Giuliani Is A Moron...

S

server

Guest
The idiot has no idea how absentee ballots are processed. A normal person would think that learning the process would be preliminary to filing lawsuits claiming fraudulent ballot voting to the tune of 700,000 votes!
Looks to me like a scam to legally deplete the $100M remaining in the campaign war chest on a bunch of phony legal fees, with the usual New York kickback of course.
 
On Saturday, November 7, 2020 at 1:14:04 PM UTC-8, bloggs.fre...@gmail.com wrote:
The idiot has no idea how absentee ballots are processed. A normal person would think that learning the process would be preliminary to filing lawsuits claiming fraudulent ballot voting to the tune of 700,000 votes!
Looks to me like a scam to legally deplete the $100M remaining in the campaign war chest on a bunch of phony legal fees, with the usual New York kickback of course.
Click to expand...

Ask all of those criminals he has put behind bars if he is a moron. Commenting on a lawsuit that hasn\'t yet been filed reflects more on you than Giuliani.
 
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 1:21:18 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, November 7, 2020 at 1:14:04 PM UTC-8, bloggs.fre...@gmail.com wrote:
The idiot has no idea how absentee ballots are processed. A normal person would think that learning the process would be preliminary to filing lawsuits claiming fraudulent ballot voting to the tune of 700,000 votes!
Looks to me like a scam to legally deplete the $100M remaining in the campaign war chest on a bunch of phony legal fees, with the usual New York kickback of course.
Ask all of those criminals he has put behind bars if he is a moron. Commenting on a lawsuit that hasn\'t yet been filed reflects more on you than Giuliani.
Click to expand...

You\'re long on wind and short on knowledge:

https://time.com/5908505/trump-lawsuits-biden-wins/
 
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 6:59:21 AM UTC-8, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 1:21:18 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, November 7, 2020 at 1:14:04 PM UTC-8, bloggs.fre...@gmail.com wrote:
The idiot has no idea how absentee ballots are processed. A normal person would think that learning the process would be preliminary to filing lawsuits claiming fraudulent ballot voting to the tune of 700,000 votes!
Looks to me like a scam to legally deplete the $100M remaining in the campaign war chest on a bunch of phony legal fees, with the usual New York kickback of course.
Ask all of those criminals he has put behind bars if he is a moron. Commenting on a lawsuit that hasn\'t yet been filed reflects more on you than Giuliani.

You\'re long on wind and short on knowledge:

https://time.com/5908505/trump-lawsuits-biden-wins/
Click to expand...

No, it is YOU that is short on knowledge - that article doesn\'t mention ONE lawsuit filed by Giuliani. If you had listened to him this morning you would have known that Giuliani will begin filing lawsuits tomorrow. The first will deal with denying observers access at Philadelphia counting rooms.
 
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 2:46:08 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 6:59:21 AM UTC-8, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 1:21:18 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, November 7, 2020 at 1:14:04 PM UTC-8, bloggs.fre...@gmail.com wrote:
The idiot has no idea how absentee ballots are processed. A normal person would think that learning the process would be preliminary to filing lawsuits claiming fraudulent ballot voting to the tune of 700,000 votes!
Looks to me like a scam to legally deplete the $100M remaining in the campaign war chest on a bunch of phony legal fees, with the usual New York kickback of course.
Ask all of those criminals he has put behind bars if he is a moron. Commenting on a lawsuit that hasn\'t yet been filed reflects more on you than Giuliani.

You\'re long on wind and short on knowledge:

https://time.com/5908505/trump-lawsuits-biden-wins/

No, it is YOU that is short on knowledge - that article doesn\'t mention ONE lawsuit filed by Giuliani. If you had listened to him this morning you would have known that Giuliani will begin filing lawsuits tomorrow. The first will deal with denying observers access at Philadelphia counting rooms.
Click to expand...

Oh, BTW, Giuliani amassed a record of 4,152 convictions and 25 reversals.
 
On 11/8/2020 9:59 AM, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 1:21:18 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, November 7, 2020 at 1:14:04 PM UTC-8, bloggs.fre...@gmail.com wrote:
The idiot has no idea how absentee ballots are processed. A normal person would think that learning the process would be preliminary to filing lawsuits claiming fraudulent ballot voting to the tune of 700,000 votes!
Looks to me like a scam to legally deplete the $100M remaining in the campaign war chest on a bunch of phony legal fees, with the usual New York kickback of course.
Ask all of those criminals he has put behind bars if he is a moron. Commenting on a lawsuit that hasn\'t yet been filed reflects more on you than Giuliani.

You\'re long on wind and short on knowledge:

https://time.com/5908505/trump-lawsuits-biden-wins/
Click to expand...

Trump\'s trying his usual tactic of throwing money and lawyers every
which way to try to bully someone into backing down.

This tends to work OK in civil cases vs. underpaid hookers holding a
grudge, but less well in criminal courts which tend to require some kind
of evidence of wrongdoing to substantiate a claim.

That is to say quid pro quo is all he know and it doesn\'t seem to be
working out, here.
 
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 4:50:20 PM UTC-8, bitrex wrote:
On 11/8/2020 9:59 AM, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 1:21:18 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, November 7, 2020 at 1:14:04 PM UTC-8, bloggs.fre...@gmail.com wrote:
The idiot has no idea how absentee ballots are processed. A normal person would think that learning the process would be preliminary to filing lawsuits claiming fraudulent ballot voting to the tune of 700,000 votes!
Looks to me like a scam to legally deplete the $100M remaining in the campaign war chest on a bunch of phony legal fees, with the usual New York kickback of course.
Ask all of those criminals he has put behind bars if he is a moron. Commenting on a lawsuit that hasn\'t yet been filed reflects more on you than Giuliani.

You\'re long on wind and short on knowledge:

https://time.com/5908505/trump-lawsuits-biden-wins/


Trump\'s trying his usual tactic of throwing money and lawyers every
which way to try to bully someone into backing down.

This tends to work OK in civil cases vs. underpaid hookers holding a
grudge, but less well in criminal courts which tend to require some kind
of evidence of wrongdoing to substantiate a claim.

That is to say quid pro quo is all he know and it doesn\'t seem to be
working out, here.
Click to expand...

Hey Bitter Ex, does that include the FBI as well?
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/09/attorney-general-william-barr-authorizes-doj-look-voting-irregularities/
Let\'s be clear here: election fraud IS illegal and ANY charges that it occurred MUST be investigated. Otherwise, Biden\'s election will ALWAYS have an asterisk by it.
 
Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote:

Hey Bitter Ex, does that include the FBI as well?
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/09/attorney-general-willi
am-barr-authorizes-doj-look-voting-irregularities/ Let\'s be clear here:
election fraud IS illegal and ANY charges that it occurred MUST be
investigated. Otherwise, Biden\'s election will ALWAYS have an asterisk
by it.
Click to expand...

Of course the Department of Justice should be concerned about NATIONAL
election fraud.

State and local Democrats lost 900 seats during Obama\'s 2 terms, sinking to
their lowest level in 100 years. All of those contested states have Republican
(lower and upper house) legislatures. That\'s another reason it\'s suspicious.

Imagine what will happen to state and local Democrats when Biden turns into a
complete vegetable and Kamala Harris takes over. It\'s the Deep State versus
the people.

Reagan talked about the Deep State on Johnny Carson in 1975...

https://youtu.be/CNmnmdtcdcg?t=94

Judicial Watch has a good definition of the Deep State on their YouTube
channel...

https://youtu.be/zLQ-2mrHXGo
 
On Monday, November 9, 2020 at 7:36:50 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 4:50:20 PM UTC-8, bitrex wrote:

Trump\'s trying his usual tactic of throwing money and lawyers every
which way to try to bully someone into backing down.

This tends to work OK in civil cases vs. underpaid hookers holding a
grudge, but less well in criminal courts which tend to require some kind
of evidence of wrongdoing to substantiate a claim.

Hey Bitter Ex, does that include the FBI as well?
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/09/attorney-general-william-barr-authorizes-doj-look-voting-irregularities/
Let\'s be clear here: election fraud IS illegal and ANY charges that it occurred MUST be investigated. Otherwise, Biden\'s election will ALWAYS have an asterisk by it.
Click to expand...

No, you are very unclear; Barr knows the Donald can fire him, so he authorizes the FBI to assist in voting
cases. But, there are NO CHARGES, those would be indictments; there are only baseless allegations
which we know of. Some courts may hear a civil suit or seven, but there\'s no asterisk except in
a few diseased minds. Creating noise around vote-count issues doesn\'t make them
credible, just loud.

Breitbart specializes in loud. So does Trump.
 
whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

Flyguy wrote:
bitrex wrote:

Trump\'s trying his usual tactic of throwing money and lawyers every
which way to try to bully someone into backing down.

This tends to work OK in civil cases vs. underpaid hookers holding a
grudge, but less well in criminal courts which tend to require some
kind of evidence of wrongdoing to substantiate a claim.

Hey Bitter Ex, does that include the FBI as well?
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/09/attorney-general-will
iam-barr-authorizes-doj-look-voting-irregularities/ Let\'s be clear
here: election fraud IS illegal and ANY charges that it occurred MUST
be investigated. Otherwise, Biden\'s election will ALWAYS have an
asterisk by it.

there are only baseless allegations which we know of. Some courts may
hear a civil suit or seven, but there\'s no asterisk except in a few
diseased minds.
Click to expand...

How often have you been right about court cases, before?

I\'m guessing \"rarely\".

Please point to your prior predictions that came true...
 
On 10/11/20 2:36 pm, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 4:50:20 PM UTC-8, bitrex wrote:
On 11/8/2020 9:59 AM, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 1:21:18 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, November 7, 2020 at 1:14:04 PM UTC-8, bloggs.fre...@gmail.com wrote:
The idiot has no idea how absentee ballots are processed. A normal person would think that learning the process would be preliminary to filing lawsuits claiming fraudulent ballot voting to the tune of 700,000 votes!
Looks to me like a scam to legally deplete the $100M remaining in the campaign war chest on a bunch of phony legal fees, with the usual New York kickback of course.
Ask all of those criminals he has put behind bars if he is a moron. Commenting on a lawsuit that hasn\'t yet been filed reflects more on you than Giuliani.

You\'re long on wind and short on knowledge:

https://time.com/5908505/trump-lawsuits-biden-wins/


Trump\'s trying his usual tactic of throwing money and lawyers every
which way to try to bully someone into backing down.

This tends to work OK in civil cases vs. underpaid hookers holding a
grudge, but less well in criminal courts which tend to require some kind
of evidence of wrongdoing to substantiate a claim.

That is to say quid pro quo is all he know and it doesn\'t seem to be
working out, here.

Hey Bitter Ex, does that include the FBI as well?
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/09/attorney-general-william-barr-authorizes-doj-look-voting-irregularities/
Let\'s be clear here: election fraud IS illegal and ANY charges that it occurred MUST be investigated. Otherwise, Biden\'s election will ALWAYS have an asterisk by it.
Click to expand...
sore loser
 
On Monday, November 9, 2020 at 8:17:10 PM UTC-8, whit3rd wrote:
On Monday, November 9, 2020 at 7:36:50 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 4:50:20 PM UTC-8, bitrex wrote:

Trump\'s trying his usual tactic of throwing money and lawyers every
which way to try to bully someone into backing down.

This tends to work OK in civil cases vs. underpaid hookers holding a
grudge, but less well in criminal courts which tend to require some kind
of evidence of wrongdoing to substantiate a claim.

Hey Bitter Ex, does that include the FBI as well?
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/09/attorney-general-william-barr-authorizes-doj-look-voting-irregularities/
Let\'s be clear here: election fraud IS illegal and ANY charges that it occurred MUST be investigated. Otherwise, Biden\'s election will ALWAYS have an asterisk by it.

No, you are very unclear; Barr knows the Donald can fire him, so he authorizes the FBI to assist in voting
cases. But, there are NO CHARGES, those would be indictments; there are only baseless allegations
which we know of. Some courts may hear a civil suit or seven, but there\'s no asterisk except in
a few diseased minds. Creating noise around vote-count issues doesn\'t make them
credible, just loud.

Breitbart specializes in loud. So does Trump.
Click to expand...

Like the \"baseless charges\" concerning Hunter BooBoo? Last time I checked, the FBI investigates BEFORE indicting people, not after.
 
On Monday, November 9, 2020 at 8:45:32 PM UTC-8, marty wrote:
On 10/11/20 2:36 pm, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 4:50:20 PM UTC-8, bitrex wrote:
On 11/8/2020 9:59 AM, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 1:21:18 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, November 7, 2020 at 1:14:04 PM UTC-8, bloggs.fre...@gmail.com wrote:
The idiot has no idea how absentee ballots are processed. A normal person would think that learning the process would be preliminary to filing lawsuits claiming fraudulent ballot voting to the tune of 700,000 votes!
Looks to me like a scam to legally deplete the $100M remaining in the campaign war chest on a bunch of phony legal fees, with the usual New York kickback of course.
Ask all of those criminals he has put behind bars if he is a moron. Commenting on a lawsuit that hasn\'t yet been filed reflects more on you than Giuliani.

You\'re long on wind and short on knowledge:

https://time.com/5908505/trump-lawsuits-biden-wins/


Trump\'s trying his usual tactic of throwing money and lawyers every
which way to try to bully someone into backing down.

This tends to work OK in civil cases vs. underpaid hookers holding a
grudge, but less well in criminal courts which tend to require some kind
of evidence of wrongdoing to substantiate a claim.

That is to say quid pro quo is all he know and it doesn\'t seem to be
working out, here.

Hey Bitter Ex, does that include the FBI as well?
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/09/attorney-general-william-barr-authorizes-doj-look-voting-irregularities/
Let\'s be clear here: election fraud IS illegal and ANY charges that it occurred MUST be investigated. Otherwise, Biden\'s election will ALWAYS have an asterisk by it.

sore loser
Click to expand...

LOL! Sounds like you are worried about what the FBI will find.
 
On Monday, November 9, 2020 at 8:24:27 PM UTC-8, John Doe wrote:
whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:

How often have you been right about court cases, before?

I\'m guessing \"rarely\".
Click to expand...

Worthless guess, as we all know. On jury duty, I have \'been right\' about a few cases.
And yes, jury duty doesn\'t happen often.

The reported flurry of legal activity has no criminal element, and doesn\'t deserve
public scrutiny until evidence DOES result in a court finding.
 
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 5:48:47 PM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 2:46:08 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 6:59:21 AM UTC-8, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 1:21:18 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, November 7, 2020 at 1:14:04 PM UTC-8, bloggs.fre...@gmail.com wrote:
The idiot has no idea how absentee ballots are processed. A normal person would think that learning the process would be preliminary to filing lawsuits claiming fraudulent ballot voting to the tune of 700,000 votes!
Looks to me like a scam to legally deplete the $100M remaining in the campaign war chest on a bunch of phony legal fees, with the usual New York kickback of course.
Ask all of those criminals he has put behind bars if he is a moron. Commenting on a lawsuit that hasn\'t yet been filed reflects more on you than Giuliani.

You\'re long on wind and short on knowledge:

https://time.com/5908505/trump-lawsuits-biden-wins/

No, it is YOU that is short on knowledge - that article doesn\'t mention ONE lawsuit filed by Giuliani. If you had listened to him this morning you would have known that Giuliani will begin filing lawsuits tomorrow. The first will deal with denying observers access at Philadelphia counting rooms.
Oh, BTW, Giuliani amassed a record of 4,152 convictions and 25 reversals.
Click to expand...

That\'s about ten million shy of what he should have done.
 
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 5:46:08 PM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 6:59:21 AM UTC-8, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 1:21:18 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, November 7, 2020 at 1:14:04 PM UTC-8, bloggs.fre...@gmail.com wrote:
The idiot has no idea how absentee ballots are processed. A normal person would think that learning the process would be preliminary to filing lawsuits claiming fraudulent ballot voting to the tune of 700,000 votes!
Looks to me like a scam to legally deplete the $100M remaining in the campaign war chest on a bunch of phony legal fees, with the usual New York kickback of course.
Ask all of those criminals he has put behind bars if he is a moron. Commenting on a lawsuit that hasn\'t yet been filed reflects more on you than Giuliani.

You\'re long on wind and short on knowledge:

https://time.com/5908505/trump-lawsuits-biden-wins/
No, it is YOU that is short on knowledge - that article doesn\'t mention ONE lawsuit filed by Giuliani. If you had listened to him this morning you would have known that Giuliani will begin filing lawsuits tomorrow. The first will deal with denying observers access at Philadelphia counting rooms.
Click to expand...

Well that\'s just it. now that he\'s seeing the courts dismissing the pathetically weak existing lawsuits as mere speculation, even Giuliani can see there\'s no point in filing his lawsuits.
 
On Wednesday, November 11, 2020 at 7:23:04 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 11, 2020 at 6:39:12 PM UTC-8, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, November 11, 2020 at 6:06:42 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
... for the last four years: the Dims have been pushing the Russian collusion hoax and impeached Pres. Trump. Other lawsuits by the Dims include ...

First error: \"Democrat\" is the spelling of the word

First and fifth errors: Dims IS the word.
Click to expand...

No, dims is a transitive verb, as in \'this knob dims the dining room lights\'.
That wasn\'t the intended word. Heck, it was YOUR intended word, you shouldn\'t
need me to tell you that
 
On Thursday, November 12, 2020 at 1:53:20 AM UTC-8, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, November 11, 2020 at 7:23:04 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 11, 2020 at 6:39:12 PM UTC-8, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, November 11, 2020 at 6:06:42 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
... for the last four years: the Dims have been pushing the Russian collusion hoax and impeached Pres. Trump. Other lawsuits by the Dims include ...

First error: \"Democrat\" is the spelling of the word
First and fifth errors: Dims IS the word.
No, dims is a transitive verb, as in \'this knob dims the dining room lights\'.
That wasn\'t the intended word. Heck, it was YOUR intended word, you shouldn\'t
need me to tell you that
Click to expand...

Wrong AGAIN! It is NOT \"dims\" - it IS \"Dims,\" a noun.
 
On Friday, November 13, 2020 at 2:01:42 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, November 12, 2020 at 1:53:20 AM UTC-8, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, November 11, 2020 at 7:23:04 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 11, 2020 at 6:39:12 PM UTC-8, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, November 11, 2020 at 6:06:42 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
... for the last four years: the Dims have been pushing the Russian collusion hoax and impeached Pres. Trump. Other lawsuits by the Dims include ...

First error: \"Democrat\" is the spelling of the word
First and fifth errors: Dims IS the word.

No, dims is a transitive verb, as in \'this knob dims the dining room lights\'. That wasn\'t the intended word. Heck, it was YOUR intended word, you shouldn\'t need me to tell you that.

Wrong AGAIN! It is NOT \"dims\" - it IS \"Dims,\" a noun.
Click to expand...

Flyguy getting petulant about a pathetic word play that he has long since flogged to death.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top