
We used to call them the \"Choo Choo Cops\" as kids e.g. \"Donnie was
slamming brewskis in South Station and got busted by the choo choo cops\"
(drinking your personal liquor on railroad property or on passenger
trains outside of sleeping compartments is VERY VERBOTEN in America.)
F
Flyguy
Guest
On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-7, Phil Allison wrote:
LOL! Here in America we have FREE SPEECH, and an IMPORTANT part of free speech is the desire NOT to speak. Voting is SPEECH - not voting is YOUR RIGHT in America, but, apparently, not in the MONARCHY of OZ!
Realistically, voting by idiots like SL0W MAN just put more noise into the system. If you don\'t do your research you either vote by party or vote randomly.
Bill Sloman wrote:
===============
The US constitution is clearly defective here, as it is in several other places. Most foreigners haven\'t been indoctrinated as children with the idea that the US founding tax evaders were super-humanly wise - they clearly weren\'t - and while they don\'t understand quite how the indoctrinated can be quite as silly about the subject as they frequently are, they probably should spout off about it more rather than less. We may not \"understand\" the US constitution in the way you do - as something precious passed down to you - but this does leaves us able to see where it falls short in a way that the indoctrinated don\'t seem to be able to manage.
** Gotta agree with Bill here - the US voting system is mind blowingly obtuse. Compared to Australia, it is wide open to skewed outcomes and anti- democratic manipulation by parties and big media.
FYI:
Here, all eligible adults (over 18) must register themselves AND vote at all elections - local govt, state and federal.
Compulsory voting *eliminates* the need to either bribe or frighten people to actually cast their vote. Candidates need *only* to convince them to vote their way.
Proportional / preferential vote counting makes sure the winner is the genuine favorite - minority candidates can affect the outcome but not win.
Having no president means we have no-one with royal power. The winning party elects their leader and he or she can be replaced at any time by vote of the same party. That leader becomes the Prime Minister who forms a \"cabinet\" of other ministers in order to run the country via the public service.
State governments control police forces in their state while the federal government runs a Federal police force for all non state matters. We have only 8 different forces - not hundreds. Voters get no direct say in who controls any of these forces so carrying out unpopular actions does not put such folk in jeopardy.
It amases me how Yanks can imagine their way is better - when proof beyond all doubt is staring them in the face right now.
..... Phil
LOL! Here in America we have FREE SPEECH, and an IMPORTANT part of free speech is the desire NOT to speak. Voting is SPEECH - not voting is YOUR RIGHT in America, but, apparently, not in the MONARCHY of OZ!
Realistically, voting by idiots like SL0W MAN just put more noise into the system. If you don\'t do your research you either vote by party or vote randomly.
P
Phil Allison
Guest
Flyguy wrote:
==============>
** Massive red herring - proving Mr Flyguy has no sane reply.
It falsely assumes the main reason for folk not voting on a given day is a strong desire not to. Hardly ever the real case.
We see voting as a duty and that keeps nearly everyone interested in what is being said and going around them cos they know they have to vote at some point.
..... Phil
==============>
** Gotta agree with Bill here - the US voting system is mind blowingly obtuse. Compared to Australia, it is wide open to skewed outcomes and anti- democratic manipulation by parties and big media.
FYI:
Here, all eligible adults (over 18) must register themselves AND vote at all elections - local govt, state and federal.
Compulsory voting *eliminates* the need to either bribe or frighten people to actually cast their vote. Candidates need *only* to convince them to vote their way.
Proportional / preferential vote counting makes sure the winner is the genuine favorite - minority candidates can affect the outcome but not win.
Having no president means we have no-one with royal power. The winning party elects their leader and he or she can be replaced at any time by vote of the same party. That leader becomes the Prime Minister who forms a \"cabinet\" of other ministers in order to run the country via the public service..
State governments control police forces in their state while the federal government runs a Federal police force for all non state matters. We have only 8 different forces - not hundreds. Voters get no direct say in who controls any of these forces so carrying out unpopular actions does not put such folk in jeopardy.
It amases me how Yanks can imagine their way is better - when proof beyond all doubt is staring them in the face right now.
LOL! Here in America we have FREE SPEECH, and an IMPORTANT part
of free speech is the desire NOT to speak.
** Massive red herring - proving Mr Flyguy has no sane reply.
It falsely assumes the main reason for folk not voting on a given day is a strong desire not to. Hardly ever the real case.
We see voting as a duty and that keeps nearly everyone interested in what is being said and going around them cos they know they have to vote at some point.
..... Phil
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 4:45:08 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
<snip>
> I not only don\'t give a fuck about what you think, I don\'t want to hear ANYTHING you have to say. NOTHING! You are about as welcome as a fart at the dinner table.
Flyguy doesn\'t seem to have noticed that we have been telling him this for some weeks now. He hasn\'t paid any attention to this, but he
seems to be silly enough to think it worth his while to tell us he resents the message.
If he doesn\'t like being reminded that he comes across as a total idiot, he needs to stop acting like one. If he tells us that he resents the information, it\'s evidence that it is having the desired effect. Not as much effect as we\'d like, but some.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 8:24:36 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 10:47:17 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 8:08:10 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 1:38:07 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-7, Phil Allison wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:
<snip>
> I not only don\'t give a fuck about what you think, I don\'t want to hear ANYTHING you have to say. NOTHING! You are about as welcome as a fart at the dinner table.
Flyguy doesn\'t seem to have noticed that we have been telling him this for some weeks now. He hasn\'t paid any attention to this, but he
seems to be silly enough to think it worth his while to tell us he resents the message.
If he doesn\'t like being reminded that he comes across as a total idiot, he needs to stop acting like one. If he tells us that he resents the information, it\'s evidence that it is having the desired effect. Not as much effect as we\'d like, but some.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
F
Flyguy
Guest
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 10:58:47 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
Hey SL0W MAN, there you go again - ZERO CONTENT, just more BULLSHIT!
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 4:45:08 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 8:24:36 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 10:47:17 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 8:08:10 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 1:38:07 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-7, Phil Allison wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:
snip
I not only don\'t give a fuck about what you think, I don\'t want to hear ANYTHING you have to say. NOTHING! You are about as welcome as a fart at the dinner table.
Flyguy doesn\'t seem to have noticed that we have been telling him this for some weeks now. He hasn\'t paid any attention to this, but he
seems to be silly enough to think it worth his while to tell us he resents the message.
If he doesn\'t like being reminded that he comes across as a total idiot, he needs to stop acting like one. If he tells us that he resents the information, it\'s evidence that it is having the desired effect. Not as much effect as we\'d like, but some.
--
SL0W MAN, Sydney
Hey SL0W MAN, there you go again - ZERO CONTENT, just more BULLSHIT!
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Friday, October 16, 2020 at 3:35:43 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
Or so you\'d like us to think. In reality if confirms that you are too stupid to shut up when you haven\'t got anything useful to say. There wasn\'t much information content in my post, but the fact that you are silly enough to waste bandwidth telling us that you didn\'t like hearing it does reinforce the point I was making.
Even a properly programmed troll program would have shut up at this point, but you aren\'t clever enough to de even that well.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 10:58:47 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 4:45:08 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 8:24:36 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 10:47:17 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 8:08:10 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 1:38:07 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-7, Phil Allison wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:
snip
I not only don\'t give a fuck about what you think, I don\'t want to hear ANYTHING you have to say. NOTHING! You are about as welcome as a fart at the dinner table.
Flyguy doesn\'t seem to have noticed that we have been telling him this for some weeks now. He hasn\'t paid any attention to this, but he
seems to be silly enough to think it worth his while to tell us he resents the message.
If he doesn\'t like being reminded that he comes across as a total idiot, he needs to stop acting like one. If he tells us that he resents the information, it\'s evidence that it is having the desired effect. Not as much effect as we\'d like, but some.
There you go again - ZERO CONTENT, just more BULLSHIT!
Or so you\'d like us to think. In reality if confirms that you are too stupid to shut up when you haven\'t got anything useful to say. There wasn\'t much information content in my post, but the fact that you are silly enough to waste bandwidth telling us that you didn\'t like hearing it does reinforce the point I was making.
Even a properly programmed troll program would have shut up at this point, but you aren\'t clever enough to de even that well.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
F
Flyguy
Guest
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 9:48:08 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
Hey SL0W MAN, it\'s just the facts: you have ZERO CONTENT and TOTAL BULLSHIT..
On Friday, October 16, 2020 at 3:35:43 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 10:58:47 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 4:45:08 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 8:24:36 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 10:47:17 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 8:08:10 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 1:38:07 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-7, Phil Allison wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:
snip
I not only don\'t give a fuck about what you think, I don\'t want to hear ANYTHING you have to say. NOTHING! You are about as welcome as a fart at the dinner table.
Flyguy doesn\'t seem to have noticed that we have been telling him this for some weeks now. He hasn\'t paid any attention to this, but he
seems to be silly enough to think it worth his while to tell us he resents the message.
If he doesn\'t like being reminded that he comes across as a total idiot, he needs to stop acting like one. If he tells us that he resents the information, it\'s evidence that it is having the desired effect. Not as much effect as we\'d like, but some.
There you go again - ZERO CONTENT, just more BULLSHIT!
Or so you\'d like us to think. In reality if confirms that you are too stupid to shut up when you haven\'t got anything useful to say. There wasn\'t much information content in my post, but the fact that you are silly enough to waste bandwidth telling us that you didn\'t like hearing it does reinforce the point I was making.
Even a properly programmed troll program would have shut up at this point, but you aren\'t clever enough to de even that well.
--
SL0W MAN, Sydney
Hey SL0W MAN, it\'s just the facts: you have ZERO CONTENT and TOTAL BULLSHIT..
R
Robert Baer
Guest
Flyguy wrote:
Do i hear stupidity echos between idiots?On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 9:48:08 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Friday, October 16, 2020 at 3:35:43 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 10:58:47 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 4:45:08 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 8:24:36 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 10:47:17 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 8:08:10 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 1:38:07 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-7, Phil Allison wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:
snip
I not only don\'t give a fuck about what you think, I don\'t want to hear ANYTHING you have to say. NOTHING! You are about as welcome as a fart at the dinner table.
Flyguy doesn\'t seem to have noticed that we have been telling him this for some weeks now. He hasn\'t paid any attention to this, but he
seems to be silly enough to think it worth his while to tell us he resents the message.
If he doesn\'t like being reminded that he comes across as a total idiot, he needs to stop acting like one. If he tells us that he resents the information, it\'s evidence that it is having the desired effect. Not as much effect as we\'d like, but some.
There you go again - ZERO CONTENT, just more BULLSHIT!
Or so you\'d like us to think. In reality if confirms that you are too stupid to shut up when you haven\'t got anything useful to say. There wasn\'t much information content in my post, but the fact that you are silly enough to waste bandwidth telling us that you didn\'t like hearing it does reinforce the point I was making.
Even a properly programmed troll program would have shut up at this point, but you aren\'t clever enough to de even that well.
--
SL0W MAN, Sydney
Hey SL0W MAN, it\'s just the facts: you have ZERO CONTENT and TOTAL BULLSHIT.
B
bitrex
Guest
On 10/16/2020 1:13 AM, Robert Baer wrote:
I can see how some might object to worldwide international gay space
communism in principle, but I think anyone would have to agree the
uniforms would be FABULOUS.
Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 9:48:08 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Friday, October 16, 2020 at 3:35:43 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 10:58:47 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 4:45:08 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 8:24:36 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 10:47:17 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 8:08:10 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 1:38:07 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-7, Phil Allison
wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:
snip
I not only don\'t give a fuck about what you think, I don\'t want to
hear ANYTHING you have to say. NOTHING! You are about as welcome
as a fart at the dinner table.
Flyguy doesn\'t seem to have noticed that we have been telling him
this for some weeks now. He hasn\'t paid any attention to this, but he
seems to be silly enough to think it worth his while to tell us he
resents the message.
If he doesn\'t like being reminded that he comes across as a total
idiot, he needs to stop acting like one. If he tells us that he
resents the information, it\'s evidence that it is having the
desired effect. Not as much effect as we\'d like, but some.
There you go again - ZERO CONTENT, just more BULLSHIT!
Or so you\'d like us to think. In reality if confirms that you are too
stupid to shut up when you haven\'t got anything useful to say. There
wasn\'t much information content in my post, but the fact that you are
silly enough to waste bandwidth telling us that you didn\'t like
hearing it does reinforce the point I was making.
Even a properly programmed troll program would have shut up at this
point, but you aren\'t clever enough to de even that well.
--
SL0W MAN, Sydney
Hey SL0W MAN, it\'s just the facts: you have ZERO CONTENT and TOTAL
BULLSHIT.
 Do i hear stupidity echos between idiots?
I can see how some might object to worldwide international gay space
communism in principle, but I think anyone would have to agree the
uniforms would be FABULOUS.
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Friday, October 16, 2020 at 4:14:05 PM UTC+11, Robert Baer wrote:
If you count yourself as the second idiot.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 9:48:08 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Friday, October 16, 2020 at 3:35:43 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 10:58:47 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 4:45:08 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 8:24:36 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 10:47:17 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 8:08:10 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 1:38:07 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-7, Phil Allison wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:
snip
I not only don\'t give a fuck about what you think, I don\'t want to hear ANYTHING you have to say. NOTHING! You are about as welcome as a fart at the dinner table.
Flyguy doesn\'t seem to have noticed that we have been telling him this for some weeks now. He hasn\'t paid any attention to this, but he
seems to be silly enough to think it worth his while to tell us he resents the message.
If he doesn\'t like being reminded that he comes across as a total idiot, he needs to stop acting like one. If he tells us that he resents the information, it\'s evidence that it is having the desired effect. Not as much effect as we\'d like, but some.
There you go again - ZERO CONTENT, just more BULLSHIT!
Or so you\'d like us to think. In reality if confirms that you are too stupid to shut up when you haven\'t got anything useful to say. There wasn\'t much information content in my post, but the fact that you are silly enough to waste bandwidth telling us that you didn\'t like hearing it does reinforce the point I was making.
Even a properly programmed troll program would have shut up at this point, but you aren\'t clever enough to de even that well.
It\'s just the facts: you have ZERO CONTENT and TOTAL BULLSHIT.
Do i hear stupidity echos between idiots?
If you count yourself as the second idiot.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
M
Michael Terrell
Guest
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 11:39:41 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
What do you expect, since he claims that their military only has an average IQ of 80? Unlike the US military that have to pass a battery of aptitude test to enlist. \"The Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) is a multiple-aptitude battery that measures developed abilities.\" Our military is modern and uses tools that require brains. Something that the post hole wouldn\'t understand. There are real PHDs in our military. I new the Nuclear Engineer from the Nautilus. He was aboard the sub when it went under the North Pole. After the service, he worked to train people to maintain power plants.
The US military doesn\'t want or need cannon fodder, like other countries still use. I wonder if the Aussies are issuing NERF rifles to their low IQ troops? Do they still use rubber bayonets? Are their rations still nothing but Twinkies?
Hey SL0W MAN,
I would suggest that you do us all a favor and shoot yourself, but your idiot monarchy confiscated all of your guns.
What do you expect, since he claims that their military only has an average IQ of 80? Unlike the US military that have to pass a battery of aptitude test to enlist. \"The Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) is a multiple-aptitude battery that measures developed abilities.\" Our military is modern and uses tools that require brains. Something that the post hole wouldn\'t understand. There are real PHDs in our military. I new the Nuclear Engineer from the Nautilus. He was aboard the sub when it went under the North Pole. After the service, he worked to train people to maintain power plants.
The US military doesn\'t want or need cannon fodder, like other countries still use. I wonder if the Aussies are issuing NERF rifles to their low IQ troops? Do they still use rubber bayonets? Are their rations still nothing but Twinkies?
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Friday, October 16, 2020 at 8:48:35 PM UTC+11, terrell....@gmail.com wrote:
It wasn\'t the military as a whole, only the front line cannon fodder, and it was a comment about the US military who pioneered using IQ tests on new recruits.
>\" Our military is modern and uses tools that require brains. Something that the post hole wouldn\'t understand. There are real Ph.D.s in our military. I knew the Nuclear Engineer from the Nautilus. He was aboard the sub when it went under the North Pole. After the service, he worked to train people to maintain power plants.
I did point out that people who scored better were used for more demanding jobs than front-line combat, where they would last longer.
> The US military doesn\'t want or need cannon fodder, like other countries still use.
Everybody has front line troops who are more likely to get killed than people working behind the front line.
> I wonder if the Aussies are issuing NERF rifles to their low IQ troops?
Probably not - I don\'t think they ever did. This is the standard issue weapon today.
https://www.navy.gov.au/weapon/f88-austeyr
> Do they still use rubber bayonets?
Did they ever?
> Are their rations still nothing but Twinkies?
Probably not - that is an American children\'s snack cake and the Australian army would have gone in for something rather more butch.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 11:39:41 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
Hey SL0W MAN,
I would suggest that you do us all a favor and shoot yourself, but your idiot monarchy confiscated all of your guns.
What do you expect, since he claims that their military only has an average IQ of 80? Unlike the US military that have to pass a battery of aptitude test to enlist. \"The Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) is a multiple-aptitude battery that measures developed abilities.
It wasn\'t the military as a whole, only the front line cannon fodder, and it was a comment about the US military who pioneered using IQ tests on new recruits.
>\" Our military is modern and uses tools that require brains. Something that the post hole wouldn\'t understand. There are real Ph.D.s in our military. I knew the Nuclear Engineer from the Nautilus. He was aboard the sub when it went under the North Pole. After the service, he worked to train people to maintain power plants.
I did point out that people who scored better were used for more demanding jobs than front-line combat, where they would last longer.
> The US military doesn\'t want or need cannon fodder, like other countries still use.
Everybody has front line troops who are more likely to get killed than people working behind the front line.
> I wonder if the Aussies are issuing NERF rifles to their low IQ troops?
Probably not - I don\'t think they ever did. This is the standard issue weapon today.
https://www.navy.gov.au/weapon/f88-austeyr
> Do they still use rubber bayonets?
Did they ever?
> Are their rations still nothing but Twinkies?
Probably not - that is an American children\'s snack cake and the Australian army would have gone in for something rather more butch.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney