Derating CCD detectors

C

ChrisNeumi

Guest
I want to use a conventional CCD Detector (e.g.E2V42-80) in a space
project. I did not find anything in the ESA derating guidelines about
derating of CCD detectors. Can anyone help me?
 
ChrisNeumi wrote:

I want to use a conventional CCD Detector (e.g.E2V42-80) in a space
project. I did not find anything in the ESA derating guidelines about
derating of CCD detectors. Can anyone help me?

Derating against what? Poor illumination? Vibration? Temperature?
Trying to image a guy in a striped purple suit?

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
 
Tim Wescott <tim@wescottnospamdesign.com> wrote:
ChrisNeumi wrote:

I want to use a conventional CCD Detector (e.g.E2V42-80) in a space
project. I did not find anything in the ESA derating guidelines about
derating of CCD detectors. Can anyone help me?

Derating against what? Poor illumination? Vibration? Temperature?
Trying to image a guy in a striped purple suit?
I'm guessing radiation.
 
Ian Stirling <root@mauve.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<42404ff4$0$16010$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>...
Tim Wescott <tim@wescottnospamdesign.com> wrote:
ChrisNeumi wrote:

I want to use a conventional CCD Detector (e.g.E2V42-80) in a space
project. I did not find anything in the ESA derating guidelines about
derating of CCD detectors. Can anyone help me?

Derating against what? Poor illumination? Vibration? Temperature?
Trying to image a guy in a striped purple suit?

I'm guessing radiation.
Of course radiation has to be considered during the design with
additional margin. (Action for the manufacturer of the CCD to provide
a radiation tolerant design)

But I mean derating of operational (electrical) parameters:
For analog circuits you have to derate e.g. power consumption (mostly
this is done by limiting bandwidth); for digital circuits e.g. the
clock/data rates are derated.

What shall I do with CCDs?
 
ChrisNeumi <ChrisNeumi@gmx.de> wrote:
Ian Stirling <root@mauve.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<42404ff4$0$16010$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>...
Tim Wescott <tim@wescottnospamdesign.com> wrote:
ChrisNeumi wrote:

I want to use a conventional CCD Detector (e.g.E2V42-80) in a space
project. I did not find anything in the ESA derating guidelines about
derating of CCD detectors. Can anyone help me?

Derating against what? Poor illumination? Vibration? Temperature?
Trying to image a guy in a striped purple suit?

I'm guessing radiation.

Of course radiation has to be considered during the design with
additional margin. (Action for the manufacturer of the CCD to provide
a radiation tolerant design)

But I mean derating of operational (electrical) parameters:
For analog circuits you have to derate e.g. power consumption (mostly
this is done by limiting bandwidth); for digital circuits e.g. the
clock/data rates are derated.

What shall I do with CCDs?
Derate what?
In general, various factors can be reduced, to mitigate the effects
of external conditions, or to increase reliability.
Run a power transistor at lower temperature than the absolute limit, and
it'll last longer.
Run a CPU at a lower clock rate, and voltage, and it'll produce
less heat.
....
There are various meanings of 'derate'.
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Ian Stirling
<root@mauve.demon.co.uk> wrote (in
<4242eb21$0$94485$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net>) about 'Derating
CCD detectors', on Thu, 24 Mar 2005:

There are various meanings of 'derate'.
Technician 1 --> Technician 2. (8-O(
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
There are two sides to every question, except
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
In article <4242eb21$0$94485$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net>,
root@mauve.demon.co.uk says...
ChrisNeumi <ChrisNeumi@gmx.de> wrote:
Ian Stirling <root@mauve.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<42404ff4$0$16010$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>...
Tim Wescott <tim@wescottnospamdesign.com> wrote:
ChrisNeumi wrote:

I want to use a conventional CCD Detector (e.g.E2V42-80) in a space
project. I did not find anything in the ESA derating guidelines about
derating of CCD detectors. Can anyone help me?

Derating against what? Poor illumination? Vibration? Temperature?
Trying to image a guy in a striped purple suit?

I'm guessing radiation.

Of course radiation has to be considered during the design with
additional margin. (Action for the manufacturer of the CCD to provide
a radiation tolerant design)

But I mean derating of operational (electrical) parameters:
For analog circuits you have to derate e.g. power consumption (mostly
this is done by limiting bandwidth); for digital circuits e.g. the
clock/data rates are derated.

What shall I do with CCDs?

Derate what?
In general, various factors can be reduced, to mitigate the effects
of external conditions, or to increase reliability.
Run a power transistor at lower temperature than the absolute limit, and
it'll last longer.
Run a CPU at a lower clock rate, and voltage, and it'll produce
less heat.
...
There are various meanings of 'derate'.
"Ian, you ignorant slut." ;-)

--
Keith
>
 
ChrisNeumi wrote:
Ian Stirling <root@mauve.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<42404ff4$0$16010$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>...

Tim Wescott <tim@wescottnospamdesign.com> wrote:

ChrisNeumi wrote:


I want to use a conventional CCD Detector (e.g.E2V42-80) in a space
project. I did not find anything in the ESA derating guidelines about
derating of CCD detectors. Can anyone help me?


Derating against what? Poor illumination? Vibration? Temperature?
Trying to image a guy in a striped purple suit?

I'm guessing radiation.


Of course radiation has to be considered during the design with
additional margin. (Action for the manufacturer of the CCD to provide
a radiation tolerant design)

But I mean derating of operational (electrical) parameters:
For analog circuits you have to derate e.g. power consumption (mostly
this is done by limiting bandwidth); for digital circuits e.g. the
clock/data rates are derated.

What shall I do with CCDs?
Oh, you're trying to compensate for the "How much of a liar is the guy
writing the data sheet" factor. Varies by manufacturer and your skill
as an engineer.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top