OT: Flyguy is immune from cognitive decline...

[Flyguy]

On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 11:27:02 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 4:14:40 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 9:34:32 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 2:16:02 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 12:17:33 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 4:05:50 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:58:13 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 12:53:00 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:47:14 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 12:35:16 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 7:18:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 12:11:22 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 12, 2020 at 8:41:24 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 13, 2020 at 1:03:00 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 1:52:09 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 12:38:29 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 6:36:52 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 6:02:43 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 5, 2020 at 7:04:39 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 6:32:02 AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 27 August 2020 04:51:47 UTC+1, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, August 26, 2020 at 1:29:23 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:

snip

You ridicule my project,

What \"project\" was that?

but you have NONE of your own!

None that you seem able to comprehend.

You are a FRAUD!!

I\'m sure it makes you happy to think that. You\'d look less like a petulant idiot if you could identify what it is you think I\'m trying to sell that is less valuable than I seem to be claiming, but that kind of thing needs longer sentences than you can manage.

AGAIN, you just PROVE what I say. You just make mindless insults that lack the any humanity, a touch of humor. You are HUMORLESS - a demented troll who has no life and sits by his computer hoping for some human contact.

Hint: next time, try making a joke (a joke has some sort of humor attached to it).

So your claim to have a \"project\" was some kind of joke? Try for something more credible next time.

If I were looking for human contact, I wouldn\'t be wasting my time showing you up. You failed the Turing test years ago.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Hey SL0W MAN,

LOL! I asked you what \"project\" you were working on. You came back with what only can be called a JOKE - a post to a design question! I, on the other hand, am working on a REAL project that you, in your infinite stupidity, denigrate w/o knowing anything (gee, sounds like a pattern).

You need to SHUT DOWN your computer and go out and get some REAL human contact!!

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 2:27:50 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:

On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 11:27:02 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 4:14:40 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 9:34:32 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 2:16:02 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 12:17:33 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 4:05:50 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:58:13 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 12:53:00 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:47:14 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 12:35:16 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 7:18:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 12:11:22 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 12, 2020 at 8:41:24 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 13, 2020 at 1:03:00 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 1:52:09 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 12:38:29 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 6:36:52 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 6:02:43 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 5, 2020 at 7:04:39 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 6:32:02 AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 27 August 2020 04:51:47 UTC+1, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, August 26, 2020 at 1:29:23 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:

snip

You ridicule my project,

What \"project\" was that?

but you have NONE of your own!

None that you seem able to comprehend.

You are a FRAUD!!

I\'m sure it makes you happy to think that. You\'d look less like a petulant idiot if you could identify what it is you think I\'m trying to sell that is less valuable than I seem to be claiming, but that kind of thing needs longer sentences than you can manage.

AGAIN, you just PROVE what I say. You just make mindless insults that lack the any humanity, a touch of humor. You are HUMORLESS - a demented troll who has no life and sits by his computer hoping for some human contact.

Hint: next time, try making a joke (a joke has some sort of humor attached to it).

So your claim to have a \"project\" was some kind of joke? Try for something more credible next time.

If I were looking for human contact, I wouldn\'t be wasting my time showing you up. You failed the Turing test years ago.

LOL! I asked you what \"project\" you were working on.

Actually you complained that I didn\'t post anything about electronics, and when I was able to demonstrate that this wasn\'t true - establishing that you don\'t actually read threads that talk about electronic - you started to witter on about \"projects\".

> You came back with what only can be called a JOKE - a post to a design question!

It\'s a scarcely a joke design question. That last time I was asked it - back in 1978 - it took a little asking around to come up with a solution, but the guy that asked the question back then wanted to publish the answer we\'d come up with, and it did end up getting published in the peer-reviewed instrument literature. It was a short paper, and it has been cited exactly once by somebody else in the group that needed it, but Martin Gira seems to have seriously wanted an answer too.

> I, on the other hand, am working on a REAL project that you, in your infinite stupidity, denigrate w/o knowing anything (gee, sounds like a pattern)..

Since you haven\'t told us anything about it and are clearly too stupid to be trusted to do anything demanding it\'s reasonable to guess that whatever it is, it isn\'t up to much.

> You need to SHUT DOWN your computer and go out and get some REAL human contact!!

I\'m 77 and have had lots of real human contacts over the years, many of them in England and the Netherlands. The computer is a handy way of maintaining that contact. Some of the real humans I have known - like the late great Tony Williams - I never met in person.

Trolls like you don\'t count.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Flyguy]

On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 10:26:29 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 2:27:50 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 11:27:02 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 4:14:40 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 9:34:32 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 2:16:02 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 12:17:33 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 4:05:50 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:58:13 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 12:53:00 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:47:14 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 12:35:16 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 7:18:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 12:11:22 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 12, 2020 at 8:41:24 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 13, 2020 at 1:03:00 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 1:52:09 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 12:38:29 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 6:36:52 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 6:02:43 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 5, 2020 at 7:04:39 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 6:32:02 AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 27 August 2020 04:51:47 UTC+1, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, August 26, 2020 at 1:29:23 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:

snip

You ridicule my project,

What \"project\" was that?

but you have NONE of your own!

None that you seem able to comprehend.

You are a FRAUD!!

I\'m sure it makes you happy to think that. You\'d look less like a petulant idiot if you could identify what it is you think I\'m trying to sell that is less valuable than I seem to be claiming, but that kind of thing needs longer sentences than you can manage.

AGAIN, you just PROVE what I say. You just make mindless insults that lack the any humanity, a touch of humor. You are HUMORLESS - a demented troll who has no life and sits by his computer hoping for some human contact.

Hint: next time, try making a joke (a joke has some sort of humor attached to it).

So your claim to have a \"project\" was some kind of joke? Try for something more credible next time.

If I were looking for human contact, I wouldn\'t be wasting my time showing you up. You failed the Turing test years ago.

LOL! I asked you what \"project\" you were working on.

Actually you complained that I didn\'t post anything about electronics, and when I was able to demonstrate that this wasn\'t true - establishing that you don\'t actually read threads that talk about electronic - you started to witter on about \"projects\".

You came back with what only can be called a JOKE - a post to a design question!

It\'s a scarcely a joke design question. That last time I was asked it - back in 1978 - it took a little asking around to come up with a solution, but the guy that asked the question back then wanted to publish the answer we\'d come up with, and it did end up getting published in the peer-reviewed instrument literature. It was a short paper, and it has been cited exactly once by somebody else in the group that needed it, but Martin Gira seems to have seriously wanted an answer too.

I, on the other hand, am working on a REAL project that you, in your infinite stupidity, denigrate w/o knowing anything (gee, sounds like a pattern).

Since you haven\'t told us anything about it and are clearly too stupid to be trusted to do anything demanding it\'s reasonable to guess that whatever it is, it isn\'t up to much.

You need to SHUT DOWN your computer and go out and get some REAL human contact!!

I\'m 77 and have had lots of real human contacts over the years, many of them in England and the Netherlands. The computer is a handy way of maintaining that contact. Some of the real humans I have known - like the late great Tony Williams - I never met in person.

Trolls like you don\'t count.

--
SL0W MAN, Sydney

Hey SL0W MAN,

News flash: I didn\'t complain about ANYTHING - I, simply, asked you what projects you were working on. MY, how you LOVE to DISTORT things!

And your pejorative insults show you don\'t know SHIT about what I am doing. ALL you know how to do is INSULT, and, frankly, that is BORING. I\'ve shown you to be WRONG time after time, but you keep plodding along in your ignorance.

It is QUITE APPARENT that nobody wants anything to do with you, no doubt based on their past relationships with you. And it is no wonder why: you have a much over-inflated image of yourself, are insufferable (such as totally distorting what I said), and, even worse, are BORING!

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Tuesday, September 22, 2020 at 12:19:55 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:

On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 10:26:29 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 2:27:50 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 11:27:02 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 4:14:40 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 9:34:32 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 2:16:02 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 12:17:33 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 4:05:50 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:58:13 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 12:53:00 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:47:14 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 12:35:16 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 7:18:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 12:11:22 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 12, 2020 at 8:41:24 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 13, 2020 at 1:03:00 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 1:52:09 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 12:38:29 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 6:36:52 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 6:02:43 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 5, 2020 at 7:04:39 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 6:32:02 AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 27 August 2020 04:51:47 UTC+1, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, August 26, 2020 at 1:29:23 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:

snip

You ridicule my project,

What \"project\" was that?

but you have NONE of your own!

None that you seem able to comprehend.

You are a FRAUD!!

I\'m sure it makes you happy to think that. You\'d look less like a petulant idiot if you could identify what it is you think I\'m trying to sell that is less valuable than I seem to be claiming, but that kind of thing needs longer sentences than you can manage.

AGAIN, you just PROVE what I say. You just make mindless insults that lack the any humanity, a touch of humor. You are HUMORLESS - a demented troll who has no life and sits by his computer hoping for some human contact.

Hint: next time, try making a joke (a joke has some sort of humor attached to it).

So your claim to have a \"project\" was some kind of joke? Try for something more credible next time.

If I were looking for human contact, I wouldn\'t be wasting my time showing you up. You failed the Turing test years ago.

LOL! I asked you what \"project\" you were working on.

Actually you complained that I didn\'t post anything about electronics, and when I was able to demonstrate that this wasn\'t true - establishing that you don\'t actually read threads that talk about electronic - you started to witter on about \"projects\".

You came back with what only can be called a JOKE - a post to a design question!

It\'s a scarcely a joke design question. That last time I was asked it - back in 1978 - it took a little asking around to come up with a solution, but the guy that asked the question back then wanted to publish the answer we\'d come up with, and it did end up getting published in the peer-reviewed instrument literature. It was a short paper, and it has been cited exactly once by somebody else in the group that needed it, but Martin Gira seems to have seriously wanted an answer too.

I, on the other hand, am working on a REAL project that you, in your infinite stupidity, denigrate w/o knowing anything (gee, sounds like a pattern).

Since you haven\'t told us anything about it and are clearly too stupid to be trusted to do anything demanding it\'s reasonable to guess that whatever it is, it isn\'t up to much.

You need to SHUT DOWN your computer and go out and get some REAL human contact!!

I\'m 77 and have had lots of real human contacts over the years, many of them in England and the Netherlands. The computer is a handy way of maintaining that contact. Some of the real humans I have known - like the late great Tony Williams - I never met in person.

Trolls like you don\'t count.

News flash: I didn\'t complain about ANYTHING - I, simply, asked you what projects you were working on. MY, how you LOVE to DISTORT things!

It was a complaint, even if you phrased it as a simple question. You are much too stupid to understand the implications of particular sorts of questions, even when John Larkin has posted hundreds of example of the device here over the years.

> And your pejorative insults show you don\'t know SHIT about what I am doing.

Since you haven\'t told us a thing about what you are doing, we clearly can\'t know anything about it, and have to resort to working out what it might be from what you do talk about.

> ALL you know how to do is INSULT, and, frankly, that is BORING. I\'ve shown you to be WRONG time after time, but you keep plodding along in your ignorance.

You may be stupid enough to think that you have \"shown me to be wrong\" by telling me that you think that I\'m wrong, but that\'s argument by repeated assertion, and all that that shows is that you are really remarkably stupid. This is an insulting assertion, but there\'s no way of saying it that isn\'t insulting.

You are stupid enough not to realise that it\'s you own ignorance that creates the problem.

> It is QUITE APPARENT that nobody wants anything to do with you, no doubt based on their past relationships with you.

Flyguy\'s perceptions are defective enough to let him post obvious nonsense. It should be apparent - even to him - that there are some posters here who do find me sympathetic. Most of them think that I ought to ignore you, and they are probably right, but some of your posts are so easy to make fun of that it\'s impossible to resist the temptation. My bad.

> And it is no wonder why: you have a much over-inflated image of yourself, are insufferable (such as totally distorting what I said), and, even worse, are BORING!

Since you are too stupid to understand most of what I post, you are obviously going to find most of it boring - but not - obviously - too boring to respond to.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Flyguy]

On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 7:59:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Tuesday, September 22, 2020 at 12:19:55 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 10:26:29 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 2:27:50 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 11:27:02 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 4:14:40 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 9:34:32 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 2:16:02 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 12:17:33 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 4:05:50 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:58:13 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 12:53:00 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:47:14 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 12:35:16 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 7:18:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 12:11:22 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 12, 2020 at 8:41:24 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 13, 2020 at 1:03:00 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 1:52:09 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 12:38:29 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 6:36:52 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 6:02:43 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 5, 2020 at 7:04:39 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 6:32:02 AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 27 August 2020 04:51:47 UTC+1, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, August 26, 2020 at 1:29:23 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:

snip

You ridicule my project,

What \"project\" was that?

but you have NONE of your own!

None that you seem able to comprehend.

You are a FRAUD!!

I\'m sure it makes you happy to think that. You\'d look less like a petulant idiot if you could identify what it is you think I\'m trying to sell that is less valuable than I seem to be claiming, but that kind of thing needs longer sentences than you can manage.

AGAIN, you just PROVE what I say. You just make mindless insults that lack the any humanity, a touch of humor. You are HUMORLESS - a demented troll who has no life and sits by his computer hoping for some human contact.

Hint: next time, try making a joke (a joke has some sort of humor attached to it).

So your claim to have a \"project\" was some kind of joke? Try for something more credible next time.

If I were looking for human contact, I wouldn\'t be wasting my time showing you up. You failed the Turing test years ago.

LOL! I asked you what \"project\" you were working on.

Actually you complained that I didn\'t post anything about electronics, and when I was able to demonstrate that this wasn\'t true - establishing that you don\'t actually read threads that talk about electronic - you started to witter on about \"projects\".

You came back with what only can be called a JOKE - a post to a design question!

It\'s a scarcely a joke design question. That last time I was asked it - back in 1978 - it took a little asking around to come up with a solution, but the guy that asked the question back then wanted to publish the answer we\'d come up with, and it did end up getting published in the peer-reviewed instrument literature. It was a short paper, and it has been cited exactly once by somebody else in the group that needed it, but Martin Gira seems to have seriously wanted an answer too.

I, on the other hand, am working on a REAL project that you, in your infinite stupidity, denigrate w/o knowing anything (gee, sounds like a pattern).

Since you haven\'t told us anything about it and are clearly too stupid to be trusted to do anything demanding it\'s reasonable to guess that whatever it is, it isn\'t up to much.

You need to SHUT DOWN your computer and go out and get some REAL human contact!!

I\'m 77 and have had lots of real human contacts over the years, many of them in England and the Netherlands. The computer is a handy way of maintaining that contact. Some of the real humans I have known - like the late great Tony Williams - I never met in person.

Trolls like you don\'t count.

News flash: I didn\'t complain about ANYTHING - I, simply, asked you what projects you were working on. MY, how you LOVE to DISTORT things!

It was a complaint, even if you phrased it as a simple question. You are much too stupid to understand the implications of particular sorts of questions, even when John Larkin has posted hundreds of example of the device here over the years.

And your pejorative insults show you don\'t know SHIT about what I am doing.

Since you haven\'t told us a thing about what you are doing, we clearly can\'t know anything about it, and have to resort to working out what it might be from what you do talk about.

ALL you know how to do is INSULT, and, frankly, that is BORING. I\'ve shown you to be WRONG time after time, but you keep plodding along in your ignorance.

You may be stupid enough to think that you have \"shown me to be wrong\" by telling me that you think that I\'m wrong, but that\'s argument by repeated assertion, and all that that shows is that you are really remarkably stupid.. This is an insulting assertion, but there\'s no way of saying it that isn\'t insulting.

You are stupid enough not to realise that it\'s you own ignorance that creates the problem.

It is QUITE APPARENT that nobody wants anything to do with you, no doubt based on their past relationships with you.

Flyguy\'s perceptions are defective enough to let him post obvious nonsense. It should be apparent - even to him - that there are some posters here who do find me sympathetic. Most of them think that I ought to ignore you, and they are probably right, but some of your posts are so easy to make fun of that it\'s impossible to resist the temptation. My bad.

And it is no wonder why: you have a much over-inflated image of yourself, are insufferable (such as totally distorting what I said), and, even worse, are BORING!

Since you are too stupid to understand most of what I post, you are obviously going to find most of it boring - but not - obviously - too boring to respond to.

--
SL0W MAN, Sydney

Hey SL0W MAN,

You just CAN\'T admit that you are wrong, can you? Go back and SHOW ME how it was a complaint - only in your DEMENTED BRAIN!

WHO CARES what demented individuals find you \"sympathetic.\" I am sure that there are some CHILD RAPISTS who find other child rapists sympathetic.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Tuesday, September 22, 2020 at 2:45:16 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:

On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 7:59:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 22, 2020 at 12:19:55 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 10:26:29 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 2:27:50 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 11:27:02 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 4:14:40 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 9:34:32 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 2:16:02 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 12:17:33 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 4:05:50 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:58:13 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 12:53:00 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:47:14 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 12:35:16 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 7:18:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 12:11:22 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 12, 2020 at 8:41:24 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 13, 2020 at 1:03:00 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 1:52:09 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 12:38:29 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 6:36:52 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 6:02:43 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 5, 2020 at 7:04:39 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 6:32:02 AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 27 August 2020 04:51:47 UTC+1, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, August 26, 2020 at 1:29:23 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:

snip

You ridicule my project,

What \"project\" was that?

but you have NONE of your own!

None that you seem able to comprehend.

You are a FRAUD!!

I\'m sure it makes you happy to think that. You\'d look less like a petulant idiot if you could identify what it is you think I\'m trying to sell that is less valuable than I seem to be claiming, but that kind of thing needs longer sentences than you can manage.

AGAIN, you just PROVE what I say. You just make mindless insults that lack the any humanity, a touch of humor. You are HUMORLESS - a demented troll who has no life and sits by his computer hoping for some human contact.

Hint: next time, try making a joke (a joke has some sort of humor attached to it).

So your claim to have a \"project\" was some kind of joke? Try for something more credible next time.

If I were looking for human contact, I wouldn\'t be wasting my time showing you up. You failed the Turing test years ago.

LOL! I asked you what \"project\" you were working on.

Actually you complained that I didn\'t post anything about electronics, and when I was able to demonstrate that this wasn\'t true - establishing that you don\'t actually read threads that talk about electronic - you started to witter on about \"projects\".

You came back with what only can be called a JOKE - a post to a design question!

It\'s a scarcely a joke design question. That last time I was asked it - back in 1978 - it took a little asking around to come up with a solution, but the guy that asked the question back then wanted to publish the answer we\'d come up with, and it did end up getting published in the peer-reviewed instrument literature. It was a short paper, and it has been cited exactly once by somebody else in the group that needed it, but Martin Gira seems to have seriously wanted an answer too.

I, on the other hand, am working on a REAL project that you, in your infinite stupidity, denigrate w/o knowing anything (gee, sounds like a pattern).

Since you haven\'t told us anything about it and are clearly too stupid to be trusted to do anything demanding it\'s reasonable to guess that whatever it is, it isn\'t up to much.

You need to SHUT DOWN your computer and go out and get some REAL human contact!!

I\'m 77 and have had lots of real human contacts over the years, many of them in England and the Netherlands. The computer is a handy way of maintaining that contact. Some of the real humans I have known - like the late great Tony Williams - I never met in person.

Trolls like you don\'t count.

News flash: I didn\'t complain about ANYTHING - I, simply, asked you what projects you were working on. MY, how you LOVE to DISTORT things!

It was a complaint, even if you phrased it as a simple question. You are much too stupid to understand the implications of particular sorts of questions, even when John Larkin has posted hundreds of example of the device here over the years.

And your pejorative insults show you don\'t know SHIT about what I am doing.

Since you haven\'t told us a thing about what you are doing, we clearly can\'t know anything about it, and have to resort to working out what it might be from what you do talk about.

ALL you know how to do is INSULT, and, frankly, that is BORING. I\'ve shown you to be WRONG time after time, but you keep plodding along in your ignorance.

You may be stupid enough to think that you have \"shown me to be wrong\" by telling me that you think that I\'m wrong, but that\'s argument by repeated assertion, and all that that shows is that you are really remarkably stupid. This is an insulting assertion, but there\'s no way of saying it that isn\'t insulting.

You are stupid enough not to realise that it\'s you own ignorance that creates the problem.

It is QUITE APPARENT that nobody wants anything to do with you, no doubt based on their past relationships with you.

Flyguy\'s perceptions are defective enough to let him post obvious nonsense. It should be apparent - even to him - that there are some posters here who do find me sympathetic. Most of them think that I ought to ignore you, and they are probably right, but some of your posts are so easy to make fun of that it\'s impossible to resist the temptation. My bad.

And it is no wonder why: you have a much over-inflated image of yourself, are insufferable (such as totally distorting what I said), and, even worse, are BORING!

Since you are too stupid to understand most of what I post, you are obviously going to find most of it boring - but not - obviously - too boring to respond to.

You just CAN\'T admit that you are wrong, can you? Go back and SHOW ME how it was a complaint - only in your DEMENTED BRAIN!

Why bother? Even if I did, you wouldn\'t be able to understand the explanation.

> WHO CARES what demented individuals find you \"sympathetic.\" I am sure that there are some CHILD RAPISTS who find other child rapists sympathetic.

This is sci.electronics.design. You may have to somewhat demented to post here - you clearly are - but that is the audience. Your experience with people who share other kinds of interests with you is irrelevant, as well as distasteful.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Flyguy]

On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 11:06:22 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Tuesday, September 22, 2020 at 2:45:16 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 7:59:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 22, 2020 at 12:19:55 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 10:26:29 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 2:27:50 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 11:27:02 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 4:14:40 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 9:34:32 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 2:16:02 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 12:17:33 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Friday, September 18, 2020 at 4:05:50 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:58:13 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 12:53:00 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:47:14 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 12:35:16 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 7:18:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 12:11:22 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 12, 2020 at 8:41:24 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 13, 2020 at 1:03:00 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 1:52:09 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 12:38:29 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 6:36:52 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 6:02:43 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, September 5, 2020 at 7:04:39 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 6:32:02 AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 27 August 2020 04:51:47 UTC+1, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, August 26, 2020 at 1:29:23 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:

snip

You ridicule my project,

What \"project\" was that?

but you have NONE of your own!

None that you seem able to comprehend.

You are a FRAUD!!

I\'m sure it makes you happy to think that. You\'d look less like a petulant idiot if you could identify what it is you think I\'m trying to sell that is less valuable than I seem to be claiming, but that kind of thing needs longer sentences than you can manage.

AGAIN, you just PROVE what I say. You just make mindless insults that lack the any humanity, a touch of humor. You are HUMORLESS - a demented troll who has no life and sits by his computer hoping for some human contact.

Hint: next time, try making a joke (a joke has some sort of humor attached to it).

So your claim to have a \"project\" was some kind of joke? Try for something more credible next time.

If I were looking for human contact, I wouldn\'t be wasting my time showing you up. You failed the Turing test years ago.

LOL! I asked you what \"project\" you were working on.

Actually you complained that I didn\'t post anything about electronics, and when I was able to demonstrate that this wasn\'t true - establishing that you don\'t actually read threads that talk about electronic - you started to witter on about \"projects\".

You came back with what only can be called a JOKE - a post to a design question!

It\'s a scarcely a joke design question. That last time I was asked it - back in 1978 - it took a little asking around to come up with a solution, but the guy that asked the question back then wanted to publish the answer we\'d come up with, and it did end up getting published in the peer-reviewed instrument literature. It was a short paper, and it has been cited exactly once by somebody else in the group that needed it, but Martin Gira seems to have seriously wanted an answer too.

I, on the other hand, am working on a REAL project that you, in your infinite stupidity, denigrate w/o knowing anything (gee, sounds like a pattern).

Since you haven\'t told us anything about it and are clearly too stupid to be trusted to do anything demanding it\'s reasonable to guess that whatever it is, it isn\'t up to much.

You need to SHUT DOWN your computer and go out and get some REAL human contact!!

I\'m 77 and have had lots of real human contacts over the years, many of them in England and the Netherlands. The computer is a handy way of maintaining that contact. Some of the real humans I have known - like the late great Tony Williams - I never met in person.

Trolls like you don\'t count.

News flash: I didn\'t complain about ANYTHING - I, simply, asked you what projects you were working on. MY, how you LOVE to DISTORT things!

It was a complaint, even if you phrased it as a simple question. You are much too stupid to understand the implications of particular sorts of questions, even when John Larkin has posted hundreds of example of the device here over the years.

And your pejorative insults show you don\'t know SHIT about what I am doing.

Since you haven\'t told us a thing about what you are doing, we clearly can\'t know anything about it, and have to resort to working out what it might be from what you do talk about.

ALL you know how to do is INSULT, and, frankly, that is BORING. I\'ve shown you to be WRONG time after time, but you keep plodding along in your ignorance.

You may be stupid enough to think that you have \"shown me to be wrong\" by telling me that you think that I\'m wrong, but that\'s argument by repeated assertion, and all that that shows is that you are really remarkably stupid. This is an insulting assertion, but there\'s no way of saying it that isn\'t insulting.

You are stupid enough not to realise that it\'s you own ignorance that creates the problem.

It is QUITE APPARENT that nobody wants anything to do with you, no doubt based on their past relationships with you.

Flyguy\'s perceptions are defective enough to let him post obvious nonsense. It should be apparent - even to him - that there are some posters here who do find me sympathetic. Most of them think that I ought to ignore you, and they are probably right, but some of your posts are so easy to make fun of that it\'s impossible to resist the temptation. My bad.

And it is no wonder why: you have a much over-inflated image of yourself, are insufferable (such as totally distorting what I said), and, even worse, are BORING!

Since you are too stupid to understand most of what I post, you are obviously going to find most of it boring - but not - obviously - too boring to respond to.

You just CAN\'T admit that you are wrong, can you? Go back and SHOW ME how it was a complaint - only in your DEMENTED BRAIN!

Why bother? Even if I did, you wouldn\'t be able to understand the explanation.

WHO CARES what demented individuals find you \"sympathetic.\" I am sure that there are some CHILD RAPISTS who find other child rapists sympathetic.

This is sci.electronics.design. You may have to somewhat demented to post here - you clearly are - but that is the audience. Your experience with people who share other kinds of interests with you is irrelevant, as well as distasteful.

--
SL0W MAN, Sydney

Hey SL0W MAN,

I THOUGHT SO - you make a phony claim and won\'t back it up. BTW, it was YOU who started this absurd topic.