Why we have Gravity

Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:01 am   

Why we have Gravity

A correct theory of gravity will show us these four (4) things:
1. It will show us why gravity also acts like acceleration (principle
of equvalence).
2. It will show us the actual cause of gravity.
3. It will show us why gravitational force and inertial force are
equivalent.
4. It will show us the speed of gravitational attraction.

Newton said gravity was acting at a much faster speed than Einstein.
Which one of them is right?


http://www.amperefitz.com/why.we.have.gravity.htm
Click that link above if you like Science!

Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:47 pm   

On 8/19/2010 7:01 PM fitz spake thus:


Well, I'm personally anti-gravity.

*Down with gravity!*


--
The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)

Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:34 pm   

In article <4c6ebf82$0$2370$822641b3_at_news.adtechcomputers.com>, David Nebenzahl <nobody_at_but.us.chickens> wrote:


Its not down. Its into.

Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:10 pm   

On Aug 20, 10:47 am, David Nebenzahl <nob...@but.us.chickens> wrote:

....and gravity says, "down with us".

Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:31 pm   

That's the direction it usually works in, isn't it?

Sat Aug 21, 2010 1:39 pm   

There is no gravity.
The earth sucks, that's what keeps us from falling off.

Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:33 pm   

Jeffrey Angus wrote:


Skippy did.

Sat Aug 21, 2010 3:09 pm   

On Aug 20, 2:34 pm, zekfr...@zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote:

It is supposed to be humorous.

Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:17 pm   

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:01:17 -0700 (PDT), fitz <zeusrdx_at_yahoo.com>
wrote:


It's a side effect of distortions in space-time caused by massive
objects. The bigger the mass, the more dense the explanation.


Gravity does not accelerate. You accelerate.


Gravity is caused by graviton particles. When you show us a graviton,
there's a Nobel Prize waiting.


Gravity is static, while inertia is dynamic (requires motion). An
object at rest has no inertial forces. You can't have it both ways.


Same as the speed of light. Any faster and you get a speeding ticket.


Einstein.


I hate science. Life would be much simpler if we didn't have science.

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl_at_cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Sat Aug 21, 2010 10:02 pm   

On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 03:01:17 +0100, fitz <zeusrdx_at_yahoo.com> wrote:


Being a Newton myself I know exactly why we have gravity.

It's because apples are meant to be eaten and when they come loose from
apple trees something is needed to make them move to the ground rather
than them being blown away in the wind.
That in a nutshell, and straight from the horses mouth via my great great
great granddad Issac and passed down though generations, is why we have
gravity.

If Einstein thought differently he was wrong.

Sun Aug 22, 2010 5:48 am   

On 8/21/2010 2:02 PM > spake thus:


What, you're saying that Einstein hated apples?


--
The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)

Sun Aug 22, 2010 8:17 am   

David Nebenzahl wrote:


Figs.

Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:57 am   

fitz wrote:

Well, the average running speed of a human is around 10 mph. Sprints, the
record is under 30 mph. I don't know how athletic Einstein was so we could
use a figure of 3 mph walking speed. Nice to set some lower boundaries
on the SoG (speed of gravity).

Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:48 am   

On Aug 22, 7:57 pm, RichTravsky <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:

God is creating gravity.

Mitch Raemsch

Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:24 pm   

RichTravsky wrote:


Slow Old Geezers.