elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronic for beginners - Why we have Gravity
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz
Guest
Guest
Sun Aug 22, 2010 2:09 am
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:32:24 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:32:01 -0500, "krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 08:37:19 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 02:29:33 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote:
VWWall wrote:
Dan wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Tim Wescott wrote:
On 08/19/2010 07:00 PM, fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
We have gravity because God loves us and holds each one of us
individually down to earth*. That's why saying "he's a down to earth
kinda guy" is a term of respect -- because it means you recognize that
God loves him.
* Hey -- it's no crazier than thinking that God put us together from
clay, and far less insulting to God's design skills.
The fact that humans exist, is proof that God has a sense of humor.
:)
On the sixth day God created man, on the seventh day He rested. On the
eighth day He created woman, since then neither God nor man have rested.
The only reason it took only six days was because the earth didn't have
to be backward compatible.
And excellent design tools. No need for a compiler for his projects.
:)
God programs in assembly. In uppercase.
Nonsense. He wouldn't have invented lower case if he didn't program in
CamelCase.
The Devil did that.
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 08:37:19 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 02:29:33 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote:
VWWall wrote:
Dan wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Tim Wescott wrote:
On 08/19/2010 07:00 PM, fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
We have gravity because God loves us and holds each one of us
individually down to earth*. That's why saying "he's a down to earth
kinda guy" is a term of respect -- because it means you recognize that
God loves him.
* Hey -- it's no crazier than thinking that God put us together from
clay, and far less insulting to God's design skills.
The fact that humans exist, is proof that God has a sense of humor.
:)
On the sixth day God created man, on the seventh day He rested. On the
eighth day He created woman, since then neither God nor man have rested.
The only reason it took only six days was because the earth didn't have
to be backward compatible.
And excellent design tools. No need for a compiler for his projects.
:)
God programs in assembly. In uppercase.
Nonsense. He wouldn't have invented lower case if he didn't program in
CamelCase.
The Devil did that.
Nah, the Devil waited until he could invent Windows.
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz
Guest
Guest
Sun Aug 22, 2010 4:58 am
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
Quote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
John Larkin
Guest
Guest
Sun Aug 22, 2010 5:19 am
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:58:13 -0500, "krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Quote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
The anti-particle of the graviton is the gravitoff.
John
Beryl
Guest
Guest
Sun Aug 22, 2010 5:25 am
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
Quote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
You polarize one gravity 270* from the other one, and they're gone.
Jasen Betts
Guest
Guest
Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:29 pm
On 2010-08-20, Dan <B2431B_at_aol.com> wrote:
Quote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:00:04 -0700 (PDT), fitz <zeusrdx_at_yahoo.com
wrote:
Why we have Gravity
To keep us from falling off barstools?
To keep airheads like 'fitzie' from floating away.
Actually gravity doesn't exist, the universe sucks.
John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:00:04 -0700 (PDT), fitz <zeusrdx_at_yahoo.com
wrote:
Why we have Gravity
To keep us from falling off barstools?
To keep airheads like 'fitzie' from floating away.
Actually gravity doesn't exist, the universe sucks.
There is no gravity, the earth sucks.
There is no dark energy, the universe blows.
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news_at_netfront.net ---
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz
Guest
Guest
Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:56 pm
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 21:19:14 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin_at_highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:58:13 -0500, "krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
The anti-particle of the graviton is the gravitoff.
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
The anti-particle of the graviton is the gravitoff.
Discovered by the Russians, under Kruschev, no doubt.
John Larkin
Guest
Guest
Sun Aug 22, 2010 4:16 pm
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:58:13 -0500, "krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Quote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
It has its ups and downs.
John
Dan
Guest
Guest
Sun Aug 22, 2010 5:36 pm
John Larkin wrote:
Quote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:58:13 -0500, "krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
It has its ups and downs.
John
So does operating elevators.
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
It has its ups and downs.
John
So does operating elevators.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
Guest
Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:55 am
Dan wrote:
Quote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:58:13 -0500, "krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
It has its ups and downs.
John
So does operating elevators.
Blood pressure.
Dan
Guest
Guest
Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:05 am
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Quote:
Dan wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:58:13 -0500, "krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
It has its ups and downs.
John
So does operating elevators.
Blood pressure.
John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:58:13 -0500, "krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
It has its ups and downs.
John
So does operating elevators.
Blood pressure.
"You are both my type, you are type A and you are type B." - Gilligan
as Dracula.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
Guest
Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:26 am
Dan wrote:
Quote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Dan wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:58:13 -0500, "krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
It has its ups and downs.
John
So does operating elevators.
Blood pressure.
"You are both my type, you are type A and you are type B." - Gilligan
as Dracula.
Dracula is a rank amateur, when compared to politicians.
Dan
Guest
Guest
Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:40 am
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
<snip>
Quote:
Dracula is a rank amateur, when compared to politicians.
No self respecting prostitute would do a politician.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
Guest
Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:23 pm
Dan wrote:
Quote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
snip
Dracula is a rank amateur, when compared to politicians.
No self respecting prostitute would do a politician.
They wouldn't be prostitutes if they had any self respect.
John Larkin
Guest
Guest
Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:07 am
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:36:04 -0500, Dan <B2431B_at_aol.com> wrote:
Quote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:58:13 -0500, "krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
It has its ups and downs.
John
So does operating elevators.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:58:13 -0500, "krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
It has its ups and downs.
John
So does operating elevators.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Heavy!
John
Dan
Guest
Guest
Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:37 am
John Larkin wrote:
Quote:
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:36:04 -0500, Dan <B2431B_at_aol.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:58:13 -0500, "krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
It has its ups and downs.
John
So does operating elevators.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Heavy!
John
John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:58:13 -0500, "krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:12:12 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
krw_at_att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:01 -0700, Beryl <fourl_at_road.net> wrote:
fitz wrote:
Why we have Gravity
A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.
Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?
Both Newton and Einstein were wrong.
Gravity doesn't come from here and go to there, the way light does.
Gravity goes both ways simultaneously, in opposite directions, along a
straight line between objects.
So you see, when it meets in the middle, it bridges the divide, even
though it's only halfway there.
Light that's gone half the distance wouldn't have made a connection,
while gravity is already fully in place and ready to work. So gravity
acts twice as fast as light.
Ah, so gravity affects gravity, also unlike light. I see...
It must. Otherwise, anti-gravity wouldn't work.
Ah, so gravity is bipolar, too. What one learns on the Usenet.
It has its ups and downs.
John
So does operating elevators.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Heavy!
John
Dig it, man, like my head's in a similar place.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronic for beginners - Why we have Gravity
