elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronics Components - What is the symbol for a mic?
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
CellShocked
Guest
Guest
Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:53 am
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:45:37 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV
<proteusiiv_at_gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Oct 21, 7:26 am, CellShocked
cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:11:06 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV
proteus...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 20, 8:35 pm, CellShocked
cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:58:11 -0700, Rich Grise <richgr...@example.net
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:47:18 -0700, CellShocked wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:43 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-...@nowhere.net
CellShocked <cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in
This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.
When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)
Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)
Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.
Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?
Hot dogs are sold in packs of ten, while hot dog buns are sold in packs
of eight.
That's so you can take the two leftover weiners, cut them up, and put
them in your mac&cheese. ;-)
Cheers!
Rich
I do Mac-Chee-Tuna-Pea.
I don't do Mac-Chee-DogBits.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text
YOU MUST HAVE INHALED TROLL GASES
GO SEE A DOCTOR
I AM PROTEUS
Go away, stupid troll.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
YOU ARE CONFUSED
AND YES YOU DO BELONG IN A CELL
I AM PROTEUS
cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:11:06 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV
proteus...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 20, 8:35 pm, CellShocked
cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:58:11 -0700, Rich Grise <richgr...@example.net
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:47:18 -0700, CellShocked wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:43 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-...@nowhere.net
CellShocked <cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in
This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.
When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)
Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)
Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.
Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?
Hot dogs are sold in packs of ten, while hot dog buns are sold in packs
of eight.
That's so you can take the two leftover weiners, cut them up, and put
them in your mac&cheese. ;-)
Cheers!
Rich
I do Mac-Chee-Tuna-Pea.
I don't do Mac-Chee-DogBits.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text
YOU MUST HAVE INHALED TROLL GASES
GO SEE A DOCTOR
I AM PROTEUS
Go away, stupid troll.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
YOU ARE CONFUSED
AND YES YOU DO BELONG IN A CELL
I AM PROTEUS
It is a reference to a spreadsheet, you absolute fucking total retard.
Proteus IIV
Guest
Guest
Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:13 am
On Oct 22, 8:53 pm, CellShocked
<cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
Quote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:45:37 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV
proteus...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 21, 7:26 am, CellShocked
cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:11:06 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV
proteus...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 20, 8:35 pm, CellShocked
cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:58:11 -0700, Rich Grise <richgr...@example.net
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:47:18 -0700, CellShocked wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:43 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-...@nowhere.net
CellShocked <cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in
This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.
When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)
Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)
Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.
Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?
Hot dogs are sold in packs of ten, while hot dog buns are sold in packs
of eight.
That's so you can take the two leftover weiners, cut them up, and put
them in your mac&cheese. ;-)
Cheers!
Rich
I do Mac-Chee-Tuna-Pea.
I don't do Mac-Chee-DogBits.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text
YOU MUST HAVE INHALED TROLL GASES
GO SEE A DOCTOR
I AM PROTEUS
Go away, stupid troll.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
YOU ARE CONFUSED
AND YES YOU DO BELONG IN A CELL
I AM PROTEUS
It is a reference to a spreadsheet, you absolute fucking total retard.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
proteus...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 21, 7:26 am, CellShocked
cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:11:06 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV
proteus...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 20, 8:35 pm, CellShocked
cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:58:11 -0700, Rich Grise <richgr...@example.net
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:47:18 -0700, CellShocked wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:43 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-...@nowhere.net
CellShocked <cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in
This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.
When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)
Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)
Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.
Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?
Hot dogs are sold in packs of ten, while hot dog buns are sold in packs
of eight.
That's so you can take the two leftover weiners, cut them up, and put
them in your mac&cheese. ;-)
Cheers!
Rich
I do Mac-Chee-Tuna-Pea.
I don't do Mac-Chee-DogBits.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text
YOU MUST HAVE INHALED TROLL GASES
GO SEE A DOCTOR
I AM PROTEUS
Go away, stupid troll.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
YOU ARE CONFUSED
AND YES YOU DO BELONG IN A CELL
I AM PROTEUS
It is a reference to a spreadsheet, you absolute fucking total retard.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
YOU WANT TO SPREAD YOUR SHITHOLE TOO ?
OKAY
I WILL PROBE YOUR ANAL APERTURE
RIGHT AFTER I COMPLETE PROBING YOUR BOYFREIND ARCHI
I AM PROTEUS
Eddie
Guest
Guest
Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:30 am
On 00:12 16 Oct 2009, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Quote:
Eddie <dummy_at_invalid.com> wrote in
news:Xns9CA5B35E7A5FA91F3A2_at_feeder.eternal-september.org:
[...]
Here's an idea...
For mono, do the usual, the circle and bar. If you were using
it in a block diagram you'd get by with one pin coming off the
circle at the point opposite the bar's contact with the circle,
otherwise two, each slightly offset from that position, and
parallel.
For stereo, use the two overlapping circles, and a bar joining
tangents on each and extending to a point at each end
coexistent with a tangent on the points most distant from each
other on the double-circle pattern. (Bar is this same length
now). Add one pin to each circle as before, for block diagrams,
and for schematics, a third extending from the circle
intersection point out to a point halfway between the outer
ends of the other pins.
Stereo mics do exist, so this symbol makes sense, it fits
existing conventions, and isn't going to get confused with a
current source symbol because that has no bar, and its pins are
in line, not offset.
I could have just drawn this, but I have no file hosting
arranged, and figuring that out is a lot harder than saying
this stuff..
news:Xns9CA5B35E7A5FA91F3A2_at_feeder.eternal-september.org:
[...]
Here's an idea...
For mono, do the usual, the circle and bar. If you were using
it in a block diagram you'd get by with one pin coming off the
circle at the point opposite the bar's contact with the circle,
otherwise two, each slightly offset from that position, and
parallel.
For stereo, use the two overlapping circles, and a bar joining
tangents on each and extending to a point at each end
coexistent with a tangent on the points most distant from each
other on the double-circle pattern. (Bar is this same length
now). Add one pin to each circle as before, for block diagrams,
and for schematics, a third extending from the circle
intersection point out to a point halfway between the outer
ends of the other pins.
Stereo mics do exist, so this symbol makes sense, it fits
existing conventions, and isn't going to get confused with a
current source symbol because that has no bar, and its pins are
in line, not offset.
I could have just drawn this, but I have no file hosting
arranged, and figuring that out is a lot harder than saying
this stuff..
Hello Lostgallifreyan, thank you for the detailed reply. I'm the
original poster. (Sorry for the delay in replying.) I'm not sure I
can see what you are describing.
(A) What does the following mean?
"bar joining tangents on each"
Does it mean a bar which passes thru the intersection of many pairs
of tangents where each tangents in a pair is drawn from a points
which is situated as if it were the mirror image of the other? This
would be a bar drawn down the middle of the overlapping circles.
(B) I'm not sure about this other part of our description:
"extending to a point at each end coexistent with
a tangent on the points most distant from each
other on the double-circle pattern"
Those "Points on the double circle pattern most distant from each
other" would presumably be those points on the 'outer edges' of the
double-circle. I don't see a single tangent which passes through
those two points. Perhaps you mean a tangent which touches each
circle at the point(s) which are the furtherest possible from one
other while still permitting the existence a common tangent.
(C) What about the overlap of the circles? Do your circles overlap
by a radius? (Such that one circle goes through the other's centre).
Or is the overlap more like half a radius?
Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
Eddie
Guest
Guest
Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:33 am
On 05:49 17 Oct 2009, Proteus IIV wrote:
Quote:
On Oct 15, 12:37 pm, Eddie <du...@invalid.com> wrote:
I want to write (by hand) if some voice recordings of mine are
in mono or stereo.
Are there some standard symbols used for a mono mic and a
stereo mic?
Are there mono/stereo mic symbols used in schematic circuit
diagrams which could be used?
--------------------------------
I've seen two overlapping circles used for stereo. But for
some reason a mono mic is one circle PLUS a short bar
http://tinyurl.com/ykdar8p
THERE ARE OVER 10 SYMBOLS TO DEPICT A MICROPHNOE IN DIAGRAMS
DEPENDING ON IT'S TYPE
IT IS SOMEWHAT SIMILAR TO THE SYMBOL FOR A SPEAKER BUT FOR THE
CONE OR AIR EXPANSION/CONTACT AREA WITH IS USUALLY CONCAVE FOR
A MIKE AND FLAT FOR A SPEAKER THE COIL IS USUALLY ENCLOSED
WITHIN THE MIKE SYMBOL AND OFFSET OFF THE CONE IN A SPEAKER
THOUGH THAT IS JUST A ROUGH GENERAL DISCRIPT IT SHOULD HELP YOU
DECIDE WHICH ONE TO USE
I AM PROTEUS
I want to write (by hand) if some voice recordings of mine are
in mono or stereo.
Are there some standard symbols used for a mono mic and a
stereo mic?
Are there mono/stereo mic symbols used in schematic circuit
diagrams which could be used?
--------------------------------
I've seen two overlapping circles used for stereo. But for
some reason a mono mic is one circle PLUS a short bar
http://tinyurl.com/ykdar8p
THERE ARE OVER 10 SYMBOLS TO DEPICT A MICROPHNOE IN DIAGRAMS
DEPENDING ON IT'S TYPE
IT IS SOMEWHAT SIMILAR TO THE SYMBOL FOR A SPEAKER BUT FOR THE
CONE OR AIR EXPANSION/CONTACT AREA WITH IS USUALLY CONCAVE FOR
A MIKE AND FLAT FOR A SPEAKER THE COIL IS USUALLY ENCLOSED
WITHIN THE MIKE SYMBOL AND OFFSET OFF THE CONE IN A SPEAKER
THOUGH THAT IS JUST A ROUGH GENERAL DISCRIPT IT SHOULD HELP YOU
DECIDE WHICH ONE TO USE
I AM PROTEUS
I am the OP. If I understand you correctly, that symbol would be
tricky to draw by hand and if it was not drawn accurately it
might look strange.
OTOH maybe I've misunderstood you. Do you have a link to an image
of what you have in mind?
CellShocked
Guest
Guest
Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:10 am
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:33:58 -0400, Eddie <invalid_at_mail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On 05:49 17 Oct 2009, Proteus IIV wrote:
On Oct 15, 12:37 pm, Eddie <du...@invalid.com> wrote:
I want to write (by hand) if some voice recordings of mine are
in mono or stereo.
Are there some standard symbols used for a mono mic and a
stereo mic?
Are there mono/stereo mic symbols used in schematic circuit
diagrams which could be used?
--------------------------------
I've seen two overlapping circles used for stereo. But for
some reason a mono mic is one circle PLUS a short bar
http://tinyurl.com/ykdar8p
THERE ARE OVER 10 SYMBOLS TO DEPICT A MICROPHNOE IN DIAGRAMS
DEPENDING ON IT'S TYPE
IT IS SOMEWHAT SIMILAR TO THE SYMBOL FOR A SPEAKER BUT FOR THE
CONE OR AIR EXPANSION/CONTACT AREA WITH IS USUALLY CONCAVE FOR
A MIKE AND FLAT FOR A SPEAKER THE COIL IS USUALLY ENCLOSED
WITHIN THE MIKE SYMBOL AND OFFSET OFF THE CONE IN A SPEAKER
THOUGH THAT IS JUST A ROUGH GENERAL DISCRIPT IT SHOULD HELP YOU
DECIDE WHICH ONE TO USE
I AM PROTEUS
I am the OP. If I understand you correctly, that symbol would be
tricky to draw by hand and if it was not drawn accurately it
might look strange.
OTOH maybe I've misunderstood you. Do you have a link to an image
of what you have in mind?
On Oct 15, 12:37 pm, Eddie <du...@invalid.com> wrote:
I want to write (by hand) if some voice recordings of mine are
in mono or stereo.
Are there some standard symbols used for a mono mic and a
stereo mic?
Are there mono/stereo mic symbols used in schematic circuit
diagrams which could be used?
--------------------------------
I've seen two overlapping circles used for stereo. But for
some reason a mono mic is one circle PLUS a short bar
http://tinyurl.com/ykdar8p
THERE ARE OVER 10 SYMBOLS TO DEPICT A MICROPHNOE IN DIAGRAMS
DEPENDING ON IT'S TYPE
IT IS SOMEWHAT SIMILAR TO THE SYMBOL FOR A SPEAKER BUT FOR THE
CONE OR AIR EXPANSION/CONTACT AREA WITH IS USUALLY CONCAVE FOR
A MIKE AND FLAT FOR A SPEAKER THE COIL IS USUALLY ENCLOSED
WITHIN THE MIKE SYMBOL AND OFFSET OFF THE CONE IN A SPEAKER
THOUGH THAT IS JUST A ROUGH GENERAL DISCRIPT IT SHOULD HELP YOU
DECIDE WHICH ONE TO USE
I AM PROTEUS
I am the OP. If I understand you correctly, that symbol would be
tricky to draw by hand and if it was not drawn accurately it
might look strange.
OTOH maybe I've misunderstood you. Do you have a link to an image
of what you have in mind?
You are attempting to converse with a total retard.
But then... you are the idiot that wants to put a schematic symbol that
no one else will even recognize onto discs where a SIMPLE TEXT label will
suffice, and will convey the info CORRECTLY.
So, you are only about two steps above the twit you are responding to.
Lostgallifreyan
Guest
Guest
Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:36 am
Eddie <invalid_at_mail.com> wrote in news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2_at_feeder.eternal-
september.org:
Quote:
Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so you'll need to tell me
somewhere to send it.
If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll try
sending it there too.
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
Guest
Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:15 pm
Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Quote:
Eddie <invalid_at_mail.com> wrote in news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2_at_feeder.eternal-
september.org:
Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so you'll need to tell me
somewhere to send it.
If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll try
sending it there too.
news:alt.binaries.schematics.electronics
--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!
Lostgallifreyan
Guest
Guest
Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:54 pm
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote in
news:LuGdncKZWZqAnnbXnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d_at_earthlink.com:
Quote:
Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Eddie <invalid_at_mail.com> wrote in
news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2_at_feeder.eternal- september.org:
Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so you'll need to tell me
somewhere to send it.
If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll
try sending it there too.
news:alt.binaries.schematics.electronics
Ta.
I googled a.b.s.e hoping they would tell me the full name, but no.. I
wish Google had an exact string search.
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
Guest
Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:58 pm
Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Quote:
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote in
news:LuGdncKZWZqAnnbXnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d_at_earthlink.com:
Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Eddie <invalid_at_mail.com> wrote in
news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2_at_feeder.eternal- september.org:
Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so you'll need to tell me
somewhere to send it.
If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll
try sending it there too.
news:alt.binaries.schematics.electronics
Ta.
I googled a.b.s.e hoping they would tell me the full name, but no.. I
wish Google had an exact string search.
Google is so screwed up anymore that it isn't funny.
--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!
Archimedes' Lever
Guest
Guest
Sat Oct 31, 2009 3:13 am
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:31:01 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-one_at_nowhere.net>
wrote:
Quote:
Eddie <invalid_at_mail.com> wrote in news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2_at_feeder.eternal-
september.org:
Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so I'll risk trying to attach a
PNG image here. It's as small as I can get it so if gets through it should do
it without raising hackles, but this group isn't meant for this.
If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll try
sending it there too.
These are ok for block diagrams or making labels for sticking on things, but
would need a bit of pin modification for schematics if you extended them to
that.
september.org:
Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so I'll risk trying to attach a
PNG image here. It's as small as I can get it so if gets through it should do
it without raising hackles, but this group isn't meant for this.
If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll try
sending it there too.
These are ok for block diagrams or making labels for sticking on things, but
would need a bit of pin modification for schematics if you extended them to
that.
That covers OMNI mikes. Ther are other symbols for cardioid and
hypercardioid, and Supercardioid.
Jeez, you DOPEY FUCKS, just put a TEXT label on the fucking disks!
Only the DOPE that puts the UNKNOWN symbol on the disks will understand
it.
In other words, do not make the jump from dopey fucktard to total
retard by actually printing stupid schematic symbol labels for your
disks.
Archimedes' Lever
Guest
Guest
Sat Oct 31, 2009 3:16 am
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:58:06 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote:
Quote:
Lostgallifreyan wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell_at_earthlink.net> wrote in
news:LuGdncKZWZqAnnbXnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d_at_earthlink.com:
Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Eddie <invalid_at_mail.com> wrote in
news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2_at_feeder.eternal- september.org:
Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so you'll need to tell me
somewhere to send it.
If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll
try sending it there too.
news:alt.binaries.schematics.electronics
Ta.
I googled a.b.s.e hoping they would tell me the full name, but no.. I
wish Google had an exact string search.
Google is so screwed up anymore that it isn't funny.
You're both idiots. Google does NOT carry the binary groups, so it only
follows that there would be no ability to search said groups.
D'OH!
Lostgallifreyan
Guest
Guest
Sat Oct 31, 2009 5:23 am
Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLever_at_InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote in
news:6e7ne5hmg3osf76fjqsvk1bmtnsam4mihc_at_4ax.com:
Quote:
If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this
I'll try sending it there too.
news:alt.binaries.schematics.electronics
Ta. I googled a.b.s.e hoping they would tell me the full name, but
no.. I wish Google had an exact string search.
Google is so screwed up anymore that it isn't funny.
You're both idiots. Google does NOT carry the binary groups, so it only
follows that there would be no ability to search said groups.
D'OH!
I'll try sending it there too.
news:alt.binaries.schematics.electronics
Ta.
I googled a.b.s.e hoping they would tell me the full name, but
no.. I wish Google had an exact string search.
Google is so screwed up anymore that it isn't funny.
You're both idiots. Google does NOT carry the binary groups, so it only
follows that there would be no ability to search said groups.
D'OH!
And you, you fine fucktard, have entirely missed the point. Again. I was
looking for the NAME. Now, as Google often returns results from web archives
of usenet groups and mailing lists, ti seemed likely that they'd quickly let
me deduce the full name from a.b.s.e IF they had a proper string search.
Because that way (I'm spelling it out here, I really don't want to give you
any excuse not to understand this), I'd have seen posts referring to a.b.s.e
exactly, and some of those would either mention the full name, or even have
been in text posted to it along with some image, thus it would be in the
header which is often also included in an archive page.
If you still think I'm stupid for thinking of this when you did not, feel
free to let me know. Oh, and don't take that 'fucktard' personally, you've
said good stuff too at times unlike the odd troll you seem too ready to feed,
I just liked the alliteration and you gave me the excuse to use it..
And Mike's right, Google is getting very screwed up. I'm beginning to wonder
if they'll start appending advertising to every mail sent via them to mailing
lists, in short, using every possible method to increase spam to the point
where those who want it to stop will only have one method that is even
practical, never mind honourable, namely to avoid their services where
possible.
Considering that sites like findchips.com exist, it's likely that this won't
be that tough a burden. Once you have good leads, internal linking between
sites is better than Google is now.
Lostgallifreyan
Guest
Guest
Sat Oct 31, 2009 5:32 am
Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLever_at_InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote in
news:e17ne5trkk9s5pho3onveodae4tsa087dp_at_4ax.com:
Quote:
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:31:01 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-one_at_nowhere.net
wrote:
Eddie <invalid_at_mail.com> wrote in
news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2_at_feeder.eternal- september.org:
Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so I'll risk trying to attach
a PNG image here. It's as small as I can get it so if gets through it
should do it without raising hackles, but this group isn't meant for
this.
If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll
try sending it there too.
These are ok for block diagrams or making labels for sticking on things,
but would need a bit of pin modification for schematics if you extended
them to that.
That covers OMNI mikes. Ther are other symbols for cardioid and
hypercardioid, and Supercardioid.
Jeez, you DOPEY FUCKS, just put a TEXT label on the fucking disks!
Only the DOPE that puts the UNKNOWN symbol on the disks will
understand
it.
In other words, do not make the jump from dopey fucktard to total
retard by actually printing stupid schematic symbol labels for your
disks.
wrote:
Eddie <invalid_at_mail.com> wrote in
news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2_at_feeder.eternal- september.org:
Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so I'll risk trying to attach
a PNG image here. It's as small as I can get it so if gets through it
should do it without raising hackles, but this group isn't meant for
this.
If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll
try sending it there too.
These are ok for block diagrams or making labels for sticking on things,
but would need a bit of pin modification for schematics if you extended
them to that.
That covers OMNI mikes. Ther are other symbols for cardioid and
hypercardioid, and Supercardioid.
Jeez, you DOPEY FUCKS, just put a TEXT label on the fucking disks!
Only the DOPE that puts the UNKNOWN symbol on the disks will
understand
it.
In other words, do not make the jump from dopey fucktard to total
retard by actually printing stupid schematic symbol labels for your
disks.
Ha! I think my use of the word fucktard is better than yours. I win. Not
hard, given your 'logic'. Just let people do what they want to do. Or do you
think that doing things slightly strange is equivalent to stealing babies?
Are you one of these BURN THE WITCH! guys? Terrified of anything that doesn't
fot your narrow version of normality? For the record, go look at any vintage
gear, you'll see all kinds of symbols that either survived, or didn't. Who
cares? If someone wants one and uses it, that's their business.
Btw, that original symbol of the circle and bar wasn't originally omni. it
wasn't specified at all, it was purely based on the ball and biscuit shape of
an early form. If people wanted to specify further they probably just wrote
text labels too. And if you're going to start arguing inanely about that
you'd better start arguing with the whole world about its use of symbols
generally and wear yourself out faster so we can get some peace.
Proteus IIV
Guest
Guest
Sat Oct 31, 2009 7:30 am
On Oct 30, 10:13 pm, Archimedes' Lever
<OneBigLe...@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
Quote:
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:31:01 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-...@nowhere.net
wrote:
Eddie <inva...@mail.com> wrote innews:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2_at_feeder.eternal-
september.org:
Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so I'll risk trying to attach a
PNG image here. It's as small as I can get it so if gets through it should do
it without raising hackles, but this group isn't meant for this.
If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll try
sending it there too.
These are ok for block diagrams or making labels for sticking on things, but
would need a bit of pin modification for schematics if you extended them to
that.
That covers OMNI mikes. Ther are other symbols for cardioid and
hypercardioid, and Supercardioid.
Jeez, you DOPEY FUCKS, just put a TEXT label on the fucking disks!
Only the DOPE that puts the UNKNOWN symbol on the disks will understand
it.
In other words, do not make the jump from dopey fucktard to total
retard by actually printing stupid schematic symbol labels for your
disks.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
wrote:
Eddie <inva...@mail.com> wrote innews:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2_at_feeder.eternal-
september.org:
Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so I'll risk trying to attach a
PNG image here. It's as small as I can get it so if gets through it should do
it without raising hackles, but this group isn't meant for this.
If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll try
sending it there too.
These are ok for block diagrams or making labels for sticking on things, but
would need a bit of pin modification for schematics if you extended them to
that.
That covers OMNI mikes. Ther are other symbols for cardioid and
hypercardioid, and Supercardioid.
Jeez, you DOPEY FUCKS, just put a TEXT label on the fucking disks!
Only the DOPE that puts the UNKNOWN symbol on the disks will understand
it.
In other words, do not make the jump from dopey fucktard to total
retard by actually printing stupid schematic symbol labels for your
disks.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
THE ONLY DOPEY FAGGOTY FUCK IN HERE IS YOU TROLL
I AM PROTEUS
Archimedes' Lever
Guest
Guest
Sat Oct 31, 2009 3:42 pm
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:32:08 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-one_at_nowhere.net>
wrote:
Quote:
Ha! I think my use of the word fucktard is better than yours. I win. Not
hard, given your 'logic'. Just let people do what they want to do.
hard, given your 'logic'. Just let people do what they want to do.
Dumbfuck. Nobody is stopping him. Folks are merely stating that it a
fucktard move, fucktard. Or is that clueless fucktard?
elektroda.net NewsGroups Forum Index - Electronics Components - What is the symbol for a mic?
