Fauci: Masks, Social Distancing Likely Until 2022...

On 10/26/2020 3:07 PM, John Larkin wrote:
> Oops, my mistake. You were already on my ignore-this-guy list.

Learn how to use Forte\'s kill filters.
 
On Monday, October 26, 2020 at 3:08:12 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:06:11 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:34:31 -0700, Don Y
blocked...@foo.invalid> wrote:

So, you\'re using \"other people are stupid, too\" as a defense for YOUR
stupidity? Are you a 3rd grader who claims \"Tommy\'s Mom let\'s HIM stay
up late...\"?

Maybe it isn\'t a matter of stupidity at all. We might discuss what
could actually be happening, if you were willing to stop shreiking and
think some. Seems unlikely.

Oops, my mistake. You were already on my ignore-this-guy list.

But, if he were to post Newton\'s laws, would you think those were wrong?

Lame excuses might not seem lame, until someone else hears them, and points
out the flaw. Listen, or read, for content, not for personality.
 
On Monday, October 26, 2020 at 7:10:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Wilson wrote:
John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:

Oops, my mistake. You were already on my ignore-this-guy list.

Try xnews. It has a plonk file

https://xnews.en.softonic.com/

Setup and config info on the web.

Yes, why bother to listen to anyone who might disagree with you? Much better to just get rid of them. Or you could try posting something about electronics and just not engaging in political discussions in an electronics newsgroup.

--

Rick C.

-+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Sunday, October 25, 2020 at 10:01:31 PM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
On 10/25/2020 5:20 PM, Michael Terrell wrote:
On Sunday, October 25, 2020 at 11:42:24 AM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:

\"We are not going to control the pandemic. We are going to control the
fact that we get vaccines, therapeutics and other mitigation areas,\"
White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows told CNN\'s Jake Tapper on \"State
of the Union.\"

From the \"Things everyone knows\"-department. By \"we get\" in this
context he likely means White House staff, I suppose.

\"What we need to do is make sure that we have the proper mitigation
factors, whether it\'s therapies or vaccines or treatments to make sure
that people don\'t die from this,\" Meadows said.

By \"people\" he means \"people who matter.\"

Are you saying that you won\'t get any of it?

Ancient Chinese proverb: Man who wants to die for his country often
given job appropriate to his skillset.

They would have used you as cannon fodder. You would have been a DI\'s pet project. Make a man out of you, or hound you until you went AWOL. I doubt that you would have survived the first week of Basic.

American proverb: Lead, follow or just get the hell out of the way.
 
On Monday, October 26, 2020 at 3:49:31 PM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
Well, there are different standards of masculinity.

Woe to anyone who goes to Japan and believes that just because some men
there tend to be soft-spoken that this implies anyone is a push-over.
rather often it\'s inversely proportional.

I dunno I kinda miss the days when a man\'s manning was in large part
evaluated on how many women he slept with and/or whether both parties
involved enjoyed the experience. Call me old-fashioned.

To me, you sound like a \'man\' who couldn\'t satisfy any woman.
 
On Monday, October 26, 2020 at 7:10:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Wilson wrote:
John Larkin wrote:

Oops, my mistake. You were already on my ignore-this-guy list.
Try xnews. It has a plonk file

https://xnews.en.softonic.com/

The site says it works with Win95 and older versions of Windows.
 
On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 7:32:55 PM UTC-4, Michael Terrell wrote:
On Monday, October 26, 2020 at 3:49:31 PM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:

Well, there are different standards of masculinity.

Woe to anyone who goes to Japan and believes that just because some men
there tend to be soft-spoken that this implies anyone is a push-over.
rather often it\'s inversely proportional.

I dunno I kinda miss the days when a man\'s manning was in large part
evaluated on how many women he slept with and/or whether both parties
involved enjoyed the experience. Call me old-fashioned.

To me, you sound like a \'man\' who couldn\'t satisfy any woman.

Lol! That\'s funny coming from you. But then most of what you say is pretty much the same sort of material.

--

Rick C.

+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top