Kimberly K Barnard (Kali) (262) 595-2669 Pyschology Instruct

O

Orville Wright

Guest
Kimberly K. Barnard (known as "Kali" on Usenet)
(262) 595-2669
Pyschology Instructor at Univesity of Winconsin at Parkside
 
4 Apr 2007 01:42:39 -0700, "Orville Wright" <Orville@deafemail.net>
licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:

Kimberly K. Barnard (known as "Kali" on Usenet)
(262) 595-2669
Pyschology Instructor at Univesity of Winconsin at Parkside
What had you hoped to accomplsih by going RL on Kali,
you nadless asswipe?



Widdershins

If ignorance is bliss, Guth must be orgasmic.
 
In <3vc71353cojg7l0ua7tnggkqgpvkneq8v7@4ax.com>, Widdershins
sinistre@liripipe.com said:
: 4 Apr 2007 01:42:39 -0700, "Orville Wright" <Orville@deafemail.net>
: licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:
:
: >Kimberly K. Barnard (known as "Kali" on Usenet)
: >(262) 595-2669
: >Pyschology Instructor at Univesity of Winconsin at Parkside
:
: What had you hoped to accomplsih by going RL on Kali,
: you nadless asswipe?

Both Steve Young and Michael Cranston enjoy trying to intimidate
me by posting my office address to Usenet.

Someone forged my name and harassed several of my colleagues at
the University this morning. It looks like a Bowtie job, but
when I saw Cranston's post this morning, I suspected him, as
well, and would be remiss to not tell investigators about him.

The State of Wisconsin has very strict policies about harassment
of its employees, forgery, and abuse of its network, and all
concerned been very supportive of me today. The incident was
reported to network people and police before I even woke up this
morning. I have just sent the intimidating posts and full RL
information about both Cranston and Young to network services
and the police, and there will be an investigation.

: Widdershins
:
: If ignorance is bliss, Guth must be orgasmic.

Kali
--
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called
research, would it?"
- Albert Einstein
 
"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:ev0e0e$nn$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <3vc71353cojg7l0ua7tnggkqgpvkneq8v7@4ax.com>, Widdershins
sinistre@liripipe.com said:
: 4 Apr 2007 01:42:39 -0700, "Orville Wright" <Orville@deafemail.net
: licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:
:
: >Kimberly K. Barnard (known as "Kali" on Usenet)
: >(262) 595-2669
: >Pyschology Instructor at Univesity of Winconsin at Parkside
:
: What had you hoped to accomplsih by going RL on Kali,
: you nadless asswipe?

Both Steve Young and Michael Cranston enjoy trying to intimidate
me by posting my office address to Usenet.

Someone forged my name and harassed several of my colleagues at
the University this morning. It looks like a Bowtie job, but
when I saw Cranston's post this morning, I suspected him, as
well, and would be remiss to not tell investigators about him.

The State of Wisconsin has very strict policies about harassment
of its employees, forgery, and abuse of its network, and all
concerned been very supportive of me today. The incident was
reported to network people and police before I even woke up this
morning. I have just sent the intimidating posts and full RL
information about both Cranston and Young to network services
and the police, and there will be an investigation.

: Widdershins
:
: If ignorance is bliss, Guth must be orgasmic.

Kali
Keep up the good fight, Kali.

As usual, people recognize the work of nonads and lose even more respect for
them.

If I were one of the harassers, I would worry. They have crossed a couple
of legal lines.

card xii
 
On Apr 4, 10:51 am, Kali <k...@powder.keg> wrote:
In <3vc71353cojg7l0ua7tnggkqgpvkneq...@4ax.com>, Widdershins
sinis...@liripipe.com said:
: 4 Apr 2007 01:42:39 -0700, "Orville Wright" <Orvi...@deafemail.net
: licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:
:
: >Kimberly K. Barnard (known as "Kali" on Usenet)
: >(262) 595-2669
: >Pyschology Instructor at Univesity of Winconsin at Parkside
:
: What had you hoped to accomplsih by going RL on Kali,
: you nadless asswipe?

Both Steve Young and Michael Cranston enjoy trying to intimidate
me by posting my office address to Usenet.

Someone forged my name and harassed several of my colleagues at
the University this morning. It looks like a Bowtie job, but
when I saw Cranston's post this morning, I suspected him, as
well, and would be remiss to not tell investigators about him.

The State of Wisconsin has very strict policies about harassment
of its employees, forgery, and abuse of its network, and all
concerned been very supportive of me today. The incident was
reported to network people and police before I even woke up this
morning. I have just sent the intimidating posts and full RL
information about both Cranston and Young to network services
and the police, and there will be an investigation.

: Widdershins
:
: If ignorance is bliss, Guth must be orgasmic.

Kali
And don't forget Brad, who recently resurrected himself on usenet and
has a history of going rl on people (my money's on Cranston, tho).
This is despicable behavior.

Fortunately, you've worked at the college long enough your colleagues
know you would never harass them. Hang in.

marcia
 
"marcia" <design1@insight.rr.com> wrote in message
news:1175705223.587188.200510@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
On Apr 4, 10:51 am, Kali <k...@powder.keg> wrote:
In <3vc71353cojg7l0ua7tnggkqgpvkneq...@4ax.com>, Widdershins
sinis...@liripipe.com said:
4 Apr 2007 01:42:39 -0700, "Orville Wright" <Orvi...@deafemail.net
licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:

Kimberly K. Barnard (known as "Kali" on Usenet)
(262) 595-2669
Pyschology Instructor at Univesity of Winconsin at Parkside

What had you hoped to accomplsih by going RL on Kali,
you nadless asswipe?

Both Steve Young and Michael Cranston enjoy trying to intimidate
me by posting my office address to Usenet.

Someone forged my name and harassed several of my colleagues at
the University this morning. It looks like a Bowtie job, but
when I saw Cranston's post this morning, I suspected him, as
well, and would be remiss to not tell investigators about him.

The State of Wisconsin has very strict policies about harassment
of its employees, forgery, and abuse of its network, and all
concerned been very supportive of me today. The incident was
reported to network people and police before I even woke up this
morning. I have just sent the intimidating posts and full RL
information about both Cranston and Young to network services
and the police, and there will be an investigation.

Widdershins

If ignorance is bliss, Guth must be orgasmic.

Kali

And don't forget Brad, who recently resurrected himself on usenet and
has a history of going rl on people (my money's on Cranston, tho).
Got any evidence for that libel?

Because I'll tell you something: the one sure fact that will come out of
this investigation is that Mike had nothing to do with the email.

This is despicable behavior.
Indeed it is. Maliciously making a police report is about as low as it
gets.

Fortunately, you've worked at the college long enough your colleagues
know you would never harass them. Hang in.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter
 
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:51:08 -0500, Kali wrote:

In <3vc71353cojg7l0ua7tnggkqgpvkneq8v7@4ax.com>, Widdershins
sinistre@liripipe.com said:
: 4 Apr 2007 01:42:39 -0700, "Orville Wright" <Orville@deafemail.net
: licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:
:
: >Kimberly K. Barnard (known as "Kali" on Usenet)
: >(262) 595-2669
: >Pyschology Instructor at Univesity of Winconsin at Parkside
:
: What had you hoped to accomplsih by going RL on Kali,
: you nadless asswipe?

Both Steve Young and Michael Cranston enjoy trying to intimidate
me by posting my office address to Usenet.
My money is on teh BowTurd. Hope he left something traceable because he
deserves a good spanking over this crap.


--
#1 Offishul Ruiner of Usenet, March 2007
#1 Usenet Asshole, March 2007
#1 Bartlo Pset, March 13-24 2007
#10 Most hated Usenetizen of all time
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004
COOSN-266-06-25794
 
On Apr 4, 10:01 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@gmail.com> wrote:
"marcia" <desi...@insight.rr.com> wrote in message

news:1175705223.587188.200510@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com





On Apr 4, 10:51 am, Kali <k...@powder.keg> wrote:
In <3vc71353cojg7l0ua7tnggkqgpvkneq...@4ax.com>, Widdershins
sinis...@liripipe.com said:
4 Apr 2007 01:42:39 -0700, "Orville Wright" <Orvi...@deafemail.net
licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:

Kimberly K. Barnard (known as "Kali" on Usenet)
(262) 595-2669
Pyschology Instructor at Univesity of Winconsin at Parkside

What had you hoped to accomplsih by going RL on Kali,
you nadless asswipe?

Both Steve Young and Michael Cranston enjoy trying to intimidate
me by posting my office address to Usenet.

Someone forged my name and harassed several of my colleagues at
the University this morning. It looks like a Bowtie job, but
when I saw Cranston's post this morning, I suspected him, as
well, and would be remiss to not tell investigators about him.

The State of Wisconsin has very strict policies about harassment
of its employees, forgery, and abuse of its network, and all
concerned been very supportive of me today. The incident was
reported to network people and police before I even woke up this
morning. I have just sent the intimidating posts and full RL
information about both Cranston and Young to network services
and the police, and there will be an investigation.

Widdershins

If ignorance is bliss, Guth must be orgasmic.

Kali

And don't forget Brad, who recently resurrected himself on usenet and
has a history of going rl on people (my money's on Cranston, tho).

Got any evidence for that libel?

Because I'll tell you something: the one sure fact that will come out of
this investigation is that Mike had nothing to do with the email.

This is despicable behavior.

Indeed it is. Maliciously making a police report is about as low as it
gets.
Ahem!

Kimberly K Barnard is a mythomaniac.

Why believe anything a mythomaniac like Kimberly K Barnard "says"?.

It's highly likely the emails and investigation are a figment of
Kimberly K Barnard's imagination.

The SPP/AUK Criminal Stalking Ring can instigate the mass hysteria
necessary to escalate the crimes being committed against Cranston
and Young and Brad and all the many other people whom the AUK/SPP
Criminal Stalking Ring will publicly accuse of authoring/sending the
alleged emails by merely publishing an articles wherein Kimberly K
Barnard *says* .. "Someone forged my name and harassed several of my
colleagues at the University this morning.

Even if the alleged emails do exist, their most likely author is
either Kimberly K Barnard or one of the other members of the SPP/AUK
Criminal Stalking Ring.

Kimberly K Barnard and the rest of the SPP/AUK Criminal Stalking Ring
are all VENGE stalkers.

The overwhelming majority of VENGE stalkers FABRICATE evidence to
manufacture the perception that the Stalkers are the victims, and the
victims are the stalkers.

Therefore, IF the alleged emails exist---Kimberly K Barnard or one of
the other members of the SPP/AUK Criminal Stalking Ring is/are the
most likely author of the emails.

Barnard and her confederates motive for going so far as to fabricate
evidence against their prey----is to escalate the pressure against
their prey so the prey isn't only the victim of all the crimes the SPP/
AUK Criminal Stalkers are committing against them---but, also the
target of a bogus police investigation.

Furthermore, the SPP Criminal stalkers fabrication of evidence of
harassing emails can be used to recruit LEA to get LEA to l turn over
personally identifying info about their prey to the SPP/AUK Crimianl
stalkers....which the SPP and AUK Criminal Stalkers can plaster all
over the WWW.

If Cranston is an attorney---Cranston might wish to consider filing a
restraining order enjoining Kimberly K Barnard and the other members
the SPP/AUK Stalking Ring (Vince Lamb, Sean Monahan, Leola Stilmack,
Judith Fitzgerald, Jamie Eckles, Carl Osterwald, Albert C. Young,
Sharon Burton, Anthony Jenkins, Steve Whitacre, Daniel L Rogers,
John/Jane Doe 1-100 etc.) from posting any accusations about Cranston
owing to the fact that Kimberly K Barnard is a member of the SPP/AUK
Criminal Stalking Ring and their publishing accusations against people
place the lives of the people they post accusations about in
UNESTIMABLE DANGER.

As a matter of fact, every past and present target of the SPP
Criminal Stalking Ring ought to consider getting a restraining order
enjoining Kimberly K Barnard, R. Vince Lamb, Sean Monaghan, Jamie
Eckles, Albert C. Young, Carl R. Osterwald, Steve Whitacer, Sharon
Burton, Judith Fitzgerald, Daniel L. Rogers, Leola Stilmack, and
John and Jane Does 1-100 from publishing ANY accusations about them
having authored the emails---because of Barnard history of getting
lots of milage out of alleged emails---by publicly accusing one person
after another after another after another of authoring sending the
emails---placing the lives of a dozen people in unestimable danger.
 
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:57:01 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On 4 Apr 2007 11:50:19 -0700, "Linda" <Indomitable2@netzero.com
wrote:

[snip]

How the fuck did this crap get cross-posted to sci.electronics.design?

Knock it off!

...Jim Thompson
Don't worry. I'll take care of this for you. Sorry about the
intrusion.

Jade
 
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:57:01 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> transparently
proposed:

On 4 Apr 2007 11:50:19 -0700, "Linda" <Indomitable2@netzero.com
wrote:

[snip]

How the fuck did this crap get cross-posted to sci.electronics.design?
With a cross post?

Knock it off!

Knock what off?

For the record, Linda is a bit on the kooky side of things. Well,
okay, she is a raging paranoid nut flap. She belongs to the gang in
SPP. But if you would like I am sure they could share Goofy,
Two-Shitz, Jesness and a few other balls of raging usenet lunacy with
you also.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2
 
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:11:24 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org>
transparently proposed:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:57:01 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On 4 Apr 2007 11:50:19 -0700, "Linda" <Indomitable2@netzero.com
wrote:

[snip]

How the fuck did this crap get cross-posted to sci.electronics.design?

Knock it off!

...Jim Thompson

Don't worry. I'll take care of this for you. Sorry about the
intrusion.

Jade
You are such a caring person.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2
 
Aratzio wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:11:24 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org
transparently proposed:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:57:01 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On 4 Apr 2007 11:50:19 -0700, "Linda" <Indomitable2@netzero.com
wrote:

[snip]

How the fuck did this crap get cross-posted to sci.electronics.design?

Knock it off!

...Jim Thompson
Don't worry. I'll take care of this for you. Sorry about the
intrusion.

Jade

You are such a caring person.

Oy. Tards in love
 
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:31:51 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:11:24 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org
transparently proposed:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:57:01 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On 4 Apr 2007 11:50:19 -0700, "Linda" <Indomitable2@netzero.com
wrote:

[snip]

How the fuck did this crap get cross-posted to sci.electronics.design?

Knock it off!

...Jim Thompson

Don't worry. I'll take care of this for you. Sorry about the
intrusion.

Jade

You are such a caring person.
Well, look how upset he is. (I'm assuming Jim is a he and not one of
those new trendy, in your face, tomboy sometimes stripper names like
Randy)

My only interest is in love and peace on usenet.

Jade
 
On Apr 4, 11:57 am, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
Web-Site.com> wrote:
On 4 Apr 2007 11:50:19 -0700, "Linda" <Indomitab...@netzero.com
wrote:

[snip]

How the fuck did this crap get cross-posted to sci.electronics.design?
It's not crap.

Two plus years ago, Kimberly K Barnard placed the lives of me and
mine in unestimable danger, when, out of the clear blue, Kimberly K
Barnard stalked me into my home ng and posted posts *saying* her
university advisor received emails about her usenet activites, and,
falsely accusing me (who had never even had an exchange with Barnard)
of being responsible for authoring/sending them.

The crimes committed against me and mine following Kimberly K
Barnard's leveling false accusations against me were crimes
necessitating the removal of my child(ren) from their school to
preclude my child(ren) from being kidnapped, sexually assaulted, set
on fire, killed etc by any of the convicted child molesters,
convicted arsonists, 2 time killers, who participate in the criminal
vigilante stalking organized by the AUK/SPP Criminal Stalking Ring.

Once Kimberly K Barnard had successfully destroyed the lives of my
child(ren)---Kimberly K Barnard ceased accusing me, and began placing
the lives of one person after another in unestimable danger by falsely
accusing them of having authored/sent the ALLLEGED email to her
university advisor.

Now that Kimberly K Barnard is once again "saying" someone sent
emails to her university colleagues---accompanied by public
accusations against specified person(s) ...every dang person whom
Barnard hates needs to haul ass to a court of law and obtain a
restraining order enjoining Kimberly K Barnard, R. Vince Lamb, Sean
Monaghan, Albert C. Young, Carl R. Osterwald, Jamie Eckles, Steve
Whitacre, Leola Stilmack, Judith Fitzgerald, Peter J. Ross,
Daniel L Rogers, from publicly accusing them of authoring/sending the
alleged emails-----since the lives of both the accused and their loved
ones are place in unestimable danger whenever any of the members of
the SPP/AUK Criminal Stalking Ring publicly accuse people of stuff
that may or may not have happened.

(Hate ng snipped, SED re-inserted).
 
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:48:50 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org>
wrote:

My only interest is in love and peace on usenet.

Jade
And not electronics? How odd.

John
 
On 04 Apr 2007 I stormed the castle called sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and heard Linda cry out in news:1175716321.710936.271910
@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

On Apr 4, 11:57 am, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
Web-Site.com> wrote:
On 4 Apr 2007 11:50:19 -0700, "Linda" <Indomitab...@netzero.com
wrote:

[snip]

How the fuck did this crap get cross-posted to sci.electronics.design?

It's not crap.

Two plus years ago, Kimberly K Barnard placed the lives of me and
mine in unestimable danger, when, out of the clear blue, Kimberly K
Barnard stalked me into my home ng and posted posts *saying* her
university advisor received emails about her usenet activites, and,
falsely accusing me (who had never even had an exchange with Barnard)
of being responsible for authoring/sending them.

The crimes committed against me and mine following Kimberly K
Barnard's leveling false accusations against me were crimes
necessitating the removal of my child(ren) from their school to
preclude my child(ren) from being kidnapped, sexually assaulted, set
on fire, killed etc by any of the convicted child molesters,
convicted arsonists, 2 time killers, who participate in the criminal
vigilante stalking organized by the AUK/SPP Criminal Stalking Ring.

Once Kimberly K Barnard had successfully destroyed the lives of my
child(ren)---Kimberly K Barnard ceased accusing me, and began placing
the lives of one person after another in unestimable danger by falsely
accusing them of having authored/sent the ALLLEGED email to her
university advisor.

Now that Kimberly K Barnard is once again "saying" someone sent
emails to her university colleagues---accompanied by public
accusations against specified person(s) ...every dang person whom
Barnard hates needs to haul ass to a court of law and obtain a
restraining order enjoining Kimberly K Barnard, R. Vince Lamb, Sean
Monaghan, Albert C. Young, Carl R. Osterwald, Jamie Eckles, Steve
Whitacre, Leola Stilmack, Judith Fitzgerald, Peter J. Ross,
Daniel L Rogers, from publicly accusing them of authoring/sending the
alleged emails-----since the lives of both the accused and their loved
ones are place in unestimable danger whenever any of the members of
the SPP/AUK Criminal Stalking Ring publicly accuse people of stuff
that may or may not have happened.

(Hate ng snipped, SED re-inserted).
If it were only that easy, I would have had one taken out against you
long ago.. but thanks for the idea..


--
ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7

Pissing off the planet, one person at a time.
 
On 4 Apr 2007 12:52:01 -0700, "Linda" <Indomitable2@netzero.com>
wrote:

On Apr 4, 11:57 am, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
Web-Site.com> wrote:
On 4 Apr 2007 11:50:19 -0700, "Linda" <Indomitab...@netzero.com
wrote:

[snip]

How the fuck did this crap get cross-posted to sci.electronics.design?

It's not crap.

Two plus years ago, Kimberly K Barnard placed the lives of me and
mine in unestimable danger, when, out of the clear blue, Kimberly K
Barnard stalked me into my home ng and posted posts *saying* her
university advisor received emails about her usenet activites, and,
falsely accusing me (who had never even had an exchange with Barnard)
of being responsible for authoring/sending them.

The crimes committed against me and mine following Kimberly K
Barnard's leveling false accusations against me were crimes
necessitating the removal of my child(ren) from their school to
preclude my child(ren) from being kidnapped, sexually assaulted, set
on fire, killed etc by any of the convicted child molesters,
convicted arsonists, 2 time killers, who participate in the criminal
vigilante stalking organized by the AUK/SPP Criminal Stalking Ring.

Once Kimberly K Barnard had successfully destroyed the lives of my
child(ren)---Kimberly K Barnard ceased accusing me, and began placing
the lives of one person after another in unestimable danger by falsely
accusing them of having authored/sent the ALLLEGED email to her
university advisor.
Oh stop your whining.

Now that Kimberly K Barnard is once again "saying" someone sent
emails to her university colleagues---accompanied by public
accusations against specified person(s) ...every dang person whom
Barnard hates needs to haul ass to a court of law and obtain a
restraining order enjoining Kimberly K Barnard, R. Vince Lamb, Sean
Monaghan, Albert C. Young, Carl R. Osterwald, Jamie Eckles, Steve
Whitacre, Leola Stilmack, Judith Fitzgerald, Peter J. Ross,
Daniel L Rogers, from publicly accusing them of authoring/sending the
alleged emails-----since the lives of both the accused and their loved
ones are place in unestimable danger whenever any of the members of
the SPP/AUK Criminal Stalking Ring publicly accuse people of stuff
that may or may not have happened.

(Hate ng snipped, SED re-inserted).
Linda, Jim was very clear that he wasn't interested in hearing it. By
our own insane definition, you are stalking and committing crimes
against him if you continue to address him. Leave Jim and his group
alone.

BTW - How do I get on your net.kook haet lits?

Jade
 
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:01:47 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:48:50 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org
wrote:


My only interest is in love and peace on usenet.

Jade

And not electronics?
No not really. I mean I use electronics constantly and appreciate the
conveniences they provide. I certainly don't know what I'd do without
such inventions as the electric wine bottle opener and electric
peppercorn grinder. (lol)

It is all too odd, my friend. I wish more people cared about love and
peace on usenet. It would be a lot happier place.

What about you, John? What makes you tick?

Jade

 
Daedalus wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:01:47 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:48:50 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org
wrote:

My only interest is in love and peace on usenet.

Jade
And not electronics?

No not really. I mean I use electronics constantly and appreciate the
conveniences they provide. I certainly don't know what I'd do without
such inventions as the electric wine bottle opener and electric
peppercorn grinder. (lol)
You forgot to mention yer electronic dildo, skank

How odd.

It is all too odd, my friend. I wish more people cared about love and
peace on usenet. It would be a lot happier place.
All you care about is your next trick, whore

What about you, John? What makes you tick?

Stop sniffing around his crotch, skank.
Jade

John
 
From : Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
Message-ID : <a2v713hij0q6co4vtothaua2g2ofen1ri9@4ax.com>




I am sure they could share Goofy, Two-Shitz, Jesness and ... SNIP



Stop name dropping you *stoopid* rude slut








--

Honorable Professeur Von TwoSteps OA
*I* care
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top